Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2002 Morphometric analysis of photoreceptive, neuronal and endocrinal cell differentiation of avian pineal cells: An in vitro immunohistochemical study on the developmental transition from neuronal to photo-endocrinal property
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Little is known about the developmental origin, determination and differentiation of different pineal immunoreactive cells in the avian group, and an experimental establishment is then required to explain the differentiation of cell types (i.e. photosensory, neural and secretory types). The present in vitro study suggests that the avian pineal organ is made up of multiple types of cells with different immunore-activity at the ontogenic state (from embryonic day 9 to day 14), before it acquires the final photoendocrinal nature of the mature state. The morphometric analysis suggests that the developmental changes in the morphology of the quail pinealocytes appear to represent a condensed expression of the phylogenic development in the ontogeny. Several types of immunoreactive cells from a neuronal line were suppressed with maturation of developing pineal glands, while other cell types such as photoreceptive and endocrinal lines became more prominent. The melatonin level in the culture medium presented a high value up to 72 hr of culture, followed by a decrease as well as dampening of the level at the end of the culture possibly because the cultures were maintained in dark. The results of the present study, a combined analysis of morphometry and RIA, open a new line for research into the pineal development and cell differentiation.

INTRODUCTION

The avian pineal organ exhibits remarkable differences in morphology and physiology compared to the mammalian pineal. The phylogenetic and ultrastructural peculiarities of the avian pineal gland have been well described in numerous studies (Collin, 1971; Oksche, 1971; Vollrath, 1981; Oksche et al., 1987). Further, the avian pineal organ is a favorite model for biologists to look into various functions of this enigmatic organ. Embryological studies have been performed using both morphological and biochemical techniques mainly with the chick pineal organ (Calvo and Boya, 1978; Oshima and Matsuo, 1988; Sato, 2001). The circa-dian oscillator and its mechanism of function including gene expression for melatonin have been established to some extent in the avian pineal gland (Nakahara et al., 1997). However, the avian pineal organ still needs elucidation in the broad sense of the ontogenic differentiation of various cell types (i.e. photosensory and secretory type). Further, little is known about the developmental origin of the organ and the molecular mechanisms involved in phenotypic determination and differentiation of pineal cells in the avian group.

Our understanding of the multipotentiality of pineal cells is based mainly on experiments using developing avian embryos (Araki, 2001). Avian pineal cells exhibit a wide spectrum of potentiality for phenotypic expression under cell culture conditions, including several types of photoreceptors, serotonin cells, HPC-1/Syntaxin positive cells and so on (Araki et al., 1992; 1993). We describe here a morpho-metric analysis of the developmental potency of different immunoreactive cells in the quail pineal cell culture in order to answer the following questions: 1. How does the developmental potency alter during ontogenic development of the avian pineal gland? To this end we cultured pineal cells from various embryonic stages, and performed immunostaining for iodopsin and pinopsin as photoreceptive phenotype, tyrosine hydroxylase and HPC-1 as neuronal phenotype, and serotonin and AVP as endocrinal phenotype.

2. How is cytodifferentiation, especially the development of sensory structures and hormone production of melatonin, linked in the developing quail pineal gland?

In view of melatonin's wide spread effect, the organs and cells producing melatonin and their fate during phylogeny are of considerable neurobiological interest. Aspects of photoreceptor pigments and phototransduction underline firm evolutionary and functional links between melatonin production and the generation of circadian rhythms. The capacity of the modified photoreceptor cells to produce melatonin has been corroborated by immunocytochemical demonstration of serotonin and HIOMT in these cells by various workers (Murakami et al., 1994; Nakahara et al., 1997). In the present study we recorded the melatonin content in the medium of alternate day culture using the RIA method described by Vakkuri et al. (1984). By comparing the results of melatonin secretion with those of morphometric analysis, it becomes possible to investigate the responses of biological systems to different stimuli and to study the effects of different agents which influence both secretory and intracellular molecules.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Animals

Quail eggs were purchased from a local hatchery (Tokai-Yuki, Aichi, Japan) and were incubated in a dark humidified incubator at 38°C for the desired number of days. Principles of laboratory animal care were always followed during the present study.

Pineal disperse cell culture

Quail eggs were incubated in different batches. The disperse pineal cell culture was performed from pineal glands at embryonic 9th (E9), 11th (E11) and 14th (E14) days of incubation. Pineals were dissected out from embryos, and separated from extra tissues in Hanks' solution. After washing with phosphate buffered saline {PBS (–)}, pineals were treated with 0.25% trypsin (GIBCO BRL, Rockville, U.S.A.) in PBS(–) for 20 min at 37°C. Following further washes in culture medium, they were dissociated by being gently pipetted through a Pasteur pipette. Dissociated cells derived from 2 pineals were seeded onto one plastic dish (35 mm, Iwaki Glass) pre-coated with collagen (Cell matrix, type-1-C, Nitta Gelatin, Osaka, Japan). The culture medium was Dulbecco's Modified Eagle MEM supplemented with Kanamycin sulfate (6 mg/dl), sodium pyruvate (5mg/dl), 0.6% glucose, and 6% FBS (fetal bovine serum). The medium was replaced every alternate day. The growth and vitality of culture were recorded by taking photographs under a phase-contrast microscope (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Phase contrast microphotographs showing cultured pineal cells from (A) E9, (B) E11, (C) E14 embryos after 2 days of culture. (D) After 6 days of culture they showed a similar appearance to each other. Bar in (A) is 20 μm and applies to B, C and D.

i0289-0003-19-7-781-f01.tif

After 6 days of culture, cultures were fixed for immunohistochemistry with glutaraldehyde (0.3%) for 10 minutes and then with paraformaldehyde (2%) in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) for 2–3 hr on ice. After several washes in PBS, cultures were processed for immunohistochemistry.

Immunohistochemistry

Cultures of E9, E11 and E14 pineal cells were tested for immunoreactivity for serotonin, arginine vasopressin (AVP), iodopsin, pinopsin, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and HPC-1/Syntaxin1A following the ABC method. The immunohistochemical method used has already been fully described in the previous papers (Araki et al., 1990; 1992). Briefly, cultures were treated with 2% FBS in PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 (PBS-TX) for 30 min at room temperature. They were incubated with one of the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by additional incubation for 1 hr at room temperature. After washing in PBS-TX, they were incubated with biotinylated antibody solution for 40 min at room temperature and then with the avidin-biotin peroxidase solution (VectoStain ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California). The immunoreactive sites were visualized by using diaminobenzidine. The primary antibodies used were anti-serotonin, anti-AVP (supplied by Gumma University, Japan), anti-iodopsin, anti-pinopsin, anti-tyrosine hydro-xylase (Sigma, Saint Louis, U.S.A.) and anti-HPC-1/syntaxin1A (Sigma). They were diluted to at least 1:1000 with PBS-TX containing 2% FBS. Their specificity has been fully described in previous papers (Araki et al., 1992; 1993; Inoue et al., 1992; Okano et al., 1997).

Determination of immunoreactive cell number

The number of immunoreactive cells was counted under a microscope at a high magnification (using an objective lens of x20) in at least 20 randomly chosen fields for each culture dish. Three separate experiments were performed for each embryonic stage and subjected to the cell number analysis, and the mean values and standard deviations were calculated.

RIA of Melatonin

The RIA of melatonin was performed by using I-125 melatonin following the method of Vakkuri et al (1984). Rabbit anti-melatonin antibody (HAC-AA92-03RBP86) was supplied by Gunma University (Japan) and used at a dilution of 1:250000. Radio iodinated melatonin (specific activity: 2200 Ci/mmol) was used at 4000 dpm per tube. The lower and upper detection limits were 0.25 and 25 pg/culture medium containing tube respectively. Inter and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 18.5% and 8% at the 5 pg reference, respectively. Statistical significance was analyzed with the Student's t-test.

Culture media were collected from the culture plates and frozen at −20°C till RIA assay. The melatonin content of an appropriate sample (50 ml) was determined by RIA. Radioiodinated melatonin and melatonin used as standards were purchased from PerkinElmer (Boston, U.S.A.) and Sigma, respectively. The assay was validated for culture medium without sample extraction. No significant interference was noted for the culture medium, which was detectable in the standard assay. The lower and upper detection limits of the assay were 7.5 and 1000 pg/ml. Melatonin release in the medium was noted under constant darkness with a 15 minute light pulse during the change of the culture medium. Each point representing the mean±SE of 4 replicated culture media is presented in Fig 4.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

1. Morphometric analysis of different immunoreactive cells in culture

During embryonic development from E9 to E14 the histological appearances of pineal glands remained mostly constant although there appeared a slight increase in the number of follicles from E9 to E11. In most follicles of E14 pineal glands, a parafollicular layer was seen surrounding the follicular cells, dividing the follicular cells into two different layers (Araki et al., 1992). Cells in the parafollicular layer were round in shape and smaller than the follicular cells as previously described by Calvo and Boya (1978).

Phase contrast microscopic observations of disperse cell cultures of E9 pineals on every alternate day initially presented slower growth rates than cultures from the other two stages. At the end of the experiment the patterns of growth and cellular texture of E9, E11 and E14 were very similar to each other (Fig. 1). No significant differences were noticed in the total cell number per culture dish among cultures from three different stages. These observations are fundamentally the same as those described previously by Araki et al (1992).

In all stages tested immunoreactive cells were found in the culture reacting to the above-mentioned antibodies (Fig. 2). A morphometric analysis (measurement of cell number) of all the immunoreactive cells is given in Fig. 3. The cell number of each cell type varied considerably; serotonin (5-HT), arginine vasopressin (AVP) and syntaxin1A/HPC-1 immunoreactive cells were predominant in population, and others like iodopsin (I), pinopsin (PI) and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) were much less predominant (Fig. 3). We will describe the results by dividing these immunohistochemically detectable substances into three categories according to their properties.

Fig. 2

Photomicrographs of various immunoreactive cells. (A,B) Arginine vasopression-positive cells. Flat epithelial cells are the dominant cell type, but occasionally neuronal cells with numerous processes are also observed. (C,D) Tyrosine hydroxylase-positive cells. Positive cells usually possess several long neuritic processes. (E) Serotonin-positive cells. Some cells are flat and some show a neuronal appearance. (F) pinopsin-positive cells. Immunoreactive products are usually observed on short thick processes (arrows). Bar in (A) is 50 μm and applies to (C) and (D). Bar in (B) is 20 μm and applies to (D) and (F).

i0289-0003-19-7-781-f02.tif

Fig. 3

Morphometric analysis of immunoreactive cells in pineal disperse cell culture of quail embryos from age E9 to E14. Pineal cells from E9, E11 and E14 embryos were cultured for 6 days. They were fixed and stained for one of 6 substances, 5-HT (serotonin), AVP (arginine vasopressin), I (iodopsin), PI (pinopsin), TH (tyrosine hydroxylase) and HPC-1/Syntaxin1A.

i0289-0003-19-7-781-f03.tif

Endocrinal substances (serotonin and AVP): The numbers of serotonin (5-HT)-immunoreactive cells in cultures from E9 and E11 appeared stable (Fig. 2E, 3), but the number of 5-HT immunoreactive cells increased significantly in E14 culture, suggesting that as the hatching day nears, the synthetic activity of the pineal increases for melatonin and that serotonin acts as the substrate, for this. During embryonic development and the post-hatching period, it has been reported that the 5-HT immunoreactivity reaches a peak in one-day-old quails and then slowly decreases with increasing age (Oshima and Matsuo, 1988). Our previous study also showed that no pineal cells are positively stained for 5-HT in E11 pineal glands and that numerous immunoreactive cells are observed in the E14 pineal but are still stained only faintly (Araki et al., 1992).

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) antibody also reacted intensely with high number of cells at the E9 stage (Fig. 2A). The positive cell numbers increased gradually as pineals for culture materials were removed from more developed embryos, and the AVP immunoreactive cell number was highest in E14 cultures (Fig. 3). The AVP immunoreactivity was localized mostly in flat epithelial cells, and occasionally it was found in the perikariya and neurite-like processes of some neuronal cells (Fig. 2A, B). Although no data are currently available on the immunohistochemical localization of AVP in developing avian pineal glands, these results indicate that endocrinal properties are acquired by pineal cells only in the late stage of development.

Neuronal substances (Tyrosine hydroxylase and Syntaxin/HPC-1): Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-immunoreactive cells followed a reverse pattern from the above mentioned endocrinal substances (Fig. 3). TH-immunoreactive cells often showed long branching neurite-like processes, as previously mentioned (Fig. 2C, D) (Araki et al., 1994). Intensely THimmunoreactive cells were noted in E9 cell cultures with a gradual decrease in number from E11 to E14 cultures. This appears to be consistent with the previous observations that TH-immunoreactive cells are found only transiently during embryonic development (E9-E11) and disappear in the matured pineal organ of the quail (Araki et al., 1993). Other studies also suggest that neural cells degenerate during the late embryonic stage and after hatching (see a review by Sato, 2001).

HPC-1/Syntaxin1A immunoreactive cells were highest in number in the E9 cultures with a gradual decrease from E11 to E14 cultures (Fig. 3). The immunoreactive cells mostly showed a neuronal morphology with long branching neurite-like processes. Thus, the cell numbers of both THand HPC-1-immunoreactive cells decreased as the culture materials were removed from more developed embryos. These results indicate that the potency for neuronal differentiation is gradually lost during embryonic development, and are consistent with the previous results of in vivo developing pineals (Araki et al., 1992; 1993).

Visual pigments (pinopsin and iodopsin): Several retinal opsins have already been described in different pineal photoreceptor populations (Araki et al., 1992; Yamao et al., 1999). Pinopsin is a blue to green light sensitive visual pigment specifically found in pineal photoreceptors (Okano et al., 1997). This photoreceptive molecule is known to mediate the photic entrainment of the endogenous circadian clock, which derives rhythmic production of melatonin and hence is the circadian pacemaker in the avian pineal gland (Okano and Fukada, 2001). Anti-pinopsin antibody reveals intensely positive images for most of the membrane structures that make contact with the lumen of the follicles in the intact pineal follicles (Hirunagi et al., 1997; Yamao et al., 1999). In the present study the antibody stained only the string and bulb shaped structures of the pineal cells (Fig. 2F), the morphology of which resembles those of retinal photoreceptor cell. The number of pinopsin immunoreactive cells increased with increasing age of the cultured embryonic pineals. High number of pinopsin-positive cells was noted in E14 culture cells. These results are consistent with those reported by Yamao et al (1999).

Iodopsin immunoreactivity was observed on the whole plasma membrane covering from cell to fine neurite-like processes of cells both under culture condition and in the pineal organ of the adult quail (Masuda et al., 1994). The number of iodopsin immunoreactive cells was significantly higher in cultured cells from E14 pineals than in those from E9 and E11 (Fig. 3). Thus, it is indicated that the developmental potency for photoreceptors becomes more enhanced as embryonic development proceeds. The two types of visual pigments showed a very similar pattern both in the cell number and rate of increase as shown in Fig. 3. Several fundamental differences, however, were found in the in vivo expression patterns of these two visual pigments; during embryonic development visual pigments such as iodopsin and rhodopsin are found later on E14, while pinopsin immunoreactivity was first observed as early as E9 (Araki et al., 1992; Yamao et al., 1999), while in E11 pineals, most of cytoplasmic protrusions in the pineal luminal cavity have already been positively stained for pinopsin (Yamao et al., 1999). The present morphometric results of pinopsin and iodopsin suggest that the present culture conditions are less favorable for the production of pinopsin than that of iodopsin, particularly in cultured pineal cells from earlier embryos. This will be partly due to the fact that differentiation of pinopsin-immunoreactive cells is susceptible to dissociation procedure with trypsin (Yamao et al., 1999).

2. Hormonal analysis of melatonin

To determine the onset of melatonin secretion and to monitor it along with the developmental changes of the pineal organ, the media of one-day cultures from E 9 to E14 cultures were collected to note any conspicuously different amounts of melatonin. In pilot studies it was adjusted in such a way that the melatonin content of the samples showing a range of measurement (15–640 pg/ml) of the RIA by serial dilution. Undiluted samples of medium extracts from one-day cultures revealed values just at the lower range of detection after 72 hr of culture, although a high amount of melatonin was detected in culture medium after 24 hr. Samples of medium extracts from one-day cultures of pineal cells from E9 to E14 embryos were assessable at 0.5, and 0.1 dilutions, respectively. To eliminate inter assay variations, all measurements of this study were ultimately performed with a single assay. The results from RIA determinations of 24 hr melatonin discharge into the culture medium are shown in Fig. 4. The culture was performed in the dark with exposure to a 15 min light pulse during the time of the medium change every day. We recorded a single point assay, which already has been reported by others suggesting a moderate value of melatonin, perhaps with no persisting rhythm under the above conditions (Murakami et al, 1994). The melatonin in the medium by the disperse pineal cells was maintained at a moderately high level under culture condition for 72 hr, after which a decrease and dampening were noted. Hence, we may suggest that the mechanisms regulating melatonin synthesis in the avian pineal gland are established during embryonic life (E9) and that the quail pineal gland is not a dominant pacemaker in the animal's circadian system.

Fig. 4

Results of 24 hr melatonin release in the culture medium by cultured pineal cells from E9, E11 and E14 quail embryos.

i0289-0003-19-7-781-f04.tif

The cell culture technique appears to be an excellent experimental approach to elucidate the developmental potency of embryonic pineal cells. Our cell culture condition for embryonic avian pineals affords a good system to reveal the control mechanism of the phenotypic expression of particular cell types. Such studies are of considerable importance for the understanding of how this organ develops into its unique function only at a restricted region in the developing diencephalon. The so-called retino-potency of pineal cells has been described in culture with immunohistochemical methods, and photoreceptor-specific visual pigments and neuron specific markers were localized in cultured avian pineal cells (Araki et al, 1993; Araki, 2001; Mano et al, 1999).

The temporal sequence of the development of chick pineal cells with the distinction of cytogenesis (until day 9 of incubation) and cytodifferentiation (embryonic day 9–14) has partially been explained by Ohshima and Matsuo (1988). According to them, cytogenesis and cytodifferentiation take place at the same time during the second half of egg incubation but probably at different sites in the pineal organ.

Diurnal changes in the serotonin immunoreactivity were noted in the culture cells of the chick (Oshima and Matsuo, 1991). We showed that quite a few serotonin immunoreactive cells were differentiated in the disperse culture condition and that the number increased as the embryonic stage of culture material advanced. In addition, the relatively high content of melatonin released in the culture medium indicates that our culture condition provided a good experimental system to investigate how the pineal organ develops the circadian oscillator system during embryonic development. Pinopsin is an important visual pigment for the lighting regulation of the pineal oscillator (Okano et al., 1997). A recent study suggested a possibility that cells must be in contact with each other for 2–3 days after the onset of pinopsin synthesis (Yamao et al., 1999). This idea is consistent with the present observations that pineal cells from E9 are mostly negative for pinopsin when cultured, but that those from E14 become clearly positive for pinopsin. Light is considered another factor affecting pinopsin expression, since experiments using cultured chicken pineal glands show a light-dependent increase in pinopsin mRNA level (Takanaka et al., 1998). However, looking into the differentiation pattern of various cell types in the present culture, the light does not seem to have been a regulatory factor for cell type switching during the ontogenic development of avian pineals.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Wakabayashi (Gunma University) for providing antibodies raised against melatonin and AVP. We are also grateful to Dr. Kimura (Shiga University of Medical Sciences), Dr. Fukada (Tokyo University) and Dr. Shichida (Kyoto University) for antibodies against serotonin, pinopsin and iodopsin, respectively. Thanks to Dr. Oishi for various assistance during melatonin RIA. Help from Ms. Ikegami for photography are sincerely acknowledged. The study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and Technology of Japan to M. Araki and a grant for Visiting Scientist from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to C. Haldar.

REFERENCES

1.

M Araki 1997. Diffusible factors produced by cultured neural retinal cells enhance in vitro differentiation of pineal cone photoreceptors of developing quail embryos. Dev Brain Res 104:71–78. Google Scholar

2.

M Araki 2001. Developmental potency of cultured pineal cells: An approach to pineal developmental biology. Microsc Res Tech 53:33–42. Google Scholar

3.

M Araki, Y Fukada, Y Shichida, and T Yoshizawa . 1990. Localization of iodopsin in the chick retina during in vivo and in vitro cone differentiation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:1466–1473. Google Scholar

4.

M Araki, Y Fukada, Y Shiida, T Yoshuzawa, and F Tokunga . 1992. Differentiation of both rod and cone types of photoreceptors in the in vivo and in vitro developing pineal glands of the quail. Develop Brain Res 65:85–92. Google Scholar

5.

M Araki, R Kodama, G Eguchi, M Yasujima, H Orii, and K Watanabe . 1993. Retinal differentiation from multipotential pineal cells of the embryonic quail. Neurosci Res 18:63–72. Google Scholar

6.

J Calvo and J Boya . 1978. Embryonic development of the pineal gland of the chicken (Gallus gallus). Acta anat 101:289–303. Google Scholar

7.

JP Collin 1971. Differentiation and regression of the cells of the sensory line in the epiphysis cerebri. In “The pineal Gland”. Ed by Wolstenholme GEW and Knight J . Churchill-Livingstone. London. pp. 79–125. Google Scholar

8.

K Hirunagi, S Ebihara, T Okano, Y Takanaka, and Y Fukada . 1997. Immunoelectron-microscopic investigation of the subcellular localization of pinopsin in the pineal organ of the chick. Cell Tissue Res 289:235–241. Google Scholar

9.

A Inoue, K Obata, and K Akagawa . 1992. Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for the neuronal cell membrane antigen, HPC-1. J Biol Chem 267:10613–10619. Google Scholar

10.

H Mano, D Kojima, and Y Fukada . 1999. Exo-rhodopsin: a novel rhosopsin expressed in the zebrafish pineal gland. Mol Brain Res 73:110–118. Google Scholar

11.

W Moller and G Moller . 1990. Structural and functional differentiation of the embryonic chick pineal organ in vivo and in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 260:337–342. Google Scholar

12.

N Murakami, H Nakamura, R Nishi, N Marumoto, and T Nasu . 1994. Comparison of circadian oscillation of melatonin release in pineal cells of house sparrow, pigeon and Japanese quail, using cell perfusion systems. Brain Res 651:209–214. Google Scholar

13.

H Masuda, T Oishi, M Ohtani, M Michinomae, Y Fukada, Y Shichida, and T Yoshizawa . 1994. Visual pigments in the pineal complex of the Japanese quail, Japanese grass lizard and bullfrog: immunocytochemistry and HPLC analysis. Tissue Cell 26:101–113. Google Scholar

14.

K Nakahara, N Murakami, T Nasu, H Kuroda, and T Murakami . 1997. Individual pineal cells in chick possess photoreceptive, circa-dian clock and melatonin- synthesizing capacities in vitro. Brain Res 774:242–245. Google Scholar

15.

T Okano and Y Fukada . 2001. Photoreception and circadian clock system of the chicken pineal gland. Micro Res Tech 53:72–80. Google Scholar

16.

T Okano, Y Takanaka, A Nakamura, K Hirunagi, A Adachi, S Ebihara, and Y Fukada . 1997. Immunocytochemical identification of pinopsin in pineal glands of chicken and pigeon. Mol Brain Res 50:190–196. Google Scholar

17.

A Oksche 1971. Sensory and glandular elements of the pineal organ. In “The pineal gland”. Ed by Wolstenholme GEW and Knight J . Churchill-Livingstone. Edinburgh. pp. 127–146. Google Scholar

18.

A Oksche, HW Korf, and EM Rodriguez . 1987. Pinealocytes as photo-neuroendocrine units of neuronal origin: Concepts and evidence. In “Advances in Pineal Research”. Ed by Fraschini and Reiter RJ . John Libbey. London. 2:1–18. Google Scholar

19.

K Oshima and S Matsuo . 1988. Cytodifferentiation of the chick pineal gland, with special reference to the photosensory and secretory elements. J Pineal Res 5:397–410. Google Scholar

20.

K Oshima and S Matsuo . 1991. Immunohistochemical localization of serotonin in the pineal gland of the chicken during post-hatching development in relation to light-dark cycle. Anat Anz 173:65–72. Google Scholar

21.

T Sato 2001. Sensory and endocrine characteristics of the avian pineal organ. Microsc Res Tech 53:2–11. Google Scholar

22.

Y Takanaka, T Okano, M Ligo, and Y Fukada . 1998. Light-dependent expression of pinopsin gene in chicken pineal gland. J Neurochem 70:908–913. Google Scholar

23.

O Vakkuri, J Leppaluoto, and O Vuolteenaho . 1984. Development and validation of a melatonin radioimmunoassay using radioiodinated melatonin as a tracer. Acta Endocrinol 106:152–157. Google Scholar

24.

L Vollrath 1981. The pineal organ. Handbuch der mikroskopischen Anatomie des Menschen. VI/7, Springer. Berlin Heidelberg New York. pp. 1–665. Google Scholar

25.

M Yamao, M Araki, T Okano, Y Fukada, and T Oishi . 1999. Pinopsinimmunoreactive cells in the developing quail pineals: A comparison with differentiation of rhodopsin-and iodopsin-immunoreactive pineal photorecptors. Cell Tissue Res 296:667–671. Google Scholar
Chandana Haldar and Masasuke Araki "Morphometric analysis of photoreceptive, neuronal and endocrinal cell differentiation of avian pineal cells: An in vitro immunohistochemical study on the developmental transition from neuronal to photo-endocrinal property," Zoological Science 19(7), 781-787, (1 July 2002). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.19.781
Received: 15 January 2002; Accepted: 1 April 2002; Published: 1 July 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top