Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
31 May 2016 New Fossil Soldier Beetles (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) in Burmese, Baltic and Dominican Amber
George Poinar, Fabrizio Fanti
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

New soldier beetles (Cantharidae) are described from amber deposits in Burma (Myanmar), the Baltic region and the Dominican Republic. They include the Lower Cretaceous Burmese amber Ornatomalthinus elvirae gen. et sp. n., the Upper Eocene Baltic amber Rhagonycha (s. str.) sucinobaltica sp. n. and the mid-Tertiary Dominican amber Tytthonyx (s. str.) geiseri sp. n. These are the first descriptions of soldier beetles from Burmese and Dominican amber. The new genus Ornatomalthinus in Burmese amber is noted for possessing features similar to lycid beetles (Coleoptera: Lycidae) and for emitting, presumable defensive, secretions from everted thoracic and abdominal vesicles.

1. Introduction

While inclusions of fossil Cantharidae Imhoff, 1856 in amber are fairly common ( Spahr 1981; Kazantsev 2013) with the first species described by Schaufuss (1892), only in the last decade of the 1900's and early 2000 has this family received more attention with descriptions of various taxa ( Kuśka 1992, 1996; Kuśka & Kupryjanowicz 2005; Kazantsev 2010, 2013; Kuśka & Kania 2010; Alekseev & Kazantsev 2014; Kazantsev & Perkovsky 2014). Previously, fossil Cantharidae were described from Baltic amber (e.g., Yablokov-Khnzorian 1960; Alekseev 2013; Kazantsev 2013), Rovno amber ( Kazantsev 2010; Kazantsev & Perkovsky 2014), Mexican Chiapas amber ( Wittmer 1963) and from the Brunstatt brown coals of Alsace ( Förster 1891). Specimens without specific attribution were reported from Baltic amber (e.g., Klebs 1910; Hieke & Pietrzeniuk 1984; Kubisz 2000, 2001), Lebanese amber ( Kirejtshuk & Azar 2013), and Burmese amber ( Rasnitsyn & Ross 2000; Poinar et al. 2007). The present study describes a new genus and species in Burmese amber that is characterized as a lycid mimic; a new species of Tytthonyx LeConte, 1851 in Dominican amber (first record of Silinae Tytthonyxini), and a new species of Rhagonycha Eschscholtz, 1830 from Baltic amber. These are the first descriptions of soldier beetles from Burmese and Dominican amber.

2. Materials and methods

The Burmese specimen originated from the Noije Bum 2001 Summit Site in the Hukawng Valley, south-west of Maingkhwan in the state of Kachin, Myanmar (26°20′N, 96°36′E). Amber-bearing strata in this mine were assigned to the Upper Albian (97-110 Ma) of the Early Cretaceous on the basis of paleontological (ammonite) evidence ( Cruickshank & Ko 2003). The Dominican fossil originated from an amber mine in the northern mountain range (Cordillera Septentrional) of the Dominican Republic between Puerto Plata and Santiago (DD latitude and longitude: 19.4–70.4).

Dating of Dominican amber is controversial, with the youngest proposed age of 20-15 mya based on foraminifera ( Iturralde-Vinent & MacPhee 1996) and the oldest of 45–30 mya based on coccoliths (Cepek in Schlee 1990). The Baltic amber specimen originated from the Kalinin-grad region in Russia. Baltic amber is considered to range between 48.6–40.4 MY and 37.2–33.9 MY.

All three amber specimens were re-polished in order to highlight the dorsal and ventral views and examined and photographed with a Nikon stereoscopic microscope SMA-10-R at 80x and a Nikon Optiphot microscope at 800x. Helicon Focus Pro X64 was used to stack photos for better clarity and depth of field. The specimens are deposited in the Poinar amber collection maintained at Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

3. Systematic descriptions

Family Cantharidae Imhoff, 1856 (1815)
Subfamily Cantharinae Imhoff, 1856 (1815)
Tribe Cantharini Imhoff, 1856 (1815)
Genus Ornatomalthinus Poinar & Fanti nov.

  • Type species: Ornatomalthinus elvirae Poinar & Fanti sp. n., monotypic.

  • Etymology: The generic name was derived from Latin “ornatus” = adorned (for sculpture elytra) and “malthinus” = soft/flabby. Gender: masculine.

  • Diagnosis: Other extant or fossil families that have elytra with costae and reticulated punctation are: Omalisidae Lacordaire, 1857, Berendtimiridae Winkler, 1987 and Lycidae Laporte de Castelnau, 1838. However, Omalisidae has six visible ventrites and the pronotum is different, Berendtimiridae has six visible ventrites, the third antennomere is similar in size and vestiture to the second, and the cranium resembles a raised flat shield-like structure ( Winkler 1987). Ornatomalthinus gen. n. has a greater number of visible ventrites and the structure of the head, antennae and pronotum are different from those of the other families. We can also distinguish the new genus from Lycidae by its normal and short trochanters (long in Lycidae) and cylindrical tibiae (nearly always flattened in Lycidae). More-over, the shape of the head and prothorax and the general habitus is different from these features in the Lycidae.

  • The unequal maxillary palpomeres with the last segment securiform, pronotum without modified lateral margins, and short elytra with complete hind wings suggest that the new taxon belongs in the Cantharinae. Ornatomalthinus gen. n. is characterized by its elytral sculpture (adorned with striations provided of relief points), which is reminiscent of representatives of the family Lycidae (lycids mimics). This feature is not present on any fossil genera (only Mimoplatycis Kazantsev, 2013, has a conspicuous carinate pronotum but the elytra are normal). Netwinged elytra with “window” punctures is an extinct character representing a case of mimicry. It is the earliest fossil record of cantharids mimicking lycids. Diagnostic characters include the combination of small size, very short 11-segmented female antennae, long meso- and metathoracic legs, complete hind wings and short elytra narrowing at apex with evident striation equipped with relief points.

  • Ornatomalthinus elvirae Poinar & Fanti sp. n.
    Figs. 13

  • Type: Holotype: female, in Burmese amber, accession No. B-C-28.

  • Type locality: Myanmar: Kachin State, Southwest of Maingkhwan, Hukawng Valley, mine near Noije Bum, designated as “Noije Bum 2001 Summit Site” (26°20′N, 96°36′E).

  • Type horizon: Upper Albian (97–110 Ma) of the Early Cretaceous.

  • Etymology: The species is named in honor of Dr. Elvira Castiglione, who proposed the genus name.

  • Description: Female, based on the very short antennae and distended abdomen. Alate, body dark-brown, length 3.5 mm. Head wrinkled, larger than the prothorax, with small elliptical eyes, and relatively long mandibles with a sharp tooth positioned at two thirds of their length. Maxillary palpomeres: first short, second long and thin, third long but shorter than the second, and the last segment securiform and triangular-shaped. Antennae 11-segmented, robust, filiform (the left preserved until the 4th article), short, reaching the humeral-elytral area with antennomeres subequal: scape long, segments 2–3 and 8–10 shorter than segments 4–7, the last filiform and moderately cylindrical. Pronotum rugose, slightly transverse, moderately narrowed forward with rounded corners. Scutellum triangular-shaped. Elytra short, not parallel, reaching to approximately the fifth tergite, rounded and narrowing at apex, adorned with striae containing relief points. Hind wings present, folded and extended beyond the elytra in dorsal position. Legs bent and slightly intertwined, anterior pair quite short, especially the tibiae, with femora quite robust; mesothoracic legs with thin and long femora and tibiae; metathoracic legs with long femora slightly thickened; tibiae and tarsi thin and long. Five tarsonmeres with the first approximately the same length as the second, the third narrow and slightly shorter than the second, the fourth with large plantar pads, and the fifth long and narrow. Anterior tarsal claws simple with pointed, triangular denticle at the base. Abdomen large and expanded.

  • Syninclusions: None.

  • Diagnosis: The new species has a unique elytral sculpture that does not occur on any extant or extinct member of the family. The combination of short elytra, small size, indistinct net-winged elytral pattern and appearance occurs in three subfamilies: Cantharinae, Chauliognathinae and Malthininae. In Cantharinae, reduced elytra and complete hind wings are very rare and only known in two species: Lycocerus michiakii Okushima & Brancucci, 2008 and Lycocerus strictipennis Y. Yang & X. Yang, 2011 (M. Geiser, personal communication, 2015), both of which are much larger than the present fossil (8–10 mm). Furthermore high-mountain species frequently have reduced elytra, but these species are apterous or have greatly reduced hind wings. In Chauliognathinae there is the Neotropical genus Malthesis Motschulsky, 1853, that looks slightly similar to the fossil but larger (extant species range from 7 to 13 mm) and the species generally have the pro thorax with strongly bordered sides. In Malthininae there are the genera: Maltypus Motschulsky, 1860, Inmalthodes Pic, 1938, and Prosthaptus Gorham, 1900, with “reticulate” elytra, but these genera have quite a different habitus. Moreover some South American Silinae are fairly similar in appearence.

  • Fig. 1.

    Ornatomalthinus elvirae gen. et sp. n. in Burmese amber. Holotype, dorsal view. Right arrow shows a cuticular vesicle extruded from the thorax. Left arrows show secretions emitted from cuticular vesicles of the abdomen. Bar = 0.8 mm.

    f01_01.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Ornatomalthinus elvirae gen. et sp. n. in Burmese amber. Holotype, subventral view. Arrow shows cuticular vesicle extruded from the thorax. Bar = 0.5 mm.

    f02_01.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Ornatomalthinus elvirae gen. et sp. n. in Burmese amber. Holotype, detail of head and prothorax. Bar = 0.5 mm.

    f03_01.jpg

    Genus Rhagonycha (s. str.) Eschscholtz, 1830
    Rhagonycha (s. str.) sucinobaltica Poinar & Fanti sp. n.
    Figs. 46

  • Type: Holotype: male, in Baltic amber, accession No. C-202.

  • Type locality: Russia: Kaliningrad region. Baltic Sea coast.

  • Type horizon: Middle Eocene (Lutetian) (48.6–40.4 MY) to Late Eocene (Priabonian) (37.2–33.9 MY).

  • Etymology: The specific name is derived from Latin “sucinum” = amber and “baltico” (named in reference to the locality).

  • Description: Male, based on antennal length and extended body, which is blackish to dark brown with pronotum slightly darker than elytra. Body length 3.5 mm. Head small, narrower then the prothorax, with prominent rounded eyes. Antennae elongate, reaching and overtaking the metathoracic legs, 11-segmented, filiform with antennomeres roughly the same length except for the longer scape. Pronotum apically constricted with posterior corners very evident but rounded. Scutellum triangular. Elytra elongate, reaching the abdominal apex with surface rough and with fine and thin long hairs; only the right hind wing that is strongly folded is visible. Legs fairly robust, anterior and mesothoracic femurs and tibiae dark brown; all femora are slighlty thickened while the tibiae are elongate with lightly enlarge apices; metathoracic legs dark brown. All tarsi five-segmented and equipped with long hairs, with third segment not bilobed at sides and shorter than the second; first and second tarsomeres about the same length, the fourth with large elongated lobes and the fifth elongated. Claws bifid at apex with rounded denticle at base. Female unknown.

  • Syninclusions: None.

  • Diagnosis: In this specimen the maxillar palpomeres are not clearly visible, but it has tarsi with third segment not bilobed at the sides and the claws bifid at apex, which characters are typical of the genus Rhagonycha and not present in other genera. This new species is distantly related to the “Rhagonycha atra group” consisting of Rh. atra (Linnaeus, 1767), Rh. elongata (Fallen, 1807) and Rh. gallica Pic, 1923, that are widely distributed in Europe, Turkey and some parts of Russia. It can be distinguished by the smaller size (3.5 mm versus 4.5–7 mm for extant species), the blackish-brown coloration, very narrow pronotum, and slender appearance. It is also distinguished from Rhagonycha kryshtofovichi ( Yablokov-Khnzorian, 1960) by the claws, pronotum and dark coloration instead of reddish-brown.

  • Fig. 4.

    Rhagonycha (s. str.) sucinobaltica sp. n. in Baltic amber. Holotype, dorsal view. Bar = 1.0 mm.

    f04_01.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Rhagonycha (s. str.) sucinobaltica sp. n. in Baltic amber. Holotype, ventral view. Bar = 0.7 mm.

    f05_01.jpg

    Fig. 6.

    Rhagonycha (s. str.) sucinobaltica sp. n. in Baltic amber. Holotype, detail of tarsus and claws. Bar = 60 µ;m.

    f06_01.jpg

    Subfamily Silinae Mulsant, 1862
    Tribe Tytthonyxini Arnett, 1962
    Genus Tytthonyx (s. str.) LeConte, 1851
    Tytthonyx (s. str.) geiseri Poinar & Fanti sp. n.
    Figs. 78

  • Type: Holotype: male, in Dominican amber, accession No. C-7-70.

  • Type locality: Dominican Republic: Cordillera Septentrional, mine between Puerto Plata and Santiago.

  • Type horizon: Uncertain. Upper Eocene to Lower Miocene (45–30 MY to 20–15 MY).

  • Etymology: The species name is in honor of Michael F. Geiser (expert of worldwide Cantharidae).

  • Description: Male, alate, light testaceous-brown. Small size but stout, body length 2.4 mm, with terminal abdominal segments folded up (estimated body length: 2.8–3.2 mm). Head large and very triangular behind the eyes, which are very prominent and rounded. Mandibles relatively long and thin with a small rounded tooth near the base. Antennae dark-testaceous, serrate, longer than the metathoracic legs, 11-segmented with first three antennomeres filiform and cylindrical at apex, segments 4–9 strongly serrate, especially the 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th, while the 4th and 9th have normal serrations and the penultimate (10th) is only slightly serrate, with the terminal segment 11 filiform; scape longest and others subequal in length. Pronotum quite transverse with rounded angles, scutellum triangular. Elytra large but abbreviated with short hairs along the sides, rounded apex and barely reaching the first tergites; hind wings very long and fully developed and only bent slightly at apex. Legs extremely long and slender (particularly the tibiae) with femora more robust. All tarsi five-segmented, the first long and thin, the second shorter, the third small, the fourth divided into two long lobes and the 5th slender. Claws simple and minute. Abdomen folded upwards.

  • Syninclusions: One Diptera.

  • Diagnosis: No fossils of this tribe and genus are currently known. Species identifications are based on copulatory structures ( Wittmer 1991, 1992) and since these features are not visible in fossils, the new species is recognized by its small size (less than 3 mm), which is found in very few extant species, and the above indicated characters. Based on the account by Wittmer (1991, 1992), we place this fossil in the subgenus Tytthonyx due to the serrate antennae of the male. The antennae are pectinate in males of the subgenus Thinalmus Gorham, 1881.

  • Remarks: The piece of amber with the Tytthonyx inclusion is very clear and transparent and allows an accurate examination of dorsal and ventral views of the specimen. It is in very good condition except for the terminal abdominal segments that are folded back on themselves.

  • Fig. 7.

    Tytthonyx (s. str.) geiseri sp. n. in Dominican amber. Holotype, dorsal view. Bar = 0.9 mm.

    f07_01.jpg

    Fig. 8.

    Tytthonyx (s. str.) geiseri sp. n. in Dominican amber. Holotype, ventral view. Bar = 0.9 mm.

    f08_01.jpg

    4. Discussion

    A second undescribed Burmese amber cantharid with similar characters to Ornatomalthinus elvirae sp. n., but currently unavailable for study, is illustrated in Poinar et al. (2007). This specimen also has very long tibiae, 11-segmented filiform antennae and a similar net-winged elytral pattern, however, it is longer, approximately 4.5 mm in length. It is difficult to say without further study whether it falls within the new fossil genus as a conspecific or new species. This undescribed specimen has cuticular vesicles extruded from both abdominal and thoracic segments. These vesicles are similar to the cuticular vesicles extruded from the thorax and abdomen of Ornatomalthinus elvirae sp. n. (Figs. 12, arrows). Secretions emitted from these vesicles are considered to represent a chemical defense response. Such defense responses are known to occur in a number of adult beetles, especially members of the Cantharidae ( Poinar et al. 2007).

    The genus Rhagonycha is poorly known in the fossil record. Specimens without specific attribution were reported from Baltic amber ( Klebs 1910; Hiere & Pietrzeniuk 1984) and Rhagonycha micans was described by Piton (1939) from the Pliocene of Chambon Lake (Puyde-Dôme, France), which is similar to the extant Rhagonycha testacea (Linnaeus, 1758). One previous species in Baltic amber (Rhagonycha krvshtofovichi) was originally described by Yablokov-Khnzorian (1960) as Malchinus kryshtofovichi. This latter specimen has simple tarsal claws, in contrast to true Rhagonycha, that has claws bifid at the apex. Characters established for Rhagonycha by Kazantsev (2013) are “anteriorly narrowed pronotum, distally widened terminal palpomeres and unmodified terminal abdominal segments”. Therefore our specimen may be the only species of this genus known in amber.

    The tribe Tytthonyxini is placed “incertae sedis” in the subfamily Silinae, between Malthininae and Silinae, due to the strange structure of the abdominal sternite s and genitalia ( Brancucci 1980). No fossils were known until now. Tytthonyx has about 70 extant species (e.g., Delkeskamp 1977; Wittmer 1991, 1992), 14 of which occur in the Dominican Republic. The female of Tytthonyx geiseri n. sp. is unknown, but probably has filiform antennae (sexual dimorphic character in extant species).

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are very grateful to Francesco Vitali, Michael F. Geiser and Sergey V. Kazantsev for their valuable assistance, and gratefully extend our thanks to Elvira Castiglione for suggesting the name Ornatomalthinus. Appreciation is also extended to the referees: Vitalii I. Alekseev and Alexander G. Kirejtshuk, whose comments enhanced the manuscript.

    5. References

    1.

    Alekseev, V. I. ( 2013): The beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) of Baltic amber: the checklist of described species and preliminary analysis of biodiversity. — Zoology and Ecology, 23: 5–12. Google Scholar

    2.

    Alekseev, V. I. & Kazantsev, S. V. ( 2014): New fossil soldier beetle (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) from Baltic amber. — Baltic Journal of Coleopterology, 14: 167–170. Google Scholar

    3.

    Brancucci, M. ( 1980): Morphologie comparée, évolution et systématique des Cantharidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). — Entomologica Basiliensia, 5: 215–388. Google Scholar

    4.

    Cruickshank, R. D. & Ko, K. ( 2003): Geology of an amber locality in the Hukawng Valley, Northern Myanmar. — Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 21: 441–455. Google Scholar

    5.

    Delkeskamp, K. ( 1977): Coleopterorum Catalogue Supplementa, 165 (1): 485 pp. [Corrigenda et Addenda: 1978: 487–556]; The Hague (W. Junk). Google Scholar

    6.

    Förster, B. ( 1891): Die Insekten des “Plattigen Steinmergels” von Brunstatt. — Abhandlungen zur Geologischen Specialkarte von Elsass-Lothringen, 3: 335–593. Google Scholar

    7.

    Hieke, F. & Pietrzeniuk, E. ( 1984): Die Bernstein-Käfer des Museums für Naturkunde, Berlin (Insecta, Coleoptera). — Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 60: 297–326. Google Scholar

    8.

    Iturralde-Vinent, M. A. & MacPhee, R. D. E. ( 1996): Age and paleogeographical origin of Dominican amber. — Science, 273: 1850–1852. Google Scholar

    9.

    Kazantsev, S. V. ( 2010): New Malthodes (Insecta: Cantharidae: Coleoptera) from the Rovno amber (Upper Eocene of Ukraine). — Russian Entomological Journal, 19: 105–107. Google Scholar

    10.

    Kazantsev, S. V. ( 2013): New taxa of Baltic amber soldier beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Cantharidae) with synonymic and taxonomic notes. — Russian Entomological Journal, 22: 283– 291. Google Scholar

    11.

    Kazantsev, S. V. & Perkovsky, E. E. ( 2014): A new Malthodes and some other interesting soldier beetles (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) from Late Eocene Rovno amber. — Russian Entomological Journal, 23: 113–116. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kirejtshuk, A. G. & Azar, D. ( 2013): Current knowledge of Coleoptera (Insecta) from the Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber and taxonomical notes for some Mesozoic groups. — Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews, 6: 103–134. Google Scholar

    13.

    Klebs, R. ( 1910): Über Bernsteineinschlüsse im allgemeinen und die Coleopteren meiner Bersteinsammlung. — Schriften der Physikalisch-ökonomischen Gesellschaft zu Königsberg in Preußen, 51: 217–242. Google Scholar

    14.

    Kubisz, D. ( 2000): Fossil beetles (Coleptera) from Baltic amber in the collection of the Museum of Natural History of ISEA in Krakow. — Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 69: 225–230. Google Scholar

    15.

    Kubisz, D. ( 2001): Beetles in the collection of the Museum of Amber Inclusions, University of Gdansk, with description of Colotes sambicus sp. n. (Coleoptera: Melyridae). — Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 70: 259–265. Google Scholar

    16.

    Kuśka, A. ( 1992): Three new species of beetles (Coleoptera: Cantharidae, Anobiidae, Curculionidae) from the Baltic amber. — Annals of the Upper Silesian Museum, Entomology, 3: 107–113. Google Scholar

    17.

    Kuśka, A. ( 1996): New beetle species (Coleoptera: Cantharidae, Curculionidae) from the Baltic amber. — Prace Muzeum Ziemi, 44: 13–18. Google Scholar

    18.

    Kuśka, A. & Kania, I. ( 2010): New soldier beetles (Coleoptera, Cantharidae) from the Eocene Baltic amber. — Zootaxa, 2400: 49–56. Google Scholar

    19.

    Kuśka, A. & Kupryjanowicz, J. ( 2005): Soldier beetles (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) from Baltic amber. — Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 74: 309–316. Google Scholar

    20.

    Piton, L. ( 1939): Note complémentaire sur les insectes fossiles des cinérites pliocènes du Lac Chambon (Puy-de-Dôme). — Revue des Sciences Naturelles d'Auvergne, nouvelle série, 5: 102–108. Google Scholar

    21.

    Poinar Jr, G. O. , Marshall, C. J. & Buckley, R. ( 2007): One hundred million years of chemical warfare by insects. — Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39: 1663–1669. Google Scholar

    22.

    Rasnitsyn, A. P. & Ross, A. J. ( 2000): A preliminary list of arthropod families present in the Burmese amber collection at The Natural History Museum, London. — Bulletin of The Natural History Museum of London, Geology Series, 56: 21–24. Google Scholar

    23.

    Schaufuss, C. ( 1892): Preussens Bernstein-Käfer. Neue Formen aus der Helm'schen Sammlung im Danziger Provinzialmuseum. — Berliner Entomologische Zeitschrift, 36: 53–64. Google Scholar

    24.

    Schlee, D. ( 1990): Das Bernstein-Kabinett. — Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, (C), 28: 1–100. Google Scholar

    25.

    Spahr, U. ( 1981): Systematischer Katalog der Bernstein- und Kopal-Käfer (Coleoptera). — Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, (B), 80: 1–107. Google Scholar

    26.

    Winkler, J. R. ( 1987): Berendtimiridae fam, n., a new family of fossil beetles from Baltic Amber (Coleoptera, Cantharoidea). — Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 77: 51–59. Google Scholar

    27.

    Wittmer, W. ( 1963): A new cantharid from the Chiapas amber of Mexico. — University of California Publications in Entomology, 31: 53 + plate 3 (p. 59). Google Scholar

    28.

    Wittmer, W. ( 1991): Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Tytthonyx Le Conte, 1851, Subgenus Thinalmus Gorham, 1881. Beitrag 1. (Coleoptera: Cantharidae, Subfam. Silinae, Tribus Tytthonyxini). — Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 64: 115–126. Google Scholar

    29.

    Wittmer, W. ( 1992): Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Tytthonyx Le Conte, 1851. Beitrag 2. (Coleoptera: Cantharidae, Subfam. Silinae, Tribus Tytthonyxini). — Entomologica Basiliensia, 15: 333–378. Google Scholar

    30.

    Yablokov-Khnzorian, S. M. ( 1960): New beetles from the Baltic amber. — Paleontologicheskifi01_01.gif Zhurnal, 3: 90–101 [in Russian]. Google Scholar
    George Poinar and Fabrizio Fanti "New Fossil Soldier Beetles (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) in Burmese, Baltic and Dominican Amber," Palaeodiversity 9(1), 1-7, (31 May 2016). https://doi.org/10.18476/pale.v9.a1
    Received: 9 August 2015; Accepted: 27 August 2015; Published: 31 May 2016
    KEYWORDS
    amber
    Cantharidae
    new genus
    new species
    palaeoentomology
    Soldier beetles
    Back to Top