Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2013 Comparing ramp and pitfall traps for capturing wandering spiders
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Pitfall traps are a common and inexpensive sampling method for epigeal spiders. They are most effective when the top edge of the trap is flush with the soil surface, which is not always possible if soil disturbance is prohibited, the soil layers are thin or the substrate is only exposed rock. Ramp traps are also inexpensive to construct and do not require soil disturbance, making them an appealing alternative to pitfall traps. We tested the efficacy of ramp traps for capturing wandering spiders at the Fort Pierre National Grassland in central South Dakota, USA. We set parallel transects of pitfall and ramp traps during three sampling periods from late May to early August 2010. Ramp traps captured twice as many individuals and, on average, 1.1 ± 0.34 SE more species than pitfall traps. Overall, ramp traps outperformed pitfall traps, and ramp traps are better for non-permanent sampling at point-specific locations.

The American Arachnological Society
L. Brian Patrick and Ashton Hansen "Comparing ramp and pitfall traps for capturing wandering spiders," The Journal of Arachnology 41(3), 404-406, (1 November 2013). https://doi.org/10.1636/Hi12-52.1
Received: 12 July 2012; Published: 1 November 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
3 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top