Translator Disclaimer
6 May 2016 Addressing Onsite Sampling in Analysis of Recreation Demand: Economic Value and Impact of Visitation to Cape Hatteras National Seashore
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This article presents a unified approach to correcting for avidity bias due to onsite sampling in estimation of descriptive statistics and recreation demand. We extend the Shaw (1988) correction for avidity bias in demand modeling to the Generalized Negative Binomial model, and we demonstrate the effects of avidity bias on descriptive statistics. Correcting for avidity bias in recreation demand lowers welfare estimates, which are still, however, quite large at $403/household, per trip (2002 USD). Correcting expenditure estimates increases economic impact by 17%, reflecting greater magnitude in spending patterns of less avid users that live further from Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

JEL Codes: C83, Q26, Q51.

© 2016 MRE Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.
Craig E. Landry, Alyson R. Lewis, Haiyong Liu, and Hans Vogelsong "Addressing Onsite Sampling in Analysis of Recreation Demand: Economic Value and Impact of Visitation to Cape Hatteras National Seashore," Marine Resource Economics 31(3), (6 May 2016). https://doi.org/10.1086/686892
Received: 30 June 2014; Accepted: 1 November 2015; Published: 6 May 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
22 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top