How to translate text using browser tools
1 May 2004 Laboratory and Simulated Field Evaluation of a New Recombinant of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus against Culex Mosquito Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae)
Nayer S. Zahiri, Brian A. Federici, Mir S. Mulla
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In the laboratory, three microbial mosquito larvicidal products consisting of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis de Barjac (Bti), Bacillus sphaericus (Neide) (Bsph) (strain 2362), and the University of California Riverside (UCR) recombinant (producing toxins of both Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis) were bioassayed against larvae of Culex quinequefasciatus Say (susceptible and resistant to Bsph 2362), and Aedes aegypti (L.). Bti proved highly effective against Cx. Quinequefasciatus susceptible and resistant strains, with LC50 values of 0.009 and 0.011 ppm and LC90 values of 0.057 and 0.026 ppm for Bsph-susceptible and -resistant strains, respectively. Bti was also highly active against Ae. eagypti with LC50 and LC90 values of 0.014 and 0.055 ppm, respectively. The UCR recombinant was equally active against both Bsph-susceptible and -resistant strains of Cx. Quinquefasciatus; LC50 values were 0.005 and 0.009 and LC90 values were 0.030 and 0.043 ppm, respectively. Bti and the UCR recombinant essentially showed similar activity against Bsph-susceptible and -resistant strains. UCR recombinant showed high toxicity against Ae. eagypti with LC50 and LC90 values of 0.023 and 0.064 ppm, respectively. Bsph was highly active against susceptible strain of Cx. quinequefasciatus with LC50 and LC90 values of 0.006 and 0.024 ppm, respectively. Bsph exhibited little toxicity against Ae. eagypti larvae and also no toxicity to Bsph resistance. In the field, we evaluated four experimental corn grit formulations of Bti (VBC 60021), Bsph (VBC 60022), UCR recombinants VBC 60023 (7.89%), and VBC 60024 (1.87%) in simulated field (microcosms) against Bsph-susceptible Culex mosquitoes. Bti and low-concentrate UCR recombinant showed similar initial activity as well as persistence. Both materials provided high-to-moderate level of control for 2–7 d posttreatment at low treatment rates. At low dosages, residual activity of Bti and UCR recombinant lasted for <7 d. Bsph and high-concentrate UCR recombinant (VBC 60023), however, were more effective against natural populations of Culex and achieved longer control (7–21 d) than the other two materials.

Nayer S. Zahiri, Brian A. Federici, and Mir S. Mulla "Laboratory and Simulated Field Evaluation of a New Recombinant of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus against Culex Mosquito Larvae (Diptera: Culicidae)," Journal of Medical Entomology 41(3), 423-429, (1 May 2004). https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-41.3.423
Received: 4 August 2003; Accepted: 1 December 2003; Published: 1 May 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
Bsph/Bti recombinant
Culex
mosquitoes
resistance
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top