Leptocereus, a genus with its centre of diversity in Cuba, has about five different assemblages of species based on floral features. However, flowers are not always available when identifying plants. Considering wood as a conservative tissue and its previous contributions to the taxonomy and systematics of flowering plants, the wood anatomy of L. arboreus and L. scopulophilus is described and compared with other species of the genus. In wood anatomy, L. arboreus, from central Cuba, differs from the western species by the presence of scalariform intervessel pits, a feature also reported for L. quadricostatus, a species of Puerto Rico and the British Virgin Islands. This fact might indicate that L. arboreus is probably more similar to the eastern species of the genus. Leptocereus scopulophilus is characterized by the predominance of septate fibres and solitary vessels. All the studied Cuban species of Leptocereus have druses in ray cells, a distinct characteristic in Cactoideae.
Leptocereus (Berger) Britton & Rose comprises about a dozen allopatric and rather distinct species, whose combined distribution extends in an arc from Cuba through Hispaniola to Puerto Rico and Culebra (Areces-Mallea 1993a). Cuba is the centre of diversity of this genus with 11 species recorded (Alain 1953; Areces-Mallea 1992, 1993a, b). Outside Cuba only four species have been described (Anderson 2001).
Even though these species have some differences in their vegetative organs, their identification has been based mostly on reproductive structures in the identification keys of Alain (1953) and Areces-Mallea (1992). Additionally, floral characters support no less than five different assemblages of allopatric species within the range of the genus in the West Indies according to Areces-Mallea (1993a). One of them is formed by Leptocereus assurgens (C. Wright & Griseb.) Britton & Rose, L. ekmanii (Werderm.) F. M. Knuth and L. prostratus Britton & Rose, species of W Cuba (Pinar del Río) characterized by bright yellow flowers (Areces-Mallea 1993a). Another group of related species in NW Cuba is formed by L. leonii Britton & Rose, L. scopulophilus Areces and L. wrightii León, with pinkish flowers. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that flowers are not always available in the field, especially for this genus where variations in the extent and abundance of the flowering season have been observed. Therefore, it is important to include vegetative organs in an identification key for Leptocereus species.
Vessel element features of Leptocereus species.
On the other hand, wood has long been viewed as a conservative tissue (Metcalfe & Chalk 1988) and a potential source of systematically informative characters (Herendeen & al. 1999). In the present study, the wood anatomy of Leptocereus arboreus, from central Cuba, and L. scopulophilus is described and compared with similar data for L. assurgens, L. leonii and L. wrightii (Gibson 1973) as well as data for the non-Cuban species L. quadricostatus (Mauseth & Ross 1988). The value of wood anatomy in Leptocereus for grouping species and its contribution to their identification is also analysed.
Material and methods
Wood samples of more than 2 cm long and 1.5 cm in diameter were taken from a mature branch of an individual of Leptocereus arboreus near to the Yaguanabo river estuary, Cienfuegos, and from a dead trunk of an individual of L. scopulophilus at the Pan de Matanzas. Sampling was limited by the fact that the two species are Endangered EN B1ab(iii) and Critically Endangered CR B1a b(i,ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v), respectively, with reduced populations (Taylor & al. 2013), so the present study considered mainly wood anatomical qualitative features.
Samples were processed by standard techniques in anatomy (Peña & Saralegui 1982; Montenegro & Gómez 1997). Semi-permanent preparations stained with safranine 1 % were made for both species. Descriptions of qualitative anatomical characters were made according to the nomenclature of the IAWA Committee (1989). Vessel element length and vessel diameter were measured with a light microscope graduated lens. Anatomical characters with diagnostic value were selected. Photomicrographs were taken using a digital camera attached to the microscope.
The anatomical comparison with other species of the genus included data of the wood anatomy of Leptocereus assurgens, L. leonii and L. wrightii taken from Gibson (1973) and of L. quadricostatus taken from Mauseth & Ross (1988).
Results and Discussion
Leptocereus arboreus Britton & Rose
Growth rings indistinct. Wood diffuse-porous. Vessels in radial pattern, 50 % solitary, in radial multiples (Fig. 1A) of 2 vessels (up to 4 vessels) and clusters of 4 vessels. Simple perforation plate. Alternate to mostly pseudoscalariform intervessel pits, elliptic to oblong, frequently elongate oblong. Pseudoscalariform to scalariform vessel-ray pits, elliptic to elongate oblong, with much-reduced borders to apparently simple, similar to the intervessel ones. Scalariform vessel-parenchyma pits (Fig. 2A), elongate oblong, with distinct borders, in general similar to the intervessel ones. Axial parenchyma scanty paratracheal, up to 4 cells per parenchyma strand; apotracheal parenchyma diffuse. Nonseptate fibres present (Fig. 1B), occasionally septate fibres, with simple to minutely bordered pits; pits common in both radial and tangential walls. Multiseriate rays of 5–9 cells wide (Table 1), up to 57 cells high; all ray cells upright and square (Fig. 1C). (Pith was lost during histological procedures.)
Leptocereus scopulophilus Areces
Growth rings indistinct. Wood diffuse-porous. Vessels in radial pattern, 74% solitary (Fig. 1D), occasionally in radial multiples of 2 or 3 vessels and clusters of 3–5 vessels. Simple perforation plate. Alternate to pseudoscalariform intervessel pits, elliptic to oblong. Alternate vesselray pits, elliptic to mostly elongate oblong, with distinct borders, different to the intervessel ones. Scalariform vessel-parenchyma pits, elongate oblong, with distinct borders, different to the intervessel ones. Axial parenchyma scanty paratracheal, up to 5 cells per parenchyma strand; apotracheal parenchyma diffuse. Septate fibres present (Fig. 2B), with simple to minutely bordered pits; pits common in both radial and tangential walls. Multiseriate rays of 5–8 cells wide (Fig. 1E), up to 48 cells high; all ray cells upright and square (Fig. 1F). (Pith was lost during histological procedures.)
These species of Leptocereus are very similar in wood anatomy (Table 1), which agrees with Gibson (1973). Nevertheless, some features allowing the identification of species can be pointed out, such as the predominance of septate fibres in L. scopulophilus and the predominance of scalariform intervessel pits in L. arboreus and L. quadricostatus (see Mauseth & Ross 1988), while in the rest of the species the transitional to alternate intervessel pitting pattern predominates, except for L. wrightii where it is exclusively alternate according to Gibson (1973).
There are also preliminary quantitative differences in the wood anatomy of the genus. For the Cuban species, Leptocereus arboreus showed the longest vessel elements, as opposed to L. assurgens with the shortest ones, with average lengths of 303 µm and 117 µm, respectively (Table 1). It should be remarked that the length of the vessel elements supports the group with pinkish flowers formed by L. leonii, L. scopulophilus and L. wrightii, with average lengths ranging from 237–268 µm (Table 1). Vessel diameter shows extreme values in L. leonii and L. scopulophilus, with averages of 70 µm and 38 µm, respectively (Table 1). This feature has been regarded as closely related to the environment (Baas 1982; Metcalfe & Chalk 1988); however, both species grow on limestone hills with similar environmental conditions, and nevertheless the vessels of L. leonii have almost twice the width of those of L. scopulophilus. The rest of the species have intermediate values. Despite these differences, further studies are needed involving a greater number of individuals per species in order to re-evaluate the diagnostic value of these quantitative characters.
Druses were abundant in the ray cells of all Cuban species studied (Fig 1B, C, E). The presence of these crystals is distinctive within Cactoideae according to Gibson (1973), as well as the presence of paedomorphic rays (Fig. 1C, F).
In general, Leptocereus arboreus differs from the western species by the presence of scalariform intervessel pits, which are also present in the species of Puerto Rico and the British Virgin Islands, L. quadricostatus, according to Mauseth & Ross (1988). This suggests that L. arboreus is probably more related to the eastern species of the genus. Further studies on this topic should be able to evaluate this hypothesis.
The studies on Leptocereus were supported by conservation and research grants from the British Cactus and Succulent Society, Idea Wild and the National Botanic Garden, University of Havana. The authors are indebted to members of the British Cactus and Succulent Society for their continued support of studies of Cuban cacti. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.
- Alain [Bro.] 1953: Flora de Cuba, 3. Dicotiledóneas: Malpighiaceae a Myrtaceae. — Contr. Ocas. Mus. Hist. Nat. Colegio “De La Salle” 13. Google Scholar
- E. F. Anderson 2001: The cactus family. — Portland: Timber Press. Google Scholar
- A. E. Areces-Mallea 1993b: Leptocereus carinatus (Cactaceae), una nueva especie de la isla de Cuba. — Moscosoa 7: 243–248. Google Scholar
- IAWA Committee 1989: IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. — I. A. W. A. J. 10: 219–332. Google Scholar
- J. D. Mauseth & R. G. Ross 1988: Systematic anatomy of the primitive ceroid cactus Leptocereus quadricostatus. — Bradleya 6: 49–64. Google Scholar
- C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk 1988: Anatomy of the dicotyledons, ed. 2, 1. – Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
- G. Montenegro & M. Gómez 1997: Anatomía y evolución del cuerpo vegetativo de las plantas vasculares. Manual de trabajos prácticos. — La Habana: Jardín Botánico Nacional de La Habana. Google Scholar
- E. Peña & H. Saralegui 1982: Técnicas de anatomía vegetal. — La Habana: Universidad de la Habana. Google Scholar