Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 1995 Changes in Phosphorylation Activities during Goldfish and Xenopus Oocyte Maturation
Noriyuki Yoshida, Toyomi Tanaka, Masakane Yamashita
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Oocyte maturation is promoted by the sequential actions of several kinases, of which MPF (a histone H1 kinase) and MAP kinase (a myelin basic protein (MBP) kinase) are known to play pivotal roles. However, other kinases responsible for inducing oocyte maturation have yet to be characterized. To identify these kinases, we examined phosphorylation activities toward 44 exogenous substrate proteins during oocyte maturation in goldfish and Xenopus. We found that 4 substrates in goldfish and 6 in Xenopus were phosphorylated and their phosphorylation states changed during oocyte maturation. Among them, only 3 substrates (histone H1, MBP and pepsin) were common to both species. Precipitation of cdc2 showed that, like histone H1, pepsin was also phosphorylated by cdc2 (MPF). These results suggest that different kinase cascades are involved in goldfish and Xenopus oocyte maturation, although MPF and MAP kinases are common to both species. We also found novel phosphorylation activities that precede the activation of MPF and MAP kinases using deoxyribonuclease I, casein, pepsin and protamine as exogenous substrates.

INTRODUCTION

Oocyte maturation is a process in which full-grown immature oocytes acquire the ability to undergo embryonic development after fertilization. This involves the reinitiation of meiosis arrested at the first meiotic prophase and is accompanied by such morphological changes as germinal vesicle break down (GVBD), chromosome condensation and spindle formation. Oocyte maturation is controlled by three major factors: gonadotropin (GTH), maturation-inducing hormone (MIH) and maturation-promoting factor (MPF) [24]. Oocyte maturation is initiated by GTH secreted from pituitary gland. GTH induces follicle cells around the oocytes to synthesize and secrete MIH. MIH is identified as 1-methyladenine in starfish [11], progesterone in amphibians [35], and 17α, 20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one (17α,20β-DP) in salmonid fishes [23]. The signal of MIH is received directly on the surface of oocytes and transduced into oocyte cytoplasm probably via the function of GTP binding proteins [2, 3, 42]. Finally, MPF is activated, bringing about all the changes accompanying oocyte maturation [12]. MPF consists of two components, cdc2 (a catalytic subunit) and cyclin B (a regulatory subunit), and its activity is controlled by phosphorylation of cdc2 after it binds to cyclin B [40].

Upon oocyte maturation, protein phosphorylation is greatly enhanced in many animal species [18]. Thus it is likely that kinases play pivotal roles in initiating and promoting oocyte maturation. Following the reception of MIH signals on the oocyte surface, a decrease in the activity of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (A-kinase) is considered to play a part in the initial step of the signal transduction toward the activation of MPF [18, 35], although there are several species in which an increase in A-kinase activity seems to induce oocyte maturation [20, 37, 43]. Besides A-kinase, several kinases are also reported to be involved in oocyte maturation (c-mos, 31, 32, 41; S6 kinase, 22, 28, 29; MAP kinase, 19, 30, 34). However, the precise biochemical cascade which leads the MIH-stimulated oocyte to maturation through the activation of MPF is still unknown. We believe that many other unknown kinases play important roles in oocyte maturation. As a first step to identify kinases responsible for inducing and promoting oocyte maturation, we examined phosphorylation activities toward 44 exogenous substrate proteins during oocyte maturation in goldfish and Xenopus. Here we report novel phosphorylation activities which exhibit different patterns depending on the species, in addition to MPF and MAP kinase activities common to both species.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental animals and the preparation of oocyte extracts

Goldfish (Carassius auratus) and African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis) were used in this study. Goldfish were obtained from a local fish farm (Yatomi, Aichi, Japan) and raised at 15°C until use. Xenopus were reared in our laboratory.

Full-grown immature goldfish oocytes were manually isolated from ovaries using a pipette and forceps, and induced to mature in vitro by incubating at room temperature in Ringer's solution [9] containing 1 μg/ml of 17α, 20β-DP. Oocyte extracts were obtained at 1 hr intervals following 17α, 20β-DP stimulation as described previously [8]. Briefly, 50 oocytes were homogenized with pestle (Pellet Pestle; Kontes) in 50 ml of ice-cold extraction buffer (100 mM β-glycerophosphate, 20 mM HEPES, 15 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 100 μM p-amidinophenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 3 μg/ml of leupeptin, pH 7.5). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000xg for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80°C until use. Oocytes were also extracted with an extraction buffer lacking β-glycerophosphate and EGTA. Maturational processes were assessed by immersing the oocytes in a clearing solution (5% formalin and 4% acetic acid in Ringer) [14], which facilitates microscopic examination of the occurrence of GVBD.

Full-grown immature Xenopus oocytes (Dumont stage VI) were isolated from ovaries by treating them with 2 mg/ml of collagenase in OR-2 (82.5 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.8) for 1 hr at room temperature with gentle agitation. They were then washed extensively with DB (111 mM NaCl, 1.3 mM KC1, 1.3 mM CaCl2) several times, and induced to mature in vitro by incubating at room temperature in DB containing 10 μg/ml of progesterone. Maturational processes were evaluated by the appearance of a white spot on the animal pole, which indicates the occurrence of GVBD.

Phosphorylation assay

The phosphorylation assay was performed as follows. Oocyte extracts (2.5 μl) were incubated with 2 μg/ml of each substrate protein for 20 min at room temperature in 10 μl of a reaction buffer (15 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 20 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM ATP) containing 3,000 Ci/mmol of [γ-32P]ATP (HAS). The reaction was stopped by adding Laemmli's SDS sample buffer [13]. Proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a 12.5% or 15% polyacrylamide gel, and the radioactivities on the substrate bands were quantified using an imaging analyzer (FUJIX BAS2000), and expressed as photostimulated luminescence (PSL) values.

Suc1-precipitation

Extracts (25 μl) from mature oocytes of goldfish and Xenopus were incubated with 2.5 μl of sucl-conjugated beads overnight at 4°C [39]. The beads were washed three times with 1 ml of TTBS (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) and used for the phosphorylation assay.

RESULTS

Phosphorylation activities during goldfish oocyte maturation

We examined phosphorylation activities against 44 exogenous substrate proteins during goldfish and Xenopus oocyte maturation. The proteins examined in this study were listed in Table 1. We used two types of buffers for extracting kinases from oocyte cytoplasm: One was a HEPES buffer containing MgCl2 and protease inhibitors, and the other contained β-glycerophosphate (a phosphatase inhibitor) and EGTA (Ca2+ chelater) in addition to the components of the former buffer. The latter buffer was used for extracting MPF. In spite of the presence of β-glycerophosphate and EGTA, however, no difference was observed between the two buffers (data not shown), suggesting that the phosphorylation activities described in this study are independent of phosphatases and Ca2+.

Table 1

Exogenous substrate proteins

i0289-0003-12-5-599-t01.gif

Of the 44 proteins examined, 18 were phosphorylated in goldfish oocyte extracts, and the phosphorylation states of 4 proteins changed during oocyte maturation (Table 1). These proteins include pepsin, deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I), histone H1, and myelin basic protein (MBP). Figure 1 shows the changes in the phosphorylation states of the 4 proteins after 17α, 20β-DP stimulation. The changes in phosphorylation activity toward the 4 protein substrates can be classified into two different patterns. The phosphorylation activity to histone H1 and MBP increased gradually after 17α, 20β-DP stimulation, followed by an abrupt increase concurrent with the onset of GVBD (Fig. 1A and B). On the other hand, the changes in phosphorylation activity toward DNase I and pepsin exhibited two peaks before and after GVBD (Fig. 1C and D). The activities toward DNase I and pepsin differed in the height of the two peaks; the former showed a higher peak after GVBD, while the latter showed a higher peak before GVBD (Fig. 1C and D).

Fig. 1

Changes in phosphorylation activities during goldfish oocyte maturation induced by 17α, 20β-DP. Percentage of GVBD and phosphorylation activity are indicated by closed and open circles, respectively.

i0289-0003-12-5-599-f01.gif

Phosphorylation activities during Xenopus oocyte maturation

Of the 44 proteins, 18 were phosphorylated in Xenopus oocyte extracts, and the phosphorylation states of 6 proteins changed during oocyte maturation (Table 1). These proteins were histone H1, MBP, pepsin, carbonic anhydrase, casein, and protamine (Fig. 2). The phosphorylation activities toward histone H1, MBP and pepsin showed similar changes during oocyte maturation. After a gradual increase following progesterone stimulation, a rapid increase occurred when oocytes underwent GVBD (Fig. 2A-C). Since histone H1 and pepsin are phosphorylated by cdc2 (MPF), and MBP is phosphorylated by MAP kinase, as will be indicated later, this confirms previous reports that progesterone-induced activation of cdc2 and MAP kinase occurs almost simultaneously in Xenopus oocytes [5, 19]. The change in the phosphorylation activity against carbonic anhydrase resembled those for histone H1, MBP and pepsin, but it was associated with a rapid decrease in the final step of oocyte maturation (Fig. 2D). The activities toward casein and protamine exhibited an apparently different pattern from those for other 4 proteins, with three peaks at 0.5, 2–2.5, and 3.5–4 hr after the progesterone treatment (Fig. 2E and F).

Fig. 2

Changes in phosphorylation activities during Xenopus oocyte maturation induced by progesterone. GVBD, closed circles; phosphorylation activity, open circles.

i0289-0003-12-5-599-f02.gif

Pepsin phosphorylation by MPF

Table 1 shows that, of 44 exogenous protein substrates, only three (histone H1, MBP and pepsin) were phosphorylated regularly during goldfish and Xenopus oocyte maturation. Histone H1 and MBP are well known substrates for cdc2 (MPF) [38] and MAP kinase [25], respectively. However, no kinase is known to be responsible for pepsin phosphorylation. It is plausible that, like histone H1, pepsin is phosphorylated by cdc2. To confirm this, we precipitated cdc2 from mature oocyte extracts with suc1, a fission yeast suc1+ gene product that binds specifically to cdc2 [39]. The suc1-precipitates and suc1-supernatants from mature goldfish and Xenopus oocyte extracts were used for the phosphorylation assay. In both goldfish and Xenopus, histone H1 was phosphorylated in the suc1 precipitate, but not in the supernatant (Fig. 3A and B), indicating that almost all active cdc2 was precipitated by suc1. In Xenopus, the phosphorylation activity against pepsin was removed from the oocyte extracts by suc1, indicating that the pepsin phosphorylation activity in Xenopus oocyte extracts is entirely derived from cdc2 (Fig. 3B). Similarly, the phosphorylation activity toward pepsin in goldfish oocyte extracts was also precipitated by suc1, although the precipitation was not complete and considerable activity remained in the supernatant (Fig. 3A). These results clearly show that, although a part of the pepsin phosphorylation activity was due to kinase(s) other than cdc2, cdc2 is also responsible for pepsin phosphorylation in mature goldfish oocyte extracts.

Fig. 3

Phosphorylation of histone H1 and pepsin in the suc1supernatant (1, 3, 5) and the suc1-precipitate (2, 4, 6) from mature goldfish (A) and Xenopus (B) oocyte extracts. Samples were incubated in the absence (1, 2) of an exogenous substrate or in the presence of either histone H1 (3, 4) or pepsin (5, 6). The uptake of 32P into histone H1 and pepsin (arrowheads) were analyzed by autoradiography following SDS-PAGE.

i0289-0003-12-5-599-f03.gif

DISCUSSION

Oocyte maturation induced by MIH is associated with the enhanced phosphorylation of many proteins in maturing oocytes of amphibians [1, 1517, 36], starfish [4, 6, 33], Urechis [21] and annelids [27]. The enhanced protein phosphorylation is thought to be a compulsory process of oocyte maturation throughout the animal kingdom, but the only protein kinases well known to play crucial roles in oocyte maturation are cdc2 and MAP kinase. As a first step to characterize kinases which play crucial roles in oocyte maturation, we examined phosphorylation activities against 44 exogenous substrate proteins in maturing goldfish and Xenopus oocytes.

Of the 44 proteins examined, four were phosphorylated and their phosphorylation states changed during oocyte maturation in goldfish, whereas the number was six in Xenopus. These proteins included histone H1, MBP, pepsin, DNase I, carbonic anhydrase, casein, and protamine, among which the former three were common in the two species. Histone H1 and MBP are well known to be phosphorylated by cdc2 [38] and MAP kinase [25], respectively. However, phosphorylation activity toward pepsin has not been reported during oocyte maturation. By suc1 precipitation experiments, we showed that pepsin phosphorylation is also responsible for cdc2 in both goldfish and Xenopus, although a part of its activity is derived from kinase(s) other than cdc2 in goldfish. It is therefore concluded that only cdc2 and MAP kinase activity are common in both goldfish and Xenopus oocyte maturation.

Molecular mechanisms of the formation and activation of MPF differ completely between goldfish and Xenopus, in spite of the identity of the final molecular structure of active MPF [40]. In immature goldfish oocytes, all cdc2 is monomeric and cyclin B is absent. Cyclin B is de novo .bl synthesized during oocyte maturation and bound to preexisting cdc2. After binding to cyclin B, cdc2 is phosphorylated on Thr161 and activated, yielding active MPF. In goldfish, therefore, MPF is formed and activated during oocyte maturation in accordance with the synthesis of cyclin B. On the other hand, cdc2 is already bound to cyclin B and phosphorylated on Thr161 in immature Xenopus oocytes. But, it is also phosphorylated on Thr14/Tyr15, thereby rendering it inactive. During oocyte maturation, cdc2 is dephosphorylated on Thr14/Tyr15 and thus acquires kinase activity. In the case of Xenopus, therefore, MPF is already present in immature oocytes as inactive form (pre-MPF), and its activation is dependent on Thr14/Tyr15 dephosphorylation and not on cyclin B. The present finding that, except for cdc2 and MAP kinase, phosphorylation activities revealed by exogenous substrates are quite different between goldfish and Xenopus also confirms the difference in the mechanisms of the promotion of oocyte maturation according to species.

Besides cdc2 and MAP kinase, we found novel phosphorylation activities that precede the activation of cdc2 and MAP kinase, when DNase I and pepsin (in the case of goldfish, Fig. 1) and casein and protamine (in the case of Xenopus, Fig. 2) were used as exogenous substrates. Although kinases responsible for the phosphorylation of these substrates have not yet been characterized, it is highly likely that these activities are derived from different kinases, since their phosphorylation patterns during oocyte maturation are apparently different from each other. Characterization of the kinases responsible for the phosphorylation activities that precede the activation of MPF and MAP kinase are of great importance, since we have little knowledge about the kinase cascade that links the reception of MIH signal on the oocyte surface and the activation of MPF in oocyte cytoplasm.

When a certain protein (DNase I or pepsin for goldfish and casein or protamine for Xenopus) was used, plural peaks of phosphorylation activities were observed during oocyte maturation. This can be explained in two ways. One explanation is that the activities of some kinases fluctuate with several peaks during oocyte maturation. In this case, these kinases may function at several points during oocyte maturation. Another explanation is that the plural peaks are the summation of plural kinase activities. In other words, certain proteins are phosphorylated by plural kinases simultaneously. For example, in Xenopus, all pepsin phosphorylation activity was due to cdc2 and exhibited only one peak (Figs. 2 and 3). In goldfish, however, pepsin phosphorylation activity exhibited two peaks before and after GVBD (Fig. 1D), and cdc2 only partially contributed to the activity found in the latter phase (in mature oocytes) (Fig. 3). This finding shows that pepsin indicates the activities of at least two different kinases in goldfish oocyte extracts. Like pepsin, it is plausible that plural peaks detected by other substrates reflect plural kinase activities. The identification of the kinases responsible for the phosphorylation activities found in this study is a prerequisite for understanding the precise role of each phosphorylation activity during oocyte maturation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (No. 0626201 and 06680712).

REFERENCES

1.

R. Belle, J. Boyer, and R. Ozon . 1979. Endogenous phosphorylated proteins during maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Gamete Res 2:137–145. Google Scholar

2.

K. Chiba, K. Kontani, H. Tadenuma, T. Katada, and M. Hoshi . 1993. Induction of starfish oocyte maturation βγ bg subunit of starfish G protein and possible existence of the subsequent effector in cytoplasm. Mol Biol Cell 4:1027–1034. Google Scholar

3.

R. J. Cork, M. Taylor, R. L. Varnold, L. D. Smith, and K. R. Robinson . 1990. Microinjected GTP-γ-S inhibits progesterone-induced maturation of Xenopus oocytes. Dev Biol 141:447–450. Google Scholar

4.

M. Dorée, J. C. Cavadore, C. J. Le Peuch, and J. G. Demaille . 1981. Hormone-induced phosphorylation of a 16000 dalton polypeptide following meiosis reinitiation in starfish oocytes. Exp Cell Res 135:251–257. Google Scholar

5.

Y. Gotoh, K. Moriyama, S. Matsuda, E. Okumura, T. Kishimoto, H. Kawasaki, K. Suzuki, I. Yahara, H. Sakai, and E. Nishida . 1991. Xenopus M phase MAP kinase:Isolation of its cDNA and activation by MPF. EMBO J 10:2661–2668. Google Scholar

6.

P. Guerrier, M. Moreau, and M. Dorée . 1977. Hormonal control of meiosis in starfish:Stimulation of protein phosphorylation induced by 1-methyladenine. Mol Cell Endocrinol 7:137–150. Google Scholar

7.

T. Hirai, A. Yamaguchi, H. Kajiura, M. Yamashita, and Y. Nagahama . 1993. Molecular cloning of protein kinases in fish oocyte during maturation. Zool Sci 10:supplement64. Google Scholar

8.

T. Hirai, M. Yamashita, M. Yoshikuni, Y. H. Lou, and Y. Nagahama . 1992. Cyclin B in fish oocytes:Its cDNA and amino acid sequences, appearance during maturation, and induction of p34cdc2 activation. Mol Reprod Dev 33:131–140. Google Scholar

9.

H. Kagawa, G. Young, and Y. Nagahama . 1984. in vitro estradiol-17β and testosterone production by ovarian follicles of the goldfish Carassius auratus. Gen Comp Endocrinol 54:139–143. Google Scholar

10.

H. Kajiura, M. Yamashita, Y. Katsu, and Y. Nagahama . 1993. Isolation and characterization of goldfish cdc2, a catalytic component of maturation-promoting factor. Dev Growth Differ 35:647–654. Google Scholar

11.

H. Kanatani, H. Shirai, K. Nakanishi, and T. Kurokawa . 1969. Isolation and identification of meiosis-inducing substance in starfish Asterias amurensis. Nature 211:273–277. Google Scholar

12.

T. Kishimoto 1988. Regulation of metaphase by a maturation-promoting factor. Dev Growth Differ 30:105–115. Google Scholar

13.

U. K. Laemmli 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685. Google Scholar

14.

C. A. Lessman and S. Kavumpurath . 1984. Cytological analysis of nuclear migration and dissolution during steroid-induced meiotic maturation in vitro of follicle-enclosed oocytes of the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Gamete Res 10:21–29. Google Scholar

15.

M. J. Lohka, J. L. Hayes, and J. L. Maller . 1987. Metaphase protein phosphorylation in Xenopus laevis eggs. Mol Cell Biol 7:760–768. Google Scholar

16.

J. L. Maller and D. S. Smith . 1985. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel analysis of changes in protein phosphorylation during maturation of Xenopus oocyte. Dev Biol 109:150–156. Google Scholar

17.

J. L. Maller, M. Wu, and J. C. Gerhart . 1977. Changes in protein phosphorylation accompanying maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Dev Biol 58:295–312. Google Scholar

18.

Y. Masui and H. J. Clarke . 1979. Oocyte maturation. Int Rev Cytol 57:185–282. Google Scholar

19.

S. Matsuda, H. Kosako, K. Takenaka, K. Moriyama, H. Sakai, T. Akiyama, Y. Gotoh, and E. Nishida . 1992. Xenopus MAP kinase activator:Identification and function as a key intermediate in the phosphorylation cascade. EMBO J 11:973–982. Google Scholar

20.

M. Mattioli, G. Galeati, B. Barboni, and E. Seren . 1994. Concentration of cyclic AMP during the maturation of pig oocytes in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fert 100:403–409. Google Scholar

21.

L. Meijer, M. Paul, and D. Epel . 1982. Stimulation of protein phosphorylation during fertilization-induced maturation of Urechis caupo oocytes. Dev Biol 94:62–70. Google Scholar

22.

L. Meijer, S. L. Pelech, and E. G. Krebs . 1987. Differential regulation of histone H1 and ribosomal S6 kinases during sea star oocyte maturation. Biochemistry 26:7968–7974. Google Scholar

23.

Y. Nagahama and S. Adachi . 1985. Identification of a maturation-inducing steroid in a teleost, the amago salmon (Oncorhynchus rhodurus). Dev Biol 109:428–435. Google Scholar

24.

Y. Nagahama, M. Yoshikuni, M. Yamashita, and M. Tanaka . 1994. Regulation of oocyte maturation in fish. In “Fish Physiology Vol XIII”. Ed by N. M. Sherwood and C. L. Hew , editors. Academic Press. New York. pp. 393–439. Google Scholar

25.

E. Nishida and Y. Gotoh . 1992. Mitogen-activated protein kinase and cytoskeleton in mitogenic signal transduction. Int Rev Cytol 138:211–238. Google Scholar

26.

S. Onoe, M. Yamashita, H. Kajiura, Y. Katsu, J. Jianquao, and Y. Nagahama . 1993. A fish homolog of the cdc2-related protein p40MO15:Its cDNA cloning and expression in oocytes. Biomed Res 14:441–444. Google Scholar

27.

G. Peaucellier, M. Dorée, and J. G. Demaille . 1982. Stimulation of endogenous protein phosphorylation in oocytes of Sabellaria alveolata (polychaete annelid) at meiosis reinitiation induced by protease, fertilization, or ionophore A 23187. Gamete Res 5:115–123. Google Scholar

28.

G. Peaucellier, A. Picard, J. J. Robert, J. P. Capony, J. C. Labbé, and M. Dorée . 1988. Phosphorylation of ribosomal proteins during meiotic maturation and following activation in starfish oocytes:its relationship with changes of intracellular pH. Exp Cell Res 174:71–78. Google Scholar

29.

S. L. Pelech, L. Meijer, and E. G. Krebs . 1987. Characterization of maturation-activated histone H1 and ribosomal S6 kinases in sea star oocytes. Biochemistry 26:7960–7968. Google Scholar

30.

S. L. Pelech, R. M. Tombes, L. Meijer, and E. G. Krebs . 1988. Activation of myelin basic protein kinases during echinoderm oocyte maturation and egg fertilization. Dev Biol 130:28–36. Google Scholar

31.

N. Sagata, I. Daar, M. Oskarsson, S. D. Showalter, and G. F. Vande Woude . 1989. The product of the mos proto-oncogene as a candidate “initiator” for oocyte maturation. Science 245:643–646. Google Scholar

32.

N. Sagata, M. Oskarsson, T. Copeland, J. Brumbaugh, and G. F. Vande Woude . 1988. Function of c-mos proto-oncogene product in meiotic maturation in Xenopus oocytes. Nature 335:519–525. Google Scholar

33.

Sano 1985. Calcium- and cyclic AMP-independent, labile protein kinase appearing during starfish oocyte maturation:Its extraction and partial characterization. Dev Growth Differ 27:263–275. Google Scholar

34.

E. K. Shibuya, T. G. Boulton, M. H. Cobb, and J. V. Ruderman . 1992. Activation of p42 MAP kinase and the release of oocytes from cell cycle arrest. EMBO J 11:3963–3975. Google Scholar

35.

L. D. Smith 1989. The induction of oocyte maturation: Trans-membrane signaling events and regulation of the cell cycle. Development 107:685–699. Google Scholar

36.

R. A. Wallace 1974. Protein phosphorylation during oocyte maturation. Nature 252:510–512. Google Scholar

37.

M. Yamashita 1988. Involvement of cAMP in initiating maturation of the brittle-star Amphipholis kochii oocytes:Induction of oocyte maturation by inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase and activators of adenylate cyclase. Dev Biol 125:109–114. Google Scholar

38.

M. Yamashita, S. Fukada, M. Yoshikuni, P. Bulet, T. Hirai, A. Yamaguchi, H. Yasuda, Y. Ohba, and Y. Nagahama . 1992. Mphase-specific histone H1 kinase in fish oocytes:Its purification, components and biochemical properties. Eur J Biochem 205:537–543. Google Scholar

39.

M. Yamashita, M. Yoshikuni, T. Hirai, S. Fukada, and Y. Nagahama . 1991. A monoclonal antibody against the PSTAIR sequence of p34cdc2, catalytic subunit of maturation-promoting factor and key regulator of the cell cycle. Dev Growth Differ 33:617–624. Google Scholar

40.

M. Yamashita, H. Kajiura, T. Tanaka, S. Onoe, and Y. Nagahama . 1995. Molecular mechanisms of the activation of maturation-promoting factor during goldfish oocyte maturation. Dev Biol 168:62–75. Google Scholar

41.

N. Yew, M. L. Mellini, and G. F. Vande Woude . 1992. Meiotic initiation by the mos protein in Xenopus. Nature 355:649–652. Google Scholar

42.

M. Yoshikuni and Y. Nagahama . 1994. Involvement of an inhibitory G-protein in the signal transduction pathway of maturation-inducing hormone (17α,20β-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one) action in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) oocytes. Dev Biol 199:615–622. Google Scholar

43.

Y. Yoshimura, Y. Nakamura, T. Oda, M. Ando, Y. Ubukata, M. Karube, N. Koyama, and H. Yamada . 1992. Induction of meiotic maturation of follicle-enclosed oocytes of rabbits by a transient increase followed by an abrupt decrease in cyclic AMP concentration. J Reprod Fert 95:803–812. Google Scholar
Noriyuki Yoshida, Toyomi Tanaka, and Masakane Yamashita "Changes in Phosphorylation Activities during Goldfish and Xenopus Oocyte Maturation," Zoological Science 12(5), 599-606, (1 October 1995). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.12.599
Received: 5 June 1995; Accepted: 1 July 1995; Published: 1 October 1995
Back to Top