Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2007 Forest Service Grazing Permittee Perceptions of the Endangered Species Act in Southeastern Arizona
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study reports the results of a survey of Coronado National Forest grazing permittees about their attitudes regarding the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the management of threatened and endangered (T&E) species on grazing allotments in southeastern Arizona. A majority of respondents perceived negative impacts from ESA implementation. However, the degree of impact remained independent of the number of listed species on allotments and of the potential for restrictions on those allotments. Perceptions of negative impact and attitudes toward T&E species policies were more related to attitudes toward federal regulation. Permittees broadly supported the idea of species conservation and expressed willingness to work with federal agencies but did not perceive the federal agencies as having the same responsiveness to their concerns. A more proactive agency strategy with science-based, focused recovery objectives coupled with economic incentives could improve support for species recovery efforts.

Julie Lorton Conley, Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez, George B. Ruyle, and Mark Brunson "Forest Service Grazing Permittee Perceptions of the Endangered Species Act in Southeastern Arizona," Rangeland Ecology and Management 60(2), 136-145, (1 March 2007). https://doi.org/10.2111/06-094R1.1
Received: 4 July 2006; Accepted: 1 January 2007; Published: 1 March 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top