Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2018 Phylogeography of Continental and Island Populations Of Blakiston's Fish-Owl (Bubo blakistoni) In Northeastern Asia
Keita Omote
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The endangered Blakiston's Fish-Owl (Bubo blakistoni) has a fragmented distribution in the northeastern Eurasian continent, as well as on Hokkaido, southern Kuril, and Sakhalin islands. To examine the phylogeography of this species, we analyzed mitochondrial sequences. The whole mitochondrial genome, which included duplicated genes, was the largest (>21 kbp) in vertebrates to date. A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial gene sequences revealed a clear separation between two clades. The insular clade comprised the mitochondrial haplotypes from Hokkaido, southern Kuril, and Sakhalin islands, whereas the continental clade consisted of those from the Eurasian continent, including the Primorye, Amur, and Magadan areas. Analyses based on whole mitochondrial sequences suggested that the level of genetic differentiation between the two subspecies, B. b. blakistoni on the islands and B. b. doerriesi on the continent, was enough to recognize them as separate species. The estimated divergence time between the clades was at least 500,000 yr before present. In contrast, the divergence times within the clades were less than 10,000 yr before present, indicating that the haplotypes within the clades diverged after the last glacial maximum (LGM). Information on the distribution of vegetation suggests that the main areas currently inhabited by B. blakistoni were unsuitable as habitats during the LGM. Lower diversities, higher growth rate, and the pattern of haplotype distribution in the continental population suggest a severe bottleneck and rapid dispersion through the last glacial period. In contrast, the insular population retains a higher haplotype variation. Because southern Hokkaido Island was covered with forests in the LGM, the area could have acted as a refugia for this species.

Global climate has fluctuated during the Quaternary period, and influenced the abundance and distribution of most living organisms (Hewitt 2000). Many bird species also experienced cycles of population contractions and expansion during the Quaternary period, and severe declines in effective population size often coincided with the beginning of the last glacial period (Nadachowska-Brzyska et al. 2015). In boreal bird species, the timing of divergence plausibly links to the fragmentation of the boreal forest by ice sheets during the mid- and late Pleistocene (Weir and Schluter 2004). The assumed vegetation types in East Asia were shifted southwards during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; Harrison et al. 2001), and there were no forests in most of continental Russian Far East, Sakhalin Island, Kuril Islands, and northeast Hokkaido Island (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1. 

(A) Simulated vegetation of northeast Asia during the Last Glacial Maximum, and (B) the present vegetation and distribution of Bubo blakistoni (lined areas). Color scale: dark gray, boreal forest; medium gray, temperate forest; light gray, non-forest. Adapted from Harrison et al. (2001), Krestov (2003), and Slaght and Surmach (2008).

i0892-1016-52-1-31-f01.tif

The endangered Blakiston's Fish-Owl (also known as Blakiston's Eagle-Owl; Bubo blakistoni, formerly Ketupa blakistoni; Omote et al. 2013) is the largest owl found in boreal forests in northeastern Asia, and requires ice-free rivers for catching fish and a large hollow tree for nesting (Takenaka 1998). Its distribution is fragmented in the Russian Far East, northeastern China, Hokkaido Island, and the southern Kuril Islands (including Kunashir and Shikotan islands; Fig. 1B; Slaght and Surmach 2008). Although B. blakistoni was known to occur on Sakhalin Island before 1969, a survey in 2005 did not detect it there (Slaght and Surmach 2008). Two subspecies are generally recognized: B. b. blakistoni from islands, and B. b. doerriesi from the continent. In the research on the species to date, genetic data was lacking for populations from the Eurasian continent, southern Kuril, and Sakhalin islands. Genetic theory predicts that population bottleneck and fragmentation will lead to decreases in genetic variability (Keller and Waller 2002), and it is assumed that populations of B. blakistoni have reduced their diversity during the glacial periods. In addition, recent events also influenced population structure and genetic diversity of the species. For example, on Hokkaido Island, the population size decreased during the 20th century due to deterioration and loss of habitat (Takenaka 1998). Genetic analyses of the Hokkaido Island population of this owl showed low genetic diversity and fragmentation (microsatellite loci by Omote et al. 2015; major histocompatibility complex genes by Kohyama et al. 2015).

In the present study, we determined nucleotide sequences of the whole mitochondrial genomes of B. blakistoni to examine the phylogenetic relationships among populations from the continental and insular areas. Here we present these results and discuss the phylogeographic patterns and historical demographic events in northeastern Asia.

Methods

Whole Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Sequencing. For sequencing the whole mtDNA genome of B. blakistoni, we utilized blood and tissue samples from Russia (n = 6) and blood samples from Hokkaido Island (n = 10). We used Tawny Fish-Owl (Ketupa flavipes, also known as Bubo flavipes), a closely related species distributed in southeastern Asia, as an outgroup taxon. We cultured fibroblasts from a skin sample of K. flavipes obtained from the Ueno Zoological Gardens to extract the DNA. Blood and tissue samples were preserved in ethanol at −20°C until use. Total DNA was extracted from blood, tissue, or fibroblasts by using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany), and from feather roots by using the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen).

Whole mitochondrial genomes were amplified from total DNA in six overlapping fragments (2.5–7.8 kilo base-pairs [kbp]) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using PrimeSTAR GXL DNA Polymerase (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan). The PCR cycling conditions were 98°C for 3 min; 30 cycles of 98°C for 10 sec, 60°C for 15 sec, and 68°C for 15 sec to 3 min; and 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products to be used as templates for nucleotide sequencing were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Sequencing was performed with the BigDye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and an ABI 3730 DNA automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems: Waltham, MA, U.S.A.). Primers for PCR and sequencing (Table 1) were newly designed, or were used or modified from those in Sorenson et al. (1999) and Omote et al. (2013). Nucleotide sequences were aligned by using MEGA 5.0 software (Tamura et al. 2011). The whole mtDNA sequences of B. blakistoni and K. flavipes were deposited in GenBank: accession nos. LC099100-LC099107.

Table 1. 

Primers for polymerase chain reaction and sequencing used to delineate phylogeny of Blakiston's Fish-Owl (Bubo blakistoni).

i0892-1016-52-1-31-t01.tif

Phylogenetic Analysis. To examine the phylogenetic relationships among mtDNA haplotypes and divergence times between clades, we used the sequences of all 13 protein-coding genes (11,373 base pairs [bp]) because extensive sequence data were required for the accurate estimation of branch lengths among the closely related lineages. The 13 protein-coding sequences of three samples from Russia and four samples from Hokkaido Island were used for analysis. In addition, the entire sequence of the mitochondrial genome of K. flavipes was used as an outgroup taxon. Because two duplicated genes (cytochrome b-2 and ND6-2) were each identical in sequences within individuals, we removed one set from subsequent molecular phylogenetic analyses.

The average Kimura-2-parameter (K2P) differences among and within populations were calculated by using MEGA 5.0. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed with the maximum likelihood method implemented with Treefinder March 2011 software (Jobb 2011), and by Bayesian inference implemented with BEAST 1.6.2 software (Drummond et al. 2006; Drummond and Rambaut 2007). The best-fit model of substitution was determined independently for each of the 13 protein-coding genes by using MEGA 5.0. A Bayesian skyline model or a coalescent constant size model was used as a tree prior. A posterior set of trees was obtained through the Bayesian MCMC analysis, which was run for 10,000,000 iterations. We used the Bayesian analysis to estimate the divergence times between and within the continental and insular populations using a strict clock model. To calculate the divergence times among haplotypes, we used 1.20% (entire mtDNA genome) and 1.81% (mitochondrial cytochrome b [cytb]) per million yr as the evolutionary rate of all mitochondrial protein-coding genes according to those in Accipitridae (Eo and DeWoody 2010, Weir and Schluter 2004).

Haplotyping of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences. To reveal geographic distributions of mtDNA haplotypes, we utilized blood, tissue, feather, and skull samples from locations in Russia, including Primorye (n = 22), Amur (n = 2), and Magadan (n = 1), and feathers obtained from museum specimens from Kunashir Island in the southern Kuril Islands (n = 2) and Sakhalin Island (n = 1). On Hokkaido Island, the population structure may have changed due to habitat fragmentation and reduction caused by human activities during the 1980s (Omote et al. 2015). To reconstruct the structure of the Hokkaido Island population before this disturbance, we utilized sequence data from Omote et al. (2015) derived from museum specimens (n = 19) collected before 1980. Total DNA was extracted from blood or tissue using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen), and from feather roots using the QIAamp DNA Micro Kit (Qiagen). Total DNA was extracted from a partial skull sample following Masuda et al. (2001).

Sequencing from the DNA samples was performed on shorter fragments (140–590 bp), amplified by using the Multiplex PCR Master Mix (Qiagen): the PCR cycling conditions were 95°C for 15 min; 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 57°C for 3 min, and 72°C for 30 sec; and 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products to be used as templates for nucleotide sequencing were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). Sequencing was performed with the BigDye Terminator 1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and an ABI 3730 DNA automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). On each museum and archaeological sample, we performed PCR and sequencing at least three times to eliminate the potential for contamination and sequencing errors, and thus confirmed authenticity of the data. Haplotypes of the samples were assigned based on the nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial control region 2 (CR-2), using the criteria for haplotyping specified in Omote et al. (2015). The relationships among haplotypes were estimated using statistical parsimony network analysis using TCS 1.21 software (Clement et al. 2000). Calculations of haplotype and nucleotide diversities were performed with ARLEQUIN 3.5.1.2 software (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). Migration rate among populations and growth rate for each population were estimated using LAMARC 2.1.10 software (Kuhner and Smith 2007).

Results

Organization of Whole Mitochondrial Genes of B. blakistoni. The size of the whole mitochondrial genome of B. blakistoni was at least 21 kbp. The genome contained a tandemly duplicated gene unit from the cytb to control region (CR; Fig. 2); due to sequencing difficulties and resulting ambiguity in the large tandemly duplicated repeat region in CR-2, we were unable to determine the exact size of the genome. In the duplicated repeat region, only cytb gene sequences were partial, and the sequences of tRNAThr-2, tRNAPro-2, tRNAGlu-2, and ND6-2 were identical with those of tRNAThr-1, tRNAPro-1, tRNAGlu-1, and ND6-1. Both CR-1 and CR-2 included tandem repeats consisting of four to six copies of 49-bp units (51-bp units in K. flavipes), whereas only CR-2 had a much longer tandem repeat region consisting of more than 20 times of 78-bp or 79-bp units. There were variations in the number and/or order of tandem repeat units as reported by Omote et al. (2013). Sequence regions other than the tandem repeat regions were similar between CR-1 and CR-2, and a few single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within individuals from the Russian Far East and from Hokkaido Island were found in the first domain of CR-2 (Omote et al. 2013).

Figure 2. 

Schematic diagram of the entire mitochondrial genome of Blakiston's Fish-Owl (Bubo blakistoni). The positions of polymerase chain reaction and sequencing primers (listed in Table 1) are indicated by arrowheads.

i0892-1016-52-1-31-f02.tif

Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Times between Clades. The phylogenetic trees from the maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses were identical in topology (Fig. 3). Both analyses strongly supported high genetic differentiations between continental and insular clades. The results showed that individuals from Hokkaido, southern Kuril, and Sakhalin islands were assigned to the same clade. The average K2P difference based on entire mtDNA sequences within continental and insular populations was 0.052% and 0.017%, respectively, and that between the populations was 1.31%. The Bayesian analysis based on the mutation rate of entire mtDNA genome indicated that continental and insular clades diverged 669 kilo yr before present (kyrBP; 95% highest posterior density interval [HPDI], 560–770 kyrBP). The timing of the most recent common ancestor for the continental clade was estimated to be 9.3 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 1.6–20 kyrBP), and that for the insular clade was estimated to be 10 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 2.3–23 kyrBP; Fig. 3). The divergence time between B. blakistoni and K. flavipes was estimated to be 3461 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 3200–3700 kyrBP). In addition, the analysis based on the mutation rate of mitochondrial cytb indicated that divergence time was 506 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 424–583 kyrBP) between the clades, 7.0 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 1.2–15 kyrBP) and 7.6 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 1.7–17 kyrBP) within the clades, and 2620 kyrBP (95% HPDI: 2400–2800 kyrBP) between B. blakistoni and K. flavipes, respectively.

Figure 3. 

The molecular phylogeny based on the whole mitochondrial genome sequences of Bubo blakistoni and K. flavipes as an outgroup. Numbers above the tree branches indicate the Bayesian posterior probabilities / ML bootstrap values. Numbers below branches show the estimated divergence times, and bars show mean 95% highest posterior density intervals; kyrBP = kilo yr before present.

i0892-1016-52-1-31-f03.tif

Geographical Distribution of CR-2 Haplotypes. Seven CR-2 haplotypes based on nucleotide substitutions were found: three haplotypes from the Russian Far East, and four haplotypes from Hokkaido Island (Fig. 4). In northeastern continental Asia, we determined new haplotypes for 13 samples from Primorye, two from Amur, and one from Magadan (Fig. 4A, B). The most common continental haplotype occurred in 12 of the 13 samples from Primorye and in the sample from Magadan, the northern boundary of the range of B. blakistoni. The other two haplotypes were minor and found in inland areas. On Hokkaido Island, three of the four haplotypes were widespread (Fig. 4C). The most frequent haplotype on Hokkaido Island was also found on Sakhalin and Kunashir islands. The parsimony network of the seven haplotypes clearly showed two clusters, which consist of continental and insular haplotypes, respectively (Fig. 4D). Haplotype and nucleotide diversities were 0.34 and 0.001 in the continental population, 0.69 and 0.004 in the insular population, respectively. The likelihood estimation showed positive growth rate for the continental and insular populations (3338 and 771, respectively) and low migration rate between the populations.

Figure 4. 

Estimated geographical distribution of mtDNA haplotypes of Bubo blakistoni in: (A) northeast Asia; (B) Primorye; and (C) Hokkaido and southern Kuril islands. (D) Parsimony network of the haplotype based on mitochondrial CR-2 sequences. Each symbol refers to one haplotype and one bar means one substitution.

i0892-1016-52-1-31-f04.tif

Discussion

Phylogeography of B. blakistoni Populations. Blakiston's Fish-Owl is classified into two subspecies, B. b. blakistoni on islands and B. b. doerriesi on the continental areas (Slaght and Surmach 2008); however, the genetic relationships between the two subspecies have not been well studied to date. Our results showed that haplotypes based on mtDNA CR-2 were not shared between insular and continental populations (Fig. 4D). The phylogenetic analysis using the whole mitochondrial genome showed two clearly separated clades: one clade consisted of individuals from Hokkaido, southern Kuril, and Sakhalin islands; and the other of individuals from the Eurasian continent (Fig. 3). The results suggest that the geographically isolated populations have been separated for a long time.

Generally, 98% of sister-species pairs of vertebrates were observed to have K2P mtDNA divergences more than 2%; however, avian taxa had less genetic divergence than same-rank taxa in other vertebrate groups (Johns and Avise 1998). According to analyses on birds using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I sequences, the average K2P difference between sister-species pairs varied from 0.78% to 11.77% (Tavares and Baker 2008). Because differences within species were much lower than those among sister-species, the suggested threshold of 10 times the mean intraspecific variation to screen for splits referred to as putative species has also been criticized (Hebert et al. 2004). For B. blakistoni, the migration rate between the continental and insular populations was estimated to be very low. The average K2P mitochondrial difference between the populations was 1.310%, and that within the populations was <0.052%; therefore, the ratio of between-populations to within-populations difference was >25. The results suggest that the level of difference between the populations is enough to recognize them as separate species. Because the two subspecies differ in plumage markings (e.g., a white spot on the head in B. b. doerriesi) and call patterns (Slaght and Surmach 2008), the geographical populations may be behaviorally isolated as well. Blakiston's Fish-Owl is listed as endangered on the IUCN Red List, and the size of insular population was much smaller than that of continental population. The continental population size may be 800 pairs, based on extrapolation, whereas the population was only an estimated 140 individuals on Hokkaido Island and 70–85 individuals on Kunashir Island, and there was no confirmation of breeding on Sakhalin Island (Slaght and Surmach 2008, Omote et al. 2015). As the present study suggests, both populations are unique and irreplaceable. It means that reintroduction of individuals across the populations is inappropriate, and indicates the greater necessity for conservation of the tiny and divided population on the islands.

Bayesian analysis shows that the insular and continental populations diverged at least 500 kyrBP. Considering the data from Antarctic ice cores (Lüthi et al. 2008), the two populations have experienced five or six global glacial-interglacial cycles since their divergence. Northern Sakhalin and the adjacent continental areas have non-forested areas that may act as a barrier to dispersal of this owl. The divergence times within the continental and insular populations were estimated to be approximately 9.3 and 10 kyrBP, respectively (Fig. 3), which were later than the end of LGM in 19–20 kyrBP (Clark et al. 2009). Populations of this owl would have decreased in size in the LGM due to limited forested habitats and drastic changes in the environment. The low differentiation in the mitochondrial genome within the populations indicates that the mtDNA haplotypes diverged from single mitochondrial lineages that survived the LGM. In continental northeastern Asia, forested areas in the LGM were much smaller and more fragmented than those at present (Fig. 1; Harrison et al. 2001), although Primorye and southern areas were not glaciated during the Pleistocene (Krestov 2003). Blakiston's Fish-Owls need forests and non-frozen rivers or lakes during winter. This means that most of the continental areas where the owls currently occur were unsuitable for them in the LGM. Refugia for the continental populations were likely located in northeastern China or Korean Peninsula, and owls likely dispersed to more northern areas after the LGM. The lower haplotype and nucleotide diversities, higher growth rate, and the distribution pattern of the mtDNA haplotypes in the continental population suggest severe bottleneck and rapid dispersion through the last glacial period. In contrast, the insular population retains a higher haplotype variation. Although environments on northeastern Hokkaido, Sakhalin, and Kuril islands could have been unsuitable for the fish-owl in the LGM, Southern Hokkaido Island was covered with forests (Harrison et al. 2001). The insular population could have survived on southern Hokkaido or Honshu Island, and dispersed to northeastern Hokkaido, Sakhalin, and the Kuril islands after the LGM. Since then, more variations might have been accumulated in the mtDNA and been maintained in the Hokkaido Island population. There are no paleontological records of Blakiston's Fish-Owl from the Japanese islands, and future study on its historical distribution is required for clarification of its dispersion history.

Because all of the three fish-owl species phylogenetically closest to B. blakistoni occur in tropical forests in southern Asia (Omote et al. 2013), B. blakistoni is assumed to have originated in southern Asia. The divergence time between the B. blakistoni and K. flavipes was estimated to be 3500 kyrBP, or during the late Pliocene. During the following Pleistocene, the climate and vegetation were repetitively changed via glacial-interglacial cycles (Lüthi et al. 2008). Glacial-interglacial cycles are thought to have stimulated speciation due to geographical isolation of populations and high selective pressure for adaptation (Weir and Schluter 2004). Ancestors of B. blakistoni could have adapted to colder environments during glacial periods and dispersed to northeastern Asia during interglacial periods.

Duplication and Variation in the Mitochondrial Genomes. In the present study, we found duplication of several genes in mtDNA sequences of B. blakistoni and K. flavipes. This is the first report of mtDNA rearrangements in the order Strigiformes. Variations of gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome have been reported in several avian taxa (Gibb et al. 2007). The pattern of the gene duplication in B. blakistoniand K. flavipes was similar to that in albatrosses (Abbott et al. 2005) in that there was an additional incomplete cytb gene and duplicates of ND6, tRNAThr, tRNAPro, tRNAGlu, and CR (Fig. 2). The rearrangements in mitochondrial genomes have occurred several times in various lineages of birds. For example, Schirtzinger et al. (2012) identified six independent origins of mitochondrial CR duplications within the order Psittaciformes. Because the same regions in the mitochondrial genome between both B. blakistoni and K. flavipes are duplicated, this gene rearrangement could have occurred before their speciation. In the duplicated region, the differentiation between paralogous sequences within each species was smaller than that between orthologous sequences between the species, indicating the result of gene conversions. A similar pattern has been reported in some other avian lineages, such as Amazona sp. parrots (Eberhard et al. 2001), Thalassarchesp. albatrosses (Abbott et al. 2005), and Black-faced Spoonbill (Platalea minor; Cho et al. 2009). In these avian lineages, the paralogous sequences, which duplicated before speciation, kept a higher similarity in each species rather than orthologous sequences, indicating that there would be some system synchronizing sequences in an individual.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Kushiro Nature Conservation Office, Ministry of the Environment, for providing blood samples from Hokkaido Island and invaluable suggestions. The blood samples were originally obtained through activities to conserve Blakiston's Fish-Owls by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Feather samples from specimens were provided by the Yamashina Institute for Ornithology (Takeshi Yamasaki, Yasuko Iwami, and Takema Saitou), Kushiro City Museum, and the Shimane Prefecture Sanbe Nature Center. A skin sample was kindly provided from the Ueno Zoological Gardens. Tissue sampling from the continental part of the species' range was managed by the Amur-Ussuri Center for Avian Biodiversity in cooperation with the Wildlife Conservation Society Russia Program. Critically important samples were provided by Nikolai Dokuchaev, Sergei Avdeyuk, and Jonathan Slaght. Export of continental samples to Japan was done according to the CITES permit #14RU001618 of 20.10. 2014 issued by the Federal Service of Natural Resources Management of Russian Federation. We are also grateful to Matthew Dick for invaluable comments and for editing an earlier version of this report. This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (23310164) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) to RM; a JSPS fellowship (13J01622) to KO; a grant from the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund, Ministry of the Environment, Japan (D-1201); and a grant from the Pro Natura Fund.

Literature Cited

1.

Abbott, C.L., M.C. Double, J.W.H. Trueman, A. Robinson, and A. Cockburn. 2005. An unusual source of apparent mitochondrial heteroplasmy: duplicate mitochondrial control regions in Thalassarche albatrosses. Molecular Ecology 14:3605–3613. Google Scholar

2.

Cho, H.J., M. Eda, S. Nishida, Y. Yasukochi, J.R. Chong, and H. Koike. 2009. Tandem duplication of mitochondrial DNA in the Black-faced Spoonbill, Platalea minor. Genes and Genetic System 84:297–305. Google Scholar

3.

Clark, P.U., A.S. Dyke, J.D. Shakun, A.E. Carlson, J. Clark, B. Wohlfarth, J.X. Mitorovica, S.W. Hostetler, and A.M. Mccabe. 2009. The last glacial maximum. Science 325:710–714. Google Scholar

4.

Clement, M., D. Posada, and K. Crandall. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology 9:1657–1660. Google Scholar

5.

Drummond, A.J., S.Y.W. Ho, M.J. Phillips, and A. Rambaut. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLOS Biology 4:699–710. Google Scholar

6.

Drummond, A.J., and A. Rambaut. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:214. Google Scholar

7.

Eberhard, J.R., T.F. Wright, and E. Bermingham. 2001. Duplication and concerted evolution of the mitochondrial control region in the parrot genus Amazona. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18:1330–1342. Google Scholar

8.

Eo, S.H. and J.A. DeWoody. 2010. Evolutionary rates of mitochondrial genomes correspond to diversification rates and to contemporary species richness in birds and reptiles. Proceeding of the Royal Society B 277:3587–3592. Google Scholar

9.

Excoffier, L. and H.E.L. Lischer. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10:564–567. Google Scholar

10.

Gibb, G.C., O. Kardailsky, R.T. Kimball, E.L. Braun, and D. Penny. 2007. Mitochondrial genomes and avian phylogeny: complex characters and resolvability without explosive radiations. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:269–280. Google Scholar

11.

Harrison, S.P., G. Yu, H. Takahara, and I.C. Prentice. 2001. Diversity of temperate plants in East Asia. Nature 413:129–130. Google Scholar

12.

Hebert, P.D.N., M.Y. Stoeckle, T.S. Zemlak, and C.M. Francis. 2004. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLOS Biology 2:e312. Google Scholar

13.

Hewitt, G. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913. Google Scholar

14.

Jobb, G. 2011. TREEFINDER version of March 2011. Munich, Germany.  www.treefinder.de (last accessed 23 June 2017). Google Scholar

15.

Johns, G.C. and J.C. Avise. 1998. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15:1481–1490. Google Scholar

16.

Keller, L.F. and D.M. Waller. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:230–241. Google Scholar

17.

Kohyama, T.I., K. Omote, C. Nishida, T. Takenaka, K. Saito, S. Fujimoto, and R. Masuda. 2015. Spatial and temporal variation at major histocompatibility complex class IIB genes in the endangered Blakiston's Fish Owl. Zoological Letters 1:13. Google Scholar

18.

Krestov, P.V. 2003. Forest vegetation of easternmost Russia (Russian Far East). Pages93–180in J. Kolbek, M. Šrůtek, and E.O. Box[Eds.], Geobotany 28. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

19.

Kuhner, M.K. and L.P. Smith. 2007. Comparing likelihood and Bayesian coalescent estimation of population parameters. Genetics 175:155–165. Google Scholar

20.

Lüthi, D., M.L. Floch, B. Bereiter, T. Blunier, J.M. Barnola, U. Siegenthaler, D. Raynaud, J. Joutzel, H. Fischer, K. Kawamura, and T.F. Stocker. 2008. High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present. Nature Letters 15:379–382. Google Scholar

21.

Masuda, R., T. Amano, and H. Ono. 2001. Ancient DNA analysis of brown bear (Ursus arctos) remains from the archaeological site of Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan. Zoological Science 18:741–751. Google Scholar

22.

Nadachowska-Brzyska, K., C. Li, L. Smeds, G. Zhang, and H. Ellegren. 2015. Temporal dynamics of avian populations during Pleistocene revealed by whole-genome sequences. Current Biology 25:1375–1380. Google Scholar

23.

Omote, K., C. Nishida, H.M. Dick, and R. Masuda. 2013. Limited phylogenetic distribution of a long tandem-repeat cluster in the mitochondrial control region in Bubo (Aves, Strigidae) and cluster variation in Blakiston's Fish Owl (Bubo blakistoni). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66:889–897. Google Scholar

24.

Omote, K., C. Nishida, T. Takenaka, K. Saito, R. Shimura, S. Fujimoto, T. Sato, and R. Masuda. 2015. Recent fragmentation of the endangered Blakiston's Fish Owl (Bubo blakistoni) population on Hokkaido Island, northern Japan, revealed by mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite analyses. Zoological Letters 1:16. Google Scholar

25.

Schirtzinger, E.E., E.S. Tavares, L.A. Gonzales, J.R. Eberhard, C.Y. Miyaki, J.J. Sanchez, A. Hernandez, H. Müeller, G.R. Graves, R.C. Fleischer, and T.F. Wright. 2012. Multiple independent origins of mitochondrial control region duplications in the order Psittaciformes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 64:342–356. Google Scholar

26.

Slaght, J.C. and S.G. Surmach. 2008. Biology and conservation of Blakiston's Fish-Owls (Ketupa blakistoni) in Russia: a review of the primary literature and an assessment of the secondary literature. Journal of Raptor Research 42:29–37. Google Scholar

27.

Sorenson, D.M., C.J. Ast, E.D. Dimcheff, T. Yuri, and P.D. Mindell. 1999. Primers for PCR-based approach to mitochondrial genome sequencing in bird and other vertibrates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12:105–114. Google Scholar

28.

Takenaka, T. 1998. Distribution, habitat environments, and reasons for reduction of the endangered Blakiston's Fish Owl in Hokkaido, Japan. Ph.D. dissertation, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan. Google Scholar

29.

Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28:2731–2739. Google Scholar

30.

Tavares, E.S. and A.J. Baker. 2008. Single mitochondrial gene barcodes reliably identify sister-species. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8:81. Google Scholar

31.

Weir, J.T. and D. Schluter. 2004. Ice sheets promote speciation in boreal birds. Proceedings of Royal Society B 271:1881–1887. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Edited by Associate Editor: Stephen B. Lewis

© 2018 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc.
Keita Omote "Phylogeography of Continental and Island Populations Of Blakiston's Fish-Owl (Bubo blakistoni) In Northeastern Asia," Journal of Raptor Research 52(1), 31-41, (1 March 2018). https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-16-65.1
Received: 29 July 2016; Accepted: 1 February 2017; Published: 1 March 2018
KEYWORDS
Blakiston's Fish-Owl
Bubo blakistoni
genetic diversity
glacial periods
molecular phylogeny
population bottleneck
WHOLE MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME
Back to Top