Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2012 Rangeland Grasshopper Numbers and Species Composition in Nebraska: A Comparison of Region and Sampling Location
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Shorthorn grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) are the most economically important pests of rangeland throughout much of North America. Their densities are estimated using a number of methods, including sweep sampling. Economic thresholds are usually set at 8 adult grasshoppers per square yard, despite differences in range conditions associated with geography and weather patterns. Several authors have concluded that grasshopper numbers are higher in ditch areas and the economic threshold in these habitats is often set substantially higher. This study compared grasshopper numbers and species composition at 120 rangeland sites across ∼ 400 km of northern Nebraska in 2007 and 2010. By taking sweep net samples in the ditch, parallel with the fence inside the pasture, and approximately 30 meters into the pasture, we found the numbers and composition of grasshoppers differed significantly across this area. Mean adult grasshopper capture was highest in the ditch samples (22.4 ± 1.9 grasshoppers captured per 20 net sweeps) compared to fence (10.3 ± 1.0) and field samples (15.9 ± 1.6). Mean adult capture increased from east (4.8 ± 0.4) to west (25.5 ± 2.1). The same trends were observed when nymphal numbers were included in analysis. Based on these results, rangeland grasshopper sampling should be conducted more than 30 meters from the fenceline, and thresholds in roadside ditches should be higher than for rangeland pastures.

Introduction

Parker (1930) set the commonly used economic threshold (ET) for grasshoppers in rangelands at eight grasshoppers per square yard. Further work by Kemp and Dennis (1993) supported the conclusion that 9.6 grasshoppers per square meter (8 per square yard) be used as the threshold for rangeland management programs in Nebraska and elsewhere (Davis et al. 1992; USDA—APHIS 2006). However, ETs for field margins and roadside ditches near crop areas are normally set much higher (Hein & Campbell 2006). This is largely because rangeland grasshopper migration from field margins and roadsides can threaten production of agricultural crops (Gillespie & Kemp 1996; Olfert & Weiss 2002); however, grasshopper damage to managed ecosystems may require much higher numbers (Bastos et al. 2011). Although some studies have focused on the differences between grasshopper species composition in crops and rangeland, no published data were found comparing grasshopper density in roadside ditches to density in adjacent rangelands.

Effective pest management of rangeland grasshoppers requires not only accurate estimation of overall grasshopper densities, but more specific data about species composition and age distribution. For example, most rangeland grasshopper species are not actually range destructive (Vermeire et al. 2004). Other grasshopper species traditionally considered pests have been shown to increase plant production under the right circumstances (Belovsky & Slade 2002). Availability of diverse vegetation in disturbed areas adjacent to rangelands can result in increased density of grasshopper species typically viewed as pests (Kaplan 2001). In addition, roadside ditches provide favorable conditions for grasshopper feeding, oviposition, and development (Parker 1937; Uvarov 1956; Pickford 1963; Edwards 1964; Gillespie & Kemp 1995). This led Johnson and Henry (1987) to suggest that control of grasshoppers should be aimed at roadsides to reduce threats to crops. Support for this conclusion has been found for the grasshopper species Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius), Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), and Melanoplus packardii (Scudder), which can move from rangeland to fields of winter wheat (Gillispie & Kemp 1996).

Roadside counts are occasionally used to quantify the potential extent of grasshopper migration from field edges into adjacent crops (Gillespie & Kemp 1996; Olfert & Weiss 2002). Although not typically applied to agroecosystems, this technique was supported by Johnson (1989a) who showed that roadside counts followed by spatial analysis could be used to generate accurate grasshopper density maps. Sweep sampling is still considered the best way to estimate both grasshopper density and species diversity (Mulkern et al. 1978; Evans et al. 1983; Larson et al. 1999), and is the most common method used (Larson et al. 1999; Gardiner et al. 2005). However, sweep sampling has been shown to have variation in capture depending upon many factors, most notably vegetation height, plant structure, and variation among samplers (O'Neill et al. 2002; Gardiner et al. 2005).

Previous studies have examined grasshopper species composition and density by ecoregion (Skinner et al. 2000), geography (Fielding & Brusven 1995; Schell & Lockwood 1997, Craig et al. 1999), and geographic features (Johnson 1989a, 1989b; Cigliano et al. 1995). Differences in assemblages have been shown to be mostly a result of weather patterns, varying plant diversity, and soil characteristics (Isley 1937, 1938; Capinera & Sechrist 1982; Kemp et al. 1990).

In this study, we compare grasshopper density and species composition among roadside ditches, fencelines, and pastures in rangelands in three regions of northern Nebraska (east, central, west) that differ in average rainfall patterns.

Materials and methods

Study sites.—Nebraska is largely a prairie state, with the western two-thirds remaining predominantly rangeland as a result of low annual precipitation (Veneman et al. 2004). This study took place in northern Nebraska along a 400-km stretch of U.S. Highway 20 which runs east to west. Much of the study took place in the Sandhills ecoregion that is primarily treeless grass-covered sand dunes, with associated wet meadows in low-lying areas (Ratcliffe & Paulsen 2008). From east to west, Nebraska is approximately 688 km and rises at a rate of approximately 2.2 m per kilometer. Northeastern Nebraska receives the highest rainfall (58 cm annually) and was historically a tallgrass prairie. In the northcentral region of Nebraska, vegetation transitions to mixed-grass prairie with declining precipitation (38 cm annually) and increasing elevation (Ratcliffe & Paulsen 2008). Dominant native grasses of the Sandhills region include big and little biuestem (Andropogon spp.), needle-and-thread grass (Stipa comata Trin.), and prairie san dreed [Calamovilfa longifolia (Hooker)] (Weaver 1965). A number of exotic grasses including brome and cheat grasses (Bromus spp.) and fescues (Festuca spp.) have been introduced in the rangeland and as roadside plantings. The topography and sandy soils prevent traditional rowcrop agriculture and the Sandhills region is primarily used for cattle grazing and hay production.

Fig. 1.

Mean adult grasshopper numbers per sample in the ditch, fence and field locations by year. Each sample represents the total number of individual adult grasshoppers captured during 20 sweeps by a 15-in insect net.

f01_269.jpg

Sampling.—We sampled 120 rangeland sites between Plainview, Nebraska and Chadron, Nebraska along a 400-km portion of U.S. Highway 20 in August of 2007, and again in August of 2010. Each year, all sampling was conducted within a five-day period to limit the temporal effects on grasshopper populations as much as possible. Sampling sites were approximately 3.2 kilometers apart. To reflect differences in rainfall patterns and topography, the sampling area was subdivided into three regions with a total of 40 sites in eastern Nebraska (east), 40 sites in central Nebraska (central), and 40 sites in western Nebraska (west).

Fig. 2.

Mean combined adult and nymphal grasshopper numbers per sample in the ditch, fence and field locations by year. Each sample represents the total number of individual grasshoppers captured during 20 sweeps by a 15-in insect net.

f02_269.jpg

Fig. 3.

Mean adult grasshopper numbers per sample in the east, central and west sampling regions by year. Each sample represents the total number of individual adult grasshoppers captured during 20 sweeps by a 15-in insect net.

f03_269.jpg

At each of our 120 sites, we collected 3 samples: 1) in the ditch parallel to the road (ditch), 2) in the pasture parallel and within 3 meters of the fenceline (fence), and 3) ∼ 30 m from the fenceline further into the rangeland (field)—using USDA-APHIS-PPQ protocols. Each sample consisted of 20 low and fast sweeps with a 38-cm diameter heavy muslin net. Each sweep consisted of moving the net through a 180° arc, with the top of the net at the top of the vegetation (Brust et al. 2009). Because ditch vegetation was taller than fence and range vegetation, sweeps were highest in the ditch and higher in the range than along fences. All sampling was conducted between 10:00 and 16:00 hours as recommended by Whipple et al. (2010). Collected grasshoppers were placed in freezer bags and stored in a portable refrigerator until subsequent laboratory identification. In this paper, we report the number of grasshoppers collected per sample (= per 20 net-sweeps).

Fig. 4.

Mean combined adult and nymphal grasshopper numbers per sample in the east, central and west sampling regions by year. Each sample represents the total number of individual adult grasshoppers captured during 20 sweeps by a 15-in insect net.

f04_269.jpg

All grasshoppers in this study were collected only by the senior author who was trained as a grasshopper surveyor by USDA-APHISPPQ in Nebraska. Adult grasshoppers were counted and identified to species. Nymphs were counted, but not identified. After checking for normality, data were log (base 10) transformed and rechecked. The number of grasshoppers captured in each location (ditch, fence and field), across regions (east, central, west) and between years were compared using a Three-Way Analysis of Variance (Sigma Plot 3.1, Jandel Scientific, Corte Madera, CA). The Holm-Sidak method of multiple comparison was used to isolate treatments that differed from one another.

Table 1.

Summary of Three-Way Analysis of Variance for adult and combined adult and nymphal grasshopper numbers across locations (ditch, fence, field), regions (east, central, west) and years (2007, 2010).

To compare numbers of individual grasshopper species, a Kruskal-Wallis One-Way Analysis of Variance was used in cases where > 100 individuals of a given species were captured. If differences among conditions were observed, a Tukey test was used as a post hoc test. Numbers in the east, central, and west regions, as well as numbers collected in the ditch, fence and field samples were analyzed by year.

Results

A total of 21,378 grasshoppers belonging to 50 species were collected across years, of which 11,657 were adults and 9,721 were nymphs. When numbers were combined across years, the mean number (± 1 SE) of adult grasshoppers captured per sample (each sample = 20 net sweeps) was 22.4 ± 1.9 in ditches, 10.3 ± 1.0 at the fences and 15.9 ± 1.6 in fields (Fig. 1 ). When nymphs were included, mean capture by site increased to 43.0 ± 3.7 in the ditch samples, 19.0 ± 1.5 at the fence, and 27.2 ± 2.3 in the field (Fig. 2). By region, mean adult capture was 4.8 ± 0.4 in eastern Nebraska, 18.3 ± 1.4 in the central region, 25.5 ± 2.1 in western Nebraska (Fig. 3). When adult and nymphal numbers were combined, mean capture was 19.9 ± 1.4 in the east, 29.1 ± 2.2 in the central and 40.1 ± 3.8 in the west, respectively (Fig. 4).

Analyses of mean adult grasshopper numbers, as well as combined adult and nymphal capture, revealed differences between years among east, central and west regions and among ditch, fence and field sites (Table 1). For adults, significant differences (P<0.05) were observed among all treatments (year, region, and location) with the exceptions of mean adult capture in 2007 vs 2010 within the eastern region (P=0.24), field vs fence in 2007 (P=0.09), field vs fence in the eastern region (P=0.07), field vs fence in the western region (P=0.42), west vs central in the ditch (P=0.44), and west vs central in the field (P=0.30) (Figs 1, 3).

When nymphs were included in analysis, all regions (east, central, west) had significantly different mean grasshopper numbers in the ditch and fence areas (P<0.05) (Figs 2, 4). Additionally, all regions (east, central, west) and sampling locations (ditch, fence, field) were significantly different in 2010 (P<0.05). No differences in total grasshopper numbers were found between mean numbers in the east vs central region in 2007 (P=0.86), 2007 vs 2010 within the eastern region (P=0.52), field vs fence in 2007 (P=0.09), field vs fence in the east (P=0.20), ditch vs field in the central (P=0.07), field vs fence in the west (P=0.49), or west vs east in the field samples (P=0.930).

Total capture of adult grasshoppers was higher in the western region than in the east (P<0.05), but not the central region (Table 2). The numbers of individuals of most species differed between years and across regions of the state. The grasshopper species with the highest numbers in the western region of Nebraska (P<0.05, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) were Ageneotettix deorum (Scudder), Melanoplus bivittatus (Say), Melanoplus femurrubrum (DeGeer), Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius), Paropomala wyomingensis (Thomas), Phoetaliotes nebrascensis (Thomas), Pseudopomala brachyptera (Scudder) and Spharageman collare (Scudder) (Table 2). The species Hypochlora alba (Dodge), Melanoplus angustipennis (Dodge), Melanoplus flavidus (Scudder), and Mermiria bivittata (Serville) had the highest numbers (P<0.05) in the central region. No species was captured in the highest numbers in the eastern region of Nebraska, although nymphal capture was higher in the east than both the central and western region (P<0.05). No differences in capture among regions were observed for Amphitornus coloradus (Thomas), Melanoplus differentialis (Thomas), Opera obscura (Thomas), or Orphulella speciosa (Scudder).

Species composition also differed (P<0.05) depending upon sampling location (ditch, fence, or field) (Table 3). Compared to fence and field locations, highest numbers were observed in the ditch for M. angustipennis, M. bivittatus, M. differentialis, M. femurrubrum, M. bivittata, P. nebrascensis, and P. brachyptera (P<0.05). Numbers in the field were greatest for A. deorum, O. obscura, and O. speciosa (P<0.05).No differences in numbers among the ditch, fence, and field areas were found for A. coloradus, H. alba, M. flavidus, M. sanguinipes, P. wyomingensis or S. collare. Overall adult capture differed among the ditch, fence and field areas (P<0.05), with the ditch samples containing the highest numbers (Table 3). Nymphal capture was also significantly higher in the ditch samples (P<0.05).

Discussion

In this study, we identify differences in rangeland grasshopper density and species composition in three regions of northern Nebraska (east, central, west) as well as among roadside ditches, fencelines and pastures (field) across two years of sampling. Currently, most Western states use the same economic thresholds (ETs) for rangeland grasshoppers, although ETs are often set at different levels between roadside ditches and pastures (Hantsbarger 1979; Skelly et al. 2002). For effective grasshopper pest management, it is essential to identify whether there is a correlation between roadside counts and grasshopper density and to establish where grasshopper numbers are most representative of populations in the rangeland.

Our study shows that across a 400-km transect in northern Nebraska, significantly more grasshoppers inhabit ditches than either fencelines or field areas (Fig. 2). This holds true whether only adults or both adults and nymphs are considered (Fig. 1). When both years of sampling are considered, grasshopper density declined from west to east in Nebraska (Figs 3, 4). These regions differ in geography, temperature, rainfall, plant species composition and variation in capture was observed depending upon year, region, and site. Grasshoppers may move to ditches, especially late in the season, when ditches retain moisture and tall grasses compared to grazed fields. This result further suggests that thresholds set based on grasshoppers in ditches should also be adjusted to reflect local conditions.

The accepted economic thresholds for rangeland grasshoppers (USDA-APHIS 2006) are 15 nymphs per square yard (17.9 per m2) or 8 adult grasshoppers per square yard (9.6 per m2). Differences in adult and nymphal thresholds reflect the observation that only ∼ 50% of all early instar nymphs will survive to adulthood (Skelly et al. 2002). Sweep samples of grasshoppers can be converted to the number per m2 by dividing the number obtained in 40 sweeps by 10 (USDA-APHIS 2008). In this study, we present data as a mean number of grasshoppers obtained in 20 sweeps and thus, estimates of the number of grasshoppers per m2 can be calculated by dividing by 5. When this conversion is applied, adult grasshopper numbers exceeded economic thresholds in western Nebraska during 2010 (Fig. 3). The calculated mean grasshopper number per m2 also approached economic thresholds for western Nebraska in 2010 when nymphs were included (Fig. 4). Because data in this study were collected in early August, USDA-APHIS would only be concerned with adult density when considering management actions and predicting grasshopper numbers for the next season (USDA-APHIS 2008). Converting to the mean number of grasshoppers per m2, no location reached the economic threshold for adults (Fig. 1) or combined adults and nymphs (Fig. 2), although ditch samples approached economic thresholds in 2010. Differences in grasshopper numbers across locations could be minimized if samples were collected away from ditches and fences.

Differences in grasshopper species composition should also be factored into treatment decisions for management of rangeland grasshoppers. In our study, composition varied significantly from east to west, despite all sites being fenced land used for grazing located along Highway 20 (Table 2). Although there are over 400 species of short-horned grasshoppers in the United States (Lockwood 2001), only 14 are considered serious pests of rangeland (Pfadt 2002). Species with the highest capture in this study were A. deorum, M. angustipennis, M. femurrubrum and P. nebrascensis, which together accounted for over 61 % of total capture. In Nebraska, only A. deorum, M. angustipennis, and P. nebrascensis are considered serious potential pests of rangeland (Campbell et al. 2001 ). During grasshopper outbreaks, numerous species are usually present; however, one species typically accounts for over 50% of the total number of individuals (Pfadt 2002). In the mixed-grass prairie of northern Nebraska, A. deorum often comprises over half of all grasshoppers present and is one of the more economically important species (Pfadt 1984, 2002).

Grasshopper nymphs occurred in significantly higher numbers in the east than the central and western regions (Table 2) with 3,637 nymphs caught in the east compared to 2,588 in the central and 3,496 in the western part of the state. This is likely a result of hatching and time of development for late-emerging species such as M. femurrubrum and P. nebrascensis (Pfadt 2002), which are both prevalent in the eastern region of Nebraska. In contrast, adult numbers were significantly higher in the western part of the state, mainly as a result of higher abundance of M. angustipennis, M. sanguinipes, P. wyomingensis and P. nebrascensis in the west (Table 2, Fig. 3).

Numerous factors influence grasshopper abundance and distribution, including soil characteristics, plant diversity, vegetation structure, microclimate and oviposition preference (Caplan 1966; Uvarov 1977; Heidorn & Joern 1987; Joern & Gaines 1990; Fielding & Brusven 1992; Craig et al. 1999; Beckerman 2000; Skinner & Child 2000; Skinner et al. 2000; Whipple et al. 2009; Whipple et al. 2010). Plant diversity and feeding preference also correlate with grasshopper density and habitat preference (Fielding & Brusven 1992). The differences observed in the numbers of each species found in the ditch, fence and field may be a result of feeding preferences and a higher proportion of forbs in ditch areas. However, because no data were gathered for plant communities, this cannot be tested.

As discussed above, the regions of Nebraska are divided by geology, soil type, vegetation communities, hydrology, and climate (Omernik 1987, 1995). Eastern, central, and western Nebraska have different native vegetation communities, largely as a result of differences in rainfall (Johnsguard 2001 ). Eastern Nebraska receives the highest rainfall and is mainly tallgrass prairie, while the mixedgrass prairie of central Nebraska and short-grass prairie of western Nebraska receive considerably less precipitation (Johnsguard 2001 ). Numerous studies have focused on precipitation as it pertains to grasshopper density with mixed results. Both Fielding and Brusven (1990) and Nerney (1960, 1961) found high grasshopper numbers to result from precipitation. Other studies have found precipitation to hinder grasshopper abundance (Parker 1933; Smith 1954; Edwards 1960; Gage & Mukerji 1977; Skinner & Child 2000). Our study shows overall grasshopper numbers decreasing from west to east (Figs 3, 4), which may indicate an inverse correlation with average regional precipitation. However, we found significant differences in grasshopper abundance between years and regions (Figs 3, 4), as well as in nymphal density by region and year, which further stresses that grasshopper abundances vary over time and space (Fielding & Brusven 1990; Skinner & Child 2000). Added plant growth from precipitation and moist soils are favorable for grasshopper survival. However, cloudy days and cold rains can affect thermoregulation, predator avoidance, and pathogen prevalence (Chappell & Whitman 1990; Stauffer & Whitman 1997). Thus, timing of precipitation and sunny weather may be more important in determining grasshopper density (Chappell & Whitman 1990; Stauffer & Whitman 1997) and annual precipitation should be used with caution when predicting grasshopper density and species composition over a broad geographic scale.

Mean grasshopper numbers were lowest in the fence samples (Figs 1, 2), but suffered no reduction in number of species captured (Table 2). Fencelines were generally heavily grazed, and in many cases, bare ground was present as result of grazing and trampling. Ditches were ungrazed and had dense vegetation. Grasshoppers are known to warm themselves by basking in areas of bare soil thereby increasing metabolism and growth (Chappell & Whitman 1990; Belovsky et al. 2000). Bare ground is also favored for oviposition by many species (Stauffer & Whitman 1997; Belovsky et al. 2000). Grasshoppers are also often attracted to bare ground for courtship displays (Otte 1970). These factors may explain the high species diversity observed in fenceline areas despite less vegetation. These results also suggest that studies aimed at quantifying species assemblages could use fence areas to obtain accurate measures of diversity, while limiting the effects of vegetation height and diversity on results.

This study shows that grasshopper density and species composition vary among ditch, fence, and field areas of rangeland across three regions of northern Nebraska. These data suggest the need to develop site-specific economic thresholds that are calculated based upon both region and location of sampling. Based on our results, sampling practitioners should take caution when using roadside surveys to estimate overall grasshopper density and species composition of both nymphal and adult grasshoppers. In addition, these results serve as a warning that samplers must be an adequate distance from the fenceline to accurately estimate grasshopper numbers in rangeland. We recommend that standardized sampling of rangeland grasshoppers be conducted at least 30 meters into a pasture.

Table 2.

Total number of grasshoppers captured in the eastern, central, and western portions of Nebraska from 40 sites sampled by sweep net in 2007 and 2010. When more than 100 total individuals of a species were captured, a Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test was used to test for differences in mean number of grasshopper captured by region for each year and overall. Different letters designate significant (P < 0.05) differences.

Table 3.

Total number of grasshoppers captured in ditch, fence line, and field across Nebraska from 120 sites sampled by sweep net in 2007 and 2010. When more than 100 total individuals of a species were captured, a Kruskal-Wallis One-Way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test was used to test for differences in mean number of grasshopper captured by region for each year and overall. Different letters designate significant (P < 0.05) differences.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Tamara Smith and John Hastings for useful discussion and comments on earlier versions of this paper. We thank Matheus Parenti and Gustavo Romani for their assistance with this research. We also thank the editors and reviewers at JOR for thorough reviews and helpful insights. This project was partially supported by the University of Nebraska Research Services Council and the USDA-APHIS-PPQ.

Literature Cited

1 

C. Bastos , S.D. Whipple , W.W. Hoback , L.G. Higley 2011. Grasshopper injury to potato: consumption, effect on photosynthesis, and economic injury level. Agronomy Journal 103: 16557–1660.

2 

A.P. Beckerman 2000. Counterintuitive outcomes of interspecific competition between two grasshopper species along a resource gradient. Ecology 81: 948–957.

3 

G.E. Belovsky, J.B. Slade 2002. An ecosystem perspective on grasshopper control: possible advantages to no treatment, Journal of Orthoptera Research 11: 29–35.

4 

G.E. Belovsky, M.A., Brusven D.J. Fielding, L. Manske 2000. Grasshopper habitat manipulation. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Inspection Service, Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management User Handbook, Technical Bulletin No. 1809, Washington, DC. p.VII. 15– 1–VII.15–5.

5 

M.L. Brust , W.W. Hoback , R.J. Wright 2008. A synopsis of Nebraska grasshopper distributions. Journal Kansas Entomological Society 81: 208–255.

6 

M.L. Brust , W.W. Hoback , R.J. Wright 2009. Degree-day requirements for eight economically important grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Nebraska using field data. Environmental Entomology 38: 1521–1526.

7 

J.B. Campbell , P.E. Reece , G.L. Hein 2001. A guide to grasshopper control on rangeland. High Plains Integrated Pest Management Guide for Colorado, Western Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana.

8 

J.L. Capinera , T.S. Sechrist 1982. Grasshopper (Acrididae) - host plant associations: response of grasshopper populations to cattle grazing intensity. Canadian Entomologist 114: 1055–1062.

9 

E.B. Caplan 1966. Differential feeding and niche relationships among Orthoptera. Ecology 47: 1074–1076.

10 

M.A. Chappell , D.W. Whitman 1990. Grasshopper thermoregulation, pp. 143–172. In: R.F. Chapman, A. Joern (Eds) Biology of Grasshoppers. Wiley, New York.

11 

M.M. Cigliano, W.P. Kemp, T. Kalaris 1995. Spatiotemporal characteristics of rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) regional outbreaks in Montana, Journal of Orthoptera Research 4: 111–126.

12 

D.P. Craig , C.E. Bock , B.C. Bennett , J.H. Bock 1999. Habitat relationships among grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) at the western limit of the great plains in Colorado. American Midland Naturalist 42: 314–27.

13 

R.M. Davis , M.D. Skold , J.S. Berry , W.P. Kemp 1992. The economic threshold for grasshoppers control on public rangelands. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17: 56–65.

14 

R.L. Edwards 1960. Relationship between grasshopper abundance and weather conditions in Saskatchewan, 1930–1958. Canadian Entomologist 92: 619–624.

15 

R.L. Edwards 1964. Some ecological factors affecting the grasshopper populations of western Canada. Canadian Entomologist 96: 307–320.

16 

E.W. Evans , R.A. Rogers , D.J. Opfermann 1983. Sampling grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on burned and unburned tallgrass prairie: night trapping vs sweeping. Environmental Entomology 12: 1449–1454.

17 

D.J. Fielding , M.A. Brusven 1990. Historical analysis of grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) population responses to climate in southern Idaho, 1950–1980. Environmental Entomology 19: 1786–1791.

18 

D.J. Fielding , M.A. Brusven 1992. Food and habitat preferences of Melanoplus sanguinipes and Aulocara elliotti (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on disturbed rangeland in southern Idaho. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 783–788.

19 

D.J. Fielding , M.A. Brusven 1995. Ecological correlates between rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and plant communities of southern Idaho. Environmental Entomology 24: 1423–1441.

20 

S.H. Gage , M.K. Mukerji 1977. A perspective of grasshopper population distribution in Saskatchewan and interrelationship with weather. Environmental Entomology 6: 469–479.

21 

T. Gardiner , J. Hill , D. Chesmore 2005. Review of the methods frequently used to estimate the abundance of Orthoptera in grassland ecosystems. Journal of Insect Conservation 9: 151–173.

22 

R.L. Gillespie , W.P. Kemp 1995. Habitat association of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acridida) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and adjacent rangeland. Journal Kansas Entomological Society 68: 425–424.

23 

R.L. Gillespie , W.P. Kemp 1996. Sampling method assessment and quantification of temporal shifts in densities of grasshopper species (Orthoptera: Acrididae) between winter wheat, Triticum aestivum, and adjacent rangeland. Environmental Entomology 25: 559–569.

24 

W.M. Hantsburger 1979. Grasshoppers in Colorado. Fort Collins, CO, Cooperative Extension Service.

25 

H.A. Hauke 1953. An annotated list of the Orthoptera of Nebraska, Part II. The Tettigidae and Acrididae. Bulletin University of Nebraska State Museum 3: 1–79.

26 

T.J. Heidorn , A. Joern 1987. Feeding preference and spatial distribution of grasshoppers (Acrididae) in response to nitrogen fertilization of Calamovilfa longifolia. Functional Ecology 1: 369–375.

27 

G.L. Hein, J.B. Campbell 2006. A guide to grasshopper control in cropland. Neb Guide G1627. Entomology.unl.edu. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension.

28 

F.B. Isley 1937. Seasonal succession, soil relations, numbers, and regional distribution of northeastern Texas acridians. Ecological Monographs 3: 317–344.

29 

F.B. Isley 1938. The relations of Texas Acrididae to plants and soils. Ecological Monographs 8: 551–604.

30 

A. Joern , S.B. Gaines 1990. Population dynamics and regulation in grasshoppers, pp. 415–482. In: R.E. Chapman, A. Joern (Eds) Biology of Grasshoppers. Wiley, New York.

31 

PA. Johnsguard 2001. The Nature of Nebraska: Ecology and Biodiversity. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. 402pp.

32 

D.L. Johnson 1989a. Spatial analysis of the relationship of grasshopper outbreaks to soil types, pp. 347–359. In: L. McDonald, B. Manly, J. Lockwood, J. Logan (Eds) Estimation and Analysis of Insect Populations, Lecture Notes in Statistics 55. Springer, New York.

33 

D.L. Johnson 1989b. Spatial autocorrelation, spatial modeling, and improvements in grasshopper survey methodology. Canadian Entomologist 121: 579–588.

34 

D.L. Johnson , J.E. Henry 1987. Low rates of insecticides and Nosema locustae (Microsporidia: Nosematidae) on baits applied to roadsides for grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) control. Journal of Economic Entomology 80: 685–689.

35 

N.E. Kaplan 2001. Community structure, diversity, and density of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) at the interface of grazed and cultivated agroecosystems in eastern Colorado. Thesis. Colorado State University. Department of Rangeland Ecosystem Science.

36 

W.P. Kemp , B. Dennis 1993. Density dependence in rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 96: 1–8.

37 

W.P. Kemp , S.J. Harvey , K.M. O'Neill 1990. Patterns of vegetation and grasshopper community composition. Oecologia 83: 299–308.

38 

D.P. Larson , K.M. O'Neill , W.P. Kemp 1999. Evaluation of the accuracy of sweep sampling in determining grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community composition. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 16: 207–214.

39 

J.A. Lockwood 2001. Voices from the past: what we can learn from the Rocky Mountain locust. American Entomologist 47: 208–215.

40 

G.B. Mulkern, J.C. Records, R.B. Carlson 1978. Attractants and phagostimulants used for control and estimation of grasshopper populations Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 24: 350–361.

41 

N.J. Nerney 1960. Grasshopper damage on shortgrass rangeland of the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation, Arizona. Journal of Economic Entomology 53: 640–646.

42 

N.J. Nerney 1961. Effects of seasonal rainfall on range condition and grasshopper population, San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation, Arizona. Journal of Economic Entomology 54: 382–385.

43 

O. Olfert , R. Weiss 2002. Impact of grasshopper feeding on selected cultivars of cruciferous oilseed crops. Journal of Orthoptera Research 11: 83–86.

44 

J.M. Omernik 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (Scale 1:7,500,000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118–125.

45 

J.M. Omernik 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management, pp. 49–62. In: W.S. Davis, T.P. Simon (Eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resources Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.

46 

K.M. O'Neill , D.P. Larson , W.P. Kemp 2002. Sweep sampling technique affects estimates of the relative abundance and community composition of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). fournal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 19: 125–131.

47 

D. Otte 1970. A Comparative Study of Communicative Behavior in Grasshoppers. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 141: 1–168.

48 

J.R. Parker 1930. Some effects of temperature and moisture upon Melanoplus mexicanus Saussure and Camnula pellucida (Orthoptera). Bull. 233. Bozeman, MT: Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. 132 pp.

49 

J.R. Parker 1933. Factors largely responsible for years of grasshopper abundance. Proceedings World's Grain Exhibition Conference, Canada 2: 472–473.

50 

J.R. Parker 1937. The influence of man and cultivation on the grasshopper problem in the United States. Proceedings Fourth International Locust Conference, Cairo, Egypt. Appendix 14. Government Press, Bulaq.

51 

R.E. Pfadt 1984. Species richness, density, and diversity of grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in a habitat of the mixed grass prairie. Canadian Entomologist 116: 703–709.

52 

R.E. Pfadt 2002. A Field Guide to Common Western Grasshoppers. 3rd edition. Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin 912. 288 pp.

53 

R. Pickford 1963. Wheat crops and native prairie in relation to the nutritional ecology of Camnula pellucida (Scudder) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Saskatchewan. Canadian Entomologist 95: 764–770.

54 

X.H. Qui , L. Kang , H.C. Li 2004. The economic threshold for control of the major species of grasshoppers on Inner Mongolian rangeland. Acta Entomologica Sinica 47: 595–598.

55 

B.C. Ratcliffe , M.J. Paulsen 2008. The Scarabaeoid beetles of Nebraska (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Bulletin University of Nebraska State Museum 22: 1–570.

56 

S.P. Schell , J.A. Lockwood 1997. Spatial characteristics of rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) population dynamics in Wyoming: implications for pest management. Environmental Entomology 26: 1056–1065.

57 

J. Skelly , W. Johnson , W. Riggs , J. Knight 2002. Surveying and collecting samples, pp. 16–19. In: Field Guide to Grasshoppers of Economic Importance in Nevada. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Bulletin. EB02-02.

58 

K.M. Skinner , R.D. Child 2000. Multivariate analysis of the factors influencing changes in Colorado grasshopper abundances. Journal of Orthoptera Research 9: 103–109.

59 

K.M. Skinner , W.P. Kemp , J.P. Wilson 2000. GIS-based indicators of Montana grasshopper communities. Transactions in GIS 4: 113–128.

60 

R.C. Smith 1954. An analysis of 100 years of grasshopper population in Kansas (1854 to 1954). Transactions Kansas Academy of Science 57: 397–433.

61 

T.W. Stauffer , D.W. Whitman 1997. Grasshopper oviposition, pp 231–280. In: S.K. Gangwere, M.C. Muralirangan, M. Muralirangan (Eds) The Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and their Kin. CAB International. New York, NY

62 

[USDA-APHIS] U.S. Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 2006. Nebraska grasshopper and mormon cricket rangeland cooperative suppression and outreach programs. Lincoln, Nebraska.

63 

[USDA-APHIS] U.S. Department of Agriculture—Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 2008. Grasshopper Guidebook Provisional Edition, January. 120 pp. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/domestic/downloads/grasshopper.pdf

64 

B.P. Uvarov 1956. The locust and grasshopper problem in relation to the development of arid lands, pp. 383–389. In: The Future of Arid Lands. American Association for the Advancment of Science. Washington, D.C.

65 

B.P. Uvarov 1977. Grasshoppers and Locusts: A Handbook of General Acridology. Volume 2, Centre for Overseas Pest Research, London, England.

66 

A.M. Veneman , J.J. Jen , R.R. Bosecker 2004. 2002 census of agriculture: Nebraska state and county data. Volume 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 27. AC-02-A-27.

67 

L.T. Vermeire , R.B. Mitchell , S.D. Fuhlendorf , D.B. Wester 2004. Selective control of rangeland grasshoppers with prescribed fire. Rangeland Ecology and Management 57: 29–33.

68 

I.E. Weaver 1965. Native Vegetation of Nebraska. University of Nebraska Press. Lincoln, NE.

69 

S.D. Whipple , M.L. Brust , W.W. Hoback , K.M. Farnsworth-Hoback 2009. The grasshoppers Arphia Xanthoptera and Dichromorpha Viridis prefer introduced smooth brome over other grasses. Great Plains Research 19: 179–86.

70 

S.D. Whipple , M.L. Brust , W.W. Hoback , K.M. Farnsworth-Hoback 2010. Sweep sampling capture rates for rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) vary during morning hours. Journal of Orthoptera Research 19: 75–80.

71 

K.M. Zimmerman, J.A. Lockwood, A.V. Latchininsky 2004. A spatial, Markovian model of rangeland grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) population dynamics: do long-term benefits justify suppression of infestations? Environmental Entomology 33: 257–266.

Sean D. Whipple, Mathew L. Brust, Kerri M. Farnsworth-Hoback, and W. Wyatt Hoback "Rangeland Grasshopper Numbers and Species Composition in Nebraska: A Comparison of Region and Sampling Location," Journal of Orthoptera Research 21(2), 269-277, (1 November 2012). https://doi.org/10.1665/034.021.0213
Published: 1 November 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top