How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2017 Reverse Size Dimorphism Estimated by an Improved Method in Eight Species of Neotropical Owls
Marcelo de Andréa Segall, Luiz Pedreira Gonzaga, Paulo Cesar Paiva
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Male birds of prey are usually smaller than females, known as “Reverse Size Dimorphism” (RSD). We quantified sexual size dimorphism in species that occur in Brazil, and suggest a bootstrap-based approach that allows an estimate of confidence intervals for dimorphism indices. We used body mass, total length, and wing length, measured from museum specimens and a few live birds, to quantify size. We gathered data from eight owl species, for which sample sizes were considered to be minimally adequate to provide reliable dimorphism estimates. We calculated a dimorphism index (DI) for each measurement and then these indices were reduced to a single latent variable using a principal component analysis. A clear trend toward positive DI values confirms RSD as a general pattern, except for negative values in Asio clamator (Striped Owl) for all measurements, for total length in Athene cunicularia (Burrowing Owl), and Ciccaba virgata (Mottled Owl), and for virtually equal to zero values in Pulsatrix koeniswaldiana (Tawny-browed Owl) for total length and A. cunicularia for wing length. Body mass was the most dimorphic trait in all species and DI values were consistent across all three traits. Wing length DI was the most precise index and total length DI was the least precise index. In descending order of overall RSD the species studied were Strix hylophila (Rusty-barred Owl), Megascops choliba (Tropical Screech-Owl), Glaucidium brasilianum (Ferruginous Pygmy-Owl), Tyto alba (Barn Owl), P. koeniswaldiana, C. virgata, A. cunicularia and A. clamator.

Marcelo de Andréa Segall, Luiz Pedreira Gonzaga, and Paulo Cesar Paiva "Reverse Size Dimorphism Estimated by an Improved Method in Eight Species of Neotropical Owls," The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 129(4), 883-890, (1 December 2017). https://doi.org/10.1676/16-068.1
Received: 5 May 2016; Accepted: 1 February 2017; Published: 1 December 2017
KEYWORDS
Brazilian owls
dimorphism index
sexual dimorphism
size estimates
Strigiformes
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top