Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2001 Response of Thyroid Follicular Cells to Gamma Irradiation Compared to Proton Irradiation. I. Initial Characterization of DNA Damage, Micronucleus Formation, Apoptosis, Cell Survival, and Cell Cycle Phase Redistribution
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Green, L. M., Murray, D. K., Tran, D. T., Bant, A. M., Kazarians, G., Moyers, M. F. and Nelson, G. A. Response of Thyroid Follicular Cells to Gamma Irradiation Compared to Proton Irradiation. I. Initial Characterization of DNA Damage, Micronucleus Formation, Apoptosis, Cell Survival, and Cell Cycle Phase Redistribution.

The RBE of protons has been assumed to be equivalent to that of photons. The objective of this study was to determine whether radiation-induced DNA and chromosome damage, apoptosis, cell killing and cell cycling in organized epithelial cells was influenced by radiation quality. Thyroid-stimulating hormone-dependent Fischer rat thyroid cells, established as follicles, were exposed to γ rays or proton beams delivered acutely over a range of physical doses. Gamma-irradiated cells were able to repair DNA damage relatively rapidly so that by 1 h postirradiation they had approximately 20% fewer exposed 3′ ends than their counterparts that had been irradiated with proton beams. The persistence of free ends of DNA in the samples irradiated with the proton beam implies that either more initial breaks or a quantitatively different type of damage had occurred. These results were further supported by an increased frequency of chromosomal damage as measured by the presence of micronuclei. Proton-beam irradiation induced micronuclei at a rate of 2.4% per gray, which at 12 Gy translated to 40% more micronuclei than in comparable γ-irradiated cultures. The higher rate of micronucleus formation and the presence of larger micronuclei in proton-irradiated cells was further evidence that a qualitatively more severe class of damage had been induced than was induced by γ rays. Differences in the type of damage produced were detected in the apoptosis assay, wherein a significant lag in the induction of apoptosis occurred after γ irradiation that did not occur with protons. The more immediate expression of apoptotic cells in the cultures irradiated with the proton beam suggests that the damage inflicted was more severe. Alternatively, the cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms required for recovery from such damage might not have been invoked. Differences based on radiation quality were also evident in the α components of cell survival curves (0.05 Gy−1 for γ rays, 0.12 Gy−1 for protons), which suggests that the higher level of survival of γ-irradiated cells could be attributed to the persistence of nonlethally irradiated thyrocytes and/or the capacity to repair damage more effectively than cells exposed to equal physical doses of protons. The final assessment in this study was radiation-induced cell cycle phase redistribution. Gamma rays and protons produced a similar dose-dependent redistribution toward a predominantly G2-phase population. From our cumulative results, it seems likely that a majority of the proton-irradiated cells would not continue to divide. In conclusion, these findings suggest that there are quantitative and qualitative differences in the biological effects of proton beams and γ rays. These differences could be due to structured energy deposition from the tracks of primary protons and the associated high-LET secondary particles produced in the targets. The results suggest that a simple dose-equivalent approach to dosimetry may be inadequate to compare the biological responses of cells to photons and protons.

L. M. Green, D. K. Murray, D. T. Tran, A. M. Bant, G. Kazarians, M. F. Moyers, and G. A. Nelson "Response of Thyroid Follicular Cells to Gamma Irradiation Compared to Proton Irradiation. I. Initial Characterization of DNA Damage, Micronucleus Formation, Apoptosis, Cell Survival, and Cell Cycle Phase Redistribution," Radiation Research 155(1), (1 January 2001). https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0032:ROTFCT]2.0.CO;2
Received: 4 February 2000; Accepted: 1 August 2000; Published: 1 January 2001
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top