Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2008 A Comparison of Weed Control in Herbicide-Resistant, Herbicide-Tolerant, and Conventional Corn
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Experiments were conducted at three North Carolina research stations in 2003 to evaluate weed control and corn yield in glyphosate-resistant, glufosinate-resistant, imidazolinone-tolerant, and conventional corn weed management systems. Late-season control of common lambsquarters, large crabgrass, and yellow nutsedge increased with metolachlor PRE compared with no PRE herbicide treatment. Common lambsquarters, pitted morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, spurred anoda, and tropic croton control was improved by a single early POST (EPOST) application regardless of herbicide system. Control of common lambsquarters, pitted morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, and spurred anoda was similar for glyphosate and glufosinate systems for each POST over-the-top (POT) herbicide system. A single EPOST application of imazethapyr plus imazapyr to imidazolinone-tolerant corn controlled common lambsquarters, pitted morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, and spurred anoda and was better than a single EPOST application of glyphosate, glufosinate, or nicosulfuron. Tropic croton was controlled ≥ 95% with glufosinate or glyphosate, applied once or twice, or in mixture with metolachlor. A single EPOST application of imazethapyr plus imazapyr or nicosulfuron did not control tropic croton. Common lambsquarters, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, and yellow nutsedge control was greater with a late-POST–directed (LAYBY) of ametryn than no LAYBY. Systems that did not include a POT herbicide system had the lowest percentage in the weed-free yield and the lowest yield. Treatments that included a POT system with or without a PRE treatment of metolachlor yielded within 5% of the weed-free treatment, regardless of herbicide system.

Nomenclature:Ametryn; glufosinate; glyphosate; imazapyr; imazethapyr; metolachlor; nicosulfuron; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEAL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray IPOHG; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; spurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. ANVCR; tropic croton, Croton glandulosus var. septentrionalis (Muell).-Arg. CVNGS; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES; corn, Zea mays L. ‘DKC 67-60 RR’, ‘Pioneer 34A55 LL’, ‘Garst 8222 IT’, ‘N75-KG’ ZEAMX

Ian C. Burke, Walter E. Thomas, JAYLA R. ALLEN, Jim Collins, and John W. Wilcut "A Comparison of Weed Control in Herbicide-Resistant, Herbicide-Tolerant, and Conventional Corn," Weed Technology 22(4), (1 October 2008). https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-184.1
Received: 28 December 2007; Accepted: 1 July 2008; Published: 1 October 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top