Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2013 Hierarchical Habitat Selection and Reproductive Success of the Ringed Warbling-Finch in Chaco Woodlands
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Breeding birds must choose habitat at a multiple scales, from landscapes to nest sites. It is important to understand how birds make these decisions and the relationships between these choices and breeding success. Over 3 years, we studied nest-site selection of the Ringed Warbling-Finch (Poospiza torquata) in the semiarid Chaco of Argentina at the scales of the landscape, nest patch, and nest site. At the landscape scale, Ringed Warbling-Finches established nesting territories in shrub-grassland exclusively. Within shrub-grassland, nest patches and nest sites selected differed in few attributes of vegetation cover from patches and sites that were available, and those differences varied from year to year. Only in the year when brood survival and breeding success were lowest did features of sites of successful and depredated nests differ clearly. The Ringed Warbling-Finch selects features of nesting habitat at the landscape, nest-patch, and nest-site scales. Implications of choices at the scales of nest patch and nest site appear to vary by year, but the presence of shrubs, particularly Geoffroea decorticans and Ziziphus mistol, was most frequently important. The species appears to be plastic in its selection of nest patches and nest sites, perhaps because these choices do not lead to consistent selective advantages.

© 2013 by The Cooper Ornithological Society. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Rights and Permissions website, http://www.ucpressjournals.com/reprintInfo.asp.
Rocío Sánchez, Pedro G. Blendinger, Eugenia Moyano Wagner, and Eduardo Martín "Hierarchical Habitat Selection and Reproductive Success of the Ringed Warbling-Finch in Chaco Woodlands," The Condor 115(4), (1 November 2013). https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2013.110206
Received: 14 December 2011; Accepted: 1 September 2013; Published: 1 November 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top