Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2000 The Mesenchymal Factors Regulating Epithelial Morphogenesis and Differentiation of the Chicken Stomach
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

It is now well established that epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are essential for the formation of many organs in the development of the animals. Chicken digestive organs provide a valuable model system for analysis of the mechanisms underlying the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Here we will present our recent data indicating that the mesenchymal factors necessary for the epithelial differentiation in the chicken stomach are composed of several components such as growth factors and extracellular matrices. The possible involvement of bone morphogenetic protein-2 will be discussed.

Introduction

The notion that cell-to-cell or, more accurately, tissue-to-tissue interactions are requisites for the formation of organ systems having normal morphology and function was developed by Spemann (1901) in his study on the development of the amphibian eye. His notion or paradigm of induction persists for about one century and is still a leading principle in the field of developmental biology, although the stress is now on the elucidation of molecular nature of the interactions.

Since the time of Spemann, many organ systems, such as skin (Peterson and Grainger, 1985), kidney (Bard et al., 1996), tooth (Peters and Balling, 1999), limb (Tickle and Eichele, 1994), urogenital sinus (Takeda et al., 1990), salivary gland (Nogawa and Mizuno, 1981), mammary gland (Streuli et al., 1991), lung (Minoo and King, 1994), pancreas (Hebrok et al., 1998), liver (Fukuda-Taira, 1981; Hentsch et al., 1996) and heart (Schultheiss et al., 1995), only to mention organs especially well studied, have been analyzed and found to involve complex interactions between tissues composing the organs or between neighboring tissues.

These studies have revealed that we can distinguish two types of interactions: instructive induction and permissive induction. The former is characterized by the experiments in which the developmental fate of the reactive tissue (effector tissue) was changed by the influence of the affective tissue (inducer) and directed toward the fate of the inducing tissue. A typical example was provided by the experiment of Rawles (1963) showing that the dermis of scale induces scale development in the associated presumptive feather epithelium. On the other hand, the idea of permissive induction came from the fact that the differentiation of pancreatic epithelium is determined rather early in the development but its realization depends on the specific influence of the pancreatic mesenchyme (Wessells and Cohen, 1967).

However, now it is said that the two types of interactions cannot be separated so clearly. It is apparent from many studies that not only inductive influence of the inducer tissue but also the reactivity of effector tissue is important for the determination of the latter. Rather, the developmental fate of a tissue is determined gradually by reciprocal tissue interactions which include complex and strictly regulated molecular cascades the understanding of which is one of the main aims of the developmental biology today.

In this review article, we will present some data indicating that the differentiation of a tissue is determined by the inductive influence of another tissue and reactivity of the responding tissue, and refer to the biological and molecular natures of the interactions, based on the results obtained with the experiments on the differentiation of the digestive organs in the chicken embryos.

Development and gene expression patterns of the chicken digestive organs

Vertebrate digestive tract is composed of endodermal epithelium and mesodermal mesenchyme. At the early stages of avian and mammalian development, both tissues are not a tube but is extending as flat sheets. Meanwhile, from embryonic day (E) 1.5 to 3, sheets of left and right sides of the embryonic body form a fold and fuse at the ventral side of the body. The formation of tube first begins at the rostral end of the gut and proceeds backward, while it commences a little later from the caudal end of the gut and proceeds forward. Both rostral and caudal tubes meet at the middle part of the embryo and thus the primitive gut tube is formed. At first the dorsal side of the endoderm is not covered with mesenchyme, but soon mesenchymal tissue surrounds entire epithelium.

From E3 to E4 we cannot explicitly distinguish each digestive organ, but liver and pancreas have already bulged out from the main gut tube. Also lung bud (trachea) separates from the pharynx, upper part of the gut. From E5, digestive organs such as esophagus, stomach, small intestine and large intestine can be seen macroscopically, but the internal structure of the organs has not yet specified: these organs consist of undifferentiated inner epithelial and outer mesenchymal tissue.

It is to be noted that bird has two stomachs: the proventriculus and gizzard. The proventriculus is a glandular stomach in which epithelium forms compound glands and gland epithelial cells later synthesize and secrete pepsinogen (embryonic chicken pepsinogen ECPg; Hayashi et al., 1988a, b; Fig. 1), a zymogen of digestive enzyme pepsin. The gizzard does not develop compound glands. The epithelium of the gizzard actively secretes mucous substances and there develop massive smooth muscle layers in the mesenchyme.

Fig. 1

Expression of ECPg (A, C, E, G) and cSP (B, D, F, H) genes during the development of the proventriculus in chicken embryo examined by in situ hybridization. (A, B) E6. The epithelium does not yet form galnds. No ECPg and cSP expression (C, D) E8. Glands are formed but gland epithelial cells (gl) do not express ECPg gene. Luminal cells (le) begin to express cSP. (E, F) E13. (G, H) E16. Compound glands develop well and gland epithelial cells (gl) express ECPg while luminal epithelial cells (le) are positive to cSP but never express ECPg. Note that expression of both genes is complementary. Bar: 200 μm. From Tabata and Yasugi (1998).

i0289-0003-17-1-1-f01.gif

We are analyzing expression patterns of many genes known to be important in organogenesis, with special attention to the expression in epithelial cells (Fig. 2) A gene expressed at the earliest stage is CdxA, a homologue of caudal gene of Drosophila and encoding a transcription factor containing homeodomain (Frumkin et al., 1991). It is expressed in the presumptive intestinal epithelium (Ishii et al., 1997) and later it becomes expressed in the entire epithelium of intestine. cSox2 gene which encodes HMG-box-containing transcription factor, is expressed in the epithelium destined to differentiate into epithelium of esophagus, proventriculus or gizzard, i.e. the anterior organs (Ishii et al., 1998), cSox2 is expressed continuously in the epithelium of anterior organs and its caudal limit coincides with the boundary of gizzard-intestine. This boundary also marks the anterior end of CdxA expression. Thus the expressions of cSox2 and CdxA respectively characterize anterior organs and intestine. Soon after the gut tube is formed epithelial cells of ventral and lateral sides express a gene encoding a morphogen sonic hedgehog (shh), and its expression soon extends to the dorsal side of the tube when mesenchymal cells underlie the epithelium (Narita et al., 1998; Roberts et al., 1998). In later development of the gut, shh is expressed in almost all epithelial cells but ceased to be expressed in cells of epithelia which bulge from the main duct, such as pancreatic duct, yolk stalk and proventricular glands.

Fig. 2

Expression patterns of genes in epithelial cells of the gut of chicken embryo (E9). Compiled from: Sakamoto et al. (1998), Ishii et al. (1997, 1998), Matsumoto et al. (1998), Narita et al. (1998), Sato and Yasugi (1998), Tabata and Yasugi (1998) and Fukuda et al. (1994). (A) Schematic figure of the gut. ES, esophagus; PV, proventriulus; GZ, gizzard; DU, duodenum; LV, liver; PA, pancreas; SI, small intestine; CE, cecum; LI, large intestine. (B) Sagital section of the gut. GL, proventricular glands; mes, mesenchyme; epi, epithelium. (C) Expression patterns of genes along the antero-posterior axis of the gut. Names of genes are indicated on the right side.

i0289-0003-17-1-1-f02.gif

Expression of transcription factor genes other than cSox2 and CdxA has been also studied. Among them are HNF3-ß and GATA5. The former is expressed throughout the gut while the latter is not expressed or only weakly expressed in the esophagus. GATA5 seemed to be upregulated in epithelial cells of proventricular glands (Sakamoto et al., unpublished data).

We also surveyed the expression of other genes of interest in view of the morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation. Oncogenes belonging to fos and jun family such as c-fos, fra-2, c-jun and junD were shown to be expressed in characteristic manners. Among them, fra-2 was expressed in the luminal epithelium but not in gland epithelium, just as cSox2 and shh. We argued that the expression of fra-2 and junD is controlled by shh and Indian hedgehog which are expressed in similar pattern as fra-2 and junD, but from earlier develop-mental stages (Matsumoto et al., 1998).

We cloned a new gene of which expression is restricted to the luminal epithelium in the proventriculus. The gene, designated chicken spasmolytic polypeptide (cSP), encodes a mucous-cell-associated protein containing a trefoil structure (Tabata and Yasugi, 1998). It is expressed from E8 in the proventricular epithelium and, after the formation of glands, only in the luminal epithelium, showing sharp contrast with the expression of ECPg (Figs. 1 and 2). Thus cSP expression is a very specific marker of luminal epithelium of the proventriculus. It is also expressed in the epithelium of esophagus and gizzard. Another gene expressed in the epithelium of the gut cloned in our laboratory is that encoding keratine-19 (GK-19, Sato and Yasugi, 1997). Keratines are intermediate filaments of many epithelial cells and GK-19 is expressed in the epidermis, endodermal epithelium and lung, but not in the liver and heart. Interestingly enough, it is expressed in the notochord and floor plate just as shh (Echelard et al., 1993) and HNF-3ß (Sasaki and Hogan, 1993). In the proventriculus, the expression of GK-19 gene is again downregulated in gland epithelial cells for a while after the onset of gland formation. The same is true for a keratine detected by an antibody PKK1 (Takiguchi-Hayashi et al., 1996).

These results demonstrated that gland epithelial cells of the proventriculus are very unique population of epithelial cells from the view point of gene expression. With these gene expressions as very sensitive and specific markers of epithelial cell differentiation, we performed experiments to reveal epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the process of stomach formation.

Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the gut formation

Our “classical” experiments about the effect of mesenchyme on the epithelial differentiation judged by the morphological criteria and ECPg expression were summarized in Yasugi (1995) and in Urase et al. (1996). In brief, the mesenchyme exerts inductive influence on the morphological differentiation of the epithelium: the proventricular mesenchyme, for example, induced gland formation in epithelia derived from esophagus, gizzard and intestine. On the other hand, when the epithelial differentiation was assessed by ECPg expression, somewhat different results were obtained. The proventricular mesenchyme could induce ECPg expression in the epithelia of esophagus and gizzard, but not in the intestinal epithelium. The gizzard mesenchyme completely inhibited the ECPg expression even in the proventricular epithelium (Fig. 3). Moreover a tissue recombination experiment demonstrated that the lung mesenchyme had the same or even stronger inductive effect on ECPg expression in the heterotypic epithelia (Urase et al., 1996).

Fig. 3

Tissue recombination experiments in which epithelia and mesenchymes of proventriculus (Pr) and gizzard (Gz) were isolated and recombined in various combinations. The recombinants were cultured in vitro and examined the gland formation and expression of ECPg. Proventricular mesenchyme exerts inductive influence while gizzard mesenchyme inhibits the differentiation toward proventricular epithelium.

i0289-0003-17-1-1-f03.jpg

From these results we have presented a hypothesis to explain the expression of ECPg gene solely in gland epithelial cells of the proventriculus as follows (Yasugi, 1995): 1) All epithelial cells of anterior digestive organs (esophagus, proventriculus and gizzard) have a potency to express ECPg (and to form glands) under the appropriate conditions provided by the mesenchyme of the proventriculus or lung, 2) the mesenchymes of esophagus and gizzard have an inhibitory effect against gland formation and ECPg expression, 3) intestinal epithelium has no potency to express ECPg from the early developmental stage (Yasugi et al., 1991). As a results of interaction between mesenchymal inductive influence and epithelial reactivity, only proventricular epithelium becomes capable of expressing ECPg in the normal course of development.

The effect of mesenchyme on expression of genes other than the ECPg was also investigated. As mentioned above, cSox2 is expressed in the epithelium of anterior organs and CdxA in the intestinal epithelium. When young (E4) stomach epithelium was associated with intestinal mesenchyme and cultivated in vitro, CdxA expression was induced in some parts of epithelium where expression of cSox2 weakened. At the same time, sucrase activity, a marker of intestinal epithelium (Matsushita, 1983) was observed in epithelial cells with CdxA expression (Ishii et al., 1997, 1998). Likewise expression of shh and cSP was shown to be regulated by the mesenchymal influences (Narita et al., 1998; Tabata et al., 1998). Thus we can say that region-specific expression of genes characterizing each organ is ultimately determined by the mesenchyme.

The nature of mesenchymal influences

We have tried to elucidate the molecular nature of the mesenchymal factors that induce or inhibit gland formation of the proventricular epithelium. First attempt was to examine if the factors could pass through the filter of appropriate pore size. In many organ systems the inducing factors have been shown to reach the effector tissue across the filter (Saxén et al., 1976).

The proventricular or gizzard epithelium was placed on the Nuclepore filter and the proventricular mesenchyme was attached to the opposite side, and the combination was cultivated in vitro for several days. We found that epithelial cells expressed ECPg if the pore size of the filter was larger than 0.45 μm. In this case, inspection by scanning electron microscopy of filter surface to which only the mesenchyme was attached revealed that many cell processes of the mesenchymal cells penetrated the filter, so that epithelia cells might touch directly with these cell processes. Thus we hypothesized that the direct contact between epithelial cells and mesenchymal cells is necessary for the induction of ECPg expression in epithelial cells (Takiguchi-Hayashi and Yasugi, 1990).

On the other hand, when mesenchymal cells of the proventriculus and gizzard were mixed in various proportions and the cell aggregate was recombined with the gizzard epithelium, even 5% of gizzard mesenchymal cells completely inhibited the gland formation and ECPg expression in the epithelium, suggesting that inhibitory effects of the gizzard mesenchyme are mediated by some water-soluble, far-reaching substances (Urase et al., 1993).

Substantial progress was made about the nature of inducing substances of the proventricular mesenchyme by the experiments using the technique of cultivation of epithelium covered with some extracellular matrices. Cultivation of epithelium or epithelial cells of the embryonic chicken gut is difficult and we could not detect ECPg in the epithelial cells cultivated in vitro (Tabata and Yasugi, 1996). Then we devised a system in which the epithelium was placed on the filter and clotted with Matrigel (Kleinman et al., 1986) or collagen solution. In this method, the epithelium grew healthy. Nevertheless, the proventricular epithelium could not express ECPg gene if it was cultivated alone. To induce ECPg expression in the epithelium, it was necessary to cultivate mesenchyme on the opposite side of the filter, which has very narrow pores not permitting the pass through of cell processes. In this case ECPg-expressing cell clusters scattered in the epithelium. It is to be noted that the lung mesenchyme has much stronger effect on ECPg induction than the proventricular mesenchyme (Koike and Yasugi, 1999, Fig 4). Moreover we demonstrated that mesenchyme secretes inducing substances onto culture gel made of agar. The gel on which the mesenchyme of the lung or proven-triculus was precultured could evoke ECPg gene expression in the epithelium cultivated on it after the removal of the mesenchyme (Koike and Yasugi, 1999). From these results we can say that the mesenchymal effects can be separated into at least two factors: one is provided by appropriate extracellular substances and another by some soluble substances.

Fig. 4

ECPg exrpession in the explants of the proventricular epithelium (epi) cultured under various gel (gl) conditions. The epithelium was cutured on the Millipore filter (MF) without gel (A, B), or covered with collagen gel (C, D), collagen plus Matrigel (E, F) or Matrigel (G, H). (A, C, E, G) Cultivation without mesenchyme. (B, D, F, G) Cultivation with the proventricular mesenchyme (mes) on the opposite side of the filter. ECPg was detected with immunohistochemical staining and appears as brown. Insets in A, C, E, F and G are higher magnification views of each section. Note that active ECPg production is seen only when the epithelium was cultured clotted in the appropriate gel and with the mesenchyme. Bar: 100 μm for A to H, and 50 μm for insets. From Koike and Yasugi (1999).

i0289-0003-17-1-1-f04.jpg

That organogenesis in vitro requires some extracellular substances and growth factors is demonstrated by studies of Nogawa and Takahashi (1991) and Taub et al. (1990).

In seeking a candidate of the soluble factors, we noticed that BMP (bone morphogenetic protein)-2 is expressed solely in the proventricular mesenchyme around the time of gland formation (E5 to E7). Other BMPs such as BMP-4 or -7 are expressed also in the gut mesenchyme but in rather ubiquitous manner. BMP-2 is expressed abundantly also in the lung mesenchyme. We therefore supposed that BMP-2 has gland-inducing ability in the proventriculus and tested the effect of overexpression of the gene in the proventricular or gizzard mesenchyme, using retroviral vectors. The gizzard epithelium cultivated combined with the proventricular mesenchyme with overexpressed BMP-2 made much more glands and almost all epithelial cells expressed ECPg, showing that BMP-2 has stimulatory effect on the differentiation of epithelium toward proventriculus. When we overexpressed the gene in the gizzard mesenchyme and cultivated it with proventricular epithelium, the latter never formed glands nor expressed ECPg, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of the gizzard mesenchyme cancels BMP-2 effect or that some cofactors necessary for BMP-2 action are lacking in the gizzard mesenchyme.

Noggin, a specific antagonist of the BMP signaling, showed a strong inhibitory effect on the gland formation and ECPg expression. So we can say that BMPs are necessary for gland formation and, among BMPs, BMP-2 is by far the important factor for the proventricular epithelial differentiation (Narita et al., 2000). The morphogenesis of mouse lung rudiment is also dependent on the expression of BMPs (Bellusci et al., 1996).

Regulation of ECPg gene expression by the mesenchyme

Whatever the molecular nature of the mesenchymal signals that elicit proventricular glands, epithelial cells of glands soon begin to express ECPg gene from E8 or 9. We have been interested in the mechanisms of regulation of gene expression by the mesenchymal influence.

We cloned ECPg gene from the genomic library and found that it is composed of 9 exons as in other pepsinogen genes of the vertebrates (Hayashi et al., 1988b). We then analyzed the regulatory segment of the 5′ upstream of the gene. Various segments of the promoter region were connected to a reporter luciferase gene and introduced into epithelial cells of the proventriculus and gizzard by lipofection. Epithelial cells were then mixed with mesenchymal cells and cultivated in vitro. Cells soon sorted themselves out and, in the combination of proventricular or gizzard epithelial cells and proventricular mesenchymal cells, epithelium formed glands and expressed ECPg. The expression of luciferase gene was confined to epithelial cells of the glands. Measurement of luciferase activity definitively showed that stretch of 1 kb just upstream to ORF of ECPg gene is necessary and enough for the right expression of luciferase in the epithelium combined with proventricular mesenchyme. So we concluded that mesenchymal signals act on the ECPg gene expression via the 1 kb stretch of 5′ upstream of the gene (Fukuda et al., 1994).

There are four binding sites of GATA transcription factor and one site of Sox factor in the 1 kb stretch (Sakamoto et al., 1998). cGATA5 is expressed in the proventricular epithelium when the ECPg gene expression begins and cSox2 expression in the proventricular epithelium decreases soon after the onset of gland formation (Ishii et al., 1998). These data suggest that ECPg expression in glandular epithelial cells of the proventriculus is regulated by the mesenchymal factors which affect the proportion of cSox2 protein and cGATA5 protein and these transcription factors in turn control ECPg expression via its promoter region.

Perspective

The elucidation of molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in organogenesis is one of the most important and urgent problems in developmental biology both for the understanding of basic concepts of the developing systems and for the application of our knowledge to the construction of artificial organs by tissue engineering. The gut is one of the targets of the tissue engineering for therapeutic use (Choi et al., 1999; Yasugi and Fukuda, 2000).

Our study has revealed the involvement of mesenchymal factors in the differentiation of epithelium and some candidates of factors have been mentioned. However, there is still a great gap to be filled up between the action of these factors and epithelial cell differentiation. We do not know whether BMPs act directly on epithelial cells, how BMPs interact with extracellular matrix, what intracellular signaling cascades of epithelial cells convey the information of mesenchymal factors to nucleus in which ECPg gene is ultimately transcribed. These problems will be solved by the use of dominant negative receptor molecules of BMPs and by the detection of some genes known to be regulated by BMP signaling, such as Msx gene (Takahashi et al., 1996).

Another important question is to find out a master key gene necessary for the formation and differentiation of proventricular glands. As is mentioned above, gene expression pattern in gland epithelial cells changes drastically at about E6. Many genes coordinately cease to be expressed or are downregulated. This means that expression of these genes is controlled by one or small number of genes of which expression is induced by the mesenchymal factors. Recently some key genes have been reported in the development of pancreas (Jonsson et al., 1994), limb (Sekine et al., 1999) and so on. The comparison of regulatory elements of genes downregulated in the proventricular gland cells to look for common sequences to which the same or similar transcription factors can bind will greatly advance the study of search for the master key gene in the development of the gut in chicken embryo.

Finally, the comparison of the developmental process and molecules involved between avian and mammalian digestive organs will be necessary to understand the common process of gut formation in vertebrates. It has been shown that several growth factors are expressed in the murine or rat gut (Matsubara et al., 1996; Murphy, 1998) during development. Also Cdx1 and Cdx2, homologues of CdxA, are expressed in the intestine and have been demonstrated to be important for the differentiation of intestine (Duprey et al., 1988; Subramanian et al., 1998; Beck et al., 1999). Moreover, the importance of mesenchymal influence on the epithelial differentiation has been repeatedly stressed (Tsukada et al, 1998). However, we do not know whether these molecules have the same functions in the development of avian and mammalian gut. These problems must be answered in future studies executed both on avian and mammalian guts.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Emeritus Takeo Mizuno of Tokyo University for introducing them into the problem and continuous guidance and interest. They are also indebted to Dr. Hidetoshi Saiga of Tokyo Metropolitan University for valuable discussion and help. Some works mentioned in this article are carried out as the collaboration with Professor Hideo Iba of Tokyo University and Dr. Paul J. Scotting of Nottingham University, England. The author's work was supported in part by Grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Japan, and from Tokyo Metropolitan University.

REFERENCES

1.

J. B. Bard, J. A. Davies, I. Karavanova, E. Lehtonen, H. Sariola, and S. Vaini . 1996. Kidney development: the inductive interactions. Seminars in Cell Dev 7:195–202. Google Scholar

2.

F. Beck, K. Chawengsaksophak, P. Waring, R. J. Playford, and J. B. Furness . 1999. Reprogamming of intestinal differentiation and intercalary regeneration in cdx2 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7318–7323. Google Scholar

3.

S. Bellusci, R. Henderson, G. Winnier, T. Oikawa, and B. L. M. Hogan . 1996. Evidence from normal expression and targeted misexpression that Bone Morphogenentic Protein-4 (BMP-4) plays a role in mouse embryonic lung morphogenesis. Development 122:1693–1702. Google Scholar

4.

R. S. Choi, M. Riegler, C. Pothoulakis, B. S. Kim, D. Mooney, M. Vacanti, and J. P. Vacanti . 1998. Studies of brush border enzymes, basement membrane components, and electrophysiology of tissue engineered neointestine. J Pediatr Surg 33:991–996. Google Scholar

5.

P. Duprey, K. Chowdhury, G. R. Dressler, R. Balling, D. Simon, J. Guenet, and P. Gruss . 1988. A mouse gene homologous to the Drosophila gene caudal is expressed in epithelial cells from the embryonic intestine. Gene Dev 2:1647–1654. Google Scholar

6.

Y. Echelard, D. J. Epstein, B. St-Jaques, l Shen, J. Mohler, J. A. McMahon, and A. P. McMahon . 1993. Sonic hedgehog, a member of family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell 75:1417–1430. Google Scholar

7.

A. Frumkin, Z. Rangini, A. Ben-Yehuda, Y. Gruenbaum, and A. Fainsod . 1991. The chicken caudal homologue, CHox-cad, is expressed in the epiblast with posterior localization and in the early endoderm lineage. Development 112:207–219. Google Scholar

8.

K. Fukuda, Y. Ishii, H. Saiga, K. Shiokawa, and S. Yasugi . 1994. Mesenchymal regulation of epithelial gene expression in developing avian stomach: 5′-flanking region of pepsinogen gene can mediate mesenchymal influence on its expression. Development 120:3487–3495. Google Scholar

9.

S. Fukuda-Taira 1981. Hepatic induction in the avian embryo: Specificity of reactive endoderm and inductive mesoderm. J Embryol Exp Morphol 63:111–125. Google Scholar

10.

K. Hayashi, K. Agata, M. Mochii, S. Yasugi, G. Eguchi, and T. Mizuno . 1988a. Molecular cloning and the nucleotide sequence of cDNA for embryonic chicken pepsinogen: Phylogenetic relationship with prochymosin gene. J Biochem 103:290–296. Google Scholar

11.

K. Hayashi, S. Yasugi, and T. Mizuno . 1988b. Isolation and structural analysis of embryonic chicken pepsinogen gene: Avian homologue of prochymosin gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 152:776–782. Google Scholar

12.

M. Hebrok, S. K. Kim, and D. A. Melton . 1998. Notochord repression of endodermal Sonic hedgehog permits pancreas development. Genes Dev 12:1705–1713. Google Scholar

13.

B. Hentsch, I. Lyons, R. Li, L. Hartley, T. J. Lints, J. M. Adams, and R. P. Harvey . 1996. Hlx homeo box gene is essential for an inductive tissue interaction that drives expansion of embryonic liver and gut. Genes Dev 10:70–79. Google Scholar

14.

Y. Ishii, K. Fukuda, H. Saiga, S. Matsushita, and S. Yasugi . 1997. Early specification of intestinal epithelium in the chicken embryo: A study on the localization and regulation of CdxA expression. Dev Growth Differ 39:643–653. Google Scholar

15.

Y. Ishii, M. Rex, P. Scotting, and S. Yasugi . 1998. Region-specific expression of chicken Sox2 in the developing gut and lung epithelium: regulation by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Dev Dyn 213:464–475. Google Scholar

16.

J. Jonsson, L. Carlson, T. Edlund, and H. Edlund . 1994. Insulin-promoterfactor-1 is required for pancreas development in mice. Nature 371:606–609. Google Scholar

17.

H. K. Kleinman, M. L. McGarvey, J. R. Hassell, V. L. Star, F. B. Cannon, G. W. Laurie, and G. R. Martin . 1986. Basement membrane complexes with biological activity. Biochemistry 25:312–318. Google Scholar

18.

T. Koike and S. Yasugi . 1999. In vitro analysis of mesenchymal influences on the differentiation of stomach epithelial cells of the chicken embryo. Differentiation 65:13–25. Google Scholar

19.

Y. Matsubara, M. Ichinose, M. Tatematsu, M. Ichinose, M. Oka, N. Yahagi, K. Kurokawa, T. Kageyama, K. Miki, and H. Fukamachi . 1996. Stage-specific elevated expression of the genes for hepatocyte growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor, and their receptors during the morphogenesis and differentiation of rat stomach mucosa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 222:669–677. Google Scholar

20.

K. Matsumoto, K. Saitoh, C. Koike, T. Narita, S. Yasugi, and H. Iba . 1998. Differential expression of the fos and jun family members in the developing chicken gastrointestinal tract. Oncogene 16:1611–1616. Google Scholar

21.

S. Matsushita 1983. Purification and partial characterization of chick intestinal sucrase. Comp Biochem Physiol 76B:465–470. Google Scholar

22.

P. Minoo and R. J. King . 1994. Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in lung development. Ann Rev Physiol 56:13–45. Google Scholar

23.

M. S. Murphy 1998. Growth factors and the gastrointestinal tract. Nutrition 14:771–774. Google Scholar

24.

T. Narita, Y. Ishii, T. Nohno, S. Noji, and S. Yasugi . 1998. Sonic hedgehog expression in the developing chicken digestive organs is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Dev Growth Differ 40:67–74. Google Scholar

25.

T. Narita, K. Saitoh, T. Kameda, A. Kuroiwa, M. Mizutani, C. Koike, H. Iba, and S. Yasugi . 2000. BMPs are necessary for stomach gland formation in the chicken embryo: A study using virally induced BMP-2 and Noggin expression. Development in press. Google Scholar

26.

H. Nogawa and T. Mizuno . 1981. Mesenchymal control over elongation and branching morphogenesis in salivary gland development. J Embryol Exp Morphol 64:209–221. Google Scholar

27.

H. Nogawa and Y. Takahashi . 1991. Substitution of mesenchyme by basement-membrane-like substratum and epidermal growth factor in inducing branching morphogenesis of mouse salivary epithelium. Development 112:855–861. Google Scholar

28.

H. Peters and R. Balling . 1999. Teeth- Where and how to make them. Trends Genet 15:59–65. Google Scholar

29.

C. A. Peterson and R. M. Grainger . 1985. Differentiation of embryonic chick feather-forming and scale-forming tissue in transfilter cultures. Dev Biol 111:8–25. Google Scholar

30.

M. E. Rawles 1963. Tissue interactions in scale and feather development as studied by dermal-epidermal recombinations. J Embryol Exp Morphol 2:765–789. Google Scholar

31.

D. J. Roberts, D. M. Smith, D. J. Goff, and C. J. Tabin . 1998. Epithelial-mesenchymal signaling during the regionalization of the chick gut. Development 125:2792–2801. Google Scholar

32.

N. Sakamoto, H. Saiga, and S. Yasugi . 1998. Analysis of temporal expression pattern and cis-regulatory sequences of chicken pepsinogen A and C. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 250:420–424. Google Scholar

33.

H. Sasaki and B. L. M. Hogan . 1993. Differential expression of multiple fork head related genes during gastrulation and axial pattern formation in the mouse embryo. Development 118:47–59. Google Scholar

34.

K. Sato and S. Yasugi . 1997. Chicken keratin-19: cloning of cDNA and analysis of expression in the chicken embryonic gut. Dev Growth Differ 39:751–761. Google Scholar

35.

L. Saxén, M. Karkinen-Jääskeläinen, F. Lehtonen, S. Nordling, and J. Wartiovaara . 1976. Inductive tissue interactions. In The Cell Surface in Animal Embryogenesis and Development G. Post and G. L. Nicolson , editors. eds. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press. pp. 331–407. Google Scholar

36.

T. M. Schultheiss, S. Xydas, and A. B. Lasser . 1995. Induction of avian cardiac myogenesis by anterior endoderm Development. 121:4203–4214. Google Scholar

37.

K. Sekine, H. Ohuchi, M. Fujiwara, M. Yamasaki, T. Yoshizawa, T. Sato, N. Yagishita, D. Matsui, Y. Koga, N. Itoh, and S. Kato . 1999. Fgf10 is essential for limb and lung formation. Nat Genet 21:138–141. Google Scholar

38.

H. Spemann 1901. Uber Korrelationen in der Entwicklung des Auges. Verh Anat Ges 15:61–79. Google Scholar

39.

C. H. Streuli, N. Bailey, and M. J. Bissell . 1991. Control of mammary epithelial differentiation: Basement membrane induces tissue-specific gene expression in the absence of cell-cell interaction and morphological polarity. J Cell Biol 115:1383–1395. Google Scholar

40.

V. Subramanian, B. Meyer, and G. S. Evans . 1998. The murine Cdx1 gene product localises to the proliferative compartment in the developing and regenerating intestinal epithelium. Differentiation 64:11–18. Google Scholar

41.

H. Tabata and S. Yasugi . 1996. Cultivation of chicken proventricular epithelial cells and their potential for differentiation. Dev Growth Differ 38:499–507. Google Scholar

42.

H. Tabata and S. Yasugi . 1998. Tissue interaction regulates expression of a spasmolytic polypeptide gene in the chicken stomach epithelium. Dev Growth Differ 40:519–526. Google Scholar

43.

Y. Takahashi, A. Tonegawa, K. Matsumoto, N. Ueno, A. Kuroiwa, M. Noda, and A. Nifuji . 1996. BMP-4 mediates interacting signals between the neural tube and skin along the dorsal midline. Genes Cells 1:775–783. Google Scholar

44.

H. Takeda, N. Suematsu, and T. Mizuno . 1990. Transcription of prostatic steroid binding protein (PSBP) gene is induced by epithelial-mesenchymal interaction. Development 110:273–282. Google Scholar

45.

K. Takiguchi-Hayashi, T. Mizuno, and S. Yasugi . 1996. Cytokeratin expression in the stomach epithelia of the chicken embryo is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. Zool Sci 13:263–270. Google Scholar

46.

K. Takiguchi-Hayashi and S. Yasugi . 1990. Transfilter analysis of the inductive influence of proventricular epithelial differentiation of chick embryo. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 198:46–466. Google Scholar

47.

M. Taub, Y. Wang, T. M. Szczesny, and H. K. Kleinman . 1990. Epidermal growth factor or transforming growth factor alpha is required for kidney tubulogenesis in matrigel cultures in serum-free medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:4002–4006. Google Scholar

48.

C. Tickle and G. Eichele . 1994. Vertebrate limb development. Ann Rev Cell Biol 10:121–152. Google Scholar

49.

S. Tsukada, M. Ichinose, N. Yahagi, Y. Matsubara, S. Yonezawa, S. Shiokawa, C. Furihata, K. Miki, and H. Fukamachi . 1998. Induction of precocious pepsinogen synthesis by glucocorticoids in fetal rat gastric epithelum in organ culture: importance of mesenchyme for epithelial differentiation. Differentiation 62:239–247. Google Scholar

50.

K. Urase, K. Fukuda, Y. Ishii, N. Sakamoto, and S. Yasugi . 1996. Analysis of mesenchymal influence on the pepsinogen gene expression in the epithelium of chicken embryonic digestive tract. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 205:382–390. Google Scholar

51.

K. Urase and S. Yasugi . 1993. Induction and inhibition of epithelial differentiation by the mixed cell aggregates of the mesenchymes from the chicken embryonic digestive tract. Dev Growth Differ 35:33–40. Google Scholar

52.

N. K. Wessells and J. H. Cohen . 1967. Early pancreatic organogenesis: morphogenesis, tissue interactions and mass effects. Dev Biol 15:237–270. Google Scholar

53.

S. Yasugi 1995. Differentiation of avian digestive tract epithelium in vitro. Tiss Cult Res Commun 14:177–184. Google Scholar

54.

S. Yasugi and K. Fukuda . 2000. Tissue interactions and genetic regulations in gut differentiation. In Tissue Engineering for Therapeutic Use Vol 4. Y. Shimizu , editor. ed. Elsevier. in press. Google Scholar

55.

S. Yasugi, H. Takeda, and K. Fukuda . 1991. Early determination of developmental fate in presumptive intestinal endoderm of the chicken embryo. Dev Growth Differ 33:235–241. Google Scholar
Sadao Yasugi and Kimiko Fukuda "The Mesenchymal Factors Regulating Epithelial Morphogenesis and Differentiation of the Chicken Stomach," Zoological Science 17(1), 1-9, (1 January 2000). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.17.1
Received: 1 November 1999; Published: 1 January 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top