Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2014 Mosses (Bryophyta) and liverworts (Marchantiophyta) of the Zackenberg valley, northeast Greenland
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The moss and liverwort flora of Zackenberg valley in the Northeast Greenland National Park has been studied based on field investigations and literature survey. Altogether 212 taxa are recorded in the area, with 43 liverworts and 169 mosses. Five taxa are reported as new to Greenland Lophochaete fryei (Perss.) R.M. Schust., Sphagnum orientale L.I. Savicz, Orthothecium lapponicum (Schimp.) C. Hartm., Pohlia vexans (Limpr.) H. Lindb. and Tortella alpicola Dixon. Additionally four taxa are reported as new to east Greenland; Grimmia plagiopodia Hedw., Riccardia latifrons (Lindb.) Lindb. Sphagnum olafii Flatberg and Tritomaria exsectiformis (Breidl.) Schiffner ex Loeske. The bryophyte flora of the Zackenberg valley is characterised by pioneer species adapted to disturbance by frost and wind, but also more stable communities exist especially at the lower part of the valley with wet to moist tundra. The Zackenberg valley bryophyte flora shows higher similarity with the flora on Svalbard (81%) compared with Ellesmere Island (67% and 60% for liverworts and mosses, respectively). This is consistent with east Greenland and Svalbard belonging to the North Atlantic Arctic flora province while Ellesmere Island belongs to the Canadian Arctic flora province.

Bryophytes (i.e. liverworts and mosses) are an important plant group of arctic and tundra ecosystems both in relation to biomass and species diversity (Longton 1988, Hassel et al. 2012). To understand the dynamics and ecology of these ecosystems knowledge about the species and their ecology is fundamental. The exploration of Arctic bryophytes is still incomplete although pioneer work has been committed in areas like Chukotka, Ellesmere Island, Svalbard, Peary Land and Arctic Alaska (Schuster et al. 1959, Holmen 1960, Brassard 1971, Steere 1978, Steere and Inoue 1978, Frisvoll and Elvebakk 1996, Afonina 2004), but there are still large unexplored areas. Zackenberg Research Station, northeast Greenland, was established in 1995 with the purpose to describe an entire high-arctic ecosystem and monitor responses to climate change(Meltofte et al. 2008). However, the bryophyte flora of the research area is still to a large degree unexplored, and our current knowledge is fragmentary.

The large bulk of bryophytes collected from Greenland are deposited in herbarium C (Copenhagen), a list of the moss names in the herbarium was published by Goldberg (2003), consisting of 535 taxa, subspecies and varieties included, this is in agreement with Mogensen (1999) who estimated the number of moss species of Greenland to 478. The number of liverwort species was estimated to 135 by Mogensen (1999), while Damsholt (2013) in his flora of Greenland report 178 species. From northeast Greenland, defined as Kangerdlugssuaq (68° 11′N lat.) to Lamberts land, Kap Drygalski (79°10′N lat.), and Norske øer, Damsholt (unpubl.) report 98 liverwort taxa (subspecies included). For mosses 286 taxa (including varieties and subspecies) are kept in herb. C from northeast Greenland (defined as region E5, E6 and E7 according to Long 1985). This area includes the south side of the fjord Kangertittivaq (Scoresbysund) north to Danmark fjord and Prinsesse Thyra Ø. In comparison Frisvoll and Elvebakk (1996) report 85 liverwort and 288 moss species from the arctic archipelago Svalbard.

The flora of northeast Greenland is very interesting in a historical perspective with Plio-Pleistocene moss and other plant fossils from the Kap København Formation, I^e de France Formation and Store Koldewey Formation (Bennike et al. 2010). Early hypothesis of survival of plants since the Tertiary seems less likely in the light of glacial deposits (Funder 1979). There has, however, been mountain peaks (nunataks) that have escaped glaciation, and poikilohydric organisms like bryophytes and lichens may well have survived here (Gjærevoll and Ryvarden 1977). During the last glacial maximum rather large, though isolated, unglaciated areas were present in northeast Greenland (Funder 1979, Funder and Hansen 1996), and areas at Wollaston Forland and Clavering Ø seem to have been ice-free for at least 40 000 years. Bennike et al. (1999) points to the low summer temperatures during the last glacial maximum as the most critical factor for vascular plant survival, but they also points out that “a larger portion of other plant groups, such as bryophytes, lichens, fungi, and algae, whose members are often less dependent on climatic conditions than vascular plants, may have survived”. In situ survival has also been pointed out as a possible explanation for some occurrences of liverwort species in south Greenland (Schuster 1988). For many bryophytes moisture rather than temperature may have been the critical factor (Segreto et al. 2010). Thus survival of bryophytes in ice-free areas of northeast Greenland during the last glacial maximum seems possible.

The bryophyte flora of northeast Greenland may therefore be a mixture of survivors from the climatically warmer last interglacial which also consisted of species currently unknown in northeast Greenland (Hedenäs 1994), and long distance dispersal events after the last glaciations. The vegetation history, as reflected in pollen diagrams extending back to ca 10 000 years B.P., has shown that many species have dispersed from northern Europe and North America (Funder 1979). For spore producing organisms like bryophytes wind dispersal are probably the most important factor. For species lacking spore production bird dispersal or ice-rafted debris and driftwood are possible dispersal vectors (Johansen and Hytteborn 2001).

This study is part of the on-going research studying effects of climate change in the arctic Zackenberg valley, where long term monitoring of the flora in permanent plots is one component. The main aim of the current study is to describe the general moss and liverwort diversity of the area by compiling a species list of the bryophytes collected in the area together with reports from the literature.

Methods and study area

Study area

The Zackenberg study area (74°30′N, 20°30′W) is situated in The Northeast Greenland National Park (Fig. 1), the largest National Park in the world. It is situated in the high arctic, about 40 km west of the outer coast (Daneborg station) and about 70 km east of the permanent Greenland ice cap. Zackenberg area is close to the northernmost areas with extensive vegetation cover in lowland (Meltofte et al. 2008). The direct influence of human activity is minimal; Zackenberg research station was founded in 1995 and has since then hosted permanent staff and visiting scientists (June to August). Beside Daneborg weather station and Zackenberg research station the area is unpopulated by humans. However, there are old trappers huts and remains of fox trapping.

Figure 1.

Map of Greenland with The Northeast Greenland National Park and the position of Zackenberg indicated (red dot).

f01_66.jpg

Zackenberg area is rather mountainous, with peaks up to more than 1300 m a.s.l. The U-shaped valley is directed northeast from the fjord and is drained by Zackenbergelven. The Zackenberg study area is geologically divided by a fault zone separating areas with Cretaceous and Tertiary sandstones topped by basalts above about 600 m a.s.l. to the east of Zackenbergelven from Caledonian gneissic and granite bedrock to the west of the river (Meltofte et al. 2008).

Precipitation is rather low, about 250 mm year-1>, precipitation as rain is only 27 mm from June to September. The mean annual temperature is -9.5°C, monthly air temperature is around 3°–7°C in July and August, and goes down to -20°C during the period of polar night. The mean humidity, which is another important factors for bryophyte growth is between 60% and 80% throughout the year, being highest during the summer months (Hansen et al. 2008).

Beside the surrounding barren mountains the area is dominated by extensive wetlands at the valley bottom and other vegetation up to about 300 m a.s.l. Most of Greenland high-arctic landforms and biodiversity is represented in the area (Elberling et al. 2008, Meltofte and Rasch 2008). The vegetation cover, including those of bryophytes is mostly influenced by melting water availability, controlled by topography and snow distribution patterns. About 83% of the vegetation cover is situated at altitudes below 300 m a.s.l. Elberling et al. (2008) distinguish at least five plant communities. Fens in the lowland are wettest and have the highest biomass, bryophyte cover is up to 100%. Grasslands occur in lower sloping areas with adequate water supply during early growing period. Snow bed communities with the character species Salix arctica often occur in sloping areas, but can also be found close to the sea. Bryophyte cover in snow beds is about 60%. Heathlands dominated by Cassiope tetragona or Vaccinium uliginosum (the latter especially on the west side of the valley) are situated mostly on the slopes just below Dryas octopetala-dominated heaths. The latter shows decreasing vegetation cover with increasing altitude. In all types of heaths bryophytes are less dominant compared to lichens or phanerogams. These general patterns of increasing frequency and dominance of bryophytes from the dry heath vegetation to the moist fen vegetation were also confirmed by Hassel et al. (2012). Extraordinary dense bryophyte dominated vegetation are found in up to 100 m wide stripes of grasslands and fens bordering small runoffs of water at altitude between 150 and 300 m. Above 300 m the vegetation is more scattered and open soil is dominating over plant cover, but bryophytes are the dominant plant group (Hassel et al. 2012).

Methods

The area was visited by KH and TP from 19 August to 31 August 2009, HZ visited the area from 4 August to 11 August 2009. The general survey of the bryophyte vegetation was a secondary aim of our project and most collections were done on the way from the research station to the plots for the vegetation analysis. In addition we used one day west of the research station along the coast of Zackenberg bugt, and one day on the west side of the river north of the station up to the small lake area. The rest of the time was spent on the east side of the river and mainly in proximity to Zero line (Fredskild and Mogensen 1997). The GPS positions of our collections (Fig. 2), gives an indication of the area that we have covered. All species reported by us have been collected at least once and are deposited in herbarium TRH or at Vienna University. Information on all specimens deposited at herbarium TRH, including their geographic coordinates, are available through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility portal (< http://data.gbif.org>). Taxonomy follows with few exceptions Hill et al. (2006) for mosses, Damsholt (2013) for liverworts and Böcher et al. (1978) for vascular plants.

Results and discussion

In total 513 specimens collected by Hassel and Prestø are deposited in herbarium TRH and 123 specimens collected by Zechmeister are stored at Vienna University. Table 1 includes 212 taxa collected in the Zackenberg valley, of these 43 are liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and 169 mosses (Bryophyta). In addition Damsholt (2013) reports five species of liverworts (Gymnomitrion mucrophorum, Lophozia pellucida, Marsupella arctica, Cephaloziella grimsulana and Cephaloziella varians), and Fredskild and Mogensen (1997) eight mosses (Amphidium lapponicum, Bryum teres, Drepanocladus vernicosus, Heterocladium sp., Hymenostylium recurvirostre, Lyellia aspera, Pseudoleskeella sp. and Schistidium apocarpum). Herbarium TRH also has a specimen of Sphagnum balticum from Zackenberg collected by Westergaard and Dahl in 2007. Making the total number of taxa known from the valley 226 (48 liverworts and 178 mosses), this number is probably a good estimate for the bryophyte species diversity in the Zackenberg valley.

The ratio between liverworts and mosses in the Zackenberg valley is 0.26, this is slightly lower compared to the bryophyte flora of Svalbard (0.30; Frisvoll and Elvebakk 1996) and Norway mainland (0.34; Hassel et al. 2010), probably reflecting a gradient in humidity from the moist Norway to the more continental Arctic climate at Zackenberg.

It is difficult to compare the bryophyte floras of different areas due to differences in area, bryological activity, and taxonomic concepts that change through time, however, with this in mind we compare the bryophyte flora of Zackenberg valley with northern Ellesmere Island and Svalbard. The mosses of northern Ellesmere Island was investigated by Brassard (Brassard 1971, 1976) and 166 species were reported. For liverworts Damsholt (2013) report the occurrences on Ellesmere Island for the species included in his flora. For Svalbard Frisvoll and Elvebakk (1996) report 85 liverworts and 288 mosses. Taxa recorded in Zackenberg and also occurring at Svalbard or Ellesmere Island are indicated in Table 1. The bryophyte flora of Zackenberg clearly shows higher affinity with the Svalbard flora with 81% similarity for both liverworts and mosses compared with 67% and 60% similarity with the liverwort and moss flora of Ellesmere, respectively. The high similarity with Svalbard may be due to more efficient dispersal between the east coast of Greenland and Svalbard compared with Ellesmere Island. The Greenlandic ice cap is a major dispersal barrier for vascular plants (Eidesen et al. 2013) and most likely for bryophytes as well. These patterns are also supported by the concept of Arctic floristic provinces and sub-provinces for vascular plant diversity put forward by Yurtsev (1994), Walker et al. (2005) and Eidesen et al. (2013). According to this system the eastern Greenland and Svalbard — Franz-Josef sub-provinces belong to the North Atlantic floris tic province, while the Ellesmere — N. Greenland sub-province belong to the Canada floristic province.

Comments on new records, distribution and ecology

New records to Greenland

Lophochaete fryei (Perss.) R.M. Schust. was found in a wetland with Eriophorum scheuchzeri and Dupontia psilosantha on eroded peat in fen hummock, growing with Aulacomnium turgidum, Cephalozia bicuspidata, Blepharostoma trichophyllum ssp. brevirete and Tritomaria quinquedentata among Sphagnum girgensohnii (Fig. 3, TRH 691784). This arctic liverwort was described as late as 1946 from St. Lawrence Island, Alaska (Pearsson 1946). The distribution includes the Asiatic part of arctic Russia (Konstantinova et al. 1992), and arctic North America from Alaska to the west coast of Hudson Bay (Schuster 1966). The current report from northeast Greenland thus fills a significant gap of the known distribution and may indicate a circum arctic distribution. Lophochaete fryei belongs to an arctic floristic element suggested to have survived in ice free areas of low precipitation north of the continental ice sheaths during the large continental glaciations (Steere 1953). Zackenberg valley is shown to have been totally glaciated during the last glaciation (Bennike et al. 2008), but ice free areas existed in neighbouring areas on the east coast of Greenland (Funder and Hansen 1996). Genetic analyses would be necessary to reveal if the east Greenlandic population is a result of long distance dispersal from arctic Russia or North America or if it could be result of short distance dispersal from east Greenlandic glacial refugia after the deglaciation of Zackenberg valley. The specimen collected in Zackenberg valley was without gametangia or sporophytes, but sporophytes are known from arctic Alaska (Steere 1953).

Figure 2.

Collection points (green circles) for bryophytes during the investigations in the Zackenberg area by the authors during 2009. Red squares mark houses, the research station is in the centre of the map, while we see two trappers huts by the fjord.

f02_66.jpg

Table 1.

List of bryophyte species collected during August 2009. The frequency of the species is given as 1 rare, 2 sporadic and 3 common. For most species habitats are given. Species presence in northern Ellesmere Island (E) and Svalbard (S) are given according to Brassard (1971), Frisvoll and Elvebakk (1996) and Damsholt (2013).

t01a_66.gif

Continued

t01b_66.gif

Continued

t01c_66.gif

Continued

t01d_66.gif

Continued

t01e_66.gif

Continued

t01f_66.gif

Continued

t01g_66.gif

Figure 3.

Lophochaete fryei growing with Sphagnum girgensohnii and Aulacomnium turgidum. A single leaf is inserted. (photo K. Hassel).

f03_66.jpg

Orthothecium lapponicum (Schimp.) C. Hartm. was growing in a snow bed with Blepharostoma trichophyllum ssp. brevirete and Ranunculus pygmaeus (TRH 692720). This species is previously only known from northern Fennoscandia and Svalbard (Hedenäs 1988, Frisvoll and Elvebakk 1996), this record thus represents the first record outside Europe.

Figure 4.

Sphagnum orientale growing in fens south of Zackenberg research station. (photo K. Hassel).

f04_66.jpg

Pohlia vexans (Limpr.) H. Lindb. was found on in wetland with Eriophorum and Dupontia (TRH 692740). The species had sporophytes and was growing on moist, disturbed soil. In Europe Pohlia vexans is previously known from Russia, Sweden, Norway and the Alps, but not from Svalbard (Frisvoll and Elvebakk 1996). In Asia it is known from south Siberia and Arctic Far East (Ignatov et al. 2006). In North America it is known mainly from Canada and Alaska on disturbed substrates, mainly clay along streams (Shaw 2009).

Sphagnum orientale L.I. Saviez is reported new to Greenland (Fig. 4). The oldest record of S. orientale in the Zackenberg area seems to be from 1947 (K. Holmen) but the specimens were named S. subsecundum. The main habitat of S. orientale in Zackenberg area was fens, but it was also found in moist Vaccinium uliginosum heathland and Salix arctica snow beds. The altitude ranges from 5–78 m a.s.l. In 2011 K. I. Flatberg (herbarium TRH) revised S. subsecundum in herbarium C. He identified 20 specimens of S. orientale from 16 localities, all in northeast Greenland (Table 2). These range from 70°N by Hurry Inlet to 76° N on Store Koldewey. Sphagnum orientale is previously re- ported from Alaska and arctic Canada (McQueen and Andrus 2007) but not from Europe (Hill et al. 2006). Sphagnum orientale also occur in Russia from Arctic Far East and southwards to south Far East, through Yakutia, east Siberia and northwards to Arctic west Siberia (Ignatov et al. 2006).

Table 2.

Sphagnum orientale from northeast Greenland in herb. C and TRH. All specimens revised by Kjell lvar Flatberg.

t02_66.gif

Tortella alpicola Dixon is reported new to Greenland (Fig. 5, TRH 692885). It was found growing on cliffs close by the fjord (11 m a.s.l.) west of the Zackenberg research station and the trappers cabin. In North America the species is previously mainly known from a western corridor from Arizona to Alaska and a single locality from Quebec (Eckel 1998), our record is thus the second from eastern North America. The distribution seem to be scattered throughout northern Eurasia (Otnyukova et al. 2004), with recent reports from western Europe (Hassel and Høitomt 2013). Tortella alpicola is most likely confused with Tortella fragilis (Hooker & Wilson) Limpricht, but is separated, even in the field by its small size, whitish leaf bases and fragile leaf tips (Fig. 5, 6).

New records to east Greenland

Riccardia latifrons (Lindb.) Lindb. (TRH 692759, shore of periodic pond, growing with Blepharostoma trichophyllum and Cephalozia sp. Riccardia latifrons is known from south Greenland (Schuster 1988), but not from east Greenland (Damsholt 2013). The plants were small and the first thought was that this is R. incurvata. Oil-bodies of the specimen should have been checked on fresh material, but this was not done. However, the transverse section of the thallus is not lunate, but biconvex. It produces abundantly with gemmae (ca 25 × 35 µm) on short side branches along the main axes. The size of the gemmae resembles that described for R. latifrons and is smaller than R. chamedryfolia, the latter is also very rare with gemmae according to Schuster (1992).

Tritomaria exsectiformis (Breidl.) Schiffner ex Loeske was growing on rocks in Vaccinium uliginosum heath together with Saelania glaucescens, Bartramia ithyphylla and Scapania sp. (TRH 693401). It is known both from Svalbard and arctic Russia (Konstantinova et al. 1992, Frisvoll and Elvebakk 1996).

Grimmia plagiopodia Hedw. (TRH 692436 and 692905), was found growing in dry calcareous situations, once on rock in Cassiope tetragona heath with Tortula hoppeana, Syntrichia ruralis and Sciuro-hypnum glaciale and once in Dryas octopetala heath with Carex nardina. It was found with sporophytes. There is one report from Svalbard, but Frisvoll and Elvebakk (1996) does not include it as they find it likely that it is confused with the more common G. anodon. In light of the rather wide North American distribution of G. plagiopodia our records from Zackenberg is not surprising, the closest known localities eastwards are from northwestern Greenland and Ellesmere Island and westwards from Iceland (Hastings and Ochyra 2007).

Sphagnum olafii Flatberg is reported new to northeast Greenland (TRH 691296, 691297, 691298, 691301, 691303, 691304, 691306, 691307, 691308, 691315, 674726 and 674727). The species was found in intermediate fens in the lowlands around Zackenberg Research Station. It grows both in fen lawns and forms hummocks. The new findings in northeast Greenland shorten the distribution gap between western Greenland and Svalbard. Flatberg (2007) reported S. olafii new to Greenland based on specimens from Qeqertarsuaq and Illulissat in western Greenland. This was the first report of the species outside Svalbard. The species was described by Flatberg (1993) based on plants from central part of Spitsbergen, the largest of the Svalbard islands. In 2007 Flatberg found S. olafii in Canada, Quebec in arctic mire and fen lawn in Nunavik (Ivujivik and Salluit, herbarium TRH, DUKE). According to Flatberg (2007) records of S. olafii outside Svalbard makes it more likely that S. olafii and its relative S. arcticum do not have a common in situ ancestor in Svalbard but have different polyploid origins. S. olafii may have reached Svalbard during the Holocene, via spores or vegetative diaspores (Flatberg 2007). Surprisingly, S. olafii was found with numerous sporophytes in the Zackenberg Area in 2009 (Fig. 7). Sporophytes in Sphagnum are rare in northern parts of the Arctic. Neither S. olafii or other Sphagnum spp. in Svalbard are found with sporophytes (Flatberg 2007). The amount of sporophytes in 2009 may be related to special climatic conditions. The 2009 season in Zackenberg Area was characterized by unusual small amounts of snow, and a very early snowmelt, with snow disappearing several weeks earlier than registered before (Sigsgaard et al. 2010).

Figure 5.

Tortella alpicola, habitus of specimens TRH 692885. showing the characteristic whitish leaf bases. (photo K. Hassel).

f05_66.jpg

Figure 6.

Leaf apices of Tortella alpicola, note the constrictions along the fragile tip of the leafs. (photo K. Hassel).

f06_66.jpg

Comments on other taxa

Riccia sorocarpa ssp. arctica R.M. Schust. was found on four localities in the area (TRH 692573, 692602, 692880, 693405). This taxon was described from west Greenland and is known with only one old locality from east Greenland (Schuster 1992). The taxon does not seem to be reported outside Greenland, but could be overlooked. It was found growing on disturbed soil in in a wide range of habitats like Carex rupestris—Dryas octopetala heath, soil by brook and boulders, soil-covered cliffs, and Anthelia juratzkana-snow bed. Spore characters separate ssp. arctica from the nominate form, by locally developed or lacking wing margin, smaller spore diameter, and smaller diameter of alveoles (Schuster 1992). One of our specimens (TRH 692602) had mature spores and the spores showed little variation in size and were about 70 µm in diameter. The spores had a narrow irregular wing margin, and the diameters of alveoles were 6.4–8.9 µm. One specimen (TRH 692880) had purplish pigmentation on the ventral side of the thallus.

Riccardia sp. At an earlier point one specimen (TRH 692837) were det. Riccardia cf. incurvata, however a critical revision (by KH 13.05.2013) of the material place some uncertainty about this determination and we have chosen to refer to the specimen as Riccardia sp. Riccardia sp. grows in rich fen lawn with Rhizomnium andrewsianum. This specimen was the basis for the first report of Riccardia incurvata from Greenland and the reason for its inclusion in Damsholt (2013). Riccardia incurvata thus still needs to be confirmed for Greenland. (Another Riccardia sp. is specimen TRH 693382).

Bryoxiphium norvegicum (Brid.) Mitt., this fascinating species was growing on exposed ridges often together with Dryas octopetala. It made dense cushions packed with sand. The plants were small of growth, but this can be due to the tough environment on the ridges. This habitat is in strong contrast to the sheltered rock walls the species usually grows on in Iceland, here also the plants get larger and are commonly fruiting. Based on the habitat where B. norvegicum is found in at Zackenberg it is surprising that the species do not have a wider arctic distribution. In the Arctic region B. norvegicum is only known from Alaska, Yakutia and Chukotka (Ignatov et al. 2006, Purseil 2007), but not reported from Ellesmere Island or Svalbard (Brassard 1971, Frisvoll and Elvebakk 1996). In Europe it is only known from Iceland.

Figure 7.

Sphangnum olafii, for the first time recorded with sporophytes in Zackenberg valley, (photo K. Hassel).

f07_66.jpg

Bryum axel-blyttii H. Philib. is not reported from Greenland, but due to different taxonomic traditions collections representing this taxon may exist under B. calophyllum R. Br. We recorded B. axel-blyttii twice growing at riverbanks (TRH 692750, 692747). Holyoak (2004) treat this taxon and Bryum acutiforme Limpr. as synonyms of Bryum calophyllum R. Br. However Zolotov (2006) argues to keep B. axel-blyttii and B. calophyllum as separate taxa based on leaf and peristome morphology.

Ceratodon purpureus var. obtusifolius Limpr. (Syn. Ceratodon heterophyllus Kindb.) This taxon is often not recognised and is included in C. purpureus (Hill et al. 2006). The main reason for this seems to be the variable leaf morphology of C. purpureus. However, when sporophytes are available the var. obtusifolius is separated from the nominate variety by the larger spores 19–21 µm versus 11–14 µm (McIntosh 2007). The specimen from Zackenberg was growing in a snow bed or wet depression, it was abundantly fruiting. Spores were generally large, but size and varied from 17 to 28 µm. Associated species were Scapania scandica and Lophozia sp. (TRH 692455). Ceratodon purpureus var. obtusifolius is not earlier reported from Greenland to our knowledge, but it is very likely that herbarium specimens exist.

Polytrichum cf. jensenii I. Hagen, this taxon has earlier been included in the P. commune complex (Nyholm 1969), but is currently recognised at the species level (Hill et al. 2006). The material from Zackenberg is problematic to identify, but is quite similar to the description of the type of P. jensenii as referred by Frisvoll and Elvebakk (1996). Our specimen (TRH 692472) has fragile leaves, incurved and edentate leaf margin, and a short hyaline to brownish leaf point. However, the top cells of the lamellae are not deeply furrowed, but rather irregular in shape (Fig. 8). The plants were growing in a rich fen community with e.g. Bryum pseudotriquetrum, Cinclidium arcticum and Meesia triquetra.

Tortella tortuosa var. fragilifolia (Jur.) Limpr., was found only once in a snow bed with Ranunculus pygmaeus and Salix arctica. It was suspected to be Tortella tortuosa var. arctica (Arnell) Broth., as it is described to grow in moist to wet habitats from e.g. Ellesmere Island (Brassard 1971). Frisvoll and Elvebakk (1996) in their treatment of the Svalbard flora only refer to the nominate variety of T. tortuosa. It is thus a little bit surprising that it is the variety fragilifolia that is recorded in this study.

Figure 8.

Polytrichum cf. jensenii with irregular shape of the top cells of the lamellae. (photo K. Hassel).

f08_66.jpg

Species searched for but not found

During the field investigation we were looking for several species that we could not find. Based on our experience from other areas there were suitable habitats, but we were not able to demonstrate the occurrence of e.g. Rhytidium rugosum, Paludella squarrosa, Schistidium holmenianum, Bryum wrigthii or Cinclidium latifolium in the Zackenberg area. Brassard (1971) also reported several interesting species from northern Ellesmere Island that we have not been able to record from the Zackenberg area e.g. Aulacomnium acuminatum, Orthothecium acuminatum, Pterygoneurum arcticum, Desmatodon ellesmerensis (syn. Pseudocrossidium obtusulum).

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Niels Martin Schmidt for inviting KH and TP to Zackenberg. Travel and stay of HZ was funded by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research, within the research programmes ‘Sparkling Science’ and FERMAP (Franz Josef Land Environmental Research, Monitoring and Assessment Programme). Kjell Ivar Flatberg has revised the Sphagnum material and put to our disposition the results of his revision of S. orientale from herbarium C. Hans H. Blom has revised the Schistidium material. Lars Hedenäs, Heribert Köckinger and Kell Damsholt have helped us with identification of selected specimens.

References

1.

Afonina, O. M. 2004. Moss flora of Chukotka. — St. Petersburg. Google Scholar

2.

Bennike, O., Björck, S., Böcher, J. et al. 1999. Early Holocene plant and animal remains from northeast Greenland. — J. Biogeogr. 26: 667–677. Google Scholar

3.

Bennike, O., Sorensen, M., Fredskild, B. et al. 2008. Late quaternary environmental and cultural changes in the Wollaston Forland region, northeast Greenland. — In: Meltofte, H. et al. (eds), Advances in ecological research. High-arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. Academic Press, pp. 45–79. Google Scholar

4.

Bennike, O. L. E., Knudsen, K. L., Abrahamsen, N. et al. 2010. Early Pleistocene sediments on Store Koldewey, northeast Greenland. — Boreas 39: 603–619. Google Scholar

5.

Brassard, G. R. 1971. The mosses of northern Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. II. Annotated list of the taxa. — Bryologist 74: 282–311. Google Scholar

6.

Brassard, G. R. 1976. The mosses of northern Ellesmere Island, Arctic Canada. III. New or additional records. — Bryologist 79: 480–487. Google Scholar

7.

Böcher, T. W., Fredskild, B., Holmen, K. et al. 1978. Grønlands Flora. — P.Hasse and søns forlag, København. Google Scholar

8.

Damsholt, K. 2013. The liverworts of Greenland. — Nord. Bryol. Soc. Lund. Google Scholar

9.

Eckel, P. M. 1998. Re-evaluation of Tortella (Musci, Pottiaceae) in conterminous USA and Canada with a treatment of the European species Tortella nitida. — Bull. Buffalo Soc. Nat. Sci. 36: 117–191. Google Scholar

10.

Eidesen, P. B., Ehrich, D., Bakkestuen, V. et al. 2013. Genetic roadmap of the Arctic: plant dispersal highways, traffic barriers and capitals of diversity. — New Phytol. 200: 898–910. Google Scholar

11.

Elberling, B., Tamstorf, M. P., Michelsen, A. et al. 2008. Soil and plant community-characteristics and dynamics at Zackenberg. — In: Meltofte, H. et al. (eds), Advances in ecological research. High-arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. Academic Press, pp. 223–248. Google Scholar

12.

Flatberg, K. I. 1993. Sphagnum olafii (Sect. Acutifolia), a new peat-moss from Svalbard. — J. Bryol. 17: 613–620. Google Scholar

13.

Flatberg, K. I. 2007. Contributions to the Sphagnum flora of West Greenland, with Sphagnum concinnum stat. et sp. nov. — Lindbergia 32: 88–95. Google Scholar

14.

Fredskild, B. and Mogensen, G. S. 1997. Zero line, final report 1997. A description of the plant communities along the ZERO line from Young Sund to the top of Aucellabjerg and the common plant communities in the Zackenberg valley, northeast Greenland. — Danish Polar Center and Botanical Museum, Univ. of Copenhagen, 36. Google Scholar

15.

Frisvoll, A. A. and Elvebakk, A. 1996. Part 2. Bryophytes. — In: Elvebakk, A. and Prestrud, P. (eds), A catalouge of Svalbard plants, fungi, algae and cyanobacteria. Norsk Polarinst. Skrifter, pp. 57–172. Google Scholar

16.

Funder, S. 1979. Ice-age plant refugia in east Greenland. — Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 28: 279–295. Google Scholar

17.

Funder, S. and Hansen, L. 1996. The Greenland ice sheet — a model for its culmination and decay during and after the last glacial maximum. — Bull. Geol. Soc. Den. 42: 137–152. Google Scholar

18.

Gjærevoll, O. and Ryvarden, L. 1977. Botanical investigations on the J. A. D. Jensens Nunatakker in Greenland. — Det Kongelige Norske Videnskabers Selskap skrifter 40: 1–40. Google Scholar

19.

Goldberg, I. 2003. < www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/MossesOfGreenland.pdf>. Mosses of Greenland: list of species in the Herbarium C. Google Scholar

20.

Hansen, B. U., Sigsgaard, C., Rasmussen, L. et al. 2008. Presentday climate at Zackenberg. — In: Meltofte, H. et al. (eds), Advances in ecological research. High-arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. Academic Press, pp. 111–149. Google Scholar

21.

Hassel, K. and Høitomt, T. 2013. Tortella vrimoseslekta i Norge, nye arter og arter vi kan være på utkikk etter [The genus Tortella in Norway, new species and species to look for]. — Blyttia 71: 215–224. Google Scholar

22.

Hassel, K., Blom, H. H., Flatberg, K.I. et al. 2010. Moser Anthocerophyta, Marchantiophyta, Bryophyta. — In: Kålås, J. A. et al. (eds), Norsk rødliste for arter 2010. The 2010 Norwegian Red List for Species. Artsdatabanken, pp. 139–153. Google Scholar

23.

Hassel, K., Prestø, T. and Schmidt, N. M. 2012. Bryophyte diversity in high and low arctic Greenland. Establishment of permanent monitoring transects and bryophyte mapping in Zackenberg and Kobbefjord 2009–2010. — Scientific Report from DCE — Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, pp. 1–46. Google Scholar

24.

Hastings, R. I. and Ochyra, R. 2007. 15. Grimmiaceae Arnott. — In: Crosby, M. R. et al. (eds), Flora of North America, pp. 231–233. Google Scholar

25.

Hedenäs, L. 1988. The status of Orthothecium lapponicum and O. complanatum (Musci, Plagiotheciaceae). — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 25: 153–157. Google Scholar

26.

Hedenäs, L. 1994. Bryophytes from the last interglacial/glacial cycle, Jameson Land, east Greenland. — Boreas 23:488–494. Google Scholar

27.

Hill, M. O., Bell, N., Bruggeman-Nannenga, M. A. et al. 2006. An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and Macaronesia. — J. Bryol. 28: 198–267. Google Scholar

28.

Holmen, K. 1960. The mosses of Pery Land north Greenland. — Meddelelser om Grønland, pp. 1–96. Google Scholar

29.

Holyoak, D. T. 2004. Taxonomic notes on some European species of Bryum (Bryopsida : Bryaceae). — J. Bryol. 26: 247–264. Google Scholar

30.

Ignatov, M. S., Afonina, O. M. and Ignatova, E. A. 2006. Check-list of mosses of east Europe and north Asia. — Arctoa 15: 1–130. Google Scholar

31.

Johansen, S. and Hytteborn, H. 2001. A contribution to the discussion of biota dispersal with drift ice and driftwood in the North Atlantic. — J. Biogeogr. 28: 105–115. Google Scholar

32.

Konstantinova, N. A., Potemkin, A. D. and Schljakov, R. N. 1992. Check-list of the Hepaticae and Anthocerorotae of the former USSR. — Arctoa 1: 87–127. Google Scholar

33.

Long, D. G. 1985. Polytrichaceae. — In: Mogensen, G. S. (ed.), Illustrated moss flora of arctic North America and Greenland. 1. Meddel. Grønland, Biosci. 17: 9–57. Google Scholar

34.

Longton, R. E. 1988. The biology of polar bryophytes and lichens. — Cambridge Univ. Press. Google Scholar

35.

McIntosh, T. T. 2007. Ceratodon Bridel, Bryol. Univ. 1: 480. 1826. — In: Crosby, M. R. et al. (eds), Flora of North America. Vol. 27. Bryophytes: Mosses, part 1. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

36.

McQueen, C. B. and Andrus, R. E. 2007. 2. Sphagnaceae Dumortier. — In: Crosby, M. R. et al. (eds), Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 27. Bryophyta, part 1. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 45–101. Google Scholar

37.

Meltofte, H. and Rasch, M. 2008. The study area at Zackenberg. — In: Meltofte, H. et al. (eds), Advances in ecological research. High-arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. Academic Press, pp. 101–110. Google Scholar

38.

Meltofte, H., Christensen, T. C., Elberling, B. et al. (eds) 2008. Advances in ecological research. High-Arctic ecosystem dynamics in a changing climate. — Academic Press. Google Scholar

39.

Mogensen, G. S. 1999. Moser. — In: Born, E. W. and Böcher, J. (eds), Grønlands økologi. Atuakkiorfik Undervisning, pp. 258–263. Google Scholar

40.

Nyholm, E. 1969. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. II. Musci, fase. 6. — Nat. Sci. Res. Council, Lund. Google Scholar

41.

Otnyukova, T. N., Ignatova, E. A., Ignatov, M. S. et al. 2004. New records of Tortella alpicola Dix. in Eurasia. — Arctoa 13: 197–201. Google Scholar

42.

Pearsson, H. 1946. Some Alaskan and Yukon bryophytes. — Bryologist 49: 41–58. Google Scholar

43.

Pursell, R. A. 2007. 20. Bryoxiphiaceae Bescherelle. — In: Crosby, M. R. et al. (eds), Flora of North America. Vol. 27. Bryophytes: Mosses, part 1. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 329–330. Google Scholar

44.

Schuster, R. M. 1966. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America. Vol. 1. — Columbia Univ. Press. Google Scholar

45.

Schuster, R. M. 1988. The Hepaticae of south Greenland. — Nova Hedwigia 92: 1–255. Google Scholar

46.

Schuster, R. M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America east of the hundredth meridian. Vol. V. — Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Chicago, IL. Google Scholar

47.

Schuster, R. M. 1992. The Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of North America east of the hundredth meridian. Vol. VI. — Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Chicago, IL. Google Scholar

48.

Schuster, R. M., Steere, W. C. and Thomson, J. W. 1959. The terrestrial cryptogams of northern Ellesmere Island. — Natl Mus. Can. Bull. 164: 1–123. Google Scholar

49.

Segreto, R., Hassel, K., Bardal, R. et al. 2010. Desiccation tolerance and natural cold acclimation allow cryopreservation of bryophytes without pretreatment or use of cryoprotectants. — Bryologist 113: 760–769. Google Scholar

50.

Shaw, A. J. 2009. Mielichhoferiaceae. — Bryophyte flora of North America, Provisional Publication: < www.mobot.org/plantscience/BFNA/V2/MielMielichhoferiaceae.htm>. Google Scholar

51.

Sigsgaard, C., Thorsø, K., Lund, M. et al. 2010. Zackenberg basic: the Climate Basis and Geo Basis programmes. — In: Jensen, L. M. and Rasch, M. (eds), Zackenberg ecological research operations, 15th Ann. Rep. 2009, pp. 12–35. Google Scholar

52.

Steere, W. C. 1953. On the geographical distribution of arctic bryophytes. — Stanford Univ. Publ. Biol. Sci. 11: 30–47. Google Scholar

53.

Steere, W. C. 1978. The mosses of Arctic Alaska. — J. Cramer, Vaduz. Google Scholar

54.

Steere, W. C. and Inoue, H. 178. The hepaticae of Arctic Alaska. — J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 44: 251–345. Google Scholar

55.

Walker, D. A., Raynolds, M. K., Daniëls, F. J. A. et al. 2005. The circumpolar Arctic vegetation map. — J. Veg. Sci. 16: 267–282. Google Scholar

56.

Yurtsev, B. A. 1994. Floristic division of the Arctic. — J. Veg. Sci. 5: 765–776. Google Scholar

57.

Zolotov, V. I. 2006. On systematics and distribution of some species of Bryum (Bryaceae, Bryophyta) in Russia. — Arctoa 15: 155–162. Google Scholar
© 2014 The Authors. This is an Open Access article.
Kristian Hassel, Harald Zechmeister, and Tommy Prestø "Mosses (Bryophyta) and liverworts (Marchantiophyta) of the Zackenberg valley, northeast Greenland," Lindbergia 37(2), 66-84, (1 January 2014). https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01051
Accepted: 17 October 2014; Published: 1 January 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
19 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top