Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2006 Using Baits to Deliver Pharmaceuticals to Feral Swine in Southern Texas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Few studies have evaluated oral delivery systems of pharmaceuticals (e.g., vaccines, fertility control agents, and toxicants) to feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Our objective was to assess, through a field trial, the percentage of feral swine and nontarget animals that remove and consume baits intended to transport pharmaceuticals to feral swine in southern Texas, USA. We hand-placed 1,178 iophenoxic acid (IA)–marked baits distributed over 1,721 ha (68 baits/km2) in April 2005 and monitored species-specific bait removal and consumption using track stations, automated camera systems, and serum IA values from captured animals. Ninety percent of baits were removed after 72 hours. For baits for which we determined the species that “definitely” or “likely” removed bait using track stations and cameras, 51% were taken by raccoons (Procyon lotor), 22% were taken by feral swine, and 20% were taken by collared peccaries (Tayassu tajacu). We found elevated serum IA values in 74% of trapped feral swine, 89% of raccoons, and 43% of opossums (Didelphis virginiana). Our oral delivery system was successful in marking a substantial proportion of feral swine. However, our observed removal rates suggest that the majority of the baits were taken by nontarget species and, therefore, unsuitable for most pharmaceutical applications in their current form.

TYLER A. CAMPBELL, STEVEN J. LAPIDGE, and DAVID B. LONG "Using Baits to Deliver Pharmaceuticals to Feral Swine in Southern Texas," Wildlife Society Bulletin 34(4), (1 November 2006). https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1184:UBTDPT]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 November 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top