How to translate text using browser tools
17 February 2020 Quantifying imperfect camera-trap detection probabilities: implications for density modelling
T. McIntyre, T. L. Majelantle, D. J. Slip, R. G. Harcourt
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Context. Data obtained from camera traps are increasingly used to inform various population-level models. Although acknowledged, imperfect detection probabilities within camera-trap detection zones are rarely taken into account when modelling animal densities.

Aims. We aimed to identify parameters influencing camera-trap detection probabilities, and quantify their relative impacts, as well as explore the downstream implications of imperfect detection probabilities on population-density modelling.

Methods. We modelled the relationships between the detection probabilities of a standard camera-trap model (n = 35) on a remotely operated animal-shaped soft toy and a series of parameters likely to influence it. These included the distance of animals from camera traps, animal speed, camera-trap deployment height, ambient temperature (as a proxy for background surface temperatures) and animal surface temperature. We then used this detection-probability model to quantify the likely influence of imperfect detection rates on subsequent population-level models, being, in this case, estimates from random encounter density models on a known density simulation.

Key results. Detection probabilities mostly varied predictably in relation to measured parameters, and decreased with an increasing distance from the camera traps and speeds of movement, as well as heights of camera-trap deployments. Increased differences between ambient temperature and animal surface temperature were associated with increased detection probabilities. Importantly, our results showed substantial inter-camera (of the same model) variability in detection probabilities. Resulting model outputs suggested consistent and systematic underestimation of true population densities when not taking imperfect detection probabilities into account.

Conclusions. Imperfect, and individually variable, detection probabilities inside the detection zones of camera traps can compromise resulting population-density estimates.

Implications. We propose a simple calibration approach for individual camera traps before field deployment and encourage researchers to actively estimate individual camera-trap detection performance for inclusion in subsequent modelling approaches.

© CSIRO 2020
T. McIntyre, T. L. Majelantle, D. J. Slip, and R. G. Harcourt "Quantifying imperfect camera-trap detection probabilities: implications for density modelling," Wildlife Research 47(2), 177-185, (17 February 2020). https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19040
Received: 1 March 2019; Accepted: 21 October 2019; Published: 17 February 2020
KEYWORDS
detectability
mark–recapture
performance
random encounter model
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top