Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2008 Comparison of In Vitro (Chicken-Skin Membrane) Versus In Vivo (Live Hamster) Blood-Feeding Methods for Maintenance of Colonized Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An in vitro feeding method using chicken-skin membranes and human blood was compared with an established in vivo method using anesthetized hamsters for blood-feeding mass-reared phlebotomine sand flies. Parameters measured were percentage of sand flies taking blood meals, number of eggs laid per female, and percentage of eggs that hatched. Females from a long established (>20 yr) colony of Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli) from Israel landed on and started feeding sooner on the hamster than on the membrane. However, when sand flies were allowed access to the membrane feeder for the same length of time as the anesthetized hamster, the feeding percentages were not significantly different and were usually better on the membrane feeder if flies were allowed access for a longer time. Egg production and percent hatch between the two feeding methods were not statistically different. Based on these results, we conclude that the chicken-skin membrane feeding method is a viable alternative to the use of live animals for feeding large numbers of P. papatasi.

Edgar D. Rowton, Kristen M. Dorsey, and Karyn L. Armstrong "Comparison of In Vitro (Chicken-Skin Membrane) Versus In Vivo (Live Hamster) Blood-Feeding Methods for Maintenance of Colonized Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae)," Journal of Medical Entomology 45(1), 9-13, (1 January 2008). https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[9:COIVCM]2.0.CO;2
Received: 13 March 2006; Accepted: 4 September 2007; Published: 1 January 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top