Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2000 The Follicle Cells of Styela Plicata (Ascidiacea, Tunicata): A Sem Study
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The morphological aspect of the follicle cells of Styela plicata eggs is described by means of scanning electron microscope investigations. The follicular layer is made of spaced, cylindrical box-like cells which are arranged hexagonally. They adhere to the egg through a complex network of membrane extensions making an overall thin layer on the vitelline coat. The walls of the follicle cells are plentifully provided with microvilli, filopodia and lamellipodia, which allow a connection among the cells. At their apical end lies a large vacuole containing a granule, probably involved in secretion. At insemination the majority of spermatozoa is distributed on the apical membrane of the follicle cells. The membrane often breaks after sperm-egg impact and the granule is therefore displaced. By means of the present investigations it is once again suggested a role played by follicle cells in ascidian eggs at fertilization.

INTRODUCTION

The ovular envelopes of Ascidians (follicle cells, vitelline coat and test cells) have been widely studied in several species and their functions are almost understood (for references see Cloney, 1990; Burighel and Cloney, 1997)

For the follicle cells, which constitute the outer envelope, many functions have been proposed, according to the species considered, e. g. RNA and protein synthesis (Jeffery, 1980); flotation (Lambert and Lambert, 1978); secretion of adhesive material, a sticky mucus coat that attaches the egg to the substrate (Young et al, 1988; Bates and Mallett, 1991); secretion of a factor that triggers germinal vesicle breakdown (Sakairi and Shirai, 1991).

In Ciona intestinalis, a self-sterile species, it has been found that gamete self-incompatibility is established during oogenesis and is controlled by follicle cells overlying the vitelline coat (De Santis and Pinto, 1991; Pinto et al., 1995); the cells prevent self fertilization by releasing self-sterility factors, of a protein nature, that bind to the vitelline coat (Marino et al., 1999). At fertilization the follicle cells influence sperm behaviour through the production of chemotactic substances such as sperm-attractans (Miller, 1975;1982), and through phagocytosis and the entrapment of spermatozoa (Villa and Patricolo, 1993). These cells play also a role in sperm activation and contribute to sperm-egg interaction by facilitating sperm aggregation on the vitelline coat of C. intestinalis, and the consequent sperm penetration (Kawamura et al, 1988). Their presence, indeed, is necessary for fertilization in Halocynthia roretzi (Ishikawa et al., 1978; Fuke, 1983); in Ascidia nigra their removal decreases the fertilization rate; in Ascidiella aspersa (Villa and Patricolo, 1992) they seem to induce a sort of “capacitation” of the spermatozoa of their own species. The follicle cells are also involved in sperm mitochondrion translocation (Villa and Patricolo, 1992; 1993), in sperm guiding into the interfollicular clefts (Villa and Patricolo, 1993; Fukumoto and Numakunai, 1995), and in creating an interspecific block to fertilization (for references see Patricolo and Villa, 1995).

In this paper the authors extend their observations to Styela plicata eggs. The peculiar morphology of the follicle cells in this ascidian species is highlighted by SEM studies; the results support the previously suggested role played by these cells at fertilization, i.e that of facilitating sperm penetration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biological material

Adult specimens of Styela plicata were collected in the Gulf of Palermo. Female and male gametes were removed from the gonoducts of dissected animals. Since this species is self-sterile hermaphrodite, insemination was accomplished by mixing the gametes of two or more individuals. Before insemination, dry sperm was diluted to a final concentration of approximately 0.1% v/v. Some lots of eggs were defollicled by a gentle shaking. Ten minutes after insemination the eggs were washed twice in Millipore filtered sea water (MFSW) at pH 7.8, at about 22°C. Part of the living eggs was examined at light microscope (LM), part was fixed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Inseminated eggs were fixed at room temperature with 2.5% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer in MFSW at pH 7.4 for 30 min. They were then rinsed twice in the same buffer and post fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer at 4°C for 1 hr. After dehydration the samples were critical point dried, sputter coated with gold and observed with a Cambridge Stereoscan 200 scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

S. plicata eggs are about 230 μm in diameter and are surrounded by large follicle cells that at LM appear as highly vacuolated and columnar in shape, with a height of about 18 μm (Figs. 1,2). At the apical end of each cell lies a very large and clear vacuole, half of which extends inward among the smaller vacuoles that fill the rest of the cell. Spermatozoa, placed on or pointing towards the protruding vacuole, are frequently observed in inseminated eggs (Fig. 2, arrow). First cleavage occurs at approximately 60 min. The removal of the follicle cells delays this event of 30 min; moreover a decrease of 50% of fertilization rate is also obtained.

Figs. 1, 2

Light micrographs of Styela plicata egg. Arrow points to the spermatozoon placed on the great vacuole. fc= follicle cell; tc=test cell; vc=vitelline coat.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f01.gif

Figs. 1, 2

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f02.gif

The follicle cells, as observed at SEM, are arranged in a single layer of largely spaced and hexagonally arranged boxlike cells (Fig. 3). The plasma membrane shows a variety of surface specializations in different regions. The lateral portions of the cell, i.e. the walls of the elongated box, are folded and/or wrinkled, while the apical region, i.e. the top of the box, appears to be thinner and generally less folded (Fig. 4). The cell surface, in fact, shows a peculiar structure, more developed in the lateral regions, consisting of a complex of membrane extensions, i.e. microvilli, filopodia and lamellipodia. Filopodia, which are very prominent compared to the other extensions, from the basal region of the plasma membrane irradiate in all directions towards the adjacent cells, thus creating a complex network which undoubtedly aids the follicle cells to anchor to one another (Fig. 5). Occasionally unattached filopodia are also visible stemming from the basal region of the follicle cells (Fig. 6). Microvilli of various length and shape are also scattered on the follicle cell surface; round formations likely made of secretory material, perhaps buds of some product to be discharged, can be observed among the microvilli (Fig. 7). The basal surface of the follicle cells also appears to be provided with lamellipodia of various shape. In regions where the network of membrane protrusions is less developed, the basal region of the follicle cells is evidenced and the interdigitations among cells can be observed.

Figs. 3–5

SEM micrographs of S. plicata eggs: general view (Fig. 3); details of fc (Fig. 4) and of the fc layer (Fig. 5). fp=filopodia; lp=lamellipodia; mv=microvilli.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f03.gif

Figs. 3–5

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f04.gif

Figs. 3–5

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f05.gif

Figs. 6–9

SEM micrographs of S. plicata eggs: details of fcs (Figs. 6, 7) and of their impressions (Figs. 8, 9). Arrows indicate the basal region of detached fcs (Fig. 8) and remnants of their cell boundaries (Fig. 9); arrowheads indicate vc microvilli. mv=microvilli; sm=secreted material (?); uf=unattached filopodia.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f06.gif

Figs. 6–9

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f07.gif

Figs. 6–9

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f08.gif

Figs. 6–9

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f09.gif

Figs. 10–14

SEM micrographs of S. plicata eggs. Figs. 10 and 11 show a part of uncovered vc; arrowheads indicate vc microvilli; arrows point to the basal layer of the fcs; asterisks indicate tcs below. Figs. 12 and 13 show the fc apical granule (g) after rupture of the membraneous cover. Fig. 14: preferential sperm location on the fcs after insemination (arrows).

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f10.gif

Figs. 10–14

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f11.gif

Figs. 10–14

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f12.gif

Figs. 10–14

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f13.gif

Figs. 10–14

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f14.gif

Figs. 15–17

SEM micrographs of inseminated S. plicata eggs showing the position of spermatozoa (arrows) on the apical cover of the fcs. Fig. 15 is a magnification of the upper right side of Fig. 14. m=mitochondrion; n=nucleus; t=tail.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f15.gif

Figs. 15–17

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f16.gif

Figs. 15–17

Continued.

i0289-0003-17-8-1115-f17.gif

The whole of the membrane extensions forms a thin yet compact layer, through which the follicle cells are tightly attached to one another and to the vitelline coat (Figs. 10, 11, arrows).

The follicle cells often fit inside niches created by projections of the vitelline coat, as visible at Transmission electron microscope (work in progress). The cohesion between the projections of the plasma membrane of the follicle cells and the vitelline coat is clearly shown in SEM micrographs of specimens damaged by the technique; in this case only the impression of the cell base is still observed adherent to the vitelline coat, the rest of the cell being lost (Fig. 8, arrows). In other specimens showing just remnants of the cell boundaries upon loss of the follicle cell base (Fig. 9, arrows), the naked vitelline coat appears to be largely microvillated (Figs. 911, arrowheads).

Uncovering of the apical region, likely due to mechanical impact with the spermatozoon head, evidences a large sponge-like granule (Figs. 12, 13). Inseminated eggs show a peculiar sperm distribution, with interfollicular spaces often empty (Fig. 14) and spermatozoa preferably scattered on the thin cover of the follicle cell (Figs. 1417, arrows). When uncovered, follicle cells show spematozoa inside; moreover, sperm mitochondrion translocation cannot be observed at this stage.

DISCUSSION

The follicle cell layer of Styela plicata is made of cylindrical and highly vacuolated box-like cells. Tucker (1942) described them as “foam cells” for their extreme vacuolization. This feature represents the final stage of development since in the ovarian egg follicle cells make an inner and an outer layer, whose structure is morphologically different. In eggs discharged from the ovary the thin outer follicle epithelium is absent and thus the outer layer of the envelopes consists only of the inner follicle cells.

In S. plicata eggs, differently from other species, the follicle cells are largely spaced. SEM observations of the cell basal regions highlight numerous membrane projections which build a highly dynamic and protective layer on the external part of the vitelline coat. This carpet-like membranous system is a newly found feature which could be considered as an egg device to balance the large gaps between the follicle cells. In this way in fact spermatozoa are offered a safe anchorage within the network of membrane projections. This suggestion is supported by the absence, in the follicle cells of S. plicata, of the alveolar structure which aids the crossing of spermatozoa, discovered in Ascidia malaca and A. aspersa (Villa and Patricolo, 1993). In the latter the authors have hypothesized that the alveolar structure, made of membrane protrusions arranged in a honey-comb fashion, could act as a “railway” in guiding the sperm across the interfollicular clefts towards the vitelline coat. A similar surface ornamentation of the follicle cells was also later described in H. roretzi by Fukumoto and Numakunai (1995).

In inseminated eggs of S. plicata the interfollicular spaces are almost devoid of spermatozoa, which instead are preferably scattered on the follicle cell covers. In other ascidian species, such as A. malaca and A. aspersa (Villa, 1977; Villa and Patricolo, 1992; 1993; Patricolo and Villa, 1995) sperm behaviour seems quite different, as spermatozoa mainly crowd the narrow interfollicular clefts and show mitochondrion translocation. In S. plicata, spermatozoa in contact with the egg do not present mitochondrion translocation; moreover, it seems that on impact with the follicle cell layer the spermatozoon head could cause the rupture of the follicle cell apical membrane owing to weakness of the latter.

The follicle cells, described at LM as having a “clear vacuole” (Tucker, 1942) involved in flotation, in the present observations possesses a large, sponge-like granule, well visible after cell uncovering. The granule endows the cell with other functions; for instance, the frequent localization of spermatozoa on the follicle cell tops suggests for the latter a primarily attractant function. Moreover the displacement of the granule after sperm-egg impact could produce a shorter passage-way for sperm penetration through the vitelline coat. This likely passageway function of the follicle cells at fertilization must be added to the already described ones, even if at present it is not satisfactorily demonstrable; this hypothesis could be only supported by our observations on the decrease in fertilization rate of defollicled eggs.

It is widely known that the follicle cells represent the earlier barrier encountered by spermatozoa after insemination and that, besides the role they have in common with all species, they also play species-specific functions. One of these is the early discrimination of heterospecific spermatozoa; it has been observed, in fact, that in ascidian interspecific fertilization, e.g. A. malaca and A. aspersa (Villa and Patricolo, 1992; Patricolo and Villa, 1992; 1995) the follicle cells constitute a hybridization barrier, acting as the primary recognition site. Foreign spermatozoa initially interacting with the follicle cell layer remain on its surface, leaving the interfollicular clefts empty; however, other functions are performed, such as mucus secretion, sperm attraction, entrapment and phagocytosis and, to a lesser extent, sperm mitochondrion translocation. Therefore, even if the species-specific block is ensured by the vitelline coat (Rosati and De Santis, 1978; Honegger, 1986; Lambert, 1986) the follicle cells undoubtedly act as the first obstacle to heterospecific sperm penetration.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mr. Leonardo Genduso of the Institute of Agricultural Entomology (Faculty of Agriculture) of the University of Palermo for his technical assistance with the SEM. This research was supported by a grant from MURST (60% 1997).

REFERENCES

1.

W. R. Bates and J. E. Mallett . 1991. Anural development of the ascidian Molgula pacifica (Huntsman). Can J Zool 69:618–627. Google Scholar

2.

P. Burighel and R. A. Cloney . 1997. Urochordata: Ascidiacea. In. “Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates Vol 15” Ed by. Wiley-Liss Inc. pp. 221–347. Google Scholar

3.

R. A. Cloney 1990. Urochordata. Ascidiacea. In “Reproduction Biology of Invertebrates Vol. IV B”. Ed by K. G. Adijody and R. G. Adijody , editors. New Dehli Oxford. pp. 391–451. Google Scholar

4.

R. De Santis and M. R. Pinto . 1991. Gamete self-discrimination in Ascidians: a role for the follicle cells. Mol Reprod Dev 29:47–50. Google Scholar

5.

M. T. Fuke 1983. Self and non-self recognition between gametes of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi. Roux's Arch Dev Biol 192:347–352. Google Scholar

6.

M. Fukumoto and T. Numakunai . 1995. Morphological aspects of fertilization in Halocynthia roretzi (Ascidiacea, Tunicata). J Struct Biol 114:157–166. Google Scholar

7.

T. G. Honegger 1986. Fertilization in Ascidians: Studies on the egg envelope, sperm and gamete interactions in Phallusia mammillata. Dev Biol 118:118–128. Google Scholar

8.

M. Ishikawa, T. Numakunai, and M. Kubo . 1978. Fertilization in Ascidians: Interaction between spermatozoa and eggs. In. “Abstract 11th Annual Meeting of Japanese Society for Developmental Biology” 74. Google Scholar

9.

W. R. Jeffery 1980. The follicular envelope of ascidian eggs: a site of messenger RNA and protein synthesis during early embryogenesis. J Exp Zool 212:279–289. Google Scholar

10.

K. Kawamura, H. Fujita, and M. Nakauchi . 1988. Helper function of follicle cells in sperm-egg interactions of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Dev Growth Differ 30:693–703. Google Scholar

11.

C. C. Lambert 1986. Fertilization-induced modification of chorion N-acetylglucosamine groups blocks polyspermy in ascidian eggs. Dev Biol 116:168–173. Google Scholar

12.

C. C. Lambert and G. Lambert . 1978. Tunicate eggs utilize ammonium ions for flotation. Science 200:64–65. Google Scholar

13.

C. C. Lambert and G. Lambert . 1981. Formation of the block to polyspermy in ascidian eggs: time course, ion requirements, and role of accessory cells. J Exp Zool 217:291–295. Google Scholar

14.

R. Marino, R. De Santis, P. Giuliano, and M. R. Pinto . 1999. Follicle cell proteasome activity and acid extract from the egg vitelline coat prompt the onset of self-sterility in Ciona intestinalis oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9633–9636. Google Scholar

15.

R. L. Miller 1975. Chemotaxis of spermatozoa of Ciona intestinalis. Nature 254:244–245. Google Scholar

16.

R. L. Miller 1982. Sperm chemotaxis in Ascidians. Amer Zool 22:827–840. Google Scholar

17.

E. Patricolo and L. Villa . 1992. Ascidian interspecific fertilization. II. A study of the external egg coating in hybrid crosses. Anim Biol 1:9–15. Google Scholar

18.

E. Patricolo and L. Villa . 1995. Ascidian interspecific fertilization. III Ultra-structural investigations of sperm-egg interaction. Eur J Morphol 33:433–442. Google Scholar

19.

M. R. Pinto, R. De Santis, R. Marino, and N. Usui . 1995. Specific induction of self-discrimination by follicle cells in Ciona intestinalis oocytes. Dev Growth Differ 37:287–291. Google Scholar

20.

F. Rosati and R. De Santis . 1978. Studies on fertilization in the Ascidians. I. Self-sterility and specific recognition between gametes of Ciona intestinalis. Exp Cell Res 112:111–119. Google Scholar

21.

K. Sakairi and H. Shirai . 1991. Possible MIS production by follicle cells in spontaneous oocyte maturation of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Growth Differ 33:155–162. Google Scholar

22.

G. H. Tucker 1942. The histology of the gonads and development of the egg envelopes of an ascidian (Styela plicata Lesueur). J Morphol 70:81–112. Google Scholar

23.

L. Villa 1977. An ultrastructural investigation on preliminaries in fertilization of Ascidia malaca (Urochordata). Acta Embryol Morphol 2:179–193. Google Scholar

24.

L. Villa and E. Patricolo . 1992. Ascidian interspecific fertilization. I. Preliminary data on the involvement of the follicle cell layer. Eur Arch Biol 103:25–30. Google Scholar

25.

L. Villa and E. Patricolo . 1993. Role of the follicle cells in ascidian sperm-egg interaction. Anim Biol 2:175–184. Google Scholar

26.

C. M. Young, R. F. Gowan, J. Dalby, C. A. Pennachetti, and D. Gagliardi . 1988. Distributional consequences of adhesive eggs and anural development in the ascidian Molgula pacifica (Huntsman, 1912). Biol Bull 174:39–46. Google Scholar
Luisa Anna Villa and Eleonora Patricolo "The Follicle Cells of Styela Plicata (Ascidiacea, Tunicata): A Sem Study," Zoological Science 17(8), 1115-1121, (1 November 2000). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.17.1115
Received: 8 March 2000; Accepted: 1 June 2000; Published: 1 November 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top