Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2009 Demographic Correlates of Sexual Size Dimorphism and Male Genital Size in the Lice Philopterus coarctatus
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Sexual selection is an influential agent of evolution, often shaping the sex ratio, sexual size dimorphism (SSD), and genital size in animals. To explore its effects in ectoparasites, we quantified SSD and male genital size in relation to intensity and sex ratio across subpopulations of Philopterus coarctatus, a philopterid louse of the great grey shrike. SSD was calculated separately for the width and length of the head and abdomen. Presuming that sexual selection affects the evolution of avian lice, we would expect that infestation intensities should covary with sex ratio, relative male size, and relative male genital size, either positively or negatively depending upon presumptions. Contrary to former studies, there was a weak negative relationship between infestation intensity and sex ratio. The relative width of male abdomens exhibited a highly significant negative interaction with the intensity of infestations. In contrast, sex ratio did not predict any of the dimorphism measures. Similarly, male genital size did not covary with the intensity of infestations or sex ratios. These findings may indicate that intensity covaries positively with levels of inbreeding in this species, suggesting that more-inbred subpopulations, wasting less energy for sexual rivalry, can multiply more intensively. Thus, small subpopulations have more frequent males which also possess larger abdomens. Alternatively, however, the same pattern may also arise due to male-biased starvation in overcrowded habitats; thus, males are rarer and have smaller abdomens in larger infrapopulations.

Piotr Tryjanowski, Zbigniew Adamski, Magdalena Dylewska, Lajos Bulkai, and Lajos Rózsa "Demographic Correlates of Sexual Size Dimorphism and Male Genital Size in the Lice Philopterus coarctatus," Journal of Parasitology 95(5), 1120-1124, (1 October 2009). https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1966.1
Received: 19 November 2008; Accepted: 1 March 2009; Published: 1 October 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top