Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2008 Population Status and Conservation of Capped Langurs (Trachypithecus pileatus) in and Around Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A survey of the distribution and population status of the capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus) was conducted in and around the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary in Arunachal Pradesh, India. From 2001–2003, we surveyed ten selected localities, recording 26 groups and a total of 195 individuals. The data was obtained using line transect surveys and total count methods. Capped langurs were found in a number of different habitats: tropical semi-evergreen forest and moist deciduous forests. Of the 195 individuals registered, 14% were adult males, 52% adult females, 2% unidentified adults, 7% sub-adults, 11% juveniles and 15%) infants. The smallest group numbered 3, and the largest 13, with an average group size of 7.5 individuals. The male-female ratio was 1:3.6. The most common size class of the group was of 7–9 individuals.

Introduction

The capped langur occurs in northeastern India, Bangladesh, northwestern Myanmar, Bhutan and southern China (Zhang et al. 1981; Blower 1985; Stanford 1991; Ahsan 1994; Srivastava and Mohnot 2001). It lives in small groups, mostly single-male, multi-female, but occasionally with more than one male (Mukherjee 1978; Green 1981; Stanford 1991; Mukherjee et al. 1995). The species occupies a number of different habitats within its range including stands of bamboo, and plantations in northeast India (Choudhury 1989, 1996; Raman et al. 1995). Populations have been declining mainly due to habitat loss and degradation (Srivastava et al. 2001a, 2001b) and hunting (for food, medicinal purposes, and artifacts for socio-cultural practices and religious and cult ceremonies [Solanki 2002; Kumar and Solanki 2004]). Here we document the status, distribution, and group size and composition of capped langurs in and around the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. We also report on human impacts on the species and their habitats in the sanctuary so that effective conservation measures can be formulated for the species in the region and particularly for the study area.

Methods

Study area

The Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary (PWLS) (formerly known as Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary) is located between 92°35′ to 93°09′E and 26°55′ to 27°15′N, and covers 861.95 km2; 20% of the East Kameng district of Arunachal Pradesh (Fig. 1). It is bordered by Bhoreli River (or Kameng River) in the north and west, by Pakke River in the east, and by the Nameri National Park and Nauduar Reserve Forest of Assam in the south. The sanctuary is well drained by tributaries of the Bhareli and Pakke rivers. The topography is undulatinghilly and the altitude ranges from 200 to 2,040 m above sea level. The climate is tropical and subtropical; cold weather prevails from November to February. Average annual rainfall is 2,599 mm, and the annual mean (± se) maximum temperature is 31 ± 1.1°C, and the mean minimum temperature is 18± 1.2°C. There are four primates in the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary—the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatto), Assamese macaque (M. assamensis), the capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus), and the Bengal or northern slow loris (Nycticebus bengalensis). The vegetation is Assam Valley type (2B/C1); tropical semi-evergreen with a high density and diversity of trees, woody lianas and climbers (Champion and Seth 1968). Tropical, semi-evergreen forests dominate the lower plains and foothills, while subtropical, broadleaved, evergreen and dense forests occur at elevations of 900 to 1,800 m above sea level. The Nyishi tribe lives around the sanctuary, one of the major elements of the human population living in the region, which also includes Nepalies, Kuli-bengalies and Bodo tribes.

Figure 1.

The location of villages around the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India.

f01_97.eps

Methods

A population survey was carried out at selected sites in and around the sanctuary over three years (2001–2003). We interviewed the sanctuary patrols, the range officer and the residents of peripheral villages for information as to the occurrence of capped langur groups in the area. A linetransect method was used to cover all areas in the sanctuary (Brockelman and Ali 1987). Total-count sampling was used in the areas of undulating terrain (NRC 1981). Repeat surveys were conducted on foot, recording group size and structure, sex ratio, vegetation type and any disturbances due to human activities such as settlements, grazing, logging, agriculture, hunting and poaching. Surveys were carried out by one researcher and two local guides from 06:00 to 11:00 and 14:00 to 18:00 or sunset. The langurs were classified into four age categories; adult, sub-adult, juvenile and infant based on the morphological differences described by Stanford (1991).

Results

Population distribution

The surveys covered 201 km of transect in ten different locations (Table 1). Most of the groups sighted were at altitudes of around 800 m (26 groups), and mostly in tropical semi-evergreen forest and moist deciduous forests. Of the 26 groups, 20 were in the sanctuary and six were on the periphery. The maximum number of groups (4) and individuals (38) were recorded at Bhola Nallah Pung (Table 1). Groups ranged in size from 2 individuals to 13, with an average of 7.5 individuals per group.

Group composition

The group structure and composition of capped langurs is shown in Figure 2. Nearly 90% of the population was recorded in one male—multi female social system. The malefemale sex-ratio for identified adults was 1:3.6. A group size of 7–9 individuals was most commonly sighted.

Demography of the villages and the livestock

Demographic information on the villages and livestock around the sanctuary, and who are dependent on the sanctuary for their daily needs, is shown in Table 2. We counted 37 villages, totaling 815 houses, 4,787 people in the surrounding area of PWLS. No human habitation was recorded inside the sanctuary. The number of cattle was 1,967, which generally use the buffer zone of sanctuary for grazing.

Table 1.

Numbers and average size of the groups and population density of capped langur.

t01_97.gif

Threats

Illegal hunting and the depletion of food plants important to the langurs due to the collection of non-timber forest produce (NTFP) were found to be the most serious threats (Fig. 3). Five capped langur groups totaling 37 individuals were recorded in December 2001 next to the eastern boundary of the sanctuary in Hatiputi area, which comes under the jurisdiction of Nauduar RF, Assam, but by the end of December 2002, the number had dropped to 13; twenty-four lost within a year (Kumar and Solanki 2004). Of these, four died due to accidents (two electrocutions, one bitten by a domestic dog and one fell out of a tree during ground foraging and social playing respectively) and the remaining individuals were hunted by tribal groups for bushmeat, ethno-medicine and socio-cultural practices (Table 3). They are also traded in local and external markets.

Extraction of plant resources

The plants exploited by the local people are shown in Table 4. A number of them are also important foods for the langurs. We recorded 37 plant species of 29 families being used by local people inhabiting the surrounding area of the sanctuary (Table 4). Of these, 21 were also used by the capped langur and other primate species in their diet (Kumar and Solanki 2003; Kumar 2006).

Discussion

Capped langurs occupy all types of habitat inside and outside the sanctuary, but the tropical evergreen and semi-evergreen, deciduous forests with such trees as Ficus bengalensis, Ficus glomerata, Bombax ceiba, Altinga excelsa, Gmelina arborea, Morus levigata have been found to be important for the distribution of capped langurs in the region (Kumar 2006), and the availability of food trees may be a limiting factor (Joseph and Ramachandran 2003). Most of the langur groups recorded were between 400 m and 1,500 m above sea level. The largest numbers were recorded in the south-eastern part of the sanctuary, from Dichu to west of Tipi. Harwich (1972) argued that evergreen forest is necessary and is always present in the home ranges of this arboreal species.

Figure 2.

Group composition (%) of capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus).

f02_97.eps

Figure 3.

Categories of threats to species and their habitats in the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh.

f03_97.eps

Table 2.

Demographics of human and cattle's population around the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India.

t02_97.gif

Table 3.

Ethnozoological uses and trading of body parts of capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus).

t03_97.gif

The size and composition of social groups varies geographically (Chivers and Raemakers 1980) because of habitat structure and food availability. Mukherjee (1978) recorded a group size of 7–13 for this species in the Manas Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, and 5–16 in Tripura (Mukherjee 1982). In the Tinsukia district of Assam, Choudhury (1995/1996) recorded group sizes of 5–15 individuals. Disturbance, especially hunting, in the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary may have been the cause of slightly smaller group sizes (2 to 15 individuals). Gupta (1994) recorded smaller groups, averaging of 5.7 individuals, in Gumati Wildlife Sanctuary, Tripura, and similar or slightly larger average group sizes have been recorded elsewhere in northeast India (9.7—Mukherjee 1978; 10.0—Choudhury 1995/1996) and Bangladesh (6.4—Islam and Husain 1982; 7.0—Green 1978; and 7–9—Stanford 1987, 1989). The average group size of capped langur is small when compared to other Indian colobine monkeys such as Trachypithecus. geei, T. obscura, T. johnii, T. phayrei, T. senex, T. vetulus, P. melalophos, Semnopithecus entellus, Presbytis thomasi, and Presbytis rubicunda (Table 5). Variation in group size in different habitats may be due to the difference in the distribution, abundance and quality of the food resources in the habitat and the population density.

Table 4.

Plants used by local people and included in the diet of the capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus).

t04_97.gif

The Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary is also a tiger reserve; hence the core area is mostly free of biotic pressures except for the occasional organized hunting and poaching trips, as informed by the local hunters. Hunting, poaching and habitat destruction, is frequent in the adjacent forest areas of PWLS such as Hatiputi, Nauduar, Charduar reserve forests and Nameri National Park in the Sonitpur District of Assam (Choudhury 1996; Kumar and Solanki 2004; Kushwaha and Hazarika 2004).

Table 5.

Summary of different colobine monkey social systems.

t05_97.gif

Habitat destruction for agricultural activities, permanent settlement, fuel and fodder, and for minor forest produce is also a threat to the sanctuary, and has been since the mid 1990s. There has been an unprecedented number of encroachments by the Bodo tribe, involving clear felling of mature forests for agriculture and settlements in the area bordering the Nameri National Park (Assam) and Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary. Choudhury (2002) reported that reserved forested areas close to the sanctuary and Nameri National Park had been fully converted into agricultural lands and permanent settlements by the end of 2000. The macaques adapted, occupying nearby tea gardens and village woodlands, but the capped langur is now restricted to a few fragmented forests. Crop raiding began following this loss of habitat, as was also reported by Das (1998) in Tripura. The villages close to the sanctuary are using it for grazing; regularly sending large numbers of cattle into the forest there. Grazing pressure is highest from September to November in the sanctuary when agricultural fields are sown with paddy and others crops.

Capped langur, one of the most threatened primates of India due to hunting for their fur and Bushmeat, requires special attention for its long-term survival. The species is declining due to habitat loss and fragmentation and hunting in the entire distribution range of northeast India (Srivastava 2001a, 2001b; Kumar and Solanki 2004) and particularly in Arunachal Pradesh (Solanki and Chutia 2004; Kumar 2006). Preventing hunting and habitat destruction in these protected and non-protected areas is vital for protecting and conserving the species from extinction.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, for providing financial support for the study, and to the Department of Environment and Forest, Arunachal Pradesh for permission to work in the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary and for logistical support. In particular, we thank the Director of NERIST for providing the necessary facilities and administrative and moral support for this work, Mr. C. Loma (Former Divisional Forest Officer, Pakke WLS) for guidance and support in the field, and Dr. Prabal Sarkar (Field Officer, WTI, New Delhi) for critical discussions.

Social group of capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus) at Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Photograph by Awadhesh Kumar.

f04_97.eps

Adult capped langur male presenting sexual solicitation during the mating season to attract the female. Photograph by Awadhesh Kumar.

f05_97.eps

Fur of capped langur is used to decorate the sheath of a traditional Dao (a big knife). Photograph by Awadhesh Kumar.

f06_97.eps

A group of local people carrying the traditional Dao in sheaths decorated with capped langur fur. Photograph by Awadhesh Kumar.

f07_97.eps

Pregnant female capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus). Photograph by Awadhesh Kumar.

f08_97.eps

Deforestation around the Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh. Photograph by Awadhesh Kumar.

f09_97.eps

Literature Cited

1.

M. F. Ahsan 1994. Feeding ecology of the primates of Bangladesh. In: Current Primatology Volume 1. Ecology and Evolution , B. Thierry , J. R. Anderson , J. J. Roeder and N. Herrenschmidt (eds.), pp.79–86. Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg. Google Scholar

2.

E. L. Bennett 1983. The Banded Langur: Ecology of a Colobine in a West Malaysian Rain Forest. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

3.

J. G. Blower 1985. Millipedes. Keys and notes for the identification of the species. Synopses of the British Fauna, No. 35. E. J. Brill, Leiden. Google Scholar

4.

W. Y. Brockelman and R. Ali . 1987. Methods of surveying and sampling forest primate populations. In: Primate Conservation in the Tropical Forest , C. W. Marsh and R. A. Mittermeier (eds.), pp.23–62. Alan R. Liss, New York. Google Scholar

5.

H. G. Champion and S. K. Seth . 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. The Manager of Publications, New Delhi. Google Scholar

6.

D. J. Chivers and J. J. Raemaekers 1980. Long-term changes in behaviour. In: Malayan forest Primates: Ten years' Study in Tropical Rain Forest , D. J. Chivers (ed.), pp.209–260. Plenum Press, New York. Google Scholar

7.

A. Choudhury 1989. Ecology of the capped langur (Presbytis pileatus) in Assam, India. Folia Primatol. 52: 88–92. Google Scholar

8.

A. Choudhury 1995/1996. Primates in Bherjan, Borajan, and Podumoni Reserved Forests of Assam, India. Asian Primates 5(3–4): 10–11. Google Scholar

9.

A. Choudhury 1996. Primates in Assam—status and conservation. TigerPaper 23(3): 14–17. Google Scholar

10.

A. Choudhury 2002. Massive habitat loss for primates in Assam's Sonitpur district. Asian Primates 8(1–2): 18–20. Google Scholar

11.

R. Curtin 1975. Socioecology of the Common Langur (Presbytis entellus) in Nepal, Himalaya, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley. Google Scholar

12.

S. H. Curtin 1980. Dusky and banded leaf monkeys. In: Malayan Forest Primates: Ten Years' Study in Tropical Rain Forest , D. J. Chivers (ed.), pp. 107–146. Plenum Press, New York. Google Scholar

13.

S. Das 1998. Depredations on crops by langurs in Tripura. Tiger Paper 25(4):29–31. Google Scholar

14.

A. G. Davies 1984. An Ecological Study of the Red Leaf Monkey (Presbytis rubicunda) in the Dipterocarp Forest of Sabah, Northern Borneo. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

15.

R. I. M. Dunbar 1987. Habitat quality, population dynamics, and group composition in colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza). Int. J. Primatol. 8(4): 299–329. Google Scholar

16.

K. M. Green 1978. Primates of Bangladesh: a preliminary survey of population and habitat. Biol. Conserv. 13(2): 141–160. Google Scholar

17.

K. M. Green 1981. Preliminary observations on the ecology and behavior of the capped langur, Presbytis pileatus in the Madhupur Forest of Bangladesh. Int. J. Primatol. 2(2): 131–151. Google Scholar

18.

A. K. Gupta and A. Kumar . 1994. Feeding ecology and conservation of Phayre's leaf monkey Presbytis phayrei in northeast India. Biol. Conserv. 69: 301–306. Google Scholar

19.

A. K. Gupta 1994. Status and conservation of non-human primates in Tripura, India. In: Current Primatology Volume 1: Ecology and Evolution , B. Thierry , J. R. Anderson , J. J. Roeder , and N. Herrenschmidt (eds.), pp. 101–111. Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg. Google Scholar

20.

K. J. Gurmaya 1986. Ecology and behavior of Presbytis thomasi in northern Sumatra. Primates 27: 151–172. Google Scholar

21.

C. M. Hladik 1977. A comparative study of the feeding strategies of two sympatric species of leaf monkeys: Presbytis senex and Presbytis entellus. In: Primate Ecology, T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), pp.323–353. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

22.

R. H. Horwich 1972. Home range and food habits of the Nilgiri langur Presbytis johnii. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 69(2): 255–267. Google Scholar

23.

M. A. Islam and K. Z. Husain . 1982. A preliminary study on the ecology of the capped langur. Folia Primatol. 39: 145–159. Google Scholar

24.

P. Jay 1965. The common langur of North India. In: Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes , I. De Vore (ed.), pp. 197–249. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York. Google Scholar

25.

G. K. Joseph and K. K. Ramachandran . 2003. Distribution and demography of the Nilgiri langur (Trachypithecus johnii) in Silent Valley National Park and adjacent areas, Kerala, India. Primate Conserv. (19): 78–82. Google Scholar

26.

A. Kumar 2006. Studies on Ecological and Behavioural Aspects of Capped Langur, Trachypithecus pileatus (Blyth 1843) in Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India. PhD thesis, North Eastern Hill University, Meghalaya, India. Google Scholar

27.

A. Kumar and G. S. Solanki . 2003. Food preference of rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta during the pre-monsoon and monsoon season, Pakhui Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh. Zoos's Print Journal 18(8): 1172–1174. Google Scholar

28.

A. Kumar and G. S. Solanki . 2004. Ethno-sociological impact on capped langur (Trachypithecus pileatus), and suggestions for conservation: a case study of Reserve Forest in Assam, India. J. Nat. Conserv. 16(1): 107–113. Google Scholar

29.

S. P. S. Kushwaha and R. Hazarika . 2004. Assessment of habitat loss in Kameng and Sonitpur Elephant Reserve, Current Science 87(10): 1447–1453. Google Scholar

30.

J. R. MacKinnon and K. S. MacKinnon . 1980. Niche differentiation in a primate community. In: Malayan Forest Primates: Ten Years' Study in Tropical Rain Forest , D. J. Chivers (ed.), pp. 167–190. Plenum Press, New York. Google Scholar

31.

D. B. McKey and P. G. Waterman . 1982. Ranging behavior of a group of black colobus (Colobus satanas) in the Douala Edea Reserve, Cameroon. Folia Primatol. 39: 264–304. Google Scholar

32.

R. P. Mukherjee 1982. Survey of non-human primates of Tripura, J. Zool. Soc. India 34: 70–81. Google Scholar

33.

R. P. Mukherjee , S. Chaudhuri and A. Murmu . 1995. Population survey of South-Asian non-human primates in and around Darjeeling. Prim. Rep. 41: 23–32. Google Scholar

34.

R. P. Mukherjee 1978. Further observations on the golden langur (Presbytis geei Khajuria, 1959) with a note to capped langur (Presbytis pileatus Blyth, 1843) of Assam. Primates 19(4): 737–747. Google Scholar

35.

NRC. 1981. Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology. National Research Council (ed.), National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

36.

J. F. Oates 1974. The Ecology and Behaviour of the Black and White Colobus Monkey (Colobus guereza Ruppell) in East Africa. PhD thesis, University of London, UK. Google Scholar

37.

F. E. Poirier 1970. The Nilgiri langur (Presbytis johnii) of south India. In: Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Researches , L.A. Rosenblum (ed.), pp. 254–383. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar

38.

T. R. S. Raman , C. Mishra and A. J. T. Johnsingh . 1995. Survey of primates in Mizoram, north-east, India. Primate Conserv. (16): 59–62. Google Scholar

39.

R. Rudran 1973. Adult male replacement in one-male troops of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex senex) and its effect on population structure. Folia Primatol. 19: 166–192. Google Scholar

40.

Y. Ruhiyat 1983. Socio-ecological study of Presbytis aygula in West Java. Primates 24: 344–359. Google Scholar

41.

G. S. Solanki 2002. Socio-cultural and faunal diversity of Arunachal Pradesh. Himalayan J. Environ. Zool. 16(2): 159–170. Google Scholar

42.

G. S. Solanki and P. Chutia 2004. Ethno-zoological and socio-cultural aspects of Monpas of Arunachal Pradesh. J. Hum. Ecol. , 15(4): 251–254. Google Scholar

43.

A. Srivastava and M. S. Mohnot . 2001. Distribution, conservation status and priorities for primates in northeast India. Envis Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas 1(1): 102–108. Google Scholar

44.

A. Srivastava , D. Chetry, P. Bujarbarua , J. Das and P. Sarkar . 2001a. Status of primates in the Gibbon Wildlife Sanctuary, Assam, India. Biosphere Conserv. 4(1): 43–49. Google Scholar

45.

A. Srivastava , J. Das, J. Biswas, P. Bujarbarua, P. Sarkar , I. S. Bernstein and S. M. Mohnot . 2001b. Primate population decline in response to habitat loss: Borajan Reserve Forest of Assam, India. Primates 42(4): 401–406. Google Scholar

46.

C. B. Stanford 1987. Ecology of the capped langur (Presbytis pileata) in Bangladesh. Am. J. Primatol. 12: 373. Abstract. Google Scholar

47.

C. B. Stanford 1988. Ecology of the capped langur and Phayre's leaf monkey in Bangladesh. Primate Conserv. (9): 125–128. Google Scholar

48.

C. B. Stanford 1989. Predation on capped langurs (Presbytis pileata) by cooperatively hunting jackals (Canis aureus). Am. J. Primatol. 19: 53–56. Google Scholar

49.

C. B. Stanford 1991. The capped langur in Bangladesh: behavioral ecology and reproductive tactics. Contrib. Primatol. 26: 1–179. Google Scholar

50.

T. T. Struhsaker 1975. The Red Colobus Monkeys. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

51.

S. F. W Sunderraj 2001. Ecology and conservation of Nilgiri langur (Trachypithecus johnii). Envis Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas 1(1): 49–59. Google Scholar

52.

K. Wolf and J. G. Fleagle . 1977. Adult male replacement in a group of silvered leaf-monkeys (Presbytis cristata) at Kuala Selangor, Malaysia. Primates 18: 949–955. Google Scholar

53.

C. P. Yeager 1989. Feeding ecology of the proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus). Int. J. Primatol. 10: 497–530. Google Scholar

54.

Y. Z. Zhang , S. Wang and G. Q. Quan . 1981. On the geographical distribution of primates in China. J. Hum. Evol. 10: 215–226. Google Scholar
Awadhesh Kumar and G. S. Solanki "Population Status and Conservation of Capped Langurs (Trachypithecus pileatus) in and Around Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh, India," Primate Conservation 23(1), 97-105, (1 November 2008). https://doi.org/10.1896/052.023.0111
Received: 1 January 2008; Accepted: 1 September 2008; Published: 1 November 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top