Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 Hibernation and seasonal fasting in bears: the energetic costs and consequences for polar bears
Author Affiliations +

Global warming has the potential to reduce arctic sea ice and thereby increase the length of summer–fall fasting when polar bears (Ursus maritimus) lose access to most marine mammals. To evaluate the consequences of such changes, we compared the cost of fasting by polar bears with hibernation by brown bears (U. arctos), American black bears (U. americanus), and polar bears and made projections about tissue reserves polar bears will need to survive and reproduce as fasts become longer. Hibernating polar bears expend energy at the same rate per unit mass as do brown bears and black bears. However, daily mass losses, energy expenditures, and the losses of lean mass are much higher in fasting, active polar bears than in hibernating bears. The average pregnant polar bear living around Hudson Bay during the 1980s and 1990s could fast for 10.0 ± 2.3 months ( ± SD), and the average lactating female with cubs born during the preceding winter could fast for 4.2 ± 1.9 months. Thus, some pregnant or lactating females with lower levels of body fat content were already approaching or beyond the constraint of being able to produce cubs and survive the required 8 months of fasting if producing new offspring or 4 months if accompanied by older offspring. Pregnant or lactating females and their dependent offspring have the most tenuous future as global warming occurs. Thus, we predict a significant reduction in productivity with even modest increases in global warming for polar bears living in the very southern part of their range and are concerned about more northern populations depending on their ability to accumulate increasing amounts of fat.

Charles T. Robbins, Claudia Lopez-Alfaro, Karyn D. Rode, Øivind Tøien, and O. Lynne Nelson "Hibernation and seasonal fasting in bears: the energetic costs and consequences for polar bears," Journal of Mammalogy 93(6), 1493-1503, (1 December 2012).
Received: 8 December 2011; Accepted: 1 May 2012; Published: 1 December 2012

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top