Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2012 Are body mass and parasite load related to social partnerships and mating in Microtus ochrogaster?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Within socially monogamous species, a male's reproductive success depends on his success at obtaining a social partner with which he mates, as well as gaining extra-pair matings. We investigated the impacts of body mass and parasitism on 2 measures of a male's success at obtaining a social partner (number of female social associations and relative strength of a social bond to a single female) and 2 measures of reproduction (number of females with which a male sires offspring and the number of offspring sired) in natural populations of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) located in Kansas and Indiana. Kansas males with greater endoparasite loads were less likely to have one social partner. Instead, they associated with multiple females although they did not sire offspring with more females than males with lower levels of endoparasitism. We did not find any relationship between endoparasite infestation and the number of females with which males associated in Indiana. There was no association between the level of endoparasites found among males in either Indiana or Kansas and the strength of a male's social bond to a female. Endoparasites, at least at the infection levels detected in this study, were not related to indices of male reproductive success in Microtus populations in Kansas or Indiana. No relationship was found between body mass and indicators of social monogamy in either population. However, body mass appears to be significantly related to male reproductive success. Heavier males produced offspring with more females, particularly in the Kansas population, and sired more pups in both populations.

2012 American Society of Mammalogists
Adrian S. Chesh, Karen E. Mabry, Brian Keane, Douglas A. Noe, and Nancy G. Solomon "Are body mass and parasite load related to social partnerships and mating in Microtus ochrogaster?," Journal of Mammalogy 93(1), 229-238, (1 February 2012). https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-399.1
Received: 30 November 2010; Accepted: 1 August 2011; Published: 1 February 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top