Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2015 Rapid Vulnerability Assessment of Yartsa Gunbu (Ophiocordyceps sinensis [Berk.] G.H. Sung et al) in Pithoragarh District, Uttarakhand State, India
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Any resource of high value and relevance to rural livelihoods is at risk of overexploitation. The anthropogenic pressure on the caterpillar fungus, Ophiocordyceps sinensis (Berk.) G.H. Sung, J.M. Sung, Hywel-Jones & Spatafora 2007, commonly referred to as yartsa gunbu, is intense, especially given the absence of traditional sustainable collection techniques. Stable harvests are the result of 2 factors: more people searching more intensely and extensively and the ongoing discovery of new areas for harvest. Increasing international demand and prices (presently around US$ 20,000 per kg) have resulted not just in overexploitation but also in the degradation of the fungus’s habitat, thus endangering its future viability. This article reports on a rapid vulnerability assessment involving 2511 harvesters in 9 broad study sites and 110 villages in the Pithoragarh district in Uttarakhand state, India, in the central Himalaya, and recommends ways to lessen the pressure on this valuable species.

Introduction

Ophiocordyceps sinensis (Berk.) G.H. Sung, J.M. Sung, Hywel-Jones & Spatafora 2007, commonly referred to as yartsa gunbu, which translates from Tibetan as “winter worm, summer grass,” and in Kumaun and Garhwal Himalaya as keera ghaas, referring to the larva (keera) and the emergent fruiting body that resembles sprouting grass (ghaas), is a genus of mostly entomophagous flask fungi (Pyrenomycetes, Ascomycotina) belonging to the family Ophiocordycipitaceae. The parasitic fungus grows on and derives nutrients from around 60 species of lepidopteran larva in the Himalayan and Tibetan Plateau (Chu et al 2004; Sung et al 2007; Wang and Yao 2011), primarily those belonging to the genus Thitarodes (previously Hepialus), a moth species belonging to the order Lepidoptera and the family Hepialidae, globally represented by 60 genera and 587 species (Nielsen et al 2000), often referred to as ghost moths. Yartsa gunbu consists of a completely mummified larva, filled and coated with mycelia, with a slender, brown, club-shaped fruiting body that usually emerges from the ground just above the eyes of the larva, reaching a total length of 8–15 cm (Figure 1A). The fruiting body emerges around mid-May, as soon as the snow melts. By mid-July, the collection season is over, but mature fruit bodies with low value are reported to persist until mid-August (Negi et al 2006; Negi et al 2014).

FIGURE 1 

Yartsa gunbu: (A) the pinkish-brown stroma (fruiting body) emerging from the soil; (B) after harvesting. The harvest is cleaned with a toothbrush in the field and often dried in the sun.

i0276-4741-35-4-382-f01.tif

Ophiocordyceps sinensis contains a broad range of compounds that are considered nutritional (Hobbs 1995; Holliday et al 2004). The pharmacological qualities ascribed to the fungus include antitumor, antimetastatic, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, insecticidal, antimicrobial, hypolipidemic, hypoglycemic, antiaging, neuroprotective, and renoprotective effects. Polysaccharides account for anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antitumor, antimetastatic, immunomodulatory, hypoglycemic, steroidogenic, and hypolipidemic effects; cordycepin contributes to antitumor, insecticidal, and antibacterial effects; and ergosterol (a universal fungal compound) exhibits antitumor and immunomodulatory effects (Negi et al 2006).

Collection of yartsa gunbu (Figure 1B) is a recent activity that can be traced back 20–25 years. Over the past 2 decades, however, increasing international demand for yartsa gunbu and concomitantly increasing prices—presently between US$ 13,000 and US$ 20,000 per kilogram—have resulted in heavy exploitation and degradation of the prized species’ habitat, endangering its future viability. Rapid vulnerability assessment (RVA) is an effective tool to assess the status of a species in the wild and its future viability (Aumeeruddy-Thomas et al 1999:17). While RVA has been conducted in Bhutan (Namgyel 2003), Tibet Autonomous Region (Winkler 2008), and Nepal (Aryal et al 2008), a similar exercise has not been conducted so far in India. This study, in addition to carrying out an RVA, conducted a comparative assessment of the different local livelihoods to inform efforts to lessen the pressure on the species.

Methodology

Study area

The study was conducted in the district of Pithoragarh, Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. The study sites, all alpine meadows, are 3200–4700 m above mean sea level and lie at 80o15′–81o5′E longitude and 29o5′–30o32′N latitude (Figure 2). The sites exhibit considerable variation in precipitation, with an average annual rainfall of 150–200 mm. The survey, which lasted 2 years (2012–2013), covered 110 villages in 9 large study sites or landscapes (Johaar, Darma, Vyas, Gori Paar, Choudas, Kanar, Metali, Ranthi, and Jumma), 902 families, and 2511 harvesters.

FIGURE 2 

Map of the study area. The study sites are restricted to the alpine meadows (3100–4700 masl). (Map by Tarun Kumar)

i0276-4741-35-4-382-f02.tif

Rapid vulnerability assessment

To assess the sustainability of wild plant harvesting, it is necessary to understand the natural distribution, abundance, population structure (density, age/size distribution, number of mature individuals) and population dynamics (mortality, recruitment, growth, and reproductive rates) of the target species, and how these vary across space and time (Hall and Bawa 1993; Boot and Gullison 1995; Gould et al 1998).

RVA—primarily attributed to Cunningham (1994, 1996, 2001) but most specifically explored by Wild and Mutebi (1996) and Watts et al (1996)—builds on several methodologies and involves collecting information about characteristics that help determine whether a plant is vulnerable to overharvesting. Species vulnerability is evaluated according to a set of criteria of sustainability, including life-form, habitat specificity, abundance and distribution, growth rate, response to harvesting, growth stage at harvest, patterns of selection and use, demand, seasonal harvesting, traditional conservation practices, commercialization, and the availability of substitutes (Wild and Mutebi 1996; Wong et al 2001).

The integration of local knowledge with scientific data facilitates triangulation, makes it possible to collect information more quickly, and promotes cooperation between local communities and outside experts in making appropriate management decisions (Wild and Mutebi 1996). Further, the integration of ecological, social, and economic factors determines whether the species is vulnerable to harvesting (Wild and Mutebi 1996; Aumeeruddy-Thomas et al 1999).

Data collection

Information was elicited through an open-ended questionnaire with questions about yartsa gunbu as well as means of livelihood—agriculture, livestock raising, and gathering of medicinal and aromatic plants from the wild. RVA was adapted for use in the study.

The broad parameters used to assess the status of yartsa gunbu were as follows:

  • For population size and frequency, phytosociology (Ralhan et al 1982) was conducted. For population assessments of the host insect (Thitarodes), 1-cubic-foot (0.028 m3) pits were dug, and the larvae were counted by hand.

  • For habitat specificity, life form, and reproductive biology (reproductive capacity, sporulation, spore dispersal, sprouting), the literature was consulted.

  • For yield, habitat reduction, harvesting community, access, demand, market price, commercialization, and traditional conservation practices, interviews were conducted using an open-ended questionnaire, primarily with the head of the family, often jointly with village elders.

Based on the information collected through the RVA, an assessment of the vulnerability of 8 ecological and 9 socioeconomic factors was conducted, using scores from 1–3 for low to high vulnerability.

Results and discussion

The total vulnerability score for yartsa gunbu elicited through the RVA was 39 for 17 factors. Low vulnerability was scored in 3 parameters, moderate vulnerability in 6 parameters, and high vulnerability in 8 parameters (Table 1). The predominance of high vulnerability scores is enough to categorize the species as vulnerable.

TABLE 1 

Factors studied in the RVA to assess the vulnerability of yartsa gunbu. Shaded cells represent the categories selected to derive the final vulnerability score.

i0276-4741-35-4-382-t01.tif

Ecological factors determining availability

Population size

This is one of the most important factors affecting plant vulnerability and relates directly to the quantity of the material available for harvest (Wild and Mutebi 1996). The population size of yartsa gunbu, in terms of yield per hectare, is relatively low in the study area: on average 600, compared with 4200, reported from some good habitat sites in Tibet Autonomous Region 15 years ago (Chen et al 2000). The finding of a lower yield in the study area than in Tibet is strengthened by the finding that in Johaar, Darma, and Gori Paar valleys—where the harvest is strictly limited to local villagers and the number of harvesters remained about the same, thus leading to comparable results between the years—the yield declined from 2008 to 2012 (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3 

Estimated yield of yartsa gunbu in the 9 study sites, 2008–2012, according to study participants.

i0276-4741-35-4-382-f03.tif

This finding is similar to that reported by Shrestha and Bawa (2013, 2014), who showed that the harvest decreased significantly, from 261–212 pieces per person in 2006 to 126–97 in 2010, suggesting overexploitation. Yield decline by 70% from 1978 to 2001 has been reported in China (Tsim and Shao 2005). In Bhutan, 70% of harvesters viewed overexploitation and habitat destruction as major factors in the decline of the Chinese caterpillar fungus (Shrivastava 2010).

Distribution

A species with a wider distribution is obviously less vulnerable than one endemic to a small area (Stockdale 2005). Even though the yartsa gunbu yield per hectare has declined according to the information collected during the RVA, the overall yield has increased then remained more or less steady in the study period (Figure 4), because every year new harvest sites are added and existing sites are enlarged as harvesters explore more inaccessible patches.

FIGURE 4 

(A) Yartsa gunbu total yield and income generated for study participants, 2008–2012; (B) Study participants’ main income sources in 2012 (INR 60  =  US$ 1).

i0276-4741-35-4-382-f04.tif

Frequency

Frequency also affects the profitability of the harvest. Harvesting a highly scattered resource takes more time and may negatively affect the ecosystem in the search area (Peters 1996). In our study area, frequency of yartsa gunbu is higher than in other areas, and distribution is scattered. However, its availability with regard to frequency is likely to decline with the observed decline, not just in the overall habitat area but also in vegetation, including among woody species such as Rhododendron campanulatum, R. anthopogon, and Juniperus communis, on whose roots the yartsa gunbu host larva feeds.

The medicinal properties of yartsa gunbu are said to be enhanced by the close proximity of highly valued plants, including Rhododendron setosum, R. anthopogon, Delphinium spp, Nardostachys jatamansi, Picrorhiza kurrooa, and Rheum spp. (Wu 1997; Zang and Kinjo 1998). As plants and their seeds occur in the fungal colonized zone, it might be speculated that the fungus has a role in plant preservation and that it ultimately contributes to seed bank longevity (Chee-Sanford 2008). Whether the relationship is mutualistic has yet to be studied; however, during the yartsa gunbu harvest, a number of the aforementioned medicinal and aromatic plants are also harvested, as are fuelwood species. The fact that the yartsa gunbu harvesters now have to procure fuelwood from 100–200 m away in the forests below their camps substantiates the previous argument.

Habitat specificity

Yartsa gunbu occurs in alpine meadows at elevations of 3200–4700 m, a relatively wide zone. However, mountain topography, especially in the alpine zone, contains a great variety of microhabitats, which narrows the niche.

Life-form

A plant’s life-form offers the possibility of easily ascertaining some of its ecological characteristics, such as growth rate, production to biomass ratio, reproduction, and longevity (Rutherford and Westfall 1986). A slow-growing, long-lived, slow-reproducing species is more vulnerable than a fast-growing, short-lived, or fast-reproducing species. The life-form of yartsa gunbu is a complex of 2 different species; while Ophiocordyceps sinensis (the fungal component) is fast growing, the emergence of the host species (Thitarodes sp) from its diapause condition may extend for a considerable period of time (2–4 years). In other words, ambient conditions that are favorable for the fungus may not be the favorable for the host.

Reproductive capacity and spore dispersal

Reproductive rate, in terms of number of spores shed per individual, remains an important criterion for vulnerability (Stockdale 2005). Cordyceps are well adapted for reproductive success, with each spore reportedly fragmenting into 100 or more part-spores, and each fungal fructification in turn produces 32 million propagules, thus increasing the odds of landing on a larva (Kendrick 1992). However, yartsa gunbu does not produce the part-spores, and thus the total number of propagules dispersed (and able to bring about the infective cycle) remains limited. Also, 70–80% of the harvested yartsa gunbu are immature, which accentuates the problem of the naturally low reproductive rate.

Further, yartsa gunbu requires the presence of the host insect (the obligate out-crosser) for the completion of its life cycle. This makes out-crossing an important vulnerability factor (Peters 1996). In other words, sustainable harvest of yartsa gunbu requires an adequate population of the host insect larva. A 14.8% decline in the host larva population was recorded within just 2 years (2012–2013), from 1218/ha to 1041/ha. Even though this decline cannot be taken as conclusive, this study does reinforce the estimation that greater anthropogenic pressure has a negative effect on the host larval population. However, results can only be conclusive if (1) similar studies are conducted across multiple sites where the intensity of harvest differs, (2) studies are undertaken over a longer time span, and (3) environmental variables affecting the population size of the host larva are recorded.

Spore germination and sprouting ability

Ophiocordyceps is an example of coevolution, wherein the precise liberation of spores coincides precisely with the presence of the larval (caterpillar) stage of the host insect, upon whose integument the spores then germinate to form hyphae, which then penetrate the larval soft tissue. The spores have little tolerance for adverse conditions (eg desiccation) and must germinate immediately. The availability of an obligate out-crosser, the host Thitarodes larva, is essential.

Socioeconomic factors determining vulnerability

Whole plant–animal complex harvested

One factor that greatly influences the rate of loss of individual plants from the population, and consequently the vulnerability of the species, is the plant part harvested (Shackleton 2001; Ticktin 2004; Stockdale 2005). Species with a single reproductive cycle (monocarpic) are likely to be more vulnerable, and this requires that enough individuals are left unharvested for adequate reproduction. Harvesting that includes mortality of the target plant, because it removes potentially reproductive individuals from the population, leaves a species more vulnerable (Cunningham 2001).

In the case of yartsa gunbu, the complete caterpillar and fungus, including the reproductive structure (the sporocarp), is harvested. The sustainability of removing whole individuals also depends greatly on the timing of harvesting (before or after fruiting) and the number of individuals remaining in the population for reproduction (Hall and Bawa 1993). In the case of yartsa gunbu, with 70–80% of the harvested lot consisting of immature samples, the inadequate number of spores dispersed by the smaller surviving population of mature individuals increases the vulnerability of the species. At the same time, the practice of harvesting immature yartsa gunbu could, paradoxically, serve as a means to sustain the population of the host moth (Stewart 2009; Winkler 2009). One can speculate that the declining population of the controlling agent (Ophiocordyceps) would result in resurgence of the population of the host insect (Thitarodes sp), which in turn would affect the ecology of the above-ground vegetation.

Volume harvested or demand for product

Greater demand and higher prices are likely to lead to increased intensity of the yartsa gunbu harvest and thus longer stays by harvesters in the harvest sites. The volume of a harvest consists of 2 basic factors: the quantity harvested and the frequency of harvest (Bennet 1992). In the area covered by this study, both factors were in play. With the declining yield of yartsa gunbu (average of 600/ha), the frequency and duration of stay in the harvest sites have increased.

While the amount harvested by this study’s 2511 informants remained more or less stagnant during 2010–2012, the income earned nearly doubled (Figure 4A). In fact, the income generated by the 1.5-month yartsa gunbu harvest far exceeded the combined annual income from other sources (Figure 4B).

Habitat reduction or degradation

Increasing anthropogenic pressure has resulted in conspicuous reduction in habitat space, with the lower reaches (inhabited by the harvesters) showing no yield. The availability of yartsa gunbu is inversely related to the slope, with greater availability reported on 15° slopes, and declining availability as the angle of slope increases; the negative impact of harvesters is increased because their tents are erected on spaces with less slope. Exploitation of herbaceous (mostly medicinal and aromatic) plants as well as woody vegetation on whose roots and flowers the host larva thrives, soil compaction by harvesters (Shrestha et al 2014) and livestock, and prolonged stays in the habitat sites have resulted in the degradation of the habitat and declining numbers of yartsa gunbu and its host insect.

Nature and size of the harvesting community

Three factors have a major impact on harvest pressure on commercially exploited natural resources—the biology of the collected species, the regime governing access to it, and market prices (Weckerle et al 2010). Hardin’s (1968) article on the “tragedy of the commons” concluded that open access in combination with increasing demand inevitably leads to overexploitation of a natural resource. Yartsa gunbu is an example of this phenomenon.

Lately, the village forest councils, which have jurisdiction over their respective alpine meadows harboring yartsa gunbu have demarcated sites that outsiders are strictly prohibited from entering. However, any resulting reduction in the number of harvesters has been offset by the greater number of women from the same village who now accompany the men to these sites. Notwithstanding, habitat sites within the jurisdiction of village forest councils are better off than sites within areas with a protection status. This is the case in the Ascot Conservation Landscape, which includes a minor portion of the adjacent Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve merged with the Askote Wildlife Sanctuary. Harvesting in these areas, though legally prohibited, remains open to all because conservation rules are not enforced.

Regulation of the harvest

Regulation of access to resources is related to sustainable management (Hutton and Leader-Williams 2003). Five years ago, the first author successfully implemented a mechanism restricting people not belonging to the van panchayat (forest council) by issuing passes to village inhabitants only. Unfortunately, these passes, misappropriated by infirm and elderly people, are now being auctioned to outsiders at exorbitant prices (up to US$ 1166 per pass). Lately, the contracting of harvesters (mostly Nepalese) by powerful villagers who provide them with lodging in the alpine meadows in return for 50% of their harvest has increased anthropogenic pressure on the yartsa gunbu habitat in all the study area.

Market price

The price of yartsa gunbu increased from around US$ 3333 per kg in 2008 to US$ 20,000 per kg in 2012. The total yield across the study area in 2012 was just under 345 kg, worth US$ 7,500,000. This extreme price increase has increased the pressure on yartsa gunbu. The prices vary depending on the quality: there are 5 categories of produce—18, 22, 28, 32, and 38—corresponding to the number of individuals (in hundreds) per kg. While category 32 currently fetches about US$ 20,000 locally, category 18 may earn the harvester more than US$ 30,000.

Trafficking

There is a well-established network of local middlemen, brokers, and merchants in the border townships of Dharchula and Munsiari. Proximity to the porous border with Nepal and Tibet Autonomous Region makes it also accessible to trafficking. All efforts by the state forest department and other agencies to regulate the trade have failed, because the price offered through the legal auction system is far below that offered by the network mentioned earlier. During 2008–2012, amounts trafficked across the border increased from 309 kg to 345 kg.

Availability of substitutes

Although the species, more precisely the mycelia, has been successfully cultivated in liquid suspension (Lu 2003; Sheng et al 2011) and on solid substrate (Sung et al 1999; Lin et al 2006; Yue 2010), buyers still prefer the wild product consisting of larva and fruiting body. Attempts to generate the composite yartsa gunbu have not reached the stage of large-scale production.

Traditional conservation practices

Until a few years ago, women were prohibited from entering the sacred alpine meadows and from collecting yartsa gunbu, which obviously restricted the number of harvesters. However, with the dramatic increase in the price of the commodity, the taboo system regarding collection has been discarded, and the same men who earlier enforced the religious prohibition now encourage women to harvest yartsa gunbu. Being religious, the female harvesters fear the wrath of the deity, more so when the stay in the sacred landscape lasts more than a month and when another, most religiously held taboo regarding menses, cannot be adhered to either. Thus, tension exists between moral-religious imperatives and the lure of economic benefits. Dilution of the traditional norms contributes to the vulnerability of yartsa gunbu.

Recommendations

Several scholars have argued that community-based management can ensure the sustainability of the yartsa gunbu harvest (Cannon et al 2009; Stewart 2009; Weckerle et al 2010; Shrestha and Bawa 2013, 2014). Measures for sustainable resource management can be effective when stakeholders are formally or informally integrated into policy-making and control mechanisms (Dietz et al 2003; Robbins et al 2009), but before that, communities must appreciate the problems arising out of commercial exploitation and institute mechanisms at the local level for the sustainable harvest of yartsa gunbu.

The use of more scientific techniques for harvesting, including spore dispersal immediately after collection or the use of burying pits after uprooting, could aid sustainable management of wild resources (Shrestha and Bawa 2013, 2014). Creating rest areas, imparting knowledge of the fungal reproductive cycle, and establishing an end date to the collection season might allow for sufficient spore dispersal to maintain sustainable populations (Baral et al 2015). Providing higher economic incentives to local harvesters who comply with harvesting guidelines might motivate sustainable harvest (Boesi 2003; Sharma 2004; Varghese and Ticktin 2008; Weckerle et al 2010); however, doubts remain when the commodity being harvested brings such high prices internationally. Fortunately, success stories exist in other countries (Box 1), which could be replicated by empowering the Biodiversity Management Committees, which are being constituted at the village level under the National Biodiversity Authority of India.

BOX 1:

Sustainable harvesting of Ophiocordyceps sinensis

Bhutan

Bhutan’s approach to managing the yartsa gunbu harvest includes (1) relaxing the laws on gathering yartsa gunbu in order to provide local people with an incentive to police their areas and protect natural resources, (2) delegating the power to restrict the number of harvesters to a few members per household, and (3) establishing a law that yartsa gunbu can only be sold at authorized auctions by authorized collectors and that buyers must be Bhutanese nationals. The government imposes a 4.9% levy on sales to cover the expenses of auctions and to support environmental protection programs (Cannon et al 2009).

Nepal

In Samagaun, Nubri Valley, Nepal, the village development council has devised and implemented a management regime for yartsa gunbu. A date is set for the commencement of the harvest, and in the weeks prior to it, every able-bodied resident must physically check in at the community meeting house 4 times daily (7 AM, 10 AM, 2 PM, and 6 PM); anyone caught venturing to the high pastures before the starting date incurs a heavy fine. Village leaders have the authority to postpone the harvest when conditions warrant. The right to gather yartsa gunbu is held only by bona fide residents of the village, a status defined through participation in a household taxation system. Each household must register its collectors with the village administration and pay a yartsa gunbu tax of NPR 100 (US$ 1.20) for the first household member and NPR 4500 (US$ 53) for each additional member; the money thus collected is spent on communal activities, such as inviting a lama to perform an empowerment ritual (dbang) (Childs 2005; Childs and Choedup 2014).

In Dolpa, in western Nepal, local people establish their camps 3–5 km from the collection area (Shrestha et al 2014). In Nubri and Tsum, Nepal, religious decrees (chos khrims) prohibit collection in certain sacred areas, ensuring that part of the landscape remains undisturbed (Childs and Choedup 2014). Lamas in Sama shield certain tracts of land on the slopes of sacred Gang Pungyen (Mount Manaslu, 8156 m), abode of Yul Iha, the resident deity, through “sealing decrees” (shag rgya) that prohibit people from cutting trees, gathering forest products (including yartsa gunbu), or hunting wildlife.

Conclusion

Considering the large number of ecological and socioeconomic factors increasing the vulnerability of yartsa gunbu, this medicinal species should definitely be considered vulnerable. Among the factors leading to higher vulnerability, dependence on another species (obligate out-crosser) for the completion of the life cycle, increasing demand and high market prices, the reduction in and degradation of habitat, and abandonment of traditional conservation practices, raise concerns as to the viability of the species in the near future. Local communities’ awareness of the problems arising out of commercial exploitation should increase. Moreover, it would be important to develop and implement effective institutional mechanisms at the local level for the sustainable harvest of yartsa gunbu. Such mechanisms should concern all ecological and socioeconomic factors that the present study has revealed as leading to greater vulnerability of the species.

Open access article: please credit the authors and the full source.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial help received from Dr Naseem Ahmad, director, Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi, India. The study would not have been possible without the help of village residents who had faith in the project and shared essential information.

REFERENCES

1.

A Aryal IC Dutta SK Dhungel A. Pyakurel 2008. Parasitic Fungal on Moth’s Larvae: Yarsagumba (Cordyceps sinensis), Ecology and Local Economic Contribution in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Biodiversity Research and Training Forum. Google Scholar

2.

Y Aumeeruddy-Thomas S Saigal N Kapoor AB. Cunningham 1999. Joint Management in the Making: Reflections and Experiences. People and Plants working paper 7, Paris, France: UNESCO. Google Scholar

3.

B Baral B Shrestha JA. Teixeira da Silva 2015. A review of Chinese Cordyceps with special reference to Nepal, focusing on conservation. Environmental and Experimental Biology 13:61–73. Google Scholar

4.

BC. Bennet 1992. Plants and people of the rainforest. The role of ethnobotany in sustainable development. BioScience 42(8):599–607. Google Scholar

5.

A. Boesi 2003. Te dbyar rtswa dgun‘bu (Cordyceps sinensis Berk.): An important trade item for the Tibetan population of the Li Tang County, Sichuan Province, China. Tibet Journal 28:29–42. Google Scholar

6.

GA Boot RE. Gullison 1995. Approaches to developing sustainable extraction systems for tropical forest products. Ecological Applications 5(4):896–903. Google Scholar

7.

PF Cannon NL Hywel-Jones N Maczey L Norbu T Tashi Samdup P. Lhendup 2009. Steps towards sustainable harvest of Ophiocordyceps sinensis in Bhutan. Biodiversity and Conservation 18(9):2263–2281. Google Scholar

8.

JC. Chee-Sanford 2008. Weed seeds as nutritional resources for soil Ascomycota and characterization of specific associations between plant and fungal species. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44:763–771. Google Scholar

9.

Chen SJ, Yin DH, Li L, Zha X, Shuen JH, Zhama C. 2000. Resources and distribution of Cordyceps sinensis in Naqu Tibet. Zhong Yao Cai 23(11): 673–675. [In Chinese, with English Abstract] Google Scholar

10.

G. Childs 2005. How to fund a ritual: Notes on the social usage of the Kanjur (bKa’-’gyur) in a Tibetan village. Tibet Journal 30(2):41–48. Google Scholar

11.

G Childs N. Choedup 2014. Indigenous management strategies and socioeconomic impacts of yartsa gunbu (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) harvesting in Nubri and Tsum, Nepal. Himalaya, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies 34(1):8–23. Google Scholar

12.

HF Chu LY Wang HX. Han 2004. Fauna Sinica, Vol. 38, Lepidoptera: Hepialidae, Epiplemidae. Beijing, China: Science Press, pp 291. Google Scholar

13.

AB. Cunningham 1994. Integrating local plant resources and habitat management. Biodiversity and Conservation 3:104–115. Google Scholar

14.

AB. Cunningham 1996. People, Park and Plant Use. Recommendations for Multiple-Use Zones and Development Alternatives Around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. People and Plants Working Paper 4, Paris, France: UNESCO. Google Scholar

15.

AB. Cunningham 2001. Applied Ethnobotany: People, Wild Plant Use and Conservation. London, United Kingdom: Earthscan. Google Scholar

16.

T Dietz E Ostrom PC. Stern 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912. Google Scholar

17.

K Gould AF Howard G. Rodriguéz 1998. Sustainable production of non-timber forest products: Natural dye extraction from El Cruce Dos Aguadas, Petén, Guatemala. Forest Ecology and Management 111:69–82. Google Scholar

18.

P Hall K. Bawa 1993. Methods to assess the impact of extraction of non-timber tropical forest products on plant populations. Economic Botany 47(3):234–247. Google Scholar

19.

G. Hardin 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248. Google Scholar

20.

CH. Hobbs 1995. Medicinal Mushrooms: An Exploration of Tradition, Healing, and Culture. Santa Cruz, CA: Botanica Press, pp 251. Google Scholar

21.

J Holliday P Cleaver M Loomis-Powers D. Patel 2004. Analysis of quality and techniques for hybridization of medicinal fungus Cordyceps sinensis. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 6:147–160. Google Scholar

22.

JM Hutton N. Leader-Williams 2003. Sustainable use and incentive-driven conservation: realigning human and conservation interests. Oryx 37(2):215–226. Google Scholar

23.

B. Kendrick 1992. The Fifth Kingdom. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing. Google Scholar

24.

QY Lin B Song YJ Zhong TH. Li 2006. Optimization of some cultivation conditions of Cordyceps militaris. Edible Fungi China 25(6):17–19. Google Scholar

25.

YL. Lu 2003. The research on fermentation of Cordyceps sinensis. Guangzhou Food Science Technology 19:21–25. Google Scholar

26.

P. Namgyel 2003. Household income, property rights and sustainable use of NTFP in subsistence mountain economy: The case of Cordyceps and matsutake in Bhutan Himalayas. In: D Pema D Tshering M Ghimiray P Namgyel S Duba TR Gurung editors. Regional Workshop on Community Based Natural Resources Management. Thimphu, Bhutan: Ministry of Agriculture, pp 95–113. Google Scholar

27.

CS Negi PR Koranga HS. Ghinga 2006. Yar tsa Gumba (Cordyceps sinensis): A call for its sustainable exploitation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 13(6):165–172. Google Scholar

28.

CS Negi M Pant P Joshi S. Bohra 2014. Yar tsa Gunbu [Ophiocordyceps sinensis (Berk.) G.H. Sung et al.]: The issue of its sustainability. Current Science 107(5):882–887. Google Scholar

29.

ES Nielsen GS Robinson DL. Wagner 2000. Ghost-moths of the world: A global inventory and bibliography of the Exoporia (Mnesarchaeoidea and Hepialoidea) (Lepidoptera). Journal of Natural History 34(6):823–878. Google Scholar

30.

CM. Peters 1996. The Ecology and Management of Non-Timber Forest Resources. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Google Scholar

31.

PK Ralhan AK Saxena JJ. Singh 1982. Analysis of forest vegetation at and around Nainital in Kumaun Himalaya. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy B48:121–137. Google Scholar

32.

P Robbins K McSweeney AK Chhangani JL. Rice 2009. Conservation as it is: Illicit resource use in a wildlife reserve in India. Human Ecology 37:559–575. Google Scholar

33.

MC Rutherford LH. Westfall 1986. Biomes of Southern Africa: An Objective Categorization. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No 54. Devon, United Kingdom: Natural History Book Service. Google Scholar

34.

CM. Shackleton 2001. Re-examining local and market-orientated use of wild species for the conservation of biodiversity. Environmental Conservation 28(3):270–278. Google Scholar

35.

S. Sharma 2004. Trade of Cordyceps sinensis from high altitudes of the Indian Himalaya: conservation and biotechnological priorities. Current Science 86:1614–1619. Google Scholar

36.

L Sheng J Chen J Li W. Zhang 2011. An exopolysaccharide from cultivated Cordyceps sinensis and its effects on cytokine expressions of immunocytes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 163:669–678. Google Scholar

37.

UB Shrestha KS. Bawa 2013. Trade, harvest, and conservation of caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) in the Himalayas. Biological Conservation 159:514–520. Google Scholar

38.

UB Shrestha KS. Bawa 2014. Economic contribution of Chinese caterpillar fungus to the livelihoods of mountain communities in Nepal. Biological Conservation 177:194–202. Google Scholar

39.

UB Shrestha S Shrestha S Ghimire K Nepali BB. Shrestha 2014. Chasing Chinese caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) harvesters in the Himalayas: Harvesting practice and its conservation implications in western Nepal. Society and Natural Resources 27(12):1242–1256. Google Scholar

40.

VK. Shrivastava 2010. Trade chain analysis of Ophiocordyceps sinensis and Tricholoma matusutake in Bhutan. In: F Helles PS Nielsen editors. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics. Gilleleje, Denmark: Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics, pp 396–416. Google Scholar

41.

MO. Stewart 2009. The “Himalayan Gold” Rush: Prospectors’ practices and implications for management. In: B Dotson KN Gurung G Halkias T Myatt editors. Contemporary Visions in Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the First International Seminar of Young Tibetologists. Chicago, IL: Serindia Publications, pp 1–26. Google Scholar

42.

M. Stockdale 2005. Steps to Sustainable and Community-Based NTFP Management. NTFP Exchange Programme for South and Southeast Asia. Desa Putera, Indonesia: SMT Grafika. Google Scholar

43.

GH Sung NL Hywel-Jones JM Sung JJ Luangsa-ard B Shrestha JW. Spatafora 2007. Phylogenetic classification of Cordyceps and the Clavicipitaceous Fungi. Studies in Mycology 57:5–59. Google Scholar

44.

JM Sung YS Choi HK. Lee 1999. Production of fruiting body using cultures of entomopathogenic fungal species. Korean Journal of Mycology 27:15–19. Google Scholar

45.

T. Ticktin 2004. The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:11–21. Google Scholar

46.

KWK Tsim PL. Shao 2005. Cordyceps sinensis:. A traditional Chinese medicine known as winter-worm summer-grass. Asia-Pacific Biotech News 9:1160–1164. Google Scholar

47.

A Varghese T. Ticktin 2008. Regional variation in non-timber forest product harvest strategies, trade, and ecological impacts: The case of black dammar (Canarium strictum Roxb.) use and conservation in the Nilgiri biosphere reserve, India. Ecology and Society 13:11. Google Scholar

48.

XL Wang YJ. Yao 2011. Host insect species of Ophiocordyceps sinensis: A review. ZooKeys 127:43–59. Google Scholar

49.

J Watts P Scott J. Mutebi 1996. Forest assessment and monitoring for conservation and local use: Experience in 3 Ugandan national parks. In: J Carter editor. Recent Approaches to Participatory Forest Resource Assessment. Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 2. London, United Kingdom: Overseas Development Institute, pp 212–243. Google Scholar

50.

CS Weckerle Y Yang FK Huber Q. Li 2010. People, money, and protected areas: The collection of the caterpillar mushroom Ophiocordyceps sinensis in the Baima Xueshan Nature Reserve, Southwest China. Biodiversity Conservation 19:2685–2698. Google Scholar

51.

RG Wild J. Mutebi 1996. Conservation Through Community Use of Plant Resources; Establishing Collaborative Management at Bwindi Impenetrable and Mgahinga Gorilla National Park, Uganda. People and Plants Working Paper 5. Paris: UNESCO. Google Scholar

52.

D. Winkler 2008. Yartsa gunbu (Cordyceps sinensis) and the fungal commodification of Tibet’s rural economy. Economic Botany 62:291–305. Google Scholar

53.

D. Winkler 2009. Caterpillar fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis): Production and sustainability on the Tibetan plateau and the Himalayas. Asian Medicine 5:291–316. Google Scholar

54.

JLG Wong K Thornber N. Baker 2001. Non-Wood Forest Products 13. Resource Assessment of Non-Wood Forest Products: Experience and Biometric Principles. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. Google Scholar

55.

N. Wu 1997. Ecological Situation of High-Frigid Rangeland and its Sustainability: A Case Study on the Constraints and Approaches in Pastoral Western Sichuan/China. Berlin, Germany: Dietrich Reimer Verlag. Google Scholar

56.

C. Yue 2010. Optimization on Cordyceps militaris’s cultivating conditions. Food Industry 2:60–61. Google Scholar

57.

M Zang N. Kinjo 1998. Notes on the alpine Cordyceps of China and nearby nations. Mycotaxon 66:215–229. Google Scholar
International Mountain Society
Chandra S. Negi, Paras Joshi, and Sachin Bohra "Rapid Vulnerability Assessment of Yartsa Gunbu (Ophiocordyceps sinensis [Berk.] G.H. Sung et al) in Pithoragarh District, Uttarakhand State, India," Mountain Research and Development 35(4), 382-391, (1 November 2015). https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00005.1
Received: 1 July 2015; Accepted: 1 October 2015; Published: 1 November 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top