Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
22 December 2003 Phylogenetic relationships in Saussurea (Compositae, Cardueae) sensu lato, inferred from morphological, ITS and trnL-trnF sequence data, with a synopsis of Himalaiella gen. nov., Lipschitziella and Frolovia
Eckhard Von Raab-Straube
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

DNA sequences from the nuclear ribosomal ITS and from the chloroplast trnL-trnF regions of 47 species of all six subgenera and 13 sections of Saussurea were analysed. The cladogram resulting from ITS sequence data indicates that Saussurea in its present circumscription is paraphyletic. S. sect. Elatae and S. subg. Jurinocera together are sister to the genus Jurinea. The affinities of S. subg. Frolovia are unclear, while representative species of the remaining four subgenera and ten sections form a strongly supported monophyletic group. Within this clade, the delimitation of S. subg. Eriocoryne and S. subg. Amphilaena against S. subg. Saussurea is not evident. The trnL-trnF intergenic spacer sequences show a remarkable synapomorphy, a 21bp insertion, for Jurinea cyanoides, S. deltoidea, S. ceratocarpa and S. frolovii, supporting the paraphyly of Saussurea. These results correspond to differences in morphological characters of achenes and pappus, which also suggest that S. sect. Elatae, S. subg. Jurinocera and S. subg. Frolovia are not closely related to the remainder of the genus. Consequently, S. sect. Elatae is separated as the new genus Himalaiella, and the small generic segregates Frolovia and Lipschitziella are resurrected. A synopsis of these three genera is presented and the new combinations Himalaiella abnormis, H. afghana, H. albescens, H. auriculata, H. chenopodiifolia, H. chitralica, H. deltoidea, H. foliosa, H. heteromalla, H. nivea, H. peguensis, Frolovia frolovii and F. gorbunovae are validated.

See the PDF.

References

1.

H. Baillon 1886: Histoire des plantes 8. — Paris. Google Scholar

2.

K. Bremer 1994: Asteraceae. Cladistics and classification. — Portland. Google Scholar

3.

A. P. de Candolle 1833: Genres nouveaux appartenant à la famille des Composées ou Synanthérées. — Arch. Bot. (Paris) 2: 330–384. Google Scholar

4.

A. O. Chater & S. Kitamura 1982: Saussurea DC. — Pp. 37–41 in: H. Hara , A. O. Chater & L. H. J. Williams (ed.), An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal 3. — London. Google Scholar

5.

Y. L. Chen & Z. Y. Li 1994: Saussurea DC. — Pp. 2103–2129 in: W. T. Wang (ed.), Vascular plants of the Hengduan mountains 2. — Beijing. Google Scholar

6.

C. B. Clarke 1876: Compositae indicae, descriptae et secum genera Benthamii ordinatae. — Calcutta. Google Scholar

7.

S. K. Čerepanov 1995: Vascular plants of Russia and adjacent states (the former USSR). — Cambridge. Google Scholar

8.

O. V. Černeva 1962: Rod Frolovia Lipsch. — Pp. 339–340 in: A. I. Vvedenskij (ed.), Flora uzbekistana 6. — Taškent. Google Scholar

9.

M. Dittrich 1970: Morphologische und anatomische Untersuchungen an Früchten der Carduinae (Compositae). I. Morphologischer Teil. — Candollea 25: 45–67. Google Scholar

10.

J. F. Duthie 1901: Saussurea chitralica. — Ann. Bot. Gard. (Calcutta) 9: 45, t. 57. Google Scholar

11.

W. Greuter , J. McNeill , F. R. Barrie , H. M. Burdet , V. Demoulin , T. S. Filgueiras , D. H. Nicolson , P. C. Silva , J. E. Skog , P. Trehane , N. J. Turland , D. L. Hawksworth (ed.) 2000: International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. — Regnum Veg. 138. Google Scholar

12.

A. J. C. Grierson & L. S. Springate 2001: Compositae. — Pp. 1397–1632 in: A. J. C. Grierson & D. G. Long (ed.), Flora of Bhutan 2. — Edinburgh. Google Scholar

13.

E. Häffner 2000: On the phylogeny of the subtribe Carduinae (tribe Cardueae, Compositae). — Engiera 21. Google Scholar

14.

E. Häffner & F. H. Hellwig 1999: Phylogeny of the tribe Cardueae (Compositae) with emphasis on the subtribe Carduinae: an analysis based on ITS sequence data. —  Willdenowia 29: 27–39. Google Scholar

15.

P. K. Hajra 1988: Brahmakamal and its allies (Saussurea the genus). — Dehra Dun. Google Scholar

16.

P. K. Hajra 1995: Tribe 4. Cardueae Cass. (Cynaroideae). — Pp. 150–225 in: P. K. Hajra , R. R. Rao , D. K. Singh & B. P. Uniyal (ed.), Flora of India 12. — Calcutta. Google Scholar

17.

D. Hepperle 2003: ALIGN. Version 01/2003. — Neuglobsow. Google Scholar

18.

J. D. Hooker 1881: Compositae. — Pp. 219–419 in: J. D. Hooker (ed.), Flora of British India 3. — Ashford. Google Scholar

19.

R. V. Kamelin 1993: Rod Lipschitziella R. Kam. gen. nov. — Pp. 371, 632 in A. I. Vvedenskij (ed.), Opreditel' rastenij Srednej Azii. Kritičeskij konspekt flory. [Conspectus florae Asiae mediae]. 10. — Taškent. Google Scholar

20.

R. V. Kamelin & S. S. Kovalevskaja 1993: Rod Frolovia (DC.) Lipsch. — Pp. 353–354 in A. I. Vvedenskij (ed.), Opreditel' rastenij Srednej Azii. Kritičeskij konspekt flory. [Conspectus florae Asiae mediae]. 10. — Taškent. Google Scholar

21.

R. V. Kamelin 1999: Sredneaziatskie vidy sekcii Frolovia (DC.) Kitam. roda Saussurea DC. [A Middle-Asian species of the section Frolovia (DC.) Kitam. of the genus Saussurea DC.]. — Turczaninowia 2(4): 25–32. Google Scholar

22.

S. Kitamura 1969: Compositae of Southeast Asia and Himalayas IV. — Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 24(1–2): 1–27. Google Scholar

23.

I. M. Krasnoborov (ed.) 1997: Flora Sibiri 13. Asteraceae (Compositae). — Novosibirsk. Google Scholar

24.

C. F. Lessing 1832: Synopsis generum compositarum. — Berlin. Google Scholar

25.

S. J. Lipšic 1954: O rode Frolovia (DC.) Lipsch. [De genere novo Frolovia (DC.) Lipsch.]. — Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk SSSR 16: 461–462. Google Scholar

26.

S. J. Lipšic 1961: K poznaniju roda Saussurea DC. flory SSSR. [Ad cognitionem generis Saussurea DC. florae URSS]. — Bot. Mater. Gerb. Bot. Inst. Komarova Akad. Nauk SSSR 21: 369–381. Google Scholar

27.

S. J. Lipšic 1962: Rod Saussurea DC. — Pp. 356–530 in: B. K. Šiškin & E. G. Bobrov (ed.), Flora SSSR 27. — Leningrad. Google Scholar

28.

S. J. Lipšic 1979: Rod Saussurea DC. — Leningrad. Google Scholar

29.

C. McCarthy 1996: Chromas. Version 1.45 — Southport. Google Scholar

30.

A. Saklani , R. R. Rao & L. B. Chaudhary 2000: SEM-characterisation of achene morphology towards the taxonomy of Indian species of Saussurea DC. (Asteraceae). — Rheedea 10: 1–18. Google Scholar

31.

C. H. Schultz-Bipontinus 1846: Bemerkungen zu der Tribus der Cynareen Less. — Linnaea 19: 321–336. Google Scholar

32.

C. Shih & S. Y. Jin 1999: Compositae (8). Cynareae. — Pp. 1–243 in: C. Shih & Y. L. Chen (ed.), Zhongguo zhiwuzhi [Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae] 78(2). — Beijing. Google Scholar

33.

D. L. Swofford 2001: PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4. 0 b10 for 32-bit Microsoft Windows. — Sunderland. Google Scholar

34.

B. A. Šaripova 1991: Rod Frolovia (DC.) Lipsch. — Pp. 159–162 in: M. R. Rasulova (ed.), Flora Tadžikskoj SSR 10. — Leningrad. Google Scholar

35.

P. Taberlet , L. Gielly , G. Pautou & J. Bouvet 1991: Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. — Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105–1109. Google Scholar

36.

T. J. White , T. Bruns , S. Lee & J. Taylor 1990: Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. — Pp. 315–322 in: M. Innis , D. Gelfand , J. Sninsky & T. White (ed.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. — San Diego. Google Scholar
© 2003 BGBM Berlin-Dahlem.
Eckhard Von Raab-Straube "Phylogenetic relationships in Saussurea (Compositae, Cardueae) sensu lato, inferred from morphological, ITS and trnL-trnF sequence data, with a synopsis of Himalaiella gen. nov., Lipschitziella and Frolovia," Willdenowia 33(2), 379-402, (22 December 2003). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.33.33214
Published: 22 December 2003
Back to Top