How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2005 Assessment of two nondestructive assays for detecting glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis)
Clifford H. Koger, Dale L. Shaner, W. Brien Henry, Talia Nadler-Hassar, Walter E. Thomas, John W. Wilcut
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Two rapid, nondestructive assays were developed and tested for their potential in differentiating glyphosate-resistant from glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of horseweed. In one assay, leaves of glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible corn, cotton, and soybean plants, as well as glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible horseweed plants, were dipped in solutions of 0, 300, 600, and 1,200 mg ae L−1 glyphosate for 3 d, and subsequent injury was evaluated. In the second assay, plant sensitivity to glyphosate was evaluated in vivo by incubating excised leaf disc tissue from the same plants used in the first assay in 0.7, 1.3, 2.6, 5.3, 10.6, 21.1, 42.3, and 84.5 mg ae L−1 glyphosate solutions for 16 h and measuring shikimate levels with a spectrophotometer. The leaf dip assay differentiated between glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible crops and horseweed biotypes. The 600 mg L−1 rate of glyphosate was more consistent in differentiating resistant and susceptible plants compared with the 300 and 1,200 mg L−1 rates. The in vivo assay detected significant differences between susceptible and glyphosate-resistant plants of all species. Shikimate accumulated in a glyphosate dose–dependent manner in leaf discs from susceptible crops, but shikimate did not accumulate in leaf discs from resistant crops, and levels were similar to nontreated leaf discs. Shikimate accumulated at high (≥ 21.1 mg ae L−1) concentrations of glyphosate in leaf discs from all horseweed biotypes. Shikimate accumulated at low glyphosate concentrations (≤ 10.6 mg L−1) in leaf discs from susceptible horseweed biotypes but not in resistant biotypes. Both assays were able to differentiate resistant from susceptible biotypes of horseweed and could have utility for screening other weed populations for resistance to glyphosate.

Nomenclature: Glyphosate; horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICA; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Dekalb 687RR’, ‘Pioneer 31B13’; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delta and Pine Land 444RR’, ‘Suregrow 747’; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Delta and Pine Land 4748’, ‘Asgrow 4702RR’.

Clifford H. Koger, Dale L. Shaner, W. Brien Henry, Talia Nadler-Hassar, Walter E. Thomas, and John W. Wilcut "Assessment of two nondestructive assays for detecting glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis)," Weed Science 53(4), 438-445, (1 July 2005). https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-010R
Received: 3 February 2005; Accepted: 1 March 2005; Published: 1 July 2005
KEYWORDS
absorbance
bioassay
Glyphosate resistance
Herbicide resistance
leaf dip
leaf disc
shikimate
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top