Translator Disclaimer
1 October 2006 L. D. Mech Critique of Our Work Lacks Scientific Validity
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An accompanying article in this issue of the Bulletin (Mech 2006) purports to critique our past research. L. D. Mech attempts to show that our model of prospective, preferred gray wolf (Canis lupus) habitat (Mladenoff et al. 1995, 1997, 1999, Mladenoff and Sickley 1998) has been incorrect. We first state clearly that we are not opposed to the re-assessment of our work based on new data. However we believe the Mech paper contains both serious conceptual and methodological flaws that render its conclusions invalid. Our own analysis, based on logic and current techniques (Mladenoff et al. 2005), shows that the model has behaved according to our predictions and continues to successfully predict wolf recolonization in Wisconsin, USA, over more than 25 years. However, the serious flaws of Mech (2006) alone show that he is incorrect in his putative critique of our work.

DAVID J. MLADENOFF, MURRAY K. CLAYTON, THEODORE A. SICKLEY, and Adrian P. Wydeven "L. D. Mech Critique of Our Work Lacks Scientific Validity," Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(3), 878-881, (1 October 2006). https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[878:LDMCOO]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 October 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top