Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2008 Genetic and Morphological Differences Among Populations of the Bonin Islands White-eye in Japan
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Bonin Islands White-eye, Apalopteron familiare, is the sole endemic avian species surviving on the Bonin Islands. The current distribution of this species is limited to only three islands of the Hahajima Island group: Hahajima, Imotojima, and Mukohjima. Imotojima and Mukohjima, which are small satellite islands of Hahajima, are about 3.6 km and 5.5 km, respectively, from the larger island. To investigate genetic and morphological differences among A. familiare populations on these islands, we assayed 634 bp of mitochondrial control region sequence for 132 birds from five locations among the three islands. We detected five haplotypes: two endemic haplotypes each on Hahajima and Imotojima and one on Mukohjima. Principal component analysis based on eight morphological characters of 162 birds from the three island populations revealed that birds from the small satellite islands had significantly different beak morphological characters. Our findings indicate that over-sea dispersal is rare in A. familiare, even when islands are separated by only a few kilometers, and suggest that little movement occurs on Hahajima. Thus, each population on each island should be conserved as an evolutionarily significant unit. The low dispersal ability of this species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Although the populations are currently stable and do not require rapid countermeasures, they should be monitored, especially those on the smaller islands.

INTRODUCTION

The Bonin Islands White-eye, Apalopteron familiare, is the sole endemic avian species surviving on the Bonin Islands, about 1000 km south of the Japanese mainland. This species, which is listed as vulnerable in the Asian Red Data Book (Birdlife International, 2001), is an omnivore, mainly forages on invertebrates, and preferentially inhabits dense forests (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003). The population has been stable for at least the last three decades on Hahajima, the main home of this species (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003). Although A. familiare had been placed in the Meliphagidae (Deignan, 1958), a study of 12S rRNA sequences by Springer et al. (1995) showed that it is a member of the white-eye family Zosteropidae.

The Bonin Islands are subtropical oceanic islands located within 26°32’–27°43’N and 142°05’–142°14’E in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. They consist of three main island groups (Mukojima, Chichijima, and Hahajima). The islands are primarily volcanic, dating to the Tertiary (Kuroda et al., 1981).

The islands were first colonized by western and Polynesian groups in 1830 (Tsuji, 1995). These immigrants exploited the forests, established crops such as sugarcane, corn, and sweet potatoes, and introduced domestic animals such as pigs, goats, cows, ducks, chickens, cats, and rats, all of which eventually became feral (Tsuji, 1995). The Bonin Islands became a Japanese territory in 1876, and deforestation and animal introductions accelerated. On the main islands of Hahajima and Chichijima, all areas amenable to cultivation were converted to sugarcane fields, until the value of this crop suddenly dropped in 1910 (Kurata, 1983). The Japanese government forced almost all inhabitants to evacuate the Bonin Islands in 1944 (Funakoshi, 1992). After World War II (WWII), the islands were under American occupation until their return to Japan in 1968 (Kurata, 1983). Subsequently, only Chichijima and Hahajima were recolonized by civilians and the other islands remained uninhabited.

Of the two subspecies of A. familiare, the nominate form A. f. familiare occurred at least on Mukojima and Nakodojima of the Mukojima group, and Chichijima (Momiyama, 1930; Suzuki, 2003, 2004; Suzuki and Morioka, 2005). On these islands, there has been no evidential record of A. familiare since 1930 (Yamashina, 1930). Although the reason for its disappearance is not clear, feral goats caused intensive habitat loss on these islands (Shimizu, 1993), and almost all forests have been changed to grasslands or been denuded (Shimizu, 1993). On Chichijima, A. f. familiare has not been observed since 1829, other than a report of a small number in the 1970s, which are thought to have escaped from captivity (Morioka and Sakane, 1978). Since a large number of feral cats already lived on Chichijima in 1853 (Jones, 1856), predation likely caused the population decline of A. f. familiare. This subspecies is considered extinct (Ministry of the Environment, 2002).

The other subspecies, A. f. hahasima, currently exists on the three islands of Hahajima, Mukohjima, and Imotojima of the Hahajima group (Suzuki, 1991) (Fig. 1). Although this subspecies also occurred on Meijima in this island group, it disappeared between 1904 and 1925 (Momiyama, 1930). There is no record of A. f. hahasima on Hirashima or Anejima, the other satellite islands of the Hahajima group, except for one observation each in 1976 and 1978, respectively (Morioka and Sakane, 1978).

Fig 1

Bonin Islands (left) and the Hahajima group (right). Open circles indicate survey sites. Horizontal hatching indicates water depth <100 m. White and gray islands in the right-hand map indicate the absence and presence of Bonin Islands White-eyes, respectively. White-eyes went extinct on the black islands after 1830.

i0289-0003-25-9-882-f01.gif

The distribution of islands in the Hahajima group with and without A. familiare is unbalanced, in that the Bonin Islands White-eye occurs alternately on islands. A population has not reestablished on Meijima, even though it is less than 1 km from Imotojima. The introduced Japanese White-eye, Zosterops japonicus, whose niche is similar to that of the native white-eye, exists on those islands lacking the native white-eye (Suzuki, 1991; Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003). Thus, these islands are likely also suitable for the Bonin Islands White-eye. However, the relationships between populations of the native white-eyes on different islands have never been investigated. The purpose of this study was to clarify the inter-population relationships of Bonin Islands White-eyes based on genetic and morphological analyses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study sites

Field surveys were conducted on Hahajima, Mukohjima, and Imotojima (Fig. 1). These islands are 20.2, 1.4, and 1.2 km2 in size, respectively. The monthly mean temperature is about 18–28°C, with an annual mean temperature of about 23°C (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2001). Monthly precipitation is 60–170 mm, with an annual precipitation of about 1300 mm (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2001). About 400 people inhabit Hahajima, which is mostly covered with secondary forests established on what was previously agricultural land. The forests are dominated by Ardisia sieboldii, Machilus boninensis, Rhaphiolepis wrightiana, and Schima mertensiana, with tree layers 5–15 m high. Mukohjima is an uninhabited island whose only inhabitants were troops during WWII (Ohzeki, 1995). The vegetation is mainly Planchonella obovata var. dubia and Wikstroemia pseudoretusa. Imotojima was inhabited by at most about 30 people during the 1890s to 1920s (Tsuji, 1995) and is mainly covered by W. pseudoretusa and R. wrightiana. Three, one, and one survey sites were respectively located on the three islands: KTK, SKM, and TMG on Hahajima; MKH on Mukohjima; and IMT on Imotojima (Fig. 1).

Genetic analysis

We obtained blood samples from birds caught in mist nets at each site in June or July 2003, 2004, and 2005. To prevent re-sampling, captured individuals were marked with metal rings. We assayed 29, 27, 28, 34, and 14 samples collected at KTK, SKM, TMG, MKH, and IMT, respectively. Samples were preserved in 99% ethanol.

Total DNA was isolated by using silica gel, according to the procedures of Boom et al. (1990). We amplified a portion of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region, including domain III, using PCR. We used the following set of primers: forward 5’-GAGAACCGAGCTACTCAAC-3’ and reverse 5’-CGTGTGGATTGTATTTTTG-3’. All PCR reactions were performed in 10-μl reaction mixtures containing 1 μl of dNTPs (2.5 mM, TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan), 0.1 μl of Taq polymerase (5 units/μl; TaKaRa), 5.5 μl of distilled water, 1 μl of 10×PCR buffer (TaKaRa), 0.2 μl of each primer (10 pmol/μl), and 2 μl of DNA solution. The thermal profile comprised an initial denaturing step at 94°C for 90 sec; 30 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec, 54°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 50 sec; and a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The resulting products were purified by using Microcon-100 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), sequenced with a Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the standard protocol, and visualized on an ABI PRISM 377 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Morphological analysis

Bonin Islands White-eyes were captured with mist nets at the five survey sites to compare morphological characters among survey sites in June or July 2002, 2004, 2005, and 2006. We analyzed 16, 54, 25, 27, and 40 individuals collected at KTK, SKM, TMG, MKH, and IMT, respectively. The captured individuals were marked with metal rings to prevent repeated sampling of the same individuals. All captured individuals were measured with digital calipers and a digital scale. The following measurements were taken: natural wing length, tail length, tarsus length, beak length (from the base to the tip of the upper mandible), beak height and width (at the posterior nostril), total head length, and body weight. The birds were weighed after being held in non-airtight paper bags for at least 5 min to standardize weight by evacuation. Throughout the study, the same researcher measured birds to avoid possible inter-observer variation. Only measurements of adults were used for the following analysis, because it is likely that juvenile morphology differs from adult morphology. The sexual dimorphism of this species is unknown. As the birds were randomly captured with mist nets by the same method at all sites, the sex ratio was estimated to be roughly similar among sites. To support this assumption, we identified gender, using cloacal shape, when possible, but because the surveys were not conducted during the peak breeding season, the number of gender-identified individuals was limited. We also tested sex-ratio differences among the survey sites. We conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) and plotted birds from each survey site in the morphological space defined by the first two principal components.

RESULTS

Genetic analysis

We obtained a 634-bp sequence for each of 132 individuals. Of the 634 bp, four sites (0.6%) were variable, and all four involved transitions. These sites defined five distinct haplotypes (H1, H2, M1, I1, and I2; Table 1). M1 was found on all three islands and was the only haplotype found on Mukohjima. In addition to M1, two endemic haplotypes (H1 and H2) were detected on Hahajima. H1 was dominant at all three sites on Hahajima, H2 did not appear at KTK, and M1 was not present at the other two sites. The haplotype composition was not significantly different between SKM and TMG (Fisher’s exact test, P=0.52422), whereas it absolutely differed between KTK and the other two sites. On Imotojima, two endemic haplotypes (I1 and I2) and M1 were detected. Haplotype diversity was highest on Imotojima and was 0.606 over all survey sites. The sequence of H1 was deposited in the DDBJ nucleotide data bank (accession no. AB436812).

Table 1.

Haplotypes of the 634-bp D-loop region for Bonin Islands White-eyes, and the haplotype composition of each population. Dashes indicate identity with the base in haplotype H1. Haplotype diversity was calculated by the formula n(1-Σxi2)/(n-1), where n is the sample size, xi is the frequency of each haplotype.

i0289-0003-25-9-882-t01.gif

Morphological analysis

The sex ratio (male:female) of identified individuals was 5:3 at KTK, 16:11 at SKM, 5:7 at TMG, 5:4 at MKH, and 19:20 at IMT. The ratio did not significantly differ among sites (χ2=1.637, df=4, P=0.80).

The ordination of the eight morphological variables by PCA yielded two axes that accounted for 56% of the variance in the data set (Table 2). The first principal component (PC-I), which accounted for 30.4% of the variance, represented body size. PC-II, which accounted for 25.7% of the variance, represented beak characteristics.

Table 2.

Factor loadings of the eight morphological measurements on axes PC-I and PC-II. Bold type indicates the three largest loadings for each principal component.

i0289-0003-25-9-882-t02.gif

The distribution of individuals in morphological space showed that body size mostly overlapped at all survey sites (Fig. 2). However, the populations on the two satellite islands, Mukohjima and Imotojima, were separated along the PC-II axis (Fig. 2). The former population has thicker and shorter beaks than the latter. Although the slopes were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05), there was a significant difference in intercept among groups (ANCOVA; F2, 89=341.282, P<0.0001). The individuals from the three localities on Hahajima widely overlapped in morphological space (Fig. 3), showing morphological similarity among the survey sites (MANOVA: Wilks’ lambda=0.953, F4, 182=1.115, P=0.351). The individual with haplotype M1 at KTK was within the morphological range of the Mukohjima population, which had only M1 individuals, whereas the M1 individual from IMT was isolated (Fig. 2).

Fig 2

Morphological positions of individuals from the five survey sites relative to PC-I and PC-II. Black arrows indicate M1 haplotype individuals collected at the IMT and KTK survey sites (see Fig. 1).

i0289-0003-25-9-882-f02.gif

Fig 3

Morphological overlap of individuals from the three survey sites on Hahajima (see Fig. 1).

i0289-0003-25-9-882-f03.gif

DISCUSSION

Geographic isolation of white-eyes

The results of our genetic analysis indicate that gene flow among the three populations is restricted. As the distances from Hahajima to Mukohjima and Imotojima are about 3.6 and 5.5 km, respectively, we infer that the restricted gene flow results from oceanic isolation. Thus, over-sea dispersal is rare in A. familiare, even when islands are separated by only a few kilometers. A population has not reestablished on Meijima, likely due to this over-sea dispersal barrier. This finding may reflect only limited female dispersal, as the assay was conducted with mtDNA. However, the fact that there have been few A. familiare sightings on Hirashima and Anejima suggests that both males and females infrequently migrate over the sea. One individual with the Mukohjima haplotype was found on each of Imotojima and Hahajima. The morphology of the Imotojima individual was not within the range of Mukohjima individuals, whereas the individual on Hahajima was within that range. This result implies that at least the former was not a temporal visitor from Mukohjima.

In addition to the lack of movement between islands, this species seems to seldom move about on Hahajima. Although the distance between KTK and SKM was only about 3.5 km, gene flow was restricted. This difference in haplotype composition among sites on Hahajima might be due to past habitat fragmentation. Hahajima had vast sugarcane cultivation, and the forested area declined in the early 1900s. The forest patch near KTK was almost completely separated from the forest that includes SKM and TMG in the early 1900s (Katahira, 1982), and the Bonin Islands White-eye prefers dense forests (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003). The land cultivated before WWII was abandoned and developed into secondary forests (Okutomi et al., 1983; Yoshida and Oka, 2000). Although the forests near KTK and SKM are currently connected by secondary forest, not enough time has passed since the forests were reconnected for the fragmented populations to intermingle. The mobility of the white-eye is restricted even within an island. Higashizaki is in the easternmost part of Hahajima, connected to the middle of the island by a 150 m wide corridor of small bushes, grasslands, and bare ground (Fig. 1). There are no Bonin Islands White-eyes in the isolated Higashizaki forest, although introduced Japanese White-eyes occur there (Hayato Chiba, pers. com.). These observations suggest that open habitats, as well as water, can be a dispersal barrier for the Bonin Islands White-eye. Although a low frequency of over-sea dispersal has been indicated for the Australian White-eye, Z. lateralis, and the Seychelles Grey White-eye, Z. modestus (Degnan and Moritz, 1992; Degnan, 1993; Rocamora and Richardson, 2003), this is the first time such restricted migration between such close islands has been detected in white-eyes.

Only a few haplotypes were detected on Hahajima, and the genetic diversity of the population was lower than that of the Imotojima population, likely because of past habitat loss. About 60% of the forest area on Hahajima was cultivated before WWII (calculation based on Katahira, 1982). This population possibly suffered a serious bottleneck. However, as our results were based on a limited mtDNA region, additional loci must be assayed to adequately assess the genetic diversity of each population.

Only one haplotype was detected on Mukohjima, whereas three were found on Imotojima, although the two islands are similar in size. A strong bottleneck likely caused this lack of haplotype diversity on Mukohjima. However, we cannot reject the possibility that the uniform haplotype was due to sampling error caused by low-frequency haplotypes. Further analysis with additional individuals is needed.

The sea level at the last glacial maximum about 20,000 years ago was ca. 100 m lower than it is today (Siddall et al., 2003), and the Hahajima group islands are thought to have been connected at that time (Kaizuka et al., 2000). Fig. 1 shows the water depth <100 m surrounding the island group and demonstrates how the islands were likely connected in the past. Possibly, only one population existed at that time. The wide distribution of haplotype M1 may be due to incomplete lineage sorting that originated before the islands separated, as well as recent dispersal. Another possibility is that the distribution of this haplotype was caused by homoplasy. Assaying a longer sequence may help to identify the cause.

The morphological variation in the Mukohjima and Imotojima populations also suggests infrequent migration from one to the other due to the sea barrier. The ranges of morphological traits in the two satellite insular populations were within the variance of the Hahajima population. We detected a difference in beak shape, which can change rapidly due to dietary variation (Pimm, 1988; Grant and Grant, 2002; Amiot et al., 2007). Differences in food items among populations should be investigated in future surveys.

Conservation implications

Our results indicate that the populations on each island are independent from others. Each population on each island should be conserved as an evolutionarily significant unit. This finding highlights the importance of conserving the smaller populations on the satellite islands. Such small populations are more vulnerable to stochastic events, and they cannot be complemented by individuals from other populations because of the possibility of genetic contamination (Frankham et al., 2002). The genetic diversity of the entire Hahajima group population is not low, compared to other threatened species (cf. Koike and Matsui, 2003). However, no population is particularly genetically diverse, especially on Mukohjima. The lack of genetic diversity implies that these populations are vulnerable to disease, pollution, climate change, and other environmental changes (Allendorf and Leary, 1986; Lande, 1999).

As Imotojima and Mukohjima are uninhabited, populations there are less threatened than those on Hahajima. One threat to Bonin Islands birds is introduced terrestrial predators, such as feral cats (Kawakami, 2000; Kawakami and Higuchi, 2002). Although feral cats have been observed on Mukohjima (Kawakami, 2002), none have been seen recently. Predation by introduced rats also leads to declines in insular bird populations (Atkinson, 1985), and the black rat, Rattus rattus, occurs on almost all of the Bonin Islands (Kawakami, 2008). However, there has been no record of rat predation on land birds there. Another concern is potential competition from introduced white-eyes (Morioka and Sakane, 1978). However, no negative impacts on the native white-eye population have been identified (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003), although competitive effects on native bird populations have been suggested in the Hawaiian Islands (Mountainspring and Scott, 1985). The deserted islands show no human impacts. However, these island environments are not unchanged. About 20% of the forest on Imotojima is secondary. The structure of secondary forests is thought to be relatively poor and less resistant to inclement weather than that of primary forests. Furthermore, the Bonin Islands have become drier than in the past; one cause is recent global warming (Oka et al., 2000). The water supply is low on the small Bonin Islands (Kawakami, 2006). Such factors can threaten small populations on satellite islands. Although countermeasures need not be rapidly implemented, the populations on these islands should be carefully monitored.

Hahajima is widely covered by forests, and Bonin Islands White-eyes occur everywhere (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003). The population density of the white-eye has been stable since the 1970s (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003), and the population is not seriously threatened at present. However, the low dispersal ability of this species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation. Deforestation has occurred since the return of the islands to Japanese possession (Kawakami and Higuchi, 2003). If deforestation continues, the white-eye population could decline significantly.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Masaki Fujita, Emi Sunaga, Minako Murakami, Nanami Kawamura, Yutaka Yamamoto, Kazuhiko Uemura, Hiromi Umeno, and Reina Tazawa for field assistance; Mamoru Kikuchi and Isamu Matsunaga for transportation; Ryoko Segawa for her support for the genetic analysis; and Seiji and Keiko Tazawa for accommodation. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This study was partly supported by the Global Environment Research Fund of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan (F-051).

REFERENCES

1.

F. W. Allendorf and R. F. Leary . 1986. Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals. In “Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity”. Ed by M. E. Soulé , editor. Sinauer. Sunderland. pp. 57–76. Google Scholar

2.

C. Amiot, O. Lorvelec, I. Mandon-Dalger, A. Sardella, P. Lequilliec, and P. Clergeau . 2007. Rapid morphological divergence of introduced Red-whiskered Bulbuls Pycnonotus jocosus in contrasting environments. Ibis 149:482–489. Google Scholar

3.

I. A. E. Atkinson 1985. The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effects on island avifaunas. In “Conservation of Island Birds”. Ed by P. J. Moors , editor. ICBP. Cambridge. pp. 35–81. Google Scholar

4.

BirdLife International 2001. Threatened Birds of Asia. the BirdLife International Red Data Book Part A. BirdLife International. Cambridge. Google Scholar

5.

R. Boom, C. J. A. Sol, M. M. M. Salimans, C. L. Jansen, P. M. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. van der Noordaa . 1990. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol 28:495–503. Google Scholar

6.

S. M. Degnan 1993. Genetic variability and population differentiation inferred from DNA fingerprinting in silvereyes (Aves: Zosteropidae). Evolution 47:1105–1117. Google Scholar

7.

S. M. Degnan and C. C. Moritz . 1992. Phylogeography of mitochondrial DNA in two species of white-eye in Australia. Auk 109:800–811. Google Scholar

8.

H. G. Deignan 1958. The systematic position of the bird genus Apalopteron. Proc US Natl Mus 108:133–136. Google Scholar

9.

R. Frankham, J. D. Ballou, and D. A. Briscoe . 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

10.

M. Funakoshi 1992. History of development and destruction. In “The Nature of Ogasawara”. Ed by Ogasawara Natural Environment Study Group , editor. Kokon-Shoin. Tokyo. pp. 38–45. Google Scholar

11.

P. R. Grant and B. R. Grant . 2002. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296:707–711. Google Scholar

12.

Japan Meteorological Agency 2001. The Climatic Data of Japan. Japan Meteorological Business Support Center. Tokyo. Google Scholar

13.

G. Jones 1856. United States Japan Expedition by Com. M. C. Perry Vol. 1. A. O. P. Nicholson Printer. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

14.

S. Kaizuka, K. Koike, K. Endo, F. Yamazaki, and T. Suzuki . 2000. Regional Geomorphology of the Japanese Islands, Vol 4, Geomorphology of Kanto and Izu-Ogasawara. University of Tokyo Press. Tokyo. Google Scholar

15.

H. Katahira 1982. Development and distribution of farmland on Hahajima. In “Report on the Assessment of Nature on Ogasawara (3)”. Ed by Tokyo Metropolitan University , editor. Tokyo Metropolitan University. Tokyo. pp. 141–144. Google Scholar

16.

K. Kawakami 2000. Bird deaths in the Bonin Islands. Anim Zoos 52:12–16. Google Scholar

17.

K. Kawakami 2002. Feral cats and rats in the Bonin islands. In “Handbook of Alien Species in Japan”. Ed by Ecological Society of Japan , editor. Chijin Shokan. Tokyo. pp. 236–237. Google Scholar

18.

K. Kawakami 2006. The Bonin Islands White-eye. Shinrin Gijutsu 771:34–35. Google Scholar

19.

K. Kawakami 2008. Threats to indigenous biota from introduced species on the Bonin Islands, southern Japan. J Disaster Res 3:174–186. Google Scholar

20.

K. Kawakami and H. Higuchi . 2002. Predation by domestic cats on birds of Hahajima Island of the Bonin Islands, southern Japan. Ornithol Sci 1:143–144. Google Scholar

21.

K. Kawakami and H. Higuchi . 2003. Interspecific interactions between the native and introduced white-eyes in the Bonin Islands. Ibis 145:583–592. Google Scholar

22.

H. Koike and M. Matsui . 2003. Conservation Genetics. University of Tokyo Press. Tokyo. Google Scholar

23.

Y. Kurata 1983. Ogasawara Album – From Discovery to Prewar Era. Aboc-sha. Kamakura. Google Scholar

24.

T. Kuroda, K. Shiraki, and H. Urano . 1981. Geology of the Bonin Islands. In “Report on the Assessment of Nature on Ogasawara (2)”. Ed by Tokyo Metropolitan University , editor. Tokyo Metropolitan University. Tokyo. pp. 111–131. Google Scholar

25.

R. Lande 1999. Extinction risks from anthropogenic, ecological, and genetic factors. In “Genetics and the Extinction of Species: DNA and the Conservation of Biodiversity”. Ed by L. F. Landweber and A. P. Dobson , editors. Princeton University Press. Princeton. pp. 1–22. Google Scholar

26.

Ministry of the Environment 2002. Threatened Wildlife of Japan — Red Data Book, Vol 2, Aves. 2nd ed. Japan Wildlife Research Center. Tokyo. Google Scholar

27.

T. Momiyama 1930. On the birds of Bonin and Iwo-Islands. Bull Biogeogr Soc Jpn 1:89–186. Google Scholar

28.

H. Morioka and T. Sakane . 1978. Observations of the ecology and behavior of Apalopteron familiare (Aves, Meliphagidae). Mem Natl Sci Mus Tokyo 11:169–188. Google Scholar

29.

S. Mountainspring and J. M. Scott . 1985. Interspecific competition among Hawaiian forest birds. Ecol Monogr 55:219–239. Google Scholar

30.

E. Ohzeki 1995. The War History of Hahajima in the Bonin Islands. Yamanami Kikaku. Tokyo. Google Scholar

31.

S. Oka, K. Yoshida, H. Iwashita, Y. Iijima, and T. Sato . 2000. International variability of the hydroclimatic environment, based on the water balance at Chichi-jima Island in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Ogasawara Res 26:15–33. Google Scholar

32.

K. Okutomi, T. Iseki, Y. Hioki, K. Kitayama, and H. Sumihiro . 1983. Vegetation of the Ogasawara Islands. In “Endemic Species and Vegetation of the Bonin Islands”. Ed by Tokyo Metropolitan Government , editor. Tokyo Metropolitan Government. Tokyo. pp. 97–268. Google Scholar

33.

S. L. Pimm 1988. Rapid morphological change in an introduced bird. Trends Ecol Evol 3:290–291. Google Scholar

34.

G. Rocamora and D. S. Richardson . 2003. Genetic and morphological differentiation between the two remnant populations of Seychelles White-eye Zosterops modestus. Ibis 145:E34–E44. Google Scholar

35.

M. Siddall, E. J. Rohling, A. Almogi-Labin, C. H. Hemleben, D. Meischner, I. Schmelzer, and D. A. Smeed . 2003. Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle. Nature 423:853–858. Google Scholar

36.

Y. Shimizu 1993. Vegetation of Mukojima Island Group in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands with reference to the ecology of Ardisia dominant forest and the influence of feral goats. Komazawa Geogr 29:9–58. Google Scholar

37.

M. S. Springer, H. Higuchi, K. Ueda, J. Minton, and C. G. Sibley . 1995. Molecular evidence that the Bonin Islands Honeyeater is a white-eye. J Yamashina Inst Ornithol 27:66–77. Google Scholar

38.

T. Suzuki 1991. Status of the landbirds on the satellite islands of Hahajima, the Ogasawara Islands, with special reference to Common Buzzards, Oriental Greenfinches and Bonin Islands Honeyeaters. In “Reports of the Second General Survey of the Natural Environment of the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands”. Ed by M. Ono, M. Kimura, K. Miyashita, and M. Nogami , editors. Tokyo Metropolitan University. Tokyo. pp. 148–157. Google Scholar

39.

T. Suzuki 2003. Memorandum of the birds which Japanese sailors met in the Ogasawara Islands in the early time of the Edo period (2). Annu Rep Ogasawara Res 26:81–97. Google Scholar

40.

T. Suzuki 2004. Memorandum of the birds which Japanese sailors met in the Ogasawara Islands in the early time of the Edo period (3). Annu Rep Ogasawara Res 27:57–74. Google Scholar

41.

T. Suzuki and H. Morioka . 2005. Distribution and extinction of the Ogasawara Islands Honeyeater Apalopteron familiare on Chichijima, Ogasawara Islands. J Yamashina Inst Ornithol 37:45–49. Google Scholar

42.

T. Tsuji 1995. The History of the Bonin Islands I. Kindaibungeisha. Tokyo. Google Scholar

43.

Y. Yamashina 1930. Birds of the Mukojima Islands. Tori 6:323–340. Google Scholar

44.

K. Yoshida and S. Oka . 2000. Impact of biological invasion of Leucaena leucocephala on successional pathway and species diversity of secondary forest on Hahajima Island, Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands, northwestern Pacific. Jpn J Ecol. 50.111. 119. Google Scholar
Kazuto Kawakami, Sachiko Harada, Tadashi Suzuki, and Hiroyoshi Higuchi "Genetic and Morphological Differences Among Populations of the Bonin Islands White-eye in Japan," Zoological Science 25(9), 882-887, (1 September 2008). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.25.882
Received: 29 February 2008; Accepted: 1 June 2008; Published: 1 September 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top