Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2008 Differential Response to Diazinon and Coumaphos in a Strain of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) Collected in Mexico
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Boophilus microplus, collected from Nuevo Leon, Mexico, were found to be highly resistant to diazinon but not highly resistant to coumaphos, suggesting that different mechanisms of resistance were present in these ticks than other Mexican organophosphate (OP)-resistant ticks reported previously. When exposed to coumaphos and piperonyl butoxide or triphenylphosphate, the LC50 estimate was reduced by 3.5- and 6.3-fold, respectively, suggesting that mono-oxygenases and/or esterases were involved in resistance to coumaphos. Additionally, it was determined that this strain had an Acetylycholinesterase (AChe) that was insensitive to the active form of coumaphos, coroxon, taking at least 24 min longer to reach 50% reduction in AChE activity compared with the susceptible strain. When exposed to diazinon, none of the synergists tested significantly lowered the LC50. However, it was determined that it took six times longer to reach 60% inhibition of AChE in the resistant strain compared with the susceptible strain when exposed to the active form of diazinon, diazoxon. Insensitive AChE seems to be very common in OP-resistant B. microplus. The potential benefits for the development of a field-portable AChE inhibition assay kit are discussed.

Robert J. Miller, Andrew Y. Li, Mary Tijerina, Ronald B. Davey, and John E. George "Differential Response to Diazinon and Coumaphos in a Strain of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) Collected in Mexico," Journal of Medical Entomology 45(5), 905-911, (1 September 2008). https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[905:DRTDAC]2.0.CO;2
Received: 10 December 2007; Accepted: 15 May 2008; Published: 1 September 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top