Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2013 A Spatial Analysis of Factors Affecting Nesting Success of Shorebirds in the Canadian Prairies
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Conversion of natural grassland to cropland has been postulated as a cause for population declines among grassland birds. We evaluated nest-site habitat characteristics and landscape composition for three species of prairie-breeding shorebirds nesting across the agricultural landscape of prairie Canada. Nests of the Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda) and Willet (Tringa semipalmata) were found disproportionately in natural grazed (57%) or natural idled (21%) patches, whereas Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa) nests were in habitats in proportion to their availability on the landscape. We examined multiple landscape variables (proportions of crop, natural idled, natural grazed, and wetland habitats, edge density, and patch area) across a broad geographic scale, using relatively large samples of nests, and found no strong relationships. Neither nest-site habitat characteristics nor landscape-level effects influenced daily survival rates of Upland Sandpiper or Willet nests. Variation in landscape composition at three different spatial scales (200, 600, and 2000 m) also did not influence daily nest-survival rates. To adequately inform land-use management programs aimed at shorebird conservation, further research should examine site-selection patterns and characteristics of nest sites that maximize survival of chicks and adults during subsequent stages in reproduction.

©2013 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintlnfo.asp.
Mary E. Garvey, Erica Nol, David W. Howerter, and Llwellyn M. Armstrong "A Spatial Analysis of Factors Affecting Nesting Success of Shorebirds in the Canadian Prairies," The Condor 115(1), 58-66, (1 February 2013). https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2012.110146
Received: 8 September 2011; Accepted: 1 July 2012; Published: 1 February 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top