Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2001 First Hydrothermal Vent Communities from the Indian Ocean Discovered
Jun Hashimoto, Suguru Ohta, Toshitaka Gamo, Hitoshi Chiba, Toshiyuki Yamaguchi, Shinji Tsuchida, Takamoto Okudaira, Hajime Watabe, Toshiro Yamanaka, Mitsuko Kitazawa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Thriving chemosynthetic communities were located for the first time in the Indian Ocean between 2420 and 2450 m, on a volcanic knoll at the eastern crest of an axial valley, approximately 22 km north of the Rodriguez Triple Junction. The communities were distributed in a 40m by 80m field around the knoll. At least seven active vent sites, including black smoker complexes that were emitting superheated water at 360°C, were observed at the field. The faunal composition of the Indian Ocean hydrothermal vent communities had links to both Pacific and Atlantic vent assemblages. This discovery supports the hypothesis that there is significant communication between vent faunas in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans via active ridges in the Indian Ocean.

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of deep-sea chemosynthetic communities associated with thermally active spreading centers has had a major impact on ocean sciences in the latter half of the twentieth century. Exploration of these communities using submersibles has revealed not only completely new forms of life, but also had implications reaching far beyond a new understanding of the diversity of life in the deep oceans. As yet, even a fundamental understanding of the prevalence of hydrothermal vent communities, or the biogeographical patterns and life histories of vent fauna remains far from complete. One hypothesis explaining the biogeography of vent faunas on a global scale states that chemosynthetic communities have dispersed along active hydrothermal systems in a “stepping stone” linking the world's oceans (Tunnicliffe and Fowler 1996; Tunnicliffe et al. 1998). Many such communities have been reported along active margins in the Atlantic Ocean (Van Dover 1995; Gebruk et al. 1997) and Pacific Ocean (Hessler and Lonsdale 1991; Tunnicliffe 1991; Lutz and Kennish 1993; Desbruyéres et al. 1994; Hashimoto et al. 1995), but none to date had been discovered in the Indian Ocean. Accordingly, oceanographers have been searching for hydrothermal communities in the Indian Ocean to gain a fuller understanding of the biogeography of chemosynthetic faunas. Evidence suggesting their presence in the Indian Ocean has been reported previously without directly detecting any vent sites (e.g., detection of hydrothermal plumes (Herzig and Plüger 1988; German et al. 1998), sampling of vent organisms (Southward et al. 1997), and sampling of sulfides (Münch et al. 1999)).

A research cruise was planned by the Japan Marine Science and Technology Center (JAMSTEC) in order to search for hydrothermalism and associated biological communities in the Indian Ocean. The survey area was selected because hydrothermal plumes with CH4, Mn, Fe and light transmission anomalies were observed during previous cruises by the Research Vessel (R/V) Hakuho Maru as well as dives of the manned submersible Shinkai 6500 (Gamo et al. 1996; Fujimoto et al. 1999). The first chemosynthetic communities in the Indian Ocean were discovered during the cruise. Preliminary analyses show that the faunal composition of the Indian Ocean communities is intermediate between some Atlantic and Pacific communities. These observations provide the first direct evidence supporting the global dispersal of common chemosynthetic genera via the active spreading ridges of the Indian Ocean.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In August 2000, a research cruise using the Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) Kaiko and its support ship, the R/V Kairei, was conducted along the northern extremity of the first segment of the Central Indian Ridge, approximately 22 km north of the Rodriguez Triple Junction (Fig. 1). Surveys focused on a small volcanic knoll (named the Hakuho Knoll; Fig. 1). Prior to the ROV dives, topographic surveys using a SeaBeam 2100 on the R/V Kairei, tow-yo observations using a CTD and transmissiometer and biological and geological observations using a deep tow TV camera system were conducted as site surveys. After the site surveys, four dives were made using the ROV Kaiko along the western slope of the knoll.

Fig. 1

(A) Map showing the Rodriguez Triple Junction (open circle). (B) Bathymetric map (20 m contours) of the Hakuho Knoll located north of the Rodriguez Triple Junction in the Indian Ocean. Solid circle indicates the active hydrothermal field named the Kairei Field (25°19.17′S, 70°02.40′E).

i0289-0003-18-5-717-f01.jpg

During the dives, vent organisms were collected using a suction sampler (Hashimoto et al., 1992). The preliminary faunal list was made out based on the collected biological samples and the video records. The in situ temperature of the vent fluids and pH value of the sampled vent fluids were measured using a self-recorded thermometer (RigoSha Co. Ltd., RMT-0-400) and a pH meter (Metrohm Co. Ltd., Model-1654), respectively.

The similarity at the familial level between the Indian Ocean vent fauna and the other vent faunas (Tunnicliffe et al., 1998; Hashimoto et al., 1995; Hessler and Lonsdale, 1991; Hashimoto et al., 1999; Desbruyéres et al., 1994) was examined using the coefficient of community (Jaccard, 1902).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

During the site surveys, evidence suggesting hydro-thermalism including light transmission anomalies, discolored areas, dead vesicomyid clams and aggregations of actinians were observed along the western slope of the Hakuho Knoll. On August 25, 2000, the Kaiko successfully located the first active hydrothermal site in the Indian Ocean. Heated effluent plumes with densely associated biological communities were distributed in a 40 m by 80 m field around the knoll between depths of 2420 m and 2450 m (25°19.17′S, 70°02.40′E). This area was named the Kairei Field. We observed at least seven active vent sites including black smoker complexes, the largest of which was over 10 m in height. The maximum temperature measured from an active black smoker (Fig. 2) was 360°C and the pH (at 25°C) was 3.4.

Fig. 2

Measuring the temperature of an active black smoker by the ROV Kaiko at the Kairei Field. The temperature of superheated water was 360°C at maximum. Rimicaris and Chorocaris shrimps and Austinograea crabs are aggregated at the base of the black smoker (25°19.17′S, 70°02.37′E, 2450 m).

i0289-0003-18-5-717-f02.jpg

Communities were dominated by swarms of densely packed shrimp belonging to the genus Rimicaris and crowded beds of actinians belonging to the family Actinostolidae (Fig. 3). This is similar in appearance to the Atlantic vent sites TAG, Broken Spur, and Snake Pit (Van Dover 1995; Gebruk et al. 1997); Rimicaris had been previously reported only from the Atlantic Ocean. However, the iphitimidid polychaete, Ophryotrocha, the provannid gastropod Alviniconcha, the bythograeid crab Austinograea, and the scalepellid cirriped Neolepas, known previously only from the Pacific Ocean (Tunnicliffe et al., 1998; Hessler and Lonsdale, 1991; Desbruyéres et al., 1994; Southward et al., 1997; Hashimoto et al., 1999), were found and captured at the Kairei Field. Shells, but no live individuals, of the vesicomyid clam were also observed close to the Kairei Field. The clams and other vent organisms observed including actinostolid actinians, Branchipolynoe polynoids, Lepetodrilus limpets, Phymorhynchus gastropods, Bathymodiolus mussels, Chorocaris shrimp and Munidopsis galatheids were reported from both Atlantic and Pacific hydrothermal vent sites (Tunnicliffe et al., 1998; Gebruk et al., 2000). Although our observation time was limited, it is interesting to note that no new families were found. Twenty species of vent-specific organisms were collected within and near the Kairei Field, and additional six species were observed (Table 1).

Table 1

Preliminary faunal list from the Kairei Field

i0289-0003-18-5-717-t01.gif

Although our observations were preliminary, a coefficient of community comparison at the familial level between the hydrothermal vent faunas in the Indian Ocean (Kairei Field) and those in the northeastern, eastern, northwestern and southwestern Pacific and Atlantic Oceans was instructive. Taxa included were limited to: actinians, polychaetes, gastropods, bivalves, cirripeds, shrimps, brachyuran crabs, galatheids, holothurians and fishes observed and/or captured at the Kairei Field. The southwestern and northwestern Pacific both showed a closer affinity to the Indian Ocean site than did the eastern Pacific Ocean or Atlantic Ocean, while the northeastern Pacific sites had a coefficient of community somewhat lower than these groups (see Table 2). This suggests that significant communication exists between the vent fauna in the western Pacific Ocean and the Indian Ocean despite no distinct plate boundary between the back-arc complex to the north of New Zealand and the southeastern Indian Ridge (Tunnicliffe et al. 1998). Similar communication also exists between the Indian and Atlantic Oceans via the southwestern Indian Ridge and the south Mid-Atlantic Ridge. These are significant observations as they lend support to the hypothesis that much of the Atlantic fauna is derived from the Pacific by way of the western Pacific and Indian Oceans (Tunnicliffe and Fowler 1996; Tunnicliffe et al. 1998). The discovery of active chemo-synthetic communities in the Indian Ocean of this study will undoubtedly yield significant advances in our understanding of the global-scale biogeography of vent fauna.

Table 2

Comparison of the coefficient of community (CC) at the familial level between the Indian Ocean vent fauna and other vent faunae. NEP: northeastern Pacific Ocean; EP: eastern Pacific Ocean; NWP: northwestern Pacific Ocean; SWP: southwestern Pacific Ocean; AO: Atlantic Ocean.

i0289-0003-18-5-717-t02.gif

Fig. 3

Typical scene characterized by Rimicaris swarms and sea anemone aggregations at the Kairei Field. Living beds of Bathymodiolus mussels can be observed in the bottom corners. Austinograea crabs are observed along the mussel beds (25°19.16′S, 70°02.34′E, 2436 m).

i0289-0003-18-5-717-f03.jpg

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere thanks to Cindy L. Van Dover, James C. Hunt and James P. Barry for their invaluable comments on this manuscript. Our thanks are also due to Takashi Okutani and Tomoyuki Miura, Yoshihiro Fujiwara and Dhugal J. Lindsay for their helpful discussion. We are indebted to the captain and crew of the R/V Kairei, the Kaiko operations team and the Deep Tow operations team for their cooperation during the cruise.

REFERENCES

1.

D. Desbruyéres, A. M. Alayse-Danet, S. Ohta, and the Scientific Parties of the BIOLAU & STARMER Cruises . 1994. Deep-sea hydrothermal communities in Southwestern Pacific back-arc basins (the North-Fiji and Lau Basins): Composition, microdistribution and food web. Marine Geology 116:227–242. Google Scholar

2.

H. Fujimoto, M. Cannat, K. Fujioka, T. Gamo, C. German, C. Mével, U. Münch, S. Ohta, M. Oyaizu, L. Parson, R. Searle, Y. Sohrin, and T. Yama-ashi . 1999. First submersible investigations of mid-ocean ridges in the Indian Ocean. InterRidge News 8/1:22–24. Google Scholar

3.

T. Gamo, E. Nakayama, K. Shitashima, K. Isshiki, H. Obata, K. Okamura, S. Kanayama, T. Oomori, T. Koizumi, S. Matsumoto, and H. Hasumoto . 1996. Hydrothermal plumes at the Rodriguez triple junction, Indian ridge. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 142:261–270. Google Scholar

4.

A. V. Gebruk, S. V. Galkin, A. L. Vereshchaka, L. I. Moskalev, and A. J. Southward . 1997. Ecology and biogeography of the hydrothermal vent fauna of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Advances in Marine Biology 32:93–144. Google Scholar

5.

A. V. Gebruk, P. Chevaldonné, T. Shank, R. C. Vrijenhoek, and R. A. Lutz . 2000. Deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities of the Logatchev area (14°45′N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge): diverse biotopes and high biomass. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80:383–393. Google Scholar

6.

C. R. German, E. T. Baker, C. Mével, K. Tamaki, and the FUJI Science Team . 1998. Hydrothermal activity along the southwest Indian ridge. Nature 395:490–493. Google Scholar

7.

J. Hashimoto, K. Fujikura, T. Aoki, and S. Tsukioka . 1992. Development of a suction sampler (Slurp Gun) for deep sea organisms. JAMSTEC Journal of Deep Sea Research 8:367–372. In Japanese with English abstract and legends. Google Scholar

8.

J. Hashimoto, S. Ohta, K. Fujikura, and T. Miura . 1995. Microdistribution pattern and biogeography of the hydrothermal vent communities of the Minami-Ensei Knoll in the Mid-Okinawa Trough, Western Pacific. Deep-Sea Research I 42/4:577–598. Google Scholar

9.

J. Hashimoto, S. Ohta, A. Fiala-Médioni, J. M. Auzende, S. Kojima, M. Segonzac, Y. Fujiwara, J. C. Hunt, K. Gena, T. Miura, T. Kikuchi, T. Yamaguchi, T. Toda, H. Chiba, S. Tsuchida, J. Ishibashi, K. Henry, M. Zbinden, A. Pruski, A. Inoue, H. Kobayashi, J. L. Birrien, J. Naka, T. Yamanaka, C. Laporte, K. Nishimura, C. Yeats, S. Malagun, P. Kia, M. Oyaizu, and T. Katayama . 1999. Hydrothermal vent communities in the Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea: Results of the BIOACCESS cruises ′96 and ′98. InterRidge News 8/2:12–18. Google Scholar

10.

P. M. Herzig and W. L. Plüger . 1988. Exploration for hydrothermal activity near the Rodriguez Triple Junction, Indian Ocean. Canadian Mineralogist 26:721–736. Google Scholar

11.

R. R. Hessler and P. F. Lonsdale . 1991. Biogeography of Mariana Trough hydrothermal vent communities. Deep-Sea Research 38/2:185–199. Google Scholar

12.

P. Jaccard 1902. Gezetze der pflanzenverthertheilund in der alpinen region. Flora 90:349–377. Google Scholar

13.

R. A. Lutz and M. J. Kennish . 1993. Ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities. Review of Geophysics 31:211–241. Google Scholar

14.

U. Münch, N. Blum, and P. Halbach . 1999. Mineralogical and geochemical features of sulfide chimneys from the MESO zone, Central Indian Ridge. Chemical Geology 155:29–44. Google Scholar

15.

A. J. Southward, W. A. Newman, V. Tunnicliffe, D. Scheirer, and K. Johnson . 1997. Biological indicators confirm hydrothermal venting on the Southeast Indian Ridge. BRIDGE Newsletter 12:35–39. Google Scholar

16.

V. Tunnicliffe 1991. The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 29:319–407. Google Scholar

17.

V. Tunnicliffe and M. R. Fowler . 1996. Influence of sea-floor spreading on the global hydrothermal vent fauna. Nature 379:531–533. Google Scholar

18.

V. Tunnicliffe, A. G. McArthur, and D. McHugh . 1998. A biogeographical perspective of the deep-sea hydrothermal vent fauna. In “Advances in Marine Biology Vol 34” Ed by J. H. S. Blaxter, A. J. Southward, and P. A. Tyler . Academic Press. San Diego. pp. 353–442. Google Scholar

19.

C. L. Van Dover 1995. Ecology of Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vents. In “Hydrothermal Vents and Process” Ed by L. M. Parson, C. L. Walker, and D. R. Dixon . Geological Society London, Special Publication 87. pp. 257–294. Google Scholar
Jun Hashimoto, Suguru Ohta, Toshitaka Gamo, Hitoshi Chiba, Toshiyuki Yamaguchi, Shinji Tsuchida, Takamoto Okudaira, Hajime Watabe, Toshiro Yamanaka, and Mitsuko Kitazawa "First Hydrothermal Vent Communities from the Indian Ocean Discovered," Zoological Science 18(5), 717-721, (1 July 2001). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.18.717
Received: 1 February 2001; Accepted: 1 March 2001; Published: 1 July 2001
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top