Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2007 Effect of Food and Habitat on Breeding Success in Spotted Owlets (Athene brama) Nesting in Villages and Rural Landscapes in India
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We measured breeding success of Spotted Owlets (Athene brama) in two habitats, villages (human habitations) and rural areas (open country) in India. We quantified habitat types in 500-m-radius circles surrounding 53 nest sites and examined owlet pellets collected at nest sites in both areas, to describe owlet diet. Breeding success was higher in the human habitations than in open country (3.3 young per successful nest vs. 2.2, respectively, P < 0.001). Diet at nests in human habitations contained more rodents and other noninsectivorous non-arachnid prey (by biomass and species richness) than those in open country (P < 0.01 for rodents and P < 0.001 for other prey). We used multivariate linear regression to examine which factors of habitat and diet most influenced breeding success and found that only the percentage of rodents, and the percentage of other prey were included as statistically significant variables in our final model. Thus, the most significant determinant of breeding success of Spotted Owlets was high-value prey items, which were more abundant in the areas of human habitations.

Other than large cities and metropolises, villages account for most of the human habitations of rural India. The residential areas in villages consist of traditional mud and stone houses, temples, ruins, schools, and public buildings. These structures offer numerous nesting sites to Spotted Owlets (Athene brama; Jerdon 1862, Baker 1927, Dewar 1929, Ali and Ripley 1969, Kumar 1985). On the fringes of villages, and along riparian areas within villages, are dilapidated buildings that also offer a number of holes, suitable for nesting for Spotted Owlets and mynas (Acridotheres tristis and A. fuscus), House Sparrows (Passer domesticus), Rose-ringed Parakeets (Psittacula krameri), Indian Robins (Saxicoloides fulicata), and Barn Owls (Tyto alba). In rural open country outside the villages, the nests of owlets are predominantly in existing tree cavities, and also under bridges in wall holes. In India, owls are generally threatened due to superstition (Pande et al. 2005). Also, in recent years, tree-felling in rural areas has become intense, and as a result, Spotted Owlets have lost many tree-cavity nests. Spotted Owlets are a common resident species in villages as well as in rural areas, and they are territorial throughout the year (Ali and Ripley 1969). These birds are mostly crepuscular and nocturnal, but occasionally hunt during the daytime. At night, they often hawk insects in flight and hunt rodents and other creeping prey close to a source of illumination (Ali and Ripley 1969, Pande et al. 2004). Owlet diet includes small rodents and birds, geckos and other lizards, arachnids, insects, molluscs, and other prey (Baker 1927, Ali and Ripley 1969, Jain and Advani 1984, Kumar 1985, Duncan 2003, Jadhav and Parasharya 2003, Pande et al. 2004). The object of this study was to determine the effect of habitat and food on breeding success of Spotted Owlets in villages and rural areas in India. The analyses of the main determinants of breeding performance are crucial to understanding the effect of human disturbance on this species. Such factors are complex, with possible intrinsic variances in reproductive parameters within the same population, and represent one of the most challenging problems for ecologists (Krebs 1991, Penteriani et al. 2002).

Methods

Study Area

The study area consisted of 32.8 km2 in and around Saswad and Kodit villages (18°19′N to 18°20′N and 73°57′E to 74°01′E) in Pune district, Maharashtra, India. This area is semiarid, with an annual rainfall of <500 mm. Elevation ranges from 764–846 m above sea level. The approximate human population of these villages is 31000 and 5400 respectively. The adjacent Pune city has an approximate human population of 3.5 million.

Census of Nesting Pairs

In 2003 and 2004, occupied nest sites of Spotted Owlets were located by (1) information from local residents, or (2) search of probable nests sites, following passive auditory surveys at dawn and dusk during the breeding season (December–April), when owlet vocal displays are highest (Ali and Ripley 1969). Nest locations were recorded using a GPS, and distances between nearest neighbors (NND) were calculated from the coordinates (Newton et al. 1977). Regularity of nest spacing was computed for both the HH and OC groups by means of G-statistic (Brown and Rothery 1978; the index in this method ranges from 0 to 1 and values >0.65 indicate a uniform nest distribution).

Nesting Habitat Categorization

Following Penteriani et al. (2002), a simple model was adopted to categorize the nest sites into two groups, human habitations (HH) or open country (OC), by identifying the relative percentage of each of five landscape cover types found within a circle of 500 m radius centered at the nest site. The five landscape cover types were (1) residential habitat (including residences, temples, ruins, fortifications, and other anthropogenic structures); (2) agricultural habitat; (3) water body (river, stream, irrigation bund, tank or well); (4) open land (noncultivable or fallow area with scrub and interspersed huts or small temples) and (5) low undulating hills and ravines. The relative percentages were estimated by look-down visual surveys conducted from high vantage points (Bibby et al. 1998). The distance from each nest to the nearest source of light was also estimated, and the source of illumination was categorized as one of the following: light from a house, streetlight, public area or hut. The radius of 500 m was chosen because the Spotted Owlets usually forage near the nest sites within this range (Pande et al. 2004).

Diet

At least three visits were made each year to each of the nest sites during the breeding seasons of 2003 and 2004. Owlet pellets were collected from all the nest sites and were pooled separately for the two groups, HH and OC. Prey in pellets were identified to orders, families, genera or species by using published literature (Gude 1914, Ellerman 1961, Tikader and Bastawade 1983, Tikader and Sharma 1992, Corbet and Hill 1992, Agrawal 2000, Daniel 2002, Ramanujam 2004) or by comparing with specimens in the collection of the Zoological Survey of India, Pune. Pellet contents were categorized as rodents, arachnids, insects, or other prey species (Table 1). The fresh masses of species were estimated by weighing specimens in the field using Pesola scales (nearest 0.1 g) or by using published masses (Spillet 1966, Khajuria 1968, Ranade 1989, 1992, Kanakasabai et al. 1998, Pande et al. 2004; Table 1). Relative contribution of each prey item to the overall biomass of each of the four prey categories was calculated by multiplying the proportion of each prey item (for each of the four prey categories) and the mean body weight of an individual item. Species richness of food items was determined for each nest in the two groups. Richness was defined as number of identified prey species in the diet (Magurran 1988).

Table 1

Diet of Spotted Owlets as determined from pellets at two sites in Pune district, Maharashtra, India, human habitations (villages) and rural open country.

i0892-1016-41-1-26-t01.gif

Breeding Outcome

Of the occupied nests found, seven randomly chosen but accessible nests were intensively studied for one year (2003) during the breeding season for the documentation of clutch size, egg size and weight, laying interval, incubating period, hatching interval, loss of egg weight during incubation, and eggshell thickness. Eggs were weighed with Pesola scales to the nearest 0.1 g. Eggshell thickness was measured with a plastic vernier caliper to the nearest 0.01 cm. We also recorded the age at which nestlings first opened their eyes, stood, preened, flapped their wings, and fledged, as well as the nestling masses (from 0–4.5 wk). For these seven nests, we determined hatching success rate (the percentage of eggs laid that hatched), fledging success (the percentage of nestlings hatched that fledged), nesting success (the percentage of nests that fledged at least one chick), and nestling survival [calculated using the Mayfield Exposure Day method (Mayfield 1961, Sutherland 2000)].

For all occupied nests in 2003 and 2004, we measured post-fledging dependence period, number of young fledged per active nest, number of young fledged per occupied nest, and breeding success. Post-fledging dependence period was measured by repeated visits to each nest area to relocate the parents and young until the young were not seen with parents. An occupied nest was one where one pair of Spotted Owlets was present during breeding season even if there was no evidence that eggs were laid. An active nest was defined as one where at least one egg was laid or an adult was seen incubating, and a breeding pair was defined as one that laid at least one egg. A successful nest was one that fledged at least one young (Postupalsky 1974, Steenhof 1987). Breeding success was defined as the number of fledged young per successful nest.

Statistical Methods

Data are given as means for continuous variables (habitat, species richness, percent biomass, breeding success) and percent for categorical variables (distance from light source). Distance from light source was categorized into three groups (<100 m, 100–500 m and >500 m). Breeding success data for 2003 and 2004 were pooled in the analysis because there was no difference in breeding success between years. Offspring survival between two nest site groups (HH and OC) was tested by chi-square test. Correctness of our classification of nest sites in two nest site groups was tested by discriminate function analysis (DFA; Sokal and Rohlf 1995). Habitat and percent biomass variables were tested for normality. All the habitat variables except percent agriculture were skewed; thus, the following variables were normalized using log-transformations: percent residential, percent open land, percent water body, percent insects in diet, and percent arachnids. Hilly area was normalized using (1-1/square root). Differences between two nest site groups for various habitats, species richness, percent biomass, and breeding success were tested by Student's t-test and distance from light source by chi-square test. Associations between habitats and diet, breeding success and habitat, and diet and distance from a light source were tested by Pearson correlation. We used stepwise forward multivariate regression analysis as a global test for estimating determinants of breeding success. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 11.0 software.

Results

Breeding Chronology and Reproductive Rates

We located a total of 53 occupied Spotted Owlet nests in 2003 and 2004. Spotted Owlets laid eggs and began incubating during December–February; chicks fledged in February–March and the post-fledging dependence period was from April–November. Fledglings dispersed during November–December and began courtship and pairing behaviors in December–January.

For the seven intensively studied nests, clutch size  =  2.2 (range  =  1–4), egg size  =  32.1 mm × 26.7 mm (range  =  34 × 25 mm to 33 × 28 mm), egg mass  =  10.5 g (range  =  9–12 g), and eggshell thickness  =  0.13 mm (range 0.11–0.15 mm). Laying interval was 24 hr for 2–4 eggs, incubation period was 31–32 d, and hatching asynchronous at intervals of 24 hr. At these nests, nestlings first opened their eyes at 5–6 d, stood, preened and flapped their wings at 7–10 d, and fledged at 31–32 d at a mass of 90–115 g. Hatching success was 37.5%, fledging success was 72.7%, and nesting success 53.1%. The daily nestling survival over 31 d was 33.5% (N  =  7 nests, all from the OC habitat). The post-fledging dependence period was 8 mo.

Of the 53 occupied nests studied, 45 (84.9%) were active and 41 (77.4%) were successful. All the occupied nests in HH were active as well as successful, while 74% and 61.2% nests in OC were so (Table 2). Breeding success (number of young fledged per successful nest) was greater in HH than in OC (P < 0.001, Table 2). Similarly, the number of nestlings per occupied nest, as well as per active nest, was greater in HH than in OC (P < 0.001, Table 2). Fourteen nests in HH fledged large broods of 3–7 chicks each, but only six nests in OC did so; eight nests in HH produced 0–2 chicks each, but 25 nests in OC did so (P  =  0.001).

Table 2

Reproductive rates of Spotted Owlets in Pune district, Maharashtra, India, 2003–2004 (years combined).

i0892-1016-41-1-26-t02.gif

Habitat Analysis

DFA significantly discriminated between the two groups (HH and OC), based on four variables (residential, water body, agriculture and hilly area). The discriminate equation was D  =  −2.250 + 0.062 (% residential) + 0.015 (% water body) + 0.004 (% agriculture) – 0.012 (% hilly area). Correct classification was obtained for 91% of nest sites in HH and 100% in OC. The percentage of residential habitat percentage was higher in HH (P < 0.001), whereas percentages of agricultural, open land, and hilly areas were higher in OC (P < 0.001; Table 3). The nearest neighbor distance (NND) in HH was 0.73 km and 1.04 km in OC, and the nests were uniformly distributed (G-statistic >0.65).

Table 3

Comparison of Spotted Owlet nest-site habitat and diet and two sites in Pune district, Maharashtra, India, human habitations (villages) and rural open country.

i0892-1016-41-1-26-t03.gif

Diet Analysis

A total of 3445 pellets were collected in two years, 1430 from HH and 2015 from OC. Owlet diet differed between HH nest sites and OC nest sites (Table 1, 3). Average species richness of prey items at HH sites was significantly higher for rodents and other prey, compared to the OC sites. Similarly, for relative percent biomass of prey items, HH nest sites had greater percentages of rodents and other prey in the pellets and correspondingly fewer insects in the pellets, compared to OC (Table 3).

Univariate Associations of Breeding Success with Habitat and Diet

Breeding success of Spotted Owlets was positively associated with the percentage of residential habitat within nest circles, inversely associated with the percentages of agriculture and open land habitats (Table 4), and negatively correlated to the distance to the nearest light source (Table 4). Breeding success was also positively correlated with species richness in the diet for all four prey categories (rodents, insects, arachnids, and other prey, Table 4) and the percentage biomass for rodents and other prey, but inversely associated with the percentage of insects (Table 4).

Table 4

Univariate correlations of breeding success with habitat and diet.

i0892-1016-41-1-26-t04.gif

Multivariate Determinants of Breeding Success

We first performed a collinearity diagnostic, and as a result, we excluded percent insect biomass from the analysis. We used forward stepwise multiple linear regression analysis with breeding success as dependent variable and all five habitats variables, the four diet variables for species richness, three diet variables for percent biomass, and distance of light from nest site as independent variables. The percent biomass for rodents and other prey (P < 0.01) were the most significant determinants of breeding success with total r2  =  0.50 (Table 5).

Table 5

Multivariate determinants of breeding success, based on forward stepwise multivariate regression analysis with breeding success as the outcome and habitat and diet factors as independent variables. (Only the final model is shown.)

i0892-1016-41-1-26-t05.gif

Discussion

Residential habitat was predominant in the human habitation study area in spite of the fact that some of the nests were located along fringe areas near open country. Agriculture, open land, and hilly habitat were more common in the open country study area. Residential habitat was not entirely absent in open country because some huts, small temples, and other minor anthropogenic structures were present. In the human habitation study area, Spotted Owlets traditionally nest in holes or crevices in human-made structures, while in open country they nest in existing cavities in trees. The traditional nest sites such as natural tree holes are diminishing in the OC due to an increase in tree-felling. The response of Spotted Owlets to this habitat destruction is their increasing occupation of newer and alternative nest sites such as holes in earth cuttings and earthen walls of wells (Pande et al. 2006). In the past, these alternative nest sites were not considered traditional nest sites (Baker 1927) and were referred to as unusual (Jerdon 1862). Spotted Owlets also readily accept and occupy nest boxes (Naik 2004). We believe that the occupation of alternative nest sites in the rural areas is an expression of their ability to adapt. Paucity of natural nest sites such as tree cavities in OC is likely to increase in the future, because habitat disturbance continues unabated.

In HH, the nearest neighbor distance (NND) was 0.7 km as compared to 1.0 km in OC. Proximity of nests is likely to produce aggressive encounters between the pairs in adjacent nest sites as well as with other cavity-nesting birds, because Spotted Owlets are territorial birds which occupy and defend their nest sites and home ranges throughout the year. Hole-nesting birds like Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis), Jungle Myna (Acridotheres fuscus), Oriental Magpie Robin (Copsychus saularis), Indian Robin (Saxicoloides fulicata), Rose-ringed Parakeet (Psittacula krameri) and Barn Owl (Tyto alba) also compete with Spotted Owlets for the existing nest holes (S. Pande pers. observ.). It is possible that more energy is expended in the defense of the territory against conspecifics by each pair in HH, compared to those in OC, because of the shorter NND in HH. Such interactions are intensified during the breeding season and fights between territorial birds can adversely affect fecundity through various mechanisms (Hickey 1942, Lack 1954, Cade 1960, Ratcliffe 1962). However, this did not occur in our study, as reproductive rates were significantly higher in HH, in spite of closer nest spacing. It is also possible that the NND we reported do not actually reflect higher density or closer neighbors in HH; we did not find nests in an unbiased way, and it is probable that landowners were more likely to find and report nests in the villages than in the sparsely populated rural areas. Future study of the relationship between breeding success and density in this population of Spotted Owlets may yield interesting results.

Spotted Owlets are likely dietary generalists. In HH, open sewers and drains were abundant; thus, rodents were plentiful. Other prey species like geckos and other lizards were also found in HH in significant numbers. It is expected that the Spotted Owlets in HH would consume the more profitable high-energy foods such as rodents and lizards, as per the law of optimal diet (Kamil and Sargent 1981, Donázar 1987, Kamil et al. 1987, Penteriani et al. 2002), because they are available. The negative correlation between breeding success and percent insect biomass in OC also may be significant. There are important conservation implications, because if habitat destruction and tree-felling leading to nest-site destruction in OC continues unabated, there may be a further negative effect on the already-lower breeding success in OC in the future, because alternative nest sites for the cavity-nesting birds are limited in rural areas.

Our observations on breeding chronology conformed to previous reports (Ali and Ripley 1969, Kumar 1985). However, the data on eggshell thickness, daily survival of nestlings, hatching success, nesting success, and post-fledging dependence period were reported here for the first time for this species.

Spotted Owlets are crepuscular and at night they prefer to hunt near a source of light (Ali and Ripley 1969). Sources of light were closer to the nest sites in HH and we found significant negative correlation between distance of light from the nest site and breeding success. This could affect breeding success by causing the owlets to expend more energy when the source of light is further from the nest site. Higher energy expenditure in moving to and from distant hunting areas to nests is known to adversely affect fecundity in Eurasian Eagle-Owls (Bubo bubo; Valverde 1967, Schoener 1971, Penteriani et al. 2002). However, we note that the distance to the nearest light source was also correlated to the percentage of residential habitat, and the relationship between breeding success and light may simply reflect the differences between HH and OC, which were primarily related to prey availability.

The most significant factor influencing breeding success of Spotted Owlets was food, particularly rodents and other prey, including lizards. These constitute high-value foods and high-value food items may improve the chance of offspring survival (Penteriani et al. 2002). Thus, our findings are consistent with results reported earlier for other owl species (Purroy 1974, Martínez et al. 1992).

Conclusions

Breeding success of Spotted Owlets in human habitations was significantly higher than that of birds in rural open country. The most important determinant of breeding success of Spotted Owlets was a diet including a relatively high percentage of rodents and other prey, which were classified as high-value foods.

Acknowledgments

Prey identification was done at the Zoological Survey of India, W.R.S. Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India, by Dr. M.S. Pradhan (Mammals), Dr. P.P. Kulkarni (Insects), Dr. D.B. Bastawade (Arachnids), Dr. S.G. Patil (Molluscs), and Dr. H. Ghate (Reptiles), Head, Dept. of Zoology, Modern College, Pune. Kumar Pawar, Pramod Pawashe, Unmesh Barbhai, Banda Pednekar, and Prashant Deshpande assisted in fieldwork. We thank the villagers who helped in reporting nest sites and owls. ELA Foundation, Pune, provided binoculars and travel support. Dr. Reuven Yosef of International Birding, Conservation and Research Center, Eliat, Israel, donated the GPS unit. We thank ‘The Conservation Handbook Gratis Copies Project’ for donating a copy by W.J. Sutherland to ELA Foundation, Pune. Software for GPS data analysis was provided by Anand Abhyankar, SoftLab, Pune. Statistical analysis was done with the advice of Mrs. Anjali Mote, statistician and, Dr. C.S. Yajnik, Dr. Ashish Bavdekar, Dr. A.N. Pandit, Dr. D.D. Shetty, and Rajesh Jadhav of K.E.M. Hospital and Research Center, Pune, made the facilities available for statistical studies. Dr. Uday Shetty of Medicare Diagnostic Center, Pune, offered logistic support. Kenyon Gibson suggested English language corrections.

Literature Cited

1.

V. C. Agrawal 2000. Taxonomic studies on Indian Muridae and Hystricidae (Mammalia: Rodentia). Rec. Zool. Surv. India, Occasional Paper No. 180. Kolkata, India. Google Scholar

2.

S. Ali and S. D. Ripley . 1969. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Vol. 3. Oxford Univ. Press. New Delhi, India. Google Scholar

3.

E. C. S. Baker 1927. Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma: Birds, Vol. IV, 2nd Ed. Taylor and Francis. London, U.K. Google Scholar

4.

C. Bibby, M. Jones, and S. Marsden . 1998. Expedition field techniques bird surveys. Expedition Advisory Centre, Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers). London, U.K. Google Scholar

5.

D. Brown and P. Rothery . 1978. Randomness and local regularity of points in a plane. Biometrica 65:115–122. Google Scholar

6.

T. J. Cade 1960. Ecology of the Peregrine and Gyrfalcon populations in Alaska. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool 63:151–290. Google Scholar

7.

G. B. Corbet and J. E. Hill . 1992. The mammals of the Indomalayan region: a systematic review. National Museum Publications and Oxford Univ. Press. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar

8.

J. C. Daniel 2002. The handbook of Indian reptiles and amphibians. Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford Univ. Press. Mumbai, India. Google Scholar

9.

D. Dewar 1929. Indian birds nests. The Mayflower Press. London, U.K. Google Scholar

10.

J. A. Donázar 1987. Geographic variations in the diet of the Eagle Owls in western Mediterranean Europe. 220–224. In R. W. Nero, R. J. Clark, R. J. Knapton, and R. H. Hamre , editors. eds. Biology and conservation of northern forest owls: symposium proceedings. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-142 USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, CO U.S.A. Google Scholar

11.

J. Duncan 2003. Owls of the world: their lives, behavior and survival. Key Porter Books. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Google Scholar

12.

J. R. Ellerman 1961. The fauna of India including Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon. Mammalia, Vol. 3. (Rodentia) Part I & II. Govt. of India. Delhi, India. Google Scholar

13.

G. K. Gude 1914. Fauna of British India. Mollusca II (Trochomorphidae-Janeliidae). Today and Tomorrow. New Delhi, India. Google Scholar

14.

J. J. Hickey 1942. Eastern population of the Duck Hawk. Auk 59:176–204. Google Scholar

15.

A. Jadhav and B. M. Parasharya . 2003. Some observations on the nesting behaviour and food of the Spotted Owlet Athene brama. Zoos' Print Journal 18:1163–1165. Google Scholar

16.

P. Jain and R. Advani . 1984. Winter food of Spotted Owlet Athene brama indica. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc 80:415–416. Google Scholar

17.

T. C. Jerdon 1862. The birds of India. Vol. I. Second Ed. reprinted in 1982. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh Publishers. Dehradun, India. Google Scholar

18.

A. C. Kamil and T. D. Sargent . 1981. Foraging behaviour, ecological, ethological and psychological approaches. Garland STPM Press. New York, NY U.S.A. Google Scholar

19.

A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs, and H. R. Pulliam . 1987. Foraging behaviour. Plenum Press. New York, NY U.S.A. Google Scholar

20.

R. Kanakasabai, P. Neelanarayanan, and R. Nagarajan . 1998. Quantifying Barn Owl Tyto alba stertens prey frequency and biomass. 153–157. In ManjeetS. Dhindsa, P. Syamsunder Rao, and B. M. Parasharya , editors. eds. Birds in Agricultural ecosystems. Society for Applied Ornithology. Hyderabad, India. Google Scholar

21.

H. Khajuria 1968. The young of the Indian long-tailed tree mouse Vandeleuria o. oleracea (Bennet) (Rodentia: Muridae). Cheetal 10:52. Google Scholar

22.

C. J. Krebs 1991. The experimental paradigm and long-term population studies. Ibis 133:(Suppl.1)3–8. Google Scholar

23.

T. S. Kumar 1985. The life history of the Spotted Owlet (Athene brama brama, Temminck) in Andhra Pradesh. Hyderabad Raptor Research Centre. Hyderabad, India. Google Scholar

24.

D. Lack 1954. The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon Press. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar

25.

A. E. Magurran 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm. London, U.K. Google Scholar

26.

J. E. MartÍnez, M. A. Sánchez, D. Carmona, J. A. Sanchez, A. Ortuño, and R. Martinez . 1992. The ecology and conservation of the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo in Murcia, south-east Spain. 84–88. In C. A. Galbraith, I. R. Taylor, and S. Percival , editors. eds. The ecology and conservation of European owls: proceedings of a symposium held at Edinburgh University. U.K. Nature Conservation No. 5, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Peterborough, U.K. Google Scholar

27.

H. F. Mayfield 1961. Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bull 73:255–261. Google Scholar

28.

S. A. Naik 2004. Building new bird homes. Hornbill Jan–Mar 2004. 38–39. Google Scholar

29.

I. Newton, M. Marquiss, D. N. Weir, and D. Moss . 1977. Spacing of sparrowhawk nesting territories. J. Anim. Ecol 52:591–602. Google Scholar

30.

S. Pande, A. Pawashe, D. B. Bastawade, and P. P. Kulkarni . 2004. Scorpions and molluscs: some new dietary records for Spotted Owlet Athene brama in India. News. Ornis 1:68–70. Google Scholar

31.

S. Pande, A. Pawashe, U. Karambelkar, and S. Shrotri . 2005. Salvage, relocation and in-nest behaviour of Barn Owl Tyto alba stertens Hartert, chicks. Indian Birds l:5–6. Google Scholar

32.

S. Pande, A. Pawashe, M. N. Mahajan, and A. Mahabal . 2006. Changing nest site preference for holes in earth cuttings in Spotted Owlet Athene brama. Indian Birds 1:7–8. Google Scholar

33.

V. Penteriani, M. Gallardo, and P. Roche . 2002. Landscape structure and food supply affect Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) density and breeding performance: a case of intra-population heterogeneity. J. Zool. Lond 257:365–372. Google Scholar

34.

S. Postupalsky 1974. Raptor reproductive success: some problems with methods, criteria and terminology. Raptor Res. Rep 2:21–31. Google Scholar

35.

F. J. Purroy 1974. Fauna navarra en peligro de extincion. Ediciones y Libros. Pamplona, Spain. Google Scholar

36.

M. E. Ramanujam 2004. Methods of analysing rodent prey of the Indian Eagle Owl Bubo bengalensis (Franklin) in and around Pondicherry, India. Zoos' Print J 19:1492–1494. Google Scholar

37.

R. V. Ranade 1989. The pygmy shrew Suncus etruscus. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc 86:238–239. Google Scholar

38.

R. V. Ranade 1992. Anatomy and histology of the common house shrew Suncus murinus (Lin.): a pictorial monograph. Univ. of Pune. Pune, India. Google Scholar

39.

D. A. Ratcliffe 1962. Breeding density in the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus and Raven Corvus corax. Ibis 104:13–39. Google Scholar

40.

T. W. Schoener 1971. Theory of feeding strategies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 2:369–404. Google Scholar

41.

R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf . 1995. Biometry, the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, Third edition. Freeman. New York, NY U.S.A. Google Scholar

42.

J. J. Spillet 1966. Growth of three species of Calcutta rats, Bandicota bengalensis, B. indica and Rattus rattus (Linn.). 177–196. In D. W. Parrack , editor. ed. December 8–11, 1966. Proceedings of the Indian Rodent Symposium, John Hopkins University Center for Medical Research & Training and United States Agency for International Development. Calcutta, India. Google Scholar

43.

K. Steenhof 1987. Assessing raptor reproductive success and fecundity. 157–170. In B. A. Giron Pendleton, B. A. Millsap, K. W. Cline, and D. M. Bird , editors. eds. Raptor management techniques manual. Natl. Wildl. Fed. Washington, DC U.S.A. Google Scholar

44.

W. J. Sutherland 2000. The conservation handbook: research, management and policy. Blackwell Science. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar

45.

B. K. Tikader and D. B. Bastawade . 1983. The fauna of India: Scorpions. Scorpionida: Arachnida. Vol. III. Zoological Survey of India. Calcutta, India. Google Scholar

46.

B. K. Tikader and R. C. Sharma . 1992. Handbook of Indian lizards. Zoological Survey of India. Calcutta, India. Google Scholar

47.

J. A. Valverde 1967. Estructura de una comunidad mediterranea de vertebrados terrestres. Madrid: I Monografa de la Estacion Biologica de Doñana. C.S.I.C Madrid, Spain. Google Scholar
Satish Pande, Amit Pawashe, Murlidhar N. Mahajan, Charu Joglekar, and Anil Mahabal "Effect of Food and Habitat on Breeding Success in Spotted Owlets (Athene brama) Nesting in Villages and Rural Landscapes in India," Journal of Raptor Research 41(1), 26-34, (1 March 2007). https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2007)41[26:EOFAHO]2.0.CO;2
Received: 7 March 2006; Accepted: 1 December 2006; Published: 1 March 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top