Translator Disclaimer
11 November 2015 Population densities of curassows, guans, and chachalacas (Cracidae): Effects of body size, habitat, season, and hunting
Author Affiliations +

Understanding the factors that determine population densities is critical for conserving viable populations of threatened species. Half of the 50 species in the family Cracidae have experienced population declines. We conducted a literature review to explore the relations of population densities of cracids with body size, habitat, season, and hunting. We compiled 103 density data points for 27 species in 37 localities from Mexico to Argentina. There was no correlation between body mass and density. The larger cracines tended to have lower densities than penelopines, but densities in both subfamilies spanned a similar range of values. Intraspecific and interspecific densities varied among sites over 2 orders of magnitude (1–100 birds km−2). Some cracids exhibited plasticity in habitat use, with variable densities among habitats. There is evidence that some species performed local movements related to seasonality in rainfall or resource availability, leading to aggregations around water sources during the dry season or around seasonally abundant food sources. Hunting had a negative effect on population densities, but in some cases low to moderate hunting did not cause a decrease in density in comparison to nonhunted sites. Despite having similar ecologies, densities of cracid species are very variable, and each population seems to respond idiosyncratically to local factors, which requires care if data are extrapolated across populations or species. Future studies that aim to characterize cracid populations for conservation purposes should take into account possible intraspecific density variations related to seasonality, local movements, and habitat heterogeneity.

Gustavo H. Kattan, Marcia C. Muñoz, and David W. Kikuchi "Population densities of curassows, guans, and chachalacas (Cracidae): Effects of body size, habitat, season, and hunting," The Condor 118(1), 24-32, (11 November 2015).
Received: 31 March 2015; Accepted: 1 September 2015; Published: 11 November 2015

Back to Top