Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2002 A Circadian Neuropeptide, Pigment-Dispersing Factor–PDF, in the Last-Summer Cicada Meimuna opalifera: cDNA Cloning and Immunocytochemistry
Author Affiliations +

Pigment-dispersing factor (PDF), an 18-amino acid neuropeptide, is a principal circadian neuromodulator functioning downstream of the insect brain's circadian clock, modulating daily rhythms of locomotor activity. Recently, we found that PDF precursors of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus comprise a nuclear localization signal (NLS). Moreover, the nuclear localization of PDF immunoreactivity and the trans-location of GFP-fused PDF precursor into the nucleus have both been demonstrated. These suggest a fundamental role for PDF peptide in the circadian clock system within the nucleus, in addition to its role in downstream neural events. In the present study, we carried out the cDNA cloning of PDF from adult brains of the last-summer cicada Meimuna opalifera, and found that an isolated clone (545 bp) encodes an ordinary PDF precursor protein. PDF peptide itself shows a high sequence identity (78–94%) and similarity (89–100%) to insect PDFs and also to the crustacean β-PDH peptides. The computer-assisted sequence analysis of PDF precursor revealed a possible translocation into the nucleus, despite the lack of a definite NLS-like sequence. Using immunocytochemistry, the optic lobes of M. opalifera revealed PDF-immunore-active neurons in both the medulla and lamina neuropiles. All these PDF cells exhibited prominent immunolabeling of both their perikarya and axons, but not their nuclei. Our results provide the first structural and immunocytochemical identification of PDF neurons in Hemiptera.


Pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) is involved in regulating insect circadian rhythms (Stengl and Homberg, 1994; Pyza and Meinertzhagen, 1996, 1997; Petri and Stengl, 1997), acting as a neuromodulator that functions in the output pathway of the brain's circadian pacemaker, and thereby regulating behavior arising from the dorsal central brain (Helfrich-Förster et al., 1998, 2000; Renn et al., 1999; Park et al., 2000). Many lines of evidence have been obtained aimed at clarifying the function of PDF in the circadian system of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. To date, PDF has been thought to be a neuropeptide functioning as a principal circadian modulator downstream of the brain's clock machinery, organizing daily locomotion or other behaviors.

Recently we have carried out the cDNA cloning of PDF from adult brains of the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, in which rhythmic behavioral activity manifests a nocturnal peak. The cDNA obtained exhibits a unique preprosequence including an ordinary PDF sequence, but with very short PDF-associated peptide (PAP) sequence consisting of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) at the N-terminus (Chuman et al., 2002). Immunoreactivity to Gryllus bimaculatus PDF was identified in all the axons of the PDF neurons. Electron microscopic observation of cells with nuclei that show PDF immunoreactivity and microscopic observation of cells with nuclei that contain GFP-fusion PDF precursor protein, both demonstrate however the translocation of PDF peptide into the nucleus of PDF neurons. These results strongly suggest that, in addition to its role as a neuromodulator at output pathways from the insect's circadian clock, PDF is also involved in the clock mechanism itself. In this study, we attempted to clone the pdf cDNAs from other insect species in order to detect similar types of PDF precursors.

Insect PDFs are close homologues of the β-subfamily of crustacean pigment-dispersing hormone (β-PDH) neuropep-tides (Rao and Riehm, 1993). Among 16 β-PDH precursors deduced from pdh cDNAs, the molecular sizes are notably similar to each other. For insect PDF precursors, only three pdf cDNAs have so far been elucidated: the precursors of D. melanogaster (Park and Hall, 1998), Romalea microptera (GenBank:  U42472), and G. bimaculatus (Chuman et al., 2002). Although the C-terminal PDF region possesses exactly the same peptide size, the region containing the signal and PAP in D. melanogaster, R. microptera, and G. bimaculatus obviously differed, with 80, 66, and 20 amino acid residues, respectively. Such differences in peptide sizes might reflect different functions of the PAP peptides. In the present study, we carried out the cDNA cloning of PDF from adult brains of the last-summer cicada, Meimuna opalifera, a member of the suborder Homoptera of Hemiptera, and thus representing a different order of insects from the previous three, D. melanogaster (Diptera), R. microptera (Orthoptera) and G. bimaculatus (Orthoptera). We here report the sequence analyses of nucleotides and deduced amino acids of M. opalifera PDF, and the results from immunocytochemistry using an antibody directed against this peptide sequence.



Last-summer cicadas, M. opalifera, were collected in the suburbs near Fukuoka and maintained at 25°C in an incubator which was illuminated for the same photoperiod as the day/night cycle as that in the field in Fukuoka. Phases of morning and evening peaks are given in Zeitgeber time (ZT), whereby lights on is ZT0 and lights off is ZT12. The brains were dissected at 4 hr intervals over 24 hr starting with ZT0 and were then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored directly at –80°C within a day. For immunocytochemistry, cicadas were dissected at 06:00, 30 min before lights ‘on’ (ZT23:30).

3′ RACE for identification of 3′ end of PDF mRNA

mRNAs were purified using a QuickPrep® Micro mRNA Purification Kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the Manufacturer's instructions. To extract mRNAs, the brains of cicadas frozen at each time point were mixed and homogenized in the extraction buffer. The mRNAs obtained (1 μg) were reverse-transcribed by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) and d(T)17-adapter primer (5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-T17-3′) as previously described (Frohman et al., 1988). After phenol extraction followed by ethanol precipitation, the resulting cDNA pellet was used as a template for 3′ RACE. Primers were all obtained from Hokkaido System Science (Sapporo) and those for 3′ RACE were as follows: PDF specific primer PDF-SP (5′-AAGCGCAACTCNGARMTVATCAA-3′) and adapter primer Ad (5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-3′). In these primers, the letters M, N, R, and V denote the nucleotides (A or C), (any nucleotides), (A or G), and (not T), respectively. A PDF-specific primer was designed based on the nucleotide sequence homology among mRNAs clarified for β-PDH and PDF (Klein et al., 1992, 1994; de Kleijn et al., 1993; Desmoucelles-Carette et al., 1996; Park and Hall, 1998). The PCR mixture (100 μl) included 1 μl of cDNA, 2 pmol of Ad primer, 20 pmol of PDF-SP primer, 200 μM dNTP, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 2.5 units of PLATINUM Taq DNA polymerase (GIBCO BRL). PCR (30 cycles) was performed as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec, extension at 72°C for 90 sec, and final extension for 7 min at 72°C, using a Geneamp PCR system 2400 (Perkin Elmer). Single-primer control PCRs were also carried out in parallel. Two primer-specific PCR products were identified on the 2% agarose gel, and recovered by phenol extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. The gel-purified PCR products were sub-cloned into pBluescript II SK+ vector. Sequencing analysis on a Thermo Sequenase Cy5.5 dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) identified plasmid DNA containing pdf.

5′ RACE for identification of 5′ end of PDF mRNA

To amplify the 5′ end of the M. opalifera pdf cDNA, we carried out the cDNA cloning by using a 5′ RACE System for rapid amplification of cDNA ends (version 2.0: GIBCO BRL) according to the Manufacturer's protocol. The antisense primers were designed from the cDNA sequence clarified by the 3′ RACE method, and these included MSP-RT (5′-TATGAGGTCTTTGTAGTT-3′), MSP-1A (5′-AGTGTGGTTCAAGGTTTGTATAATTT-3′), and MSP-2A (5′-TTCAAGGTTTGTATAATTTGTTGTATG-3′).

First-strand cDNA was synthesized from a mRNA using a single gene specific primer (MSP-RT) and a reverse transcriptase SUPER SCRIPTTM II (GIBCO BRL). The original mRNA template was removed by treatment with the enzyme RNase Mix (a mixture of RNase H and RNase T1). Unincorporated dNTPs, MSP-RT, and proteins were separated from synthesized cDNA using an adsorbent GLASSMAX® Spin Cartridge. A homopolymeric tail, poly(C), using terminal deoxytransferase (TdT) and a substrate dCTP, elon-gated the 3′-end of the purified cDNA. Since this tailing reaction was performed in a PCR-compatible buffer, the entire contents of the reaction mixture were directly amplified by PCR without intermediate organic extraction and ethanol precipitation.

PCR amplification was accomplished using PLATINUM Taq DNA polymerase (GIBCO), gene-specific primers (MSP-1A and MSP-2A), and deoxyinosine-containing anchor primers. PCR product using MSP-1A and Abridged Anchor Primer AAP (5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAGTACGGGIIGGGIIGGGIIG-3′, GIBCO) was further amplified with MSP-2A and Abridged Universal Anchor Primer AUAP (5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-3′, GIBCO). Respective PCR was carried out for 30 cycles as described above. The PCR products were separated in an agarose gel and cloned into pBluescript II SK+. The clones were verified by sequencing each separated cDNA as mentioned above.


For anatomical analysis of PDF immunoreactive cells, confocal microscopy was first used on whole-mount immunolabeled preparations. Dissected brains containing the optic lobes with attached retina were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 16 hr. After washing with PBS, brains were incubated for 96 hr at 4°C in a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against G. bimaculatus PDF (Tomioka et al., in preparation) (1:1500). Fluoresein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunore-search, Westgrove, PA) were used. For washings between all steps, PBS with 1% Triton X-100 was used. Preparations were dehydrated in graded ethanol, cleared in 100% methyl salicylate, and coverslipped in methyl salicylate prior to imaging in a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning confocal microscope.

To localize the PDF cells and their neurites precisely in the neuropile, horizontal Vibratome slices of 80 μm thickness were also immunolabeled, using the same rabbit polyclonal antibody against G. bimaculatus PDF but at 1:3500 for 48 hr at 4°C in a free-floating reaction (Sternberger, 1979). Sections were then incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody to rabbit IgG. Sections were mounted in Vectashield (Vectoo Lab., Bmlingame, CA).


Isolation of a Meimuna opalifera PDF cDNA

To be sure of obtaining target mRNAs, heads of adult cicadas Meimuna opalifera were collected every 4 hr, namely six times a day. The last-summer cicadas only appeared during a very limited period, and thus those that were collected were taken within about two weeks at a particular area where they appeared in a large population. The total number of collected adults was about 700.

All animals were maintained in a daily cycle of L12:D12, that was almost the same as the natural day/night cycle, in September in Fukuoka. We adopted the procedure designed for direct isolation of polyadenylated RNA without purifying the total RNA. Isolated mRNAs are all converted to cDNAs by the RT-PCR method, in which AMV reverse transcriptase catalyzes the polymerization of DNA using mRNA as templates. This enzyme has an intrinsic RNase H activity to degrade mRNA, and thus the method eventually affords a mixture of single-strand cDNAs.

RACE methods to determine the full sequence of a Meimuna opalifera PDF

To screen for the pdf cDNA of the cicada M. opalifera, we first carried out the 3′ RACE method. There is a clear reasoning to carry out the 3′ RACE method as an initiating cloning procedure. With respect to the nucleotide sequence of insect PDF precursors, no prominent similarities have been found except for the N-terminal portion of the PDF peptide regions. Thus, if we had first carried out 5′ RACE, it would have been difficult to judge whether or not a cloned cDNA were the one for PDF. This is not the case, however, for 3′ RACE, which would yield the entire structure of the PDF peptide region. Thus, we first screened a pdf cDNA clone from the cDNA mixture by the 3′ RACE method.

PDF-specific sense primer for 3′ RACE was designed with reference to sequence alignment analyses for both amino acid and nucleotide sequences. The N-terminal portion of PDF, including the dibasic processing site (KR) -- the residues –2 ∼ 6, was chosen as a PDF-specific sense primer (PDF-SP). The first PCR with a primer of PDF-SP and an adapter primer Ad lacking d(T)17 yielded no distinct gel-bands, while the second PCR using the resulting PCR product provided several products. A dim gel-band, a two primer-specific PCR product of about 270 bp was subsequently isolated for sequence analysis. The nucleotide sequence so determined encoded a PDF peptide with the amidation sequence in addition to the 3′-UTR non-coding region (Fig. 1). The open reading frame encoding PDF was found to be highly conserved among pdf and pdh genes.

Fig. 1

Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the Meimuna opalifera PDF-precursor. Arrows indicate primers used for the 3′ RACE or 5′ RACE method. Amino acid sequences in white, gray, and black boxes correspond to the signal, PAP, and PDF regions, respectively. KR (=Lys-Arg) is a processing cleavage site, while the C-terminal GRK(=Gly-Arg-Lys) double-underlined is an amidation site. An underlined portion (AATAAA) in the 3′-UTR region is a putative poly-adenylation signal site (Conway and Wickens, 1985; Gil and Proudfoot, 1987; Takagaki et al., 1988). The underlined TGA trinucleotide sequence, shown by the asterisk, is the stop codon.


Compared with the 3′-UTR regions of other insect pdf genes, the 3′-UTR region of M. opalifera pdf was found to be very similar to that of R. microptera both in length (190 and 197 bp, respectively) and sequence (ca. 50% identity). The 3′-UTR regions of both M. opalifera and R. microptera pdf are unique in length and sequence as compared with those of Drosophila (492 bp) and G. bimaculatus (113 bp).

To determine the structure of the 5′-end of pdf cDNA, we undertook the 5′ RACE method. Based on the sequence information obtained from 3′ RACE, the antisense primer for RT-PCR against PDF mRNA was set at the 3′-UTR region (Fig. 1). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from mRNA using a gene-specific antisense primer MSP-RT and a reverse transcriptase SUPER SCRIPTTM II. A characteristic reaction of the 5′ RACE method is an addition of poly(C) tail to the 3′-end of cDNA obtained. The resulting poly(C)-tailed cDNA was utilized as a template for PCR using an anchor primer AAP, having a poly(I) truncated with deoxyguanosine, G/poly(I)/G, that enables the primer to anneal specifically to poly(C). PCR was carried out by using AAP and gene-specific antisense primer MSP-1A, which was assigned at the 3′-UTR region. The anchor primer AAP possesses a specific 5′-end anchor sequence, and subsequent nested PCR was performed using antisense MSP-2A (assigned at the 3′-UTR region) and another anchor primer AUAP lacking G/poly(I)/G. MSP-1A and MSP-2A are adjacent, being separated by only 9 nucleotides.

The sequencing analysis afforded complete sequence data including 5′-UTR, signal region, and PAP peptide region. The cDNA sequence was further confirmed by RTPCR using primers set for both 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR to amplify the full-length PDF cDNA. Eventually, the full length of the cDNA clone was found to comprise 545 bp, with a precursor protein of 82 amino acid residues (Fig. 1). We assigned the initiator codon as shown in Fig. 1 according to the following sequence data. (i) The selected ATG codon and its adjacent nucleotide sequences fulfilled Kozak's consensus motif (Kozak, 1999). (ii) We found no additional ATG codon in the upstream region of any cDNA clones isolated in the RT-PCR analysis. (iii) The four-amino-acid sequence at the putative N-terminal (Met-Arg-Ser-Ala) was exactly the same as those of Carcinus maenas (Klein et al., 1992), Orconectes limosus (de Kleijn et al., 1993), and Penaeus vannamei (Desmoucelles-Carette et al., 1996), all crustacean β-PDH precursors. Finally, (iv) the full-length PDF cDNA was isolated by RT-PCR using a primer set for both 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR.

Comparing the sequences of insect pdf cDNAs, the entire open-reading frame region of M. opalifera was found to be very similar, as for the 3′-UTR region, to that of R. microptera in sequence (ca. 60% identity). Furthermore, the number of amino acid residues (n), 82, of the PDF precursor was also similar to that of R. microptera (n = 89), although it was considerably different from those of other insects (102 for D. melanogaster and 43 for G. bimaculatus) (Fig. 2). When analyzed by the computer-assisted signal peptide prediction method for eukaryotic sequences (Nielsen et al., 1997, 1999), M. opalifera PDF precursor was assigned to possess 24-peptide sequences for the signal regions and 35-peptide sequences for the PAP region. This structural profile appears to be just normal when compared with those of D. melanogaster and R. microptera. Although the G. bimaculatus PDF precursor consisted of a nuclear localization signal (NLS) at the N-terminal portion, no NLS-like sequence was found in the PAP region of the M. opalifera PDF precursor.

Fig. 2

Schematic comparison between the primary structures deduced from the nucleotide sequences of insect PDF precursor proteins. White, gray, and black rod boxes correspond to the signal, PAP, and PDF regions, respectively. Each number in the box indicates the number of amino acid residues. KR (=Lys-Arg) is a processing cleavage site, and the C-terminal GRK(=Gly-Arg-Lys) or GK(=Gly-Lys) is an amidation site.


Highly Conserved Primary Structure of the M. opalifera PDF Peptide

When the sequences of insect PDF peptides were compared, it was found that M. opalifera PDF, NSEIINSLLGLPKVLNDA-amide, is completely identical to those reported in G. bimaculatus (Chuman et al., 2002) and Acheta domesticus (Rao and Riehm, 1988) (Fig. 3). The sequence identity and similarity of M. opalifera PDF peptides were calculated to be 78–100% and 89–100%, respectively, considerably higher compared with PDFs of other insect species. Only a sole residue substitution was found, for PDFs of Periplaneta americana (Mohrherr et al., 1991) and R. microptera; i.e., Ile4↔Leu and Val14↔Leu, respectively. As for Drosophila PDF (Park and Hall, 1998), four residue substitutions were found; i.e., Ile4↔Leu, Gly10↔Ser, Val14↔Asn, and Leu15↔Met. The Ser10 residue of Drosophila PDF is uncommon, since Gly10 is preserved among the known sequences of all other arthropod species.

Fig. 3

Amino acid sequences of insect PDFs. PDFs from insects: Meimuna opalifera, G. bimaculatus (Chuman et al., 2002), Acheta domes-ticus (Rao and Riehm, 1988), R. microptera (Rao et al., 1987), P. americana (Rao and Riehm, 1993), and D. melanogaster (Park and Hall, 1998). Asterisk indicates the residues conserved among all PDFs.


Prediction of translocation of M. opalifera PDF precursor

When we analyzed the pdf cDNA of the nocturnal cricket G. bimaculatus, it was found that PDF precursor consists of a nuclear localization signal (NLS)-like sequence. Nuclear localization and translocation of G. bimaculatus PDF were demonstrated, by both electron microscopic observation of PDF immunocytoreactivity and biochemical translocation of GFP-fused PDF precursors (Chuman et al., 2002). Nuclear localization was also predicted by means of the network computer-assisted system running the PSORT II program (Nakai and Kanehisa, 1992; Reinhardt and Hubbard, 1998; Nakai and Horton 1999). The G. bimaculatus PDF precursor was judged to have a higher likelihood of being in the nucleus (about 48%) than in the cytoplasm (about 22%) (Table 1).

Table 1

Prediction of the subcellular localization sites of insect PDF precursor proteins from their amino acid sequences by the computer Program PSORT II.


Using a combined sequence of the signal and PAP regions, we calculated the score that distinguishes the tendency of a peptide to translocate either to the nucleus or to other cellular sites. The cicada's PDF precursor was judged to be present mainly at the extracellular site (about 44%) (Table 1). The possibility of this extracellular translocation was even greater for PDF precursors of R. microptera (about 56%) and D. melanogaster (about 67%). These results strongly suggest that all these PDF peptides are secretory and not nuclear. Even though the PDF precursor proteins of D. melanogaster and R. microptera are unlikely to translocate into the nucleus (Table 1), the program PSORT II has calculated for M. opalifera that the PDF precursor is likely to be located in the nucleus with a finite possibility of about 22% (Table 1). It is however difficult to distinguish and identify the NLS-like sequence in the signal and PAP regions of M. opalifera PDF precursor protein.

Immunocytochemical examination of M. opalifera PDF in brain

The relatively high score for the possible nuclear trans-location of the M. opalifera PDF precursor prompted us to investigate the cicada's brain immunocytochemically with anti-PDF. Since the amino acid sequence of M. opalifera PDF is exactly the same as that of the cricket G. bimaculatus, we utilized a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against G. bimaculatus PDF (Tomioka et al., in preparation). Confocal analysis revealed two cell groups in the optic lobe clearly labeled by this antibody. One of them was located at the proximal-frontal region in the optic lobe, while the other was in the posterior cleft between the lamina and the medulla. The latter cell cluster was elongated from the dorsal to the ventral rim. In addition, the same antibody labeled clearly the fibers of these cells in the optic lobes and midbrain. The whole profile also revealed PDF immunoreactive fibers in the midbrain of M. opalifera similar to those previously reported in the orthopteroid insects (Homberg et al., 1991; Stengl and Homberg, 1994; Okamoto et al., 2001; Chuman et al., 2002), namely the posterior optic commissure and the ramification in the superior lateral protocerebrum (data not shown).

Immunolabeled Vibratome slices revealed precisely the location of the PDF cells and their arborizations in the optic lobe and midbrain. Fig. 4 shows the LSM image of a virtual section from such a Vibratome slice of the optic lobe. The numerous PDFLa cells in the cleft between the lamina and the medulla from the preparation which was dissected at ZT23:30 are strongly immunoreactive, and give rise to a dense arborization in the first optic chiasma and thence to the lamina and the medulla. In the medulla, these axons extend along the module structure to make the ramification in the middle layer of the medulla. On the other hand, PDFMe cells (which comprise at least four cells) are less immunoreactive than PDFLa cells at this time of day. Immunoreactive fiber from PDFMe cells enter into the middle layer of the medulla, and make the network. Immunolabeled fibers in the lobula are seen sparsely. These results imply that PDF precursor or PDF itself was secreted from the particular PDF-expressing cells. In hemimetabola insects previously described, PDFMe cells are generally reported to be much immunoreactive rather than PDFLa cells. In M. opalifera, however, PDFLa cells are shown to be strongly immunoreactive at just before dawn in this study. In G. bimaculatus, the distal region of the medulla is reported to be important for the persistence of rhythmicity (Okamoto et al., 2001). In cockroach, anti-PER antiserum labeled the cells clusters located in the outer optic chiasm (Takeda et al., 2000). These results suggest that the expression of PDF in the PDFLa cells is regulated by some clock mechanism to elicit the daily fluctuation.

Fig. 4

Medulla (PDFMe) and lamina (PDFLa) PDF cells and their neurite network in the optic lobe from the horizontal Vibratome slice immunolabeled with anti-PDF antiserum (ZT 23:30). PDFMe cells (arrow) are located in the anterior cortex of the medulla, and PDFLa cells (double arrows) in the posterior cleft between the lamina and medulla. Strongly immunoreactive PDFLa cells give rise to the neurite in the first chiasma and thence into the lamina and medulla. PDFMe cells give rise to the neurite proximally, and partially into the medulla La: lamina, Me: medulla, Lo: lobula. Scale bar, 100 μm.


When the immunolabeled cells were carefully examined for their nuclei, no cells with an immunolabeled nucleus were found. Fig. 5 is the LSM images of a virtual section from the series of images scanned by 1 μm steps. As shown in these figures, all immunolabeled cells in the lamina and medulla exhibited a nucleus that was unlabeled. It is thus concluded that M. opalifera PDF neurons have no PDF-related peptides in the nucleus, at least at ZT23:30. This is in agreement with the sequence profile, which shows no cluster of basic amino acids, and thus no candidate for a NLS. Since the calculation using the PSORT II program indicated the finite (22%) possibility that the M. opalifera PDF precursor might be localized in the nucleus, a signal might therefore be in the precursor sequence that is unknown. Examination of this possibility may require a careful examination of the cells at various time intervals throughout the entire day.

Fig. 5

LSM image of the PDFLa cells (A) and PDFMe cells (B) immunolabeled with anti-PDF antiserum. All PDF cells showed the nucleus (arrowhead) unlabeled in the series of images by 1 μm steps. Scale bars, 100 μm.



We express our sincere gratitude to Prof. Ian A. Meinertzhagen (Dalhausie University) for his kind reviewing the manuscript and correction of the English. We thank Mr. Hayato Oka for his assistance to collect the cicadas.



Y. Chuman, A. Matsushima, S. Sato, K. Tomioka, Y. Tominaga, I. A. Meinertzhagen, Y. Shimohigashi, and M. Shimohigashi . 2002. cDNA cloning and nuclear localization of circadian neuropeptide designated as pigment-dispersing factor PDF in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. J Biochem 131:895–903. Google Scholar


L. Conway and M. Wickens . 1985. A sequence downstream of AAUAAA is required for formation of SV40 late mRNA 3′ termini in frog oocytes'. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:3949–3953. Google Scholar


D. P. V. de Kleijn, B. Linck, J. M. Klein, W. M. Weidemann, R. Keller, and F. van Herp . 1993. Structure and localization of mRNA encoding a pigment dispersing hormone (PDH) in eyestalk of crayfish Orconectes limosus. FEBS Lett 321:251–255. Google Scholar


C. Desmoucelles-Carette, D. Sellos, and A. Van Wormhoudt . 1996. Molecular cloning of the precursors of pigment dispersing hormone in crustaceans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 221:739–743. Google Scholar


M. A. Frohman, M. K. Dush, and G. R. Martin . 1988. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:8998–9002. Google Scholar


A. Gil and N. J. Proudfoot . 1987. Position-dependent sequence elements downstream of AAUAAA are required for efficient rabbit β-globlin mRNA 3′end formation. Cell 49:399–406. Google Scholar


C. Helfrich-Förster, M. Stengl, and U. Homberg . 1998. Organaization of the circadian system in insects. Chronobiol Int 15:567–594. Google Scholar


C. Helfrich-Förster, M. Täuber, J. H. Park, M. Mühlig-Versen, S. Schneuwly, and A. Hofbauer . 2000. Ectopic expression of the neuropep-tide pigment-dispersing factor alters behavioral rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci 20:3339–3353. Google Scholar


U. Homberg, S. Würden, H. Dircksen, and K. R. Rao . 1991. Comparative anatomy of pigment-dispersing hormone-immunoreactive neurons in the brain of orthopteroid insects. Cell Tissue Res 266:343–357. Google Scholar


J. M. Klein, D. P. V. de Kleijn, R. Keller, and W. M. Weidemann . 1992. Molecular cloning of crustacean pigment dispersing hormone precursor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189:1509–1514. Google Scholar


J. M. Klein, C. J. Mohrherr, F. Sleutels, J. P. Riehm, and K. R. Rao . 1994. Molecular cloning of two pigment-dispersing hormone (PDH) precursors in the blue clab Cllinectes spidus reveals a novel member of the PDH neuropeptide family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 205:410–416. Google Scholar


M. Kozak 1999. Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene 234:187–208. Google Scholar


K. Nakai and M. Kanehisa . 1992. A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cell. Genomics 14:897–911. Google Scholar


K. Nakai and P. Horton . 1999. PSORT: a program for detecting sorting signals in proteins and predicting their subcellular localization. Trends Biochem Sci 24:34–35. Google Scholar


H. Nielsen, J. Engelbrecht, S. Brunak, and G. von Heijne . 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng 10:1–6. Google Scholar


H. Nielsen, S. Brunak, and G. von Heijne . 1999. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng 12:3–9. Google Scholar


A. Okamoto, H. Mori, and K. Tomika . 2001. The role of the optic lobe in circadian loco,ptor rhythm generation in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, with special reference to PDH-immunoreactive neurons. J Insect Physiol 47:889–895. Google Scholar


J. H. Park and J. C. Hall . 1998. Isolation and chronobiological analysis of a neuropeptide pigment-dispersing factor gene in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Rhythms 13:219–228. Google Scholar


J. H. Park, C. Helfrich-Förster, G. Lee, L. Liu, M. Rosbash, and J. C. Hall . 2000. Differential regulation of circadian pacemaker output by separate clock genes in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3608–3613. Google Scholar


B. Petri and M. Stengl . 1997. Pigment-dispersing hormone shifts the phase of the circadian pacemaker of the cockroach Leucophaea maderae. J Neurosci 17:4087–4093. Google Scholar


E. Pyza and I. A. Meinertzhagen . 1996. Neurotransmitters regulate rhythmic size changes amongst cells in the fly's optic lobe. J Comp Physiol [A] 178:33–45. Google Scholar


E. Pyza and I. A. Meinertzhagen . 1997. Neurites of period-expressing PDH cells in the fly's optic lobe exhibit circadian oscillations in morphology. Europ J Neurosci 9:1784–1788. Google Scholar


K. R. Rao, C. J. Mohrherr, J. P. Riehm, C. A. Zahnow, S. Norton, L. Johnson, and G. E. Tarr . 1987. Primary structure of an analog of crustacean pigment-dispersing hormone from the lubber grasshopper Romalea microptera. J Biol Chem 262:2672–2675. Google Scholar


K. R. Rao and J. P. Riehm . 1988. Pigment-dispersing hormone: A novel family of neuropeptides from arthropods. Peptides 9:Suppl 1153–159. Google Scholar


K. R. Rao and J. P. Riehm . 1993. Pigment-dispersing hormones. Ann NY Acad Sci 680:78–88. Google Scholar


A. Reinhardt and T. Hubbard . 1998. Using neural networks for prediction of the subcellular location of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 26:2230–2236. Google Scholar


S. C. P. Renn, J. H. Park, M. Rosbash, J. C. Hall, and P. H. Taghert . 1999. A pdf neuropeptide gene mutation and ablation of PDF neurons each cause severe abnormalities of behavioral circadian rhythms in Drosophila. Cell 99:791–802. Google Scholar


M. Stengl and U. Homberg . 1994. Pigment dispersing hormone-immunoreactive neurons in the cockroach Leucophaea maderae share properties with circadian pacemaker neurons. J Comp Physiol [A] 175:203–213. Google Scholar


L. A. Sternberger 1979. Immunocytochemistry. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sans Inc. New York. Google Scholar


Y. Takagaki, L. C. Ryner, and J. L. Manley . 1988. Separation and characterization of poly(A) polymerase and a clevage/specificity factor required for pre-mRNA polyadenylation. Cell 52:731–742. Google Scholar


M. Takeda, J. Bembenek, and N. Ichihara . 2000. Structure of cockroach circadian system viewed from clock gene products and roles of melatonin in the output pathway. In. Seventh Meeting of the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms. America Island. Jacksonville, FL. p. 156. Google Scholar
Seiji Sato, Yoshiro Chuman, Ayami Matsushima, Yoshiya Tominaga, Yasuyuki Shimohigashi, and Miki Shimohigashi "A Circadian Neuropeptide, Pigment-Dispersing Factor–PDF, in the Last-Summer Cicada Meimuna opalifera: cDNA Cloning and Immunocytochemistry," Zoological Science 19(8), 821-828, (1 August 2002).
Received: 24 April 2002; Accepted: 1 May 2002; Published: 1 August 2002

Back to Top