Three phenotypic color pattern genes of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata), i.e., black caudalpeduncle (Bcp), red tail (Rdt) and variegated tail patterning (Var), were genetically analyzed and mapped. Crosses between the Tuxedo (TUX) and Green Variegated (GV) guppy strains commercially cultured in Singapore were used to determine the gene control of these color patterns. F1 progenies were produced by single-pair reciprocal crossing between TUX and GV, while the F2 generation was obtained from full-sib mating between F1 males and females. F1 and F2 data were segregated according to color phenotypes and sex, and tested by chi-square analyses. The Bcp, Rdt and Var color pattern genes, located at different loci on the X- and Y-chromosomes, showed single gene inheritance and dominant expression in both sexes. Their corresponding recessive alleles, Bcp , Rdt and Var , do not produce any color patterns. Genotypes of Tuxedo males are proposed to be XBcp,Rdt,Var YBcp,Rdt,Var (type I), XBcp ,Rdt,Var YBcp,Rdt,Var (type II) and XBcp,Rdt,Var YBcp ,Rdt,Var (type III) while females are XBcp,Rdt,Var XBcp,Rdt,Var . Green Variegated males and females have the XBcp ,Rdt ,VarYBcp ,Rdt ,Var and XBcp ,Rdt ,VarXBcp ,Rdt ,Var genotypes, respectively. Close linkages of 3.1, 2.3 and 2.2 map units were estimated for the sex-determining region (SdR)–Rdt, Rdt–Bcp, and SdR–Var gene pairs, respectively, while Bcp was approximately 5.1 map units from the SdR. The phenotypic map order of the guppy Y-chromosome is inferred to be Var–SdR–Rdt–Bcp.
The guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters, is a fresh- and brackish-water ovoviviparous poecilid fish native to Trinidad, Barbados, Venezuela, Guyana and north-eastern Brazil (Haskins and Haskins, 1951; Yamamoto, 1975). The guppy shows distinct sexual dimorphism whereby males are smaller than females and their anal fin is modified into a copulatory organ, the gonopodium. Complex polymorphic spots and patches of colors on the body and fins are also expressed by sexually mature males while females are devoid of bright color patterns, being olive-brown with hyaline fins (Haskins and Haskins, 1951). The guppy was introduced into Singapore and other parts of South-East Asia in the late 1930s as a biological control for mosquitoes (Herre, 1940).
The guppy is popular among commercial guppy breeders and hobbyists who have developed many exotic strains by intensive selection of spontaneous mutant genes that affect the coloration as well as the shape and size of the body and fins (Dzwillo, 1959; Kirpichnikov, 1981; Fernando and Phang, 1985). In Singapore, culture of fancy guppy strains began in the early 1950s. About 30–40 different strains are reared in monoculture guppy farms (Fernando and Phang, 1985). The guppy is one of the top 10 most popularly farmed ornamental fish in Singapore which exported US$48 million worth of ornamental fish in 1997 (Cheong, 1998).
The guppy is unique in that almost all the genes involved in color pigmentation and patterning are sex-linked. It has 23 pairs of chromosomes, 22 of which are autosomal and one the sex chromosomes. Male guppies are heterogametic (XY) while the females are homogametic (XX) (Winge, 1922a, b; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947). It is the first species shown to have Y-linked inheritance of genes (Schmidt, 1920). Kirpichnikov (1981) documented 17 Y-linked genes that are passed only from father to son (one-sided masculine inheritance), 15 that are X- and Y-linked (found in both males and females but expressed only in males as they are sex-limited and hormone-mediated), and one that is autosomal dominant. Some of these color pattern genes, e.g., Maculatus (Ma), Armatus (Ar) and Pauper (Pa), influence sex determination in wild-type guppies (Schmidt, 1920; Winge, 1922a, b, 1927, 1934; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947). These genes are usually found close to or within a short sex-determining region (designated as SdR) on the Y-chromosome, and are presumably linked tightly to a gene for maleness (Winge, 1927, 1934; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947; Kirpichnikov, 1981). The SdR may also represent a dominant factor for male-determination and possibly has a recessive female-determining region at a similar position on the X-chromosome. Genes for background body coloration, e.g., blond (b), gold (g), albino (a) and blue (bl) are, however, autosomally inherited and recessive to their wild-type alleles (Haskins and Druzba, 1938; Goodrich et al., 1944, 1947; Dzwillo, 1959; Kirpichnikov, 1981).
Color patterns on the body and fins of domesticated guppy strains take the form of single colors, snakeskin-like reticulations and variegated mosaic patterns of two or more colors (Nayudu, 1975, 1979; Kirpichnikov, 1981; Fernando and Phang, 1989; Phang et al., 1989a, b, 1990; Phang and Fernando, 1991; Khoo et al., 1999a, b). The ease with which new strains can be developed from spontaneous mutation makes the guppy a suitable model for investigating the genetic control of color polymorphism (Dzwillo, 1959; Yamamoto, 1975; Kirpichnikov, 1981; Fernando and Phang, 1985). Expression of phenotypic color patterns in cultured guppies has been found to be determined by dominant sex-linked and sex-limited genes (Dzwillo, 1959; Nayudu, 1975, 1979; Kirpichnikov, 1981; Fernando and Phang, 1989, 1990; Phang et al., 1989a, b, 1990; Phang and Fernando, 1991; Khoo et al., 1999a, b). Consequently, these genes may be used as genetic (phenotypic) markers to map the X- and Y-chromosomes of the guppy (Winge, 1927, 1934; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947; Nayudu, 1975, 1979; Kirpichnikov, 1981; Purdom, 1993).
This paper presents the genetic linkage analyses of three sex-linked color pattern genes: black caudal-peduncle (Bcp), red tail (Rdt) and variegated tail (Var) (Khoo et al., 1999a, b), their interactions with each other and the SdR, and their relationships to the blue tail (Blt), green tail (Grt) and snakeskin body-snakeskin tail (Ssb-Sst) traits that were investigated in our earlier studies (Fernando and Phang, 1989; Phang et al., 1989a, b, 1990; Phang and Fernando, 1991). Map distances of these genes from the sex-determining region and from each other were determined from recombination rates. We report the mapping of these gene loci of domesticated guppies onto the phenotypic map of wild-type guppy sex chromosomes that was originally constructed by Winge (1927, 1934) and later revised by Winge and Ditlevsen (1947), Yamamoto (1975), Kirpichnikov (1981) and Purdom (1993).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Source of the fish
Three-to four-week old fry of the Tuxedo (TUX) and Green Variegated (GV) guppy strains were obtained from highly inbred and well-established TUX and GV stocks of the Chin Lam Brothers Tropical Fish Farm and Swee Hing & Brothers Aquarium Co., respectively, in Singapore. Tuxedo and Green Variegated are the commercial names given to these strains by guppy breeders. Male and female juveniles, distinguishable by the expression of their color patterns due to sexual dimorphism, were cultured separately according to Khoo et al. (1999a, b) for another three to four weeks before being used for reciprocal crosses between the TUX and GV strains. This was to ensure that juvenile males were fully mature (as indicated by a well-developed gonopodium) and females had not been previously inseminated. Under laboratory conditions, domesticated guppies reach sexual maturation at six to eight weeks of age.
Description of the strains
Adult males of the Tuxedo (TUX) strain have black or dark grey pigmentation on the caudal-peduncle region, and a caudal fin that ranges from blood-red to orange-red in color (Fig. 1A). TUX females show wild-type olive-brown body coloration and grey caudal-peduncle with red tinges of varying intensity on an opaque greyish-white tail (Fig. 1B). The TUX strain has been shown to carry the black caudalpeduncle (Bcp) and red tail (Rdt) color pattern genes by Fernando and Phang (1990) and Khoo et al. (1999b).
Adult Green Variegated (GV) males display wild-type male body coloration which consists of polymorphic patches of various colors that are overlaid by a green metallic sheen. GV males also have a bright orange caudal fin with a mosaic pattern of black spots of different shapes and sizes, and some yellow streaks (Fig. 1C). GV females display wild-type female body coloration and greyish-brown variegated patterns on a yellowish translucent tail (Fig. 1D). The variegated tail patterning of the GV strain is due to the Var color pattern gene (Khoo et al., 1999a).
To establish the mode of inheritance and linkage of the black caudal-peduncle, red tail and variegated tail color patterns, singlepair reciprocal crosses were made between six-week old mature virgin fish of the TUX and GV strains. Each pair was kept in a 3.5-liter breeding tank. Broods were produced 4–6 weeks after mating. Single-pair full-sib F1 males and F1 females were mated to produce the F2 generation. The following notations were used: TUX♂♂×GV♀♀ (Table 1A) and GV♂♂ × TUX♀♀ (Table 2A) for parental crosses, and F1♂♂ × F1♀♀ (Tables 1B and 2B) for full-sib F1 crosses. Newly born fry were separated and raised to maturity in 3.5-liter clear plastic tanks (five fish/tank). F1 and F2 offspring were segregated according to color phenotype and sex. Their color patterns were designated as TUX (black caudal-peduncle and red tail typical of the Tuxedo strain), TUXVAR (Tuxedo with variegated tail patterning), RTVAR (red tail with variegated patterns), BCPVAR (black caudal-peduncle with variegated tail patterns), RT (red tail) and VAR (variegated tail with a mosaic pattern of large black spots and patches). To facilitate description of the crosses, Tuxedo male parents of TUX ♂♂ × GV ♀ ♀ were typed using Roman numerals (I, II, III, IV and V) according to their putative genotypes following segregation and scoring of F1 and F2 progenies (Khoo et al., 1999b).
Mating results of crosses between Tuxedo (TUX) males and Green Variegated (GV) females showing observed and expected numbers for each phenotypic class, expected segregation ratios, chi-square goodness-of-fit to the expected ratios and their corresponding adjusted values (χ2adj) after application of Yates' correction for continuity, χ2 test for homogeneity, probable genotypes and recombinants for (A) the F1 generation of single-pair parental crosses, and (B) the F2 generation of single-pair crosses between full-sib F1 males and F1 females. Recombinants (§) due to crossing-over of the Rdt, Bcp and Var genes were not considered in chi-square analyses. (Phenotypes: TUX=Tuxedo with black caudal-peduncle and red tail [grey caudal-peduncle and faint red tinges on an opaque greyish-white tail in TUX females]; RT=red tail without black caudal-peduncle; BCP=black caudal-peduncle without red tail; VAR=tail with variegated patterns; TUXVAR=Tuxedo with variegated tail patterns; RTVAR=red tail with variegated patterns; BCPVAR=black caudal-peduncle with variegated tail patterns. Genes: Bcp =black caudalpeduncle gene; Bcp+= absence of black caudal-peduncle gene; Rdt =red tail gene; Rdt+=absence of red tail gene; Var =variegated tail pattern gene; Var+=absence of variegated tail pattern gene).
Mating results of crosses between Green Variegated (GV) males and Tuxedo (TUX) females showing observed and expected numbers for each phenotypic class, expected segregation ratios, chi-square goodness-of-fit to the expected ratios and their corresponding adjusted values (χ2adj) after application of Yates' correction for continuity, χ2 test for homogeneity, probable genotypes and recombinants for (A) the F1 generation of single-pair parental crosses, and (B) the F2 generation of single-pair crosses between full-sib F1 males and F1 females. Recombinants (#) due to crossing-over of the Rdt, Bcp and Var genes were not considered in chi-square analyses. (Phenotypes: TUX=Tuxedo with black caudal-peduncle and red tail [grey caudal-peduncle and faint red tinges on an opaque greyish-white tail in TUX females]; VAR=tail with variegated patterns; TUXVAR=Tuxedo with variegated tail patterns; RTVAR=red tail with variegated patterns; BCPVAR=black caudal-peduncle with variegated tail patterns. Genes: Bcp =black caudal-peduncle gene; Bcp+= absence of black caudal-peduncle gene; Rdt =red tail gene; Rdt+=absence of red tail gene; Var =variegated tail pattern gene; Var+=absence of variegated tail pattern gene).
Statistical and linkage analyses
Observed phenotypic distributions were tested for goodness-of-fit with predicted proportions using the chi-square (χ2) test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981; Strickberger, 1990). Since the observed and expected numbers in each phenotypic class and sample sizes were small (n< 200), Yates' (1934) correction for continuity was included in the calculation of χ2 to improve the approximation to the χ2 distribution, as shown by the χ2adj values. Data was pooled when the χ2 test for homogeneity indicated that there were no significant differences among the phenotypic frequencies, the observations were sufficiently uniform and the families homogeneous. The correction for continuity was not incorporated into the test for homogeneity because calculated χ2 values had to be summed and χ2adj values were not additive (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981; Strickberger, 1990). Individuals with exceptional coloration due to crossing-over of the black caudal-peduncle (Bcp), red tail (Rdt) and variegated tail (Var) genes between the X- and Y-chromosomes were not considered during chi-square analyses (Winge, 1922b, 1923, 1927, 1934; Nayudu, 1979; Phang et al., 1989a, b, 1990; Phang and Fernando, 1991; Khoo et al., 1999a, b).
Crossover fractions and map distances of Bcp, Rdt and Var relative to each other and the sex-determining region (SdR) were calculated according to Strickberger (1990), Phang et al. (1990), Phang and Fernando (1991), Purdom (1993) and Khoo et al. (1999a, b). Winge's (1922b, 1927, 1934) “zig-zag line diagram” method was used to test all possible linkage combinations between Bcp, Rdt, Var and the SdR, and to map these gene loci onto the sex chromosomes. Double recombinants were noted but excluded from all estimations of map distances (Winge, 1927, 1934; Purdom, 1993, Khoo et al., 1999b).
Segregation and recombination in F1 and F2 offspring of TUX × GV
Nine mating pairs of TUX♂♂ × GV♀♀ produced a total of 132 male and 131 female F1 offspring (Table 1A). F1 males had the black caudal-peduncle and red caudal fin of their TUX male parents but also displayed black spots and patches on the tail fin (Fig. 2A). F1 females had a grey caudal-peduncle and an opaque greyish-white tail with red tinges and black spots (Fig. 2B). Phenotypically classed as Tuxedo with variegated tail patterning (TUXVAR), F1 males and females inherited the black caudal-peduncle and red tail traits from their TUX male parents (type I) while variegated tail patterning was from the GV female parents (Fig. 3). Table 1A and Fig. 3 show two other crosses in which the TUX male parents were heterozygous for black caudal-peduncle. To facilitate describing these crosses and their offspring, the TUX males were labelled as types II and III. Types IV and V males (heterozygous for red tail) were not observed in this study although they were found among crosses between the Tuxedo strain and wild-type guppies (Khoo et al., 1999b). For mating pair TG7 (type II), there were three F1 broods of 20 TUXVAR males and 32 females with variegated patterns on their reddish tails but without a black caudal-peduncle (RTVAR) (Figs. 2, 3, Table 1A). RTVAR males (27) and TUXVAR females (30) were produced by the cross between type III TUX males and GV females (mating pairs TG1 and TG20) (Figs. 2 and 3, Table 1A). For all three types (I, II and III) of TUX male parents, the number of F1 males to females was consistent with the expected ratio of 1:1 (Table 1A).
The F2 generation for type I TUX male parents comprised 129 TUX and 149 TUXVAR males, and 145 TUXVAR and 140 VAR females (Figs. 2A, 2B), with observed numbers conforming to the expected 1:1:1:1 phenotypic ratio (Table 1B, Fig. 3). Four F2 phenotypes of 25 TUX and 26 TUXVAR males, and 27 RTVAR and 25 VAR females were obtained from three single-pair full-sib F1 crosses of type II (Figs. 2A, 2B). These also agreed with the 1:1:1:1 ratio (Table 1B, Fig. 3). Mating pairs TG1 and TG20 (type III) gave four F2 phenotypes of 24 TUX and 21 RTVAR males, and 22 TUXVAR and 29 VAR females (Figs. 2A, 2B) that concurred with the ratio of 1:1:1:1 (Table 1B, Fig. 3). Homogeneity χ2 tests for types I and III TUX males showed that the F1 and F2 progenies did not form heterogeneous populations and were uniform (Tables 1A, 1B). F1 and F2 results also indicated that homozygous Tuxedo male and Green Variegated female parents had the XBcp,Rdt,Var+YBcp,Rdt,Var+ (type I) and XBcp+,Rdt+,VarXBcp+,Rdt+,Var genotypes, respectively (Table 1, Fig. 3). Conversely, genotypes of Tuxedo males heterozygous for black caudal-peduncle were XBcp+,Rdt,Var+YBcp,Rdt,Var+ (type II) and XBcp,Rdt,Var+YBcp+,Rdt,Var+ (type III). Fig. 3 shows the segregation and mechanism of inheritance of the Bcp, Rdt and Var genes.
Crossing-over between the Bcp, Rdt and Var color pattern genes, and the sex-determining region (SdR) from the Y- to the X-chromosome and vice versa in the F1 parents produced F2 offspring that did not conform to the expected phenotypic classes for TUX male parents of types I, II and III (Table 1B, Figs. 2 and 3). F2 recombinants produced by type I were a BCPVAR and four VAR males, and four TUX females (Figs. 2A, 2B, Table 1B). Recombination frequency calculated from the percentage of VAR males out of the total number of F2 males (4/283×100%) was 1.413% for the SdR–Rdt region (Table 1B). The four TUX females of 289 F2 females gave a crossover rate of 1.384% between the Var locus and SdR. Occurrence of the VAR male and TUX female F2 recombinants suggested that the Y-chromosome may have a gene map order of Var–SdR–Rdt–Bcp as these individuals could not be produced using Winge's (1922b, 1927, 1934) “zig-zag line diagram” method if the order had been either SdR–Var–Rdt–Bcp or SdR–Rdt–Bcp–Var (Figs. 3, 4). The BCPVAR recombinant male was not used to calculate map distance as it could be produced by single crossing-over that occurred simultaneously at SdR–Rdt in the F1 male parent and Rdt–Bcp in the F1 female parent. This individual could also result from double recombination between the SdR and Bcp whereby Rdt on the Y-chromosome of the F1 male parent crossed over to the X. In the latter event, Rdt appears to lie between the SdR and Bcp, and has an estimated double crossover frequency of 0.353%.
A recombination of 3.704% was estimated for SdR–Rdt from two VAR males out of 54 F2 males for type II (Fig. 2A, Table 1B). These VAR males further support a gene order of Var–SdR–Rdt–Bcp (Figs. 3, 4). From a solitary RTVAR male (Fig. 2A), 1.852 map units was estimated to separate Bcp from Rdt (Table 1B). TUXVAR F2 recombinant females of mating pair TG7 (type II TUX male) were not used to calculate map distances as crossing-over could have taken place at SdR–Rdt, Rdt–Bcp or SdR–Var (Figs. 2B, 3). Double recombination at either Var–Rdt or Var–Bcp might have produced F2 TUX females where the SdR crossed over to the X-chromosome from the Y during meiosis in the F1 male parents. These events generate several possible genotypes for a particular phenotype, hence making it impossible to determine the actual region of crossover. Map distance was also not estimated from the F2 RT male recombinant of a type III TUX male (mating pair TG20) as crossing-over could occur at Var–Rdt or Rdt–Bcp in the F1 female parent to produce this individual (Fig. 2A, Table 1B). Combining the results of this study (SdR–Rdt =2.559±1.620 map units) with those of Khoo et al. (1999b), the mean genetic map distance between SdR and Rdt was estimated to be 3.055±1.687 map units (Fig. 4).
Segregation and recombination in F1 and F2 offspring of GV × TUX
Seven mating pairs (GT1, GT2, GT3, GT5, GT8, GT9 and GT11) of the reciprocal cross, GV♂♂ × TUX♀♀, gave 18 F1 broods of 98 males and 102 females. All the F1 offspring possessed black caudal-peduncle and red tail with variegated patterns typical of the TUXVAR phenotype described earlier (Figs. 2A, 2B). The observed numbers of F1 male to female offspring agreed with the expected ratio of 1:1 (Table 2A, Fig. 3). Except for seven TUX and five BCPVAR males resulting from crossing-over in the F1 parents, F2 progenies segregated into 101 TUXVAR and 89 VAR males, and 108 TUXVAR and 109 TUX females according to the 1:1:1:1 phenotypic ratio (Table 2B, Figs. 2, 3). No F2 data was obtained for mating pair GT8, as the two F1♂♂× F1♀♀ pairs did not produce any F2 offspring (Table 2B). The TUX female parent of mating pair GT7 was heterozygous for both Bcp and Rdt as it produced 25 TUXVAR and 18 VAR males, and 15 TUXVAR and 16 VAR females that conformed to the expected F1 ratio of 1:1:1:1 (Table 2A, Figs. 2, 3). Similarly, GT4 and GT16 gave 17 TUXVAR and 14 RTVAR male, and 15 TUXVAR and 10 RTVAR female F1 progenies, indicating that these two TUX female parents were heterozygous for the Bcp gene. As shown by the homogeneity χ2 values, the families were uniform and homogeneous (Table 2). Results for F1 and F2 progenies also showed that the Green Variegated male and Tuxedo female parents used in this study were homozygous (genotypes: XBcp+,Rdt+,VarYBcp+,Rdt+,Var and XBcp,Rdt,Var+XBcp,Rdt,Var+, respectively) (Table 2, Fig. 3). Putative genotypes of heterozygous Tuxedo females were XBcp,Rdt,Var+XBcp+,Rdt+,Var+ for mating pair GT7, and XBcp,Rdt,Var+XBcp+,Rdt,Var+ for GT4 and GT16. The segregation of Bcp, Rdt and Var, and their mode of inheritance are illustrated in Fig. 3.
Seven F2 males from the full-sib cross of GV♂♂×TUX♀ ♀ exhibited normal Tuxedo color patterns, i.e., a black caudal-peduncle and red tail without variegated tail patterning (Fig. 2A, Table 2B). The variegated tail (Var) pattern gene, in this instance, would have crossed-over from the Y-chromosome to the X in the F1 male parents to produce the TUX phenotype. Since there were seven TUX males out of 202 F2 male individuals, 3.465% recombination occurred between SdR and Var (Table 2B). Five BCPVAR F2 males were also produced by this cross, giving a distance of 2.475 map units between the Bcp and Rdt loci (Fig. 2A, Table 2B). From the F2 results of TUX♂♂×GV♀♀ and GV♂♂×TUX♂♂ (Tables 1, 2), map distances for Bcp–Rdt and SdR–Var were averaged to be 2.164±0.441 and 2.425±1.471 units, respectively. In conjunction with our previous analyses involving crosses between wildtype guppies with the Green Variegated (Khoo et al., 1999a) and Tuxedo (Khoo et al., 1999b) strains, the Var locus appears to lie 2.174±1.301 map units from the SdR while Rdt and Bcp are 2.330±1.416 map units apart (Fig. 4).
Inheritance of the Bcp, Rdt and Var color pattern genes
Observations for all parental (TUX♂♂×GV♀♀ and GV ♂♂×TUX♀♀, Tables 1A, 2A) and full-sib (F1♂♂×F2♀♀, Tables 1B, 2B) crosses, initiated to determine the inheritance of the black caudal-peduncle (Bcp), red tail (Rdt) and variegated tail (Var) color patterns in domesticated guppy (Poecilia reticulata) strains, demonstrate that these color patterns are simple sex-linked traits controlled by single genes (Khoo et al., 1999a, b). In addition, our studies show that Bcp, Rdt and Var are dominantly expressed in both males and females, albeit the colors are more distinct and definitive in the males due to the presence of androgens (Figs. 1, 2, Tables 1, 2). These results confirm the preliminary findings of Fernando and Phang (1989, 1990) and Phang et al. (1990), and further support those of Khoo et al., (1999a, b). Each of the three color pattern genes has two alleles: Bcp which is dominant over Bcp+, Rdt dominant over Rdt+ and Var over Var+. Recessive alleles of these loci do not give rise to any color patterns. Tuxedo guppies used in this study are therefore proposed to have the XBcp,Rdt,Var+YBcp,Rdt,Var+ (type I), XBcp+,Rdt,Var+YBcp,Rdt,Var+ (type II) and XBcp,Rdt,Var+YBcp+,Rdt,Var+ (type III) genotypes for males, and XBcp,Rdt,Var+XBcp,Rdt,Var+, XBcp,Rdt,Var+XBcp+,Rdt+,Var+ and XBcp,Rdt,Var+XBcp+,Rdt,Var+ for females (Tables 1, 2, Fig. 3). Genotypes of Green Variegated males and females are XBcp+,Rdt+,VarYBcp+,Rdt+,Var and XBcp+,Rdt+,VarXBcp+,Rdt+,Var, respectively.
Phenotypic map of Bcp, Rdt, Var and the SdR
This study proves that the Bcp, Rdt and Var genes are able to cross over from the X-chromosome to the Y and vice versa since male and female recombinants of the TUX, VAR, RT, TUXVAR, RTVAR and BCPVAR phenotypes were observed at the F2 level of TUX♂♂×GV♀♀ (for types I, II and III TUX male parents) and GV♂♂×TUX♀♀ (Tables 1, 2, Figs. 2, 3). Alleles of color genes migrating between the X- and Y-chromosomes were initially documented by Winge (1922a, b, 1923) in wild-type guppies. Subsequent analyses by Winge (1927, 1934), Winge and Ditlevsen (1938), Dzwillo (1959), Nayudu (1975, 1979) and Kirpichnikov (1981) showed that the X- and Y-chromosomes of the guppy are equal in size and indistinguishable by ordinary cytological methods. As a result of this homology between the sex chromosomes, genes are able to crossover along almost the whole length of their chromatids. Only a small segment on the Y-chromosome, the sex-determining region (SdR) which is presumed to contain male-determining genes, is known to be non-homologous and different from the X.
Double recombination may have given rise to a BCPVAR F2 male (mating pair TG23) and two TUX F2 females (mating pair TG7) (Table 1B, Fig. 3). Very high double crossover rates of 0.353% and 3.279% were obtained from these offspring, respectively. The TUX F2 females may possibly be produced by a form of “sex-reversal” as a result of the instability of the genetic mechanism of sex-determination in the guppy (Kirpichnikov, 1981). This takes place when the SdR on the Y-chromosome undergoes double crossing-over with a segment that contains recessive female-determining genes on the X-chromosome (Winge, 1927, 1934; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947; Kirpichnikov, 1981). Double crossover values were not included in our estimations of map distances because the number of crosses were limited and brood sizes were small (Khoo et al., 1999b). Moreover, Winge (1927, 1934) concluded that double crossing-over was unlikely to occur in the guppy as he could find only a few single crossovers among the thousands of guppies he crossed and examined. Also, recombination frequencies of up to 10% have been recorded only between the Doppelschwert (Double sword, Ds) and Pigmentierte caudalis (Caudal pigment, Cp) genes in wild-type guppies (Winge, 1927, 1934; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947; Dzwillo, 1959; Nayudu, 1975, 1979; Kirpichnikov, 1981).
Based on our earlier studies (Khoo et al., 1999a, b), Bcp, Rdt and Var are inferred to be located within homologous regions on the X- and Y-chromosomes, and are about 5.147, 3.055±1.992 and 2.174±1.301 map units, respectively, from the SdR (Tables 1, 2, Fig. 4). The mean percentage recombination that involved Rdt and Bcp alone was 2.330±1.416. As expected, the map distance between SdR and Bcp (5.147 map units) is almost equal to the sum of distances (3.055+2.330=5.385 map units) for SdR–Rdt and Rdt–Bcp (Fig. 4) (Khoo et al., 1999b). Recombination rates between two loci that are far apart are, however, never exactly the sum of the estimates for smaller regions amidst them (Purdom, 1993). This is because a crossover between two loci usually inhibits a second crossover from occurring in an adjacent region (Strickberger, 1990). Crossing-over at SdR–Bcp, SdR–Rdt and Rdt–Bcp will thus influence each other, thereby affecting their frequency of occurrence. Despite this, our results indicate that Rdt is closer to SdR than Bcp as there was less recombination between Rdt and SdR than between Bcp and SdR (Tables 1, 2). This further verifies the findings of Khoo et al. (1999b). It is therefore evident that the Bcp and Rdt loci are arranged in the following sequence, SdR–Rdt–Bcp (Fig. 4), as proposed earlier by Khoo et al. (1999b).
The locus for variegated tail patterning, Var, is shown in this study and by Khoo et al. (1999a) to be 2.174±1.301 map units from the SdR (Fig. 4). Testing all possible linkage combinations for Bcp, Rdt, Var and the SdR using the “zig-zag line diagram” method of Winge (1922b, 1927, 1934), we have found that the map order of these genes is most likely Var–SdR–Rdt–Bcp (Fig. 4). Recombinant individuals observed in this study could not be produced if the order had been SdR–Var–Rdt–Bcp, SdR–Rdt–Bcp–Var or SdR–Rdt–Var–Bcp. Furthermore, any arrangement in which Bcp lies closer to the SdR than Rdt has been ruled out by this study and Khoo et al. (1999b). Khoo et al. (1999b) also noted that the SdR–Bcp–Rdt sequence was possible in only one exceptional case in which a segment of the Y-chromosome containing at least one of these three color genes and the SdR may have undergone translocation or pericentric inversion. Using the “zig-zag line diagram” method, we have reanalyzed and assigned other phenotypic markers such as blue tail (Blt), green tail (Grt) and the snakeskin body-snakeskin tail complex (Ssb–Sst complex) (Phang et al., 1989a, b, 1990; Phang and Fernando, 1991) onto the preliminary genetic map (encompassing Var–SdR–Rdt–Bcp) of the guppy Y-chromosome (Fig. 4). Six loci of Winge's (1927, 1934) color pattern genes of wild-type guppies: Maculatus (Ma), Coccineus (Co), Tigrinus (Ti), Luteus (Lu), Vitellinus (Vi) and Elongatus (El), were also ordered onto this map based on Kirpichnikov's (1981) and Purdom's (1993) revisions.
Recently, the use of molecular techniques such as Arbitrarily Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction or Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (AP-PCR/RAPD) fingerprinting (Welsh and McClelland, 1990; Williams et al., 1990) has proved to be a quick and reliable method for generating a large number of genetic markers for the construction of linkage maps of the zebrafish, Danio rerio (Johnson et al., 1994; Postlethwait et al., 1994), medaka, Oryzias latipesy (Wada et al., 1995) and swordtail-platyfish hybrid of the genus Xiphophorus (Kazianis et al., 1996). In our on-going effort to identify and link genetic markers to the X- and Y-chromosomes of the guppy, Foo et al. (1995) showed that AP-PCR/RAPD markers were inherited in Mendelian fashion at the F1 level. We have also found several AP-PCR/RAPD markers that could differentiate domesticated stocks and wild-type guppies (Chen, 1999). One of these, a 444 bp fragment amplified using a 10-mer primer OPJ-4 (Operon Technologies, USA), was absent in guppies with variegated tail patterning, while another 10-mer primer OPJ-7 amplified an 800 bp fragment in 80% of guppies with variegated tails (Chen, 1999). In view of applying these phenotypic and molecular markers in future studies to map the guppy sex chromosomes, we hypothesize the length of the guppy genome to be between 1,800 centiMorgans (cM) estimated by isozyme polymorphisms for Xiphophorus (Morizot et al., 1991) and 3,000 cM (1.7×109 bp or 600 kb/cM) by AP-PCR/RAPD for zebrafish (Postlethwait et al., 1994). Following the assignation of AP-PCR/RAPD markers to the 24 chromosomes of Xiphophorus (Kazianis et al., 1996), the genome size of Xiphophorus has been revised to about 2,700 cM (S. Kazianis, personal communication).
In conclusion, the black caudal-peduncle (Bcp), red tail (Rdt) and variegated tail (Var) color pattern genes of the domesticated guppy are (1) single genes located at three different loci, (2) dominantly expressed, (3) X- and Y-linked, and (4) fully capable of crossing-over from the Y- to the X-chro-mosome and vice versa. Map distances for sex-determining region (SdR)–Rdt, Rdt–Bcp, SdR–Bcp and SdR–Var are approximately 3.1, 2.3, 5.1 and 2.2 map units, respectively, with a gene order of Var–SdR–Rdt–Bcp. To date, the number of sex-linked color genes reported for the guppy far outnumber the autosomal ones described (Winge, 1927, 1934; Winge and Ditlevsen, 1947; Dzwillo, 1959; Nayudu, 1975, 1979; Kirpichnikov, 1981; Fernando and Phang, 1989; Phang et al., 1989a, b, 1990; Phang and Fernando, 1991; Purdom, 1993; Khoo et al., 1999a, b). As such, additional genetic data is necessary to verify the preliminary genetic map shown in Fig. 4 through a larger sample size from more crosses and back-crosses. Consequently, this will allow the construction of a denser and more saturated map of the X- and Y-chromosomes using phenotypic and molecular genetic markers established by previous workers and those identified from on-going analyses of domesticated guppy strains.
This project was funded by research grants from the European Commission (CI1*-CT94-0021) and National University of Singapore (RP3972366 and RP3981303) to V.P.E. Phang (P.I.), T.M. Lim and W.-K. Chan.
- F. Chen 1999. Genetic variation of color varieties of guppy (Poecilia reticulata) using RAPD fingerprinting. MSc thesis. Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore. Singapore. Google Scholar
- M. Dzwillo 1959. Genetische Untersuchungen an domestizierten Stämmen von Lebistes reticulatus Peters. Mitt Hamburg Zool Mus Inst 57:143–186. Google Scholar
- A. A. Fernando and V. P. E. Phang . 1985. Culture of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, in Singapore. Aquaculture 51:49–63. Google Scholar
- A. A. Fernando and V. P. E. Phang . 1989. X-linked inheritance of red and blue tail colorations of domesticated varieties of guppy, Poecilia reticulata, and its implications to the farmer. Singapore J Pri Ind 17:10–18. Google Scholar
- A. A. Fernando and V. P. E. Phang . 1990. Inheritance of the Tuxedo and blond Tuxedo color pattern phenotypes of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. In “Proceedings of the Second Asian Fisheries Forum”Ed by R. Hirano and I. Hanyu , editors. Asian Fisheries Soc. Manila, Philippines. pp. 487–490. Google Scholar
- C. L. Foo, K. R. Dinesh, T. M. Lim, W. K. Chan, and V. P. E. Phang . 1995. Inheritance of RAPD markers in the guppy fish, Poecilia reticulata. Zool Sci 12:535–541. Google Scholar
- H. B. Goodrich, N. D. Josephson, J. P. Trinkaus, and J. M. Slate . 1944. The cellular expression and genetics of two new genes in Lebistes reticulatus. Genetics 29:584–592. Google Scholar
- H. B. Goodrich, R. L. Hine, and H. M. Lesner . 1947. Interaction of genes in Lebistes reticulatus. Genetics 32:535–540. Google Scholar
- C. P. Haskins and J. P. Druzba . 1938. Note on anomalous inheritance of sex-linked color factors in the Guppyi. Amer Nat 72:571–574. Google Scholar
- C. P. Haskins and E. F. Haskins . 1951. The inheritance of certain color patterns in wild populations of Lebistes reticulatus in Trinidad. Evolution 5:216–225. Google Scholar
- A. W. C. T. Herre 1940. Additions to the fish fauna of Malaya and notes on rare or little known Malayan and Bornean fishes. Bull Raffles Mus 16:27–61. Google Scholar
- S. L. Johnson, C. N. Midson, E. W. Ballinger, and J. H. Postlethwait . 1994. Identification of RAPD primers that reveal extensive polymorphisms between laboratory strains of zebrafish. Genomics 19:152–156. Google Scholar
- S. Kazianis, D. C. Morizot, B. B. McEntire, R. S. Nairn, and R. L. Borowsky . 1996. Genetic mapping in Xiphophorus hybrid fish: assignment of 43 AP-PCR/RAPD and isozyme markers to multipoint linkage groups. Genome Res 6:280–289. Google Scholar
- G. Khoo, T. M. Lim, W. K. Chan, and V. P. E. Phang . 1999a. Genetic basis of the variegated tail pattern in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Zool Sci 16:431–437. Google Scholar
- G. Khoo, T. M. Lim, W. K. Chan, and V. P. E. Phang . 1999b. Sex-linkage of the black caudal-peduncle and red tail genes in the Tuxedo strain of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Zool Sci 16:629–638. Google Scholar
- V. S. Kirpichnikov 1981. The genetics of aquarium fish species. In “Genetic Bases of Fish Selection”. Translated by G. G. Gause Springer-Verlag. Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany. pp. 77–103. Google Scholar
- D. C. Morizot, S. A. Slaugenhaupt, K. D. Kallman, and A. Chakravarti . 1991. Genetic linkage map of fishes of the genus Xiphophorus (Teleostei: Poeciliidae). Genetics 127:399–410. Google Scholar
- P. Nayudu 1975. Contributions to the genetics of Poecilia reticulata. PhD Thesis. Monash University. Australia. Google Scholar
- P. Nayudu 1979. Genetic studies of melanic color patterns, and atypical sex determination in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Copeia 1979:225–231. Google Scholar
- V. P. E. Phang, L. N. Ng, and A. A. Fernando . 1989a. Inheritance of the snake-skin color pattern in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. J Hered 80:393–399. Google Scholar
- V. P. E. Phang, L. N. Ng, and A. A. Fernando . 1989b. Genetics of the color of the yellow snakeskin variety of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Singapore J Pri Ind 17:19–28. Google Scholar
- V. P. E. Phang, A. A. Fernando, and E. W. K. Chia . 1990. Inheritance of the color patterns of the blue snakeskin and red snakeskin varieties of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Zool Sci 7:419–425. Google Scholar
- V. P. E. Phang and A. A. Fernando . 1991. Linkage analysis of the X-linked green tail and blue tail color genes in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Zool Sci 8:975–981. Google Scholar
- J. H. Postlethwait, S. L. Johnson, C. N. Midson, W. S. Talbot, M. Gates, E. W. Ballinger, D. Africa, R. Andrews, T. Carl, J. S. Eisen, S. Horne, C. B. Kimmel, M. Hutchinson, M. Johnson, and A. Rodriguez . 1994. A genetic linkage map for the zebrafish. Science 264:699–703. Google Scholar
- C. E. Purdom 1993. Genetics and Fish Breeding. Chapman & Hall. London, UK. p. Google Scholar
- J. Schmidt 1920. Racial investigations. IV. The genetic behavior of a secondary sexual character. CR Trav Lab Carlsberg 14:1–8. Google Scholar
- R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf . 1981. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 2nd edWH Freeman and Co. New York, USA. p. Google Scholar
- M. W. Strickberger 1990. Genetics. 3rd edMacmillan Publishing Co. New York, USA. p. Google Scholar
- H. Wada, K. Naruse, A. Shimada, and A. Shima . 1995. Genetic linkage map of a fish, the Japanese medaka Oryzias latipes. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 4:269–274. Google Scholar
- J. Welsh and M. McClelland . 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:7213–7218. Google Scholar
- J. G. K. Williams, A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski, and S. V. Tingey . 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge 1922a. A peculiar mode of inheritance and its cytological explanation. J Genet 12:137–144. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge 1922b. One-sided masculine and sex-linked inheritance in Lebistes reticulatus. J Genet 12:145–162. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge 1923. Crossing-over between the X- and the Y-chromosome in Lebistes. J Genet 13:201–219. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge 1927. The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. J Genet 18:1–43. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge 1934. The experimental alteration of sex chromosomes into autosomes and vice versa, as illustrated by Lebistes. CR Trav Lab Carlsberg, Ser Physiol 21:1–49. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge and E. Ditlevsen . 1938. A lethal gene in the Y-chromosome of Lebistes. CR Trav Lab Carlsberg, Ser Physiol 22:203–210. Google Scholar
- Ö Winge and E. Ditlevsen . 1947. Color inheritance and sex determination in Lebistes. Heredity 1:65–83. Google Scholar
- T-O. Yamamoto 1975. The medaka, Oryzias latipes, and the guppy, Lebistes reticularis. In “Handbook of Genetics Vol 4”. Ed by R. C. King , editor. Plenum Press. New York, USA. pp. 133–149. Google Scholar
- F. Yates 1934. Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. J R Stat Soc (suppl) 1:217–235. Google Scholar