The fundamental role of hydrology in determining HGM classification and function leads to the assumption that any test of regionalization might do well to begin with a comparison of hydrologic variation within regional subclasses across a geographical or landscape continuum. This paper deals with only the basic hydrologic comparisons between New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia for similarly classified wetlands in all three regions. Water levels for headwater floodplain wetlands varied substantially between the New York region and the Pennsylvania and Virginia regions; the latter regions were very similar. The same pattern was evident for slope wetlands across the three regions, but there was no significant difference in water levels for riparian depressions. Based upon the hydrologic data alone, it seems that applying the classification outside of central Pennsylvania had mixed results; it worked well south to Virginia and less well north to New York. One substantial influence in New York was the presence of beaver (Castor canadensis) that greatly influenced almost every watershed we worked in. Furthermore, climate differences between the three regions may also have a large impact – the New York sites were subject to much more snow than sites further south.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.
Vol. 28 • No. 2