Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2011 Complex Biogeographic History of Lanius Shrikes and its Implications for the Evolution of Defenses Against Avian Brood Parasitism
Author Affiliations +

Using portions of three mitochondrial genes to resolve the uncertain systematic relationships, we constructed a phylogeny of the “gray shrikes” in the genus Lanius. We used the tree and estimates of the rate of evolution of passeriform mtDNA genes to project the nodes' ages and to assess the pattern and age of egg-rejection behavior in shrikes. Our results suggest that Lanius excubitor and L. m. meridionalis are sister taxa and that this clade is sister to L. ludovicianus, then L. sphenocercus is sister to this clade. Lanius excubitor from the Old World was considerably diverged from both New World species and part of a clade also containing four other subspecies of L. meridionalis. The paraphyly and sequence divergence between New World and Old World L. excubitor suggest that these populations represent distinct species. Mapping egg rejection onto the phylogeny suggests that rejection is deeply rooted in shrikes, as it is present as deep as two species, L. collurio and L. bucephalus, that are outgroups to the gray shrikes and in the derived L. ludovicianus. Rejection in L. ludovicianus may have been retained as long as 1.1–1.8 million years, since its clade split from the Old World L. sphenocercus, providing more evidence that once hosts evolve rejection they retain it for long periods of time. These results suggest hosts are becoming increasingly resistant to brood parasitism, which will force parasites to specialize on a few host species.

© 2011 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website,
Brian D. Peer, Carl E. McIntosh, Michael J. Kuehn, Stephen I. Rothstein, and Robert C. Fleischer "Complex Biogeographic History of Lanius Shrikes and its Implications for the Evolution of Defenses Against Avian Brood Parasitism," The Condor 113(2), 385-394, (1 May 2011).
Received: 2 April 2010; Accepted: 1 October 2010; Published: 1 May 2011

Get copyright permission
Back to Top