Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2015 Chironomid Midges (Diptera, Chironomidae) Show Extremely Small Genome Sizes
Author Affiliations +

Chironomid midges (Diptera; Chironomidae) are found in various environments from the high Arctic to the Antarctic, including temperate and tropical regions. In many freshwater habitats, members of this family are among the most abundant invertebrates. In the present study, the genome sizes of 25 chironomid species were determined by flow cytometry and the resulting C-values ranged from 0.07 to 0.20 pg DNA (i.e. from about 68 to 195 Mbp). These genome sizes were uniformly very small and included, to our knowledge, the smallest genome sizes recorded to date among insects. Small proportion of transposable elements and short intron sizes were suggested to contribute to the reduction of genome sizes in chironomids. We discuss about the possible developmental and physiological advantages of having a small genome size and about putative implications for the ecological success of the family Chironomidae.


Chironomids, or non-biting midges, often constitute the most abundant group of insects in freshwater, and also include terrestrial and marine species. The family Chironomidae is estimated to comprise about 10,000 species in the world (Cranston, 1995a) and is widely distributed since these midges are found in a large variety of habitats (Fig. 1). Chironomids are especially remarkable as many species show a wide range of tolerance to harsh environmental conditions, such as hypoxia, low temperatures, high salinity, low pH or desiccation (Pinder, 1986). Indeed, many species are tolerant to poorly oxygenated conditions, because most Chironomids possess a large quantity of hemoglobins, proposed to act in oxygen storage (Pinder, 1986; Burmester and Hankeln, 2007). Chironomids are thus widely distributed and ecologically adapted to a great variety of environments. Since chironomid larvae are found in most of the types of freshwater ecosystems, they constitute good bioindicators to assess the water quality and the impact of chemicals from human activities on aquatic environments (Madden et al., 1995). The adults form sometimes huge mating swarms, which may represent a sanitary threat for human populations, especially causing allergies in hypersentitized people (Cranston, 1995b). Chironomid midges are also economically important, as their larvae are reared in mass to produce live or lyophilized food for fish farms and aquarium fish keepers around the world.

Fig. 1.

Pictures of some Chironomid species, showing larval or adult stages. (A) Male adult of Chironomus plumosus, the biggest of all Chironomids. Note the fluffy antennae, characteristic of males in most of the species in this family. (B) Mating of Clunio tsushimensis on a seashore. This marine species shows a conspicuous sexual dimorphism with an apterous worm-like female. (C) Polypedilum tamanigrum larva found in an acidic stream. Most Chironomid larvae are red, since their body fluid contains hemoglobins, and they are thus commonly called bloodworms. (D) Larva of the anhydrobiotic species Polypedilum vanderplanki in the dry state. Upon rehydration, this larva can revive as fast as within 20 min.


Some important work has been conducted on the physiology and molecular biology of these insects. For example, the diversity of hemolymphatic hemoglobins, which constitutes a characteristic feature of chironomids, has been investigated in detail (Ruf et al., 1994; Hankeln et al., 1998), mainly within the genus Chironomus (Fig. 1A). More recently, the mechanism of tolerance to low temperatures in the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica is well documented (Lee et al., 2006; Rinehart et al., 2006). In our research group, we have been studying for a decade extreme desiccation tolerance, known as anhydrobiosis, in the African sleeping chironomid, Polypedilum vanderplanki (Hinton, 1951, 1960a, 1960b; Watanabe, 2006). The expression of various chaperone proteins, antioxidants, and the ultimate vitrification of a trehalose matrix have been shown to be essential for successful anhydrobiosis (Kikawada et al., 2006; Sakurai et al., 2008; Cornette et al., 2010; Cornette and Kikawada, 2011). Recently, genomic DNA was shown to experience severe damage during anhydrobiosis and these damages were repaired slowly after rehydration (Gusev et al., 2010). Consequently, sequencing P. vanderplanki genome was needed for a better understanding of the mechanism of desiccation tolerance and of the organization of a chironomid genome directly interacting with a stressful environment. However, the genome size of P. vanderplanki remained unknown and data concerning the genome size of chironomids were restricted to a couple of species (Petitpierre, 1996; Schmidt-Ott et al., 2009). Furthermore, in various taxonomic groups, a correlation was found between genome size and some characters such as cell size, developmental complexity or metabolic rate (Gregory, 2005). Thus, a possible relation between genome size and specific traits in chironomids deserved to be investigated.

In the present work, we determined the genome sizes from an array of chironomids and data showed that the family Chironomidae comprises species with uniformly small genomes. The putative relationship between the small genome size of chironomids and their body size or adaptation to harsh environments is also discussed.



Chironomid species were collected in various environments in Japan, Australia and Nigeria, or kindly provided by researchers. A Nigerian strain of the sleeping chironomid (P. vanderplanki, Fig. 1D), originally collected in temporary rock pools, is routinely reared in the laboratory on milk agar under a 13–11 h light:dark photoregime at 27–28°C (Watanabe et al., 2002). Chironomids collected in the field at the larval stage were reared in similar conditions, when possible, in order to obtain adults for species identification and flow cytometry analysis.

Female adults of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster strain W1118, were used as a standard to calculate and express the C-values of chironomid species. Under our experimental conditions, the measured genome size of W1118 strain was not significantly different from that of Oregon-R and iso-1 strains and the generally accepted C-value for D. melanogaster strains Oregon-R and iso-1 is 0.18 pg (Rasch et al., 1971; Johnston et al., 1999; Bennett et al., 2003).

Flow cytometry

Heads of Chironomid larvae and adults, and D. melanogaster adults (3 individuals per sample) were chopped with microscissors in a solution of 0.5 % Triton X-100 in 1 ml PBS buffer and digested for about 2 h at room temperature. The resulting lysate was then stained with 5 µg/ml of propidium iodide (PI) for several minutes and filtered with CellTrics Filter using mesh diameter of 30 µm (Partec) in order to collect nuclei. The DNA contents of dissociated nuclei were measured by a Coulter Epics® Elite flow cytometry system (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) with the argon laser emitting 15 mW of exciting light at 488 nm. Fluorescent nuclei were detected using a high bandpass filter (610 nm). The C-value was calculated by multiplying the ratio of the mean fluorescence peak of the 2C sample/mean peak of the 2C standard with 0.18 pg, the haploid DNA content of D. melanogaster (Rasch et al., 1971). An example of the peaks obtained for P. vanderplanki and D. melanogaster nuclei is shown in Fig. 2.


Genome size estimates for the 25 species reported in this study are provided in Table 1. The obtained values range roughly threefold, from 0.07 pg in the marine Chironomid Clunio tsushimensis (Fig. 1B) to 0.20 pg in the Australian species Paraborniella tonnoiri. Thus, the family Chironomidae comprised uniformly very small genome sizes, even in comparison to their Dipteran relatives, whose genome sizes range up to 20-fold (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Examples of nuclei count patterns obtained by PI-stained flow cytometry for D. melanogaster, P. vanderplanki and for a mixture of both species. The major peak was composed of 2C cells (G0/G1 phase).


Table 1.

Summary of the estimated C-value data of Chironomids obtained in the present work, shown with the standard deviations (S.D.) and the number of individuals (n; M = male, F = female, L = larva).


The present study allowed us to extend the Chironomid genome size dataset from three to 28 species, covering six of the 11 Chironomid subfamilies. Classified by subfamily, the mean C-values were 0.13 pg for Chironominae, 0.10 pg for Orthocladiinae, 0.08 pg for Diamesiinae, 0.13 pg for Prodiamesinae, 0.16 pg for Tanypodinae and 0.13 pg for Telmatogetoninae. The smallest genome sizes were observed in the subfamilies Orthocladiinae and Diamesinae. An apparent relationship was observed between genome sizes and the phylogeny within the family Chironomidae with uniform C-values around 0.10 pg for the genus Polypedilum and the relatively larger genome sizes around 0.15 pg in the genus Chironomus (Fig. 3). In addition, Orthocladiinae and Diamesinae apparently showed smaller genome sizes.

No clear correlation was found between the genome size of Chironomids and their body size (Figs. 4A, 4B).


We determined here the genome sizes of 25 chironomid species; these values were congruent with the genome sizes of the three species previously reportedin the literature (Petitpierre, 1996; Schmidt-Ott et al., 2009), that were comprised between 0.13 and 0.21 pg DNA. The results of this study showed that the genome sizes of chironomids were uniformly very small (Fig. 3, Table 1). The obtained mean C-value for the Chironomidae family is 0.13 + 0.03 pg DNA, which is clearly smaller than D. melanogaster genome size. The smallest genome size among insects has been recorded in the Strepsiptera Caenocholax fenyesi with about 0.11 pg DNA (corresponding roughly to 108 Mb), although the Hessian fly Mayetiola destructor was also suggested to have an even smaller genome size of 0.09 pg (Johnston et al., 2004; Gregory, 2014). Here, we report at least three species with smaller genomes than any known insect: C. tsushimensis, Diamesa japonica and Hydrobaenus tsukubalatus, with C-values of 0.07 pg, 0,08 pg and 0.08 pg, respectively (Table 1). To our knowledge, C. tsushimensis (Fig. 1B) can be now considered as having the smallest genome size of any known insect, with a C-value of 0.07 pg DNA, corresponding roughly to 68 Mb. This value is congruent with the genome size of a related species, Clunio marinus, which was estimated once to 95 Mb and more recently to 87.2 Mb (Kaiser and Heckel, 2012; Tobias S. Kaiser, personal communication).

Recently, the genome of the Antarctic midge, B. antarctica, was sequenced (Kelley et al., 2014). The authors claimed that the genome size of this species, estimated to 89.5–105 Mb, was the smallest among all insects. However, we show here that this genome size is comprised within the normal range of chironomids values. The authors also suggested that the small genome size of B. antarctica was an adaptation to extreme cold environment. Our data may corroborate this hypothesis, since D. japonica, an alpine species from the subfamily Diamesinae also presents a tiny genome size. Another related Diamesinae, the Himalayan midge Diamesa sp. was actually found to be active at temperatures as low as -16°C (Kohshima, 1984). However, Telmatogeton japonicus, which is also able to develop at very low temperatures (Danks, 1971; Sunose and Fujisawa, 1982), shows a relatively large genome size, compared to the chironomid family average. A phylogenetic influence on the genome size should be taken into account here, since B. antarctica belongs to the Orthocladiinae subfamily, which presents small genome sizes on average. The species C. tsushimensis and Hydrobaenus tsukubalatus, showing the smallest genome sizes among chironomids, also belong to the Orthocladiinae subfamily. Thus, the small genome size of B. antarctica may simply constitute an ancestral trait, not the result of extreme cold adaptation.

P. vanderplanki is the only insect species known to achieve anhydrobiosis in a completely dehydrated state (Fig. 1D) and recover after rehydration (Hinton, 1951, 1960a; Watanabe, 2006; Cornette and Kikawada, 2011). Our research group recently published a comparative analysis of the genome sequences of the desiccation-tolerant Polypedilum vanderplanki and the desiccation-sensitive congeneric Polypedilum nubifer (Gusev et al., 2014). The comparison showed that both species had similar genome sizes and that only a limited set of duplicated gene clusters was related to anhydrobiosis in P. vanderplanki (Gusev et al., 2014). The genome sizes inferred from genome assembly were 104 Mb for P. vanderplanki and 107 Mb for P. nubifer and these values did not differ markedly from the genome sizes measured for these species in the present study, which corresponded to approximately 98 Mb. P. vanderplanki and P. nubifer genomes showed a similar low proportion of DNA repeats and only a small number of transposable elements were found, compared to other dipteran species. This reduction of the proportion of transposable elements was also observed in the Antarctic midge, B. antarctica (Kelley et al., 2014). The average intron length was also considerably reduced in the Antarctic midge and in both P. vanderplanki and P. nubifer as well (Gusev et al., 2014). Since the desiccation sensitive and freeze intolerant P. nubifer shares these features with the Antarctic midge and the anhydrobiotic midge, a low proportion of transposable elements and short intron length may constitute a characteristic shared by all chironomids and may be not directly related to the tolerance to extreme environments, even if an adaptive effect could not be excluded.

Fig. 3.

Phylogeny of Diptera showing estimated C-values. The Chironomid family is shown in black. The dash line shows the genome size of D. melanogaster. The phylogenetic cladogram is a consensus from different Chironomid and Dipteran trees (Yeates and Wiegmann, 1999, 2005; Saether, 2000; Cranston et al., 2012). Errors bars show standard deviation. Genome sizes without error bars were obtained from previous studies listed in the Animal Genome Size Database (Gregory, 2014).


Fig. 4.

Relationship between body size and genome size among the chironomid species investigated in the present study. (A) For each species, the mean total body length is shown in millimeters and the mean C-value is expressed in pg DNA. Only a weak positive correlation (r2 = 0.171, n = 25), materialized by a solid line, was observed between the two variables. (B) At the genus level, means of the same values were transformed by the method of phylogenetically independent contrasts, based on the phylogeny of Cranston et al. (2012). The correlation between these transformed contrasts, materialized by a solid line, was not significant (r2 = 0.118, n = 13). Data analysis was performed on Prism 4.0 software for Macintosh (GraphPad Software, Inc.).


What could be the adaptive traits potentially associated with the tiny genome sizes among the Chironomidae family? In fact, several developmental and ecological factors have been suggested to correlate to genome sizes. First, a positive correlation between genome size and body size has been found in many taxa and this correlation appears as a relatively general phenomenon (Gregory, 2005). This correlation has been reported also in mosquitoes (Ferrari and Rai, 1989), but it is not always clear in other insect taxa (Gregory and Hebert, 2003; Ardila-Garcia and Gregory, 2009). Within the chironomids, we found only a weak positive correlation between genome size and body size (Fig. 4A). The mean C-value for the genus Chironomus (0.15 pg) was higher than that for the genus Polypedilum (0.10 pg), and this difference may be attributable to the generally larger body size of Chironomus species. However, the phylogenetic distance between both genera could also explain this difference of genome sizes. Consequently, we corrected our data at the genus level with phylogenetically independent contrasts analysis (Garland and Adolph, 1994; Garland et al., 2005) and as a result, the correlation between genome size and body size turned out to be non significant (Fig. 4B). The narrow range of Chironomid genome sizes (only two—threefold) and the average small body size of these species (most do not exceed a few millimeters) probably make difficult to find any correlation between both traits within the Chironomidae family.

Among insects, another correlation was suggested between genome size and developmental complexity. Whereas hemimetabolous insects, with gradual nymphal molts only, show a wide range of genome sizes (C-values from 0.18 to 16.93 pg), holometabolous insects with their complex metamorphosis have C-values restricted within a putative 2 pg threshold, for most of them (Gregory, 2002, 2005). The influence of developmental complexity on genome size is here obvious because holometabolous insects undergo intensive morphological remodeling during the limited time of metamorphosis and a small genome size presents advantages for accomplishing cell divisions at a high rate. Chironomids are holometabolous insects and their metamorphosis is extremely rapid. Their pupal stage may last only one day, or even just a few hours for certain species (Cranston, 1995c). For example, C. tsushimensis shows a complex metamorphosis with pronounced sexual dimorphism (Fig. 1B).

The relation between genome size and the rate of cell division also influences the developmental rate. For example, the rapid life cycle of aphids was suggested to be related to their small genome sizes (Ma et al., 1992). Thus, small genome sizes should constitute an advantage for chironomid species rapidly developing in temporary environments. Chironomids from the genus Clunio can develop into temporary tide pools and also show synchronized emergence of the adults in relation to the moon cycle and during the short window of the low tide (Kaiser and Heckel, 2012). A high developmental rate should be needed to achieve this. Note that small polychaete annelids developing rapidly in similar interstitial environments show smaller genome sizes than macrobenthic species (Gambi et al., 1997). For Antarctic midges, such as B. antarctica or Eretmoptera murphyi (Lee et al., 2006; Worland, 2010), larval development lasts two years, mostly arrested in a frozen state, but metamorphosis and reproduction must occur during the very short summer period. In this case, a high developmental rate is needed and this may be facilitated by B. antarctica small genome. This phenomenon was illustrated by a study on angiosperm plants, showing that the species able to complete their entire life cycle during the short Antarctic summer presented the smallest genome sizes (Bennett et al., 1982). Another extreme, the anhydrobiotic midge P. vanderplanki is adapted to ephemeral rock pools. Here again, high developmental rate in a temporary habitat may be linked with the small genome size of this species. However, the Australian species P. tonnoiri, which is also exposed to desiccation on similar rock pools (Jones, 1975; Adams, 1985; Frouz et al., 2003), shows a relatively large genome size for a chironomid (Fig. 3 and Table 1).

Abiotic stresses are also likely to influence DNA integrity and as a consequence, genome size. For example, larvae of P. vanderpianki experience massive DNA damage after anhydrobiosis and efficient DNA repair occurs during the few days following rehydration (Gusev et al., 2010). In plants, a negative correlation was found between genome size and radiation tolerance (Bennett and Leitch, 2005) and mutation rate was also lower in species with smaller genome size (Abrahamson et al., 1973). Consequently, the small genome size of P. vanderpianki may represent an advantage to avoid the accumulation of deleterious mutations during the DNA repair events associated with cycles of desiccation and rehydration. As a marine species, C. tsushimensis is also exposed to high salinity stress, which is lethal for most insect species. High salinity and other abiotic stresses are known to generate intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), which were suggested as a main source of DNA damage (Franca et al., 2007; Gill and Tuteja, 2010). This might also be related to small genome size. However, other marine and high salinity tolerant species, such as T. japonicus or Chironomus salinarius do not show genome sizes as small as C. tsushimensis. Acid-tolerant species, such as Chironomus sulfurosus, Chironomus acerbiphilus or Polypedilum tamanigrum (Fig. 1C) can survive in hot springs with a pH as low as 1.4 (Doi et al., 2004; Takagi et al., 2005). Here again, no clear correlation between tolerance to acidic stress and small genome size could be observed and the phylogenetic influence appeared more important, with smaller genome size for the genus Polypedilum and larger genome sizes in the genus Chironomus.

To conclude, the tiny genome sizes observed in chironomids are probably the result of an ancestral reduction of the number of transposable elements and of the length of introns in their genome structure. Among the Chironomidae family, genome sizes differed according to phylogeny at the subfamily level and at the genus level. As inferred from correlations in various taxa, the small genome size of chironomids theoretically could have constituted a preadaptation to unstable and extreme environments through high developmental rate and low mutation rate. We hope that this study will encourage future Chironomid genome projects and that comparative genomics within this taxon will help to understand how Chironomid genomes are interacting with their environment.


We are grateful to Prof. Koichiro Kawai for providing us some chironomid species and to Mr. Tadashi Kobayashi for species determination. P. tonnoiri samples were collected in Australia under regulation 17 (license number: SF007249) and D. melanogaster strains were kindly provided by the Drosophila Genetic Resource Center in Kyoto Institute of Technology. We extend our gratitude to the Federal Ministry of Environment of Nigeria for permitting research on P. vanderplanki. This work was supported by NIAS and grants-in-aid for the scientific research (KAKENHI No 23780055 & 23128512) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and partially by Russian Science Foundation grant N 14-44-00022.



S Abrahamson , MA Bender , AD Conger , S Wolff ( 1973) Uniformity of radiation-induced mutation rates among different species. Nature 245: 460–462 Google Scholar


A Adams ( 1985) Cryptobiosis in Chironomidae (Diptera) - two decades on. Antenna: Bull Roy Entomol Soc London 8: 58–61 Google Scholar


AM Ardila-Garcia , TR Gregory ( 2009) An exploration of genome size diversity in dragonflies and damselflies (Insecta: Odonata). J Zool 278: 163–173 Google Scholar


MD Bennett , IJ Leitch ( 2005) Genome size evolution in plants. In “The evolution of the genome” Ed by TR Gregory , Burlington, pp 89–162 Google Scholar


MD Bennett , IJ Leitch , HJ Price , JS Johnston ( 2003) Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb. Ann Bot 91: 547–557 Google Scholar


MD Bennett , JB Smith , RI Lewis Smith ( 1982) DNA amounts of angiosperms from the Antarctic and South Georgia. Environ Exper Bot 22: 307–318 Google Scholar


T Burmester , T Hankeln ( 2007) The respiratory proteins of insects. J Insect Physiol 53: 285–294 Google Scholar


R Cornette , Y Kanamori , M Watanabe , Y Nakahara , O Gusev , K Mitsumasu , K Kadono-Okuda , et al. ( 2010) Identification of anhydrobiosis-related genes from an expressed sequence tag database in the cryptobiotic midge Polypedilum vanderplanki (diptera; chironomidae). J Biol Chem 285: 35889–35899 Google Scholar


R Cornette , T Kikawada ( 2011) The induction of anhydrobiosis in the sleeping chironomid: current status of our knowledge. IUBMB Life 63: 419–429 Google Scholar


PS Cranston ( 1995a) Introduction. In “The Chironomidae” Ed by P Armitage , PS Cranston, LCV Pinder, Chapman & Hall, London, pp 1–7 Google Scholar


PS Cranston ( 1995b) Medical significance. In “The Chironomidae” Ed by P Armitage , PS Cranston, LCV Pinder, Chapman & Hall, London, pp 365–384 Google Scholar


PS Cranston ( 1995c) Morphology. In “The Chironomidae” Ed by P Armitage , PS Cranston, LCV Pinder, Chapman & Hall, London, pp 11–30 Google Scholar


PS Cranston , NB Hardy , GE Morse ( 2012) A dated molecular phylogeny for the Chironomidae (Diptera). Syst Entomol 37: 172– 188 Google Scholar


HV Danks ( 1971) Overwintering of some north temperate and arctic Chironomidae - II. Chironomid biology. Can Entomol 103: 1875–1910 Google Scholar


H Doi , E Kikuchi , S Takagi , S Shikano ( 2004) Seasonal changes of carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios for dominant species: chironomid larvae, phytoplankton, and benthic diatom inhabiting strongly acidic lake Katanuma. Rep Res Edu Ctr Inlandwat Environ 2: 25–28 Google Scholar


JA Ferrari , KS Rai ( 1989) Phenotypic correlates of genome size variation in Aedes albopictus. Evolution 43: 895–899 Google Scholar


MB Franca , AD Panek , EC Eleutherio ( 2007) Oxidative stress and its effects during dehydration. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 146: 621–631 Google Scholar


J Frouz , J Matěna , A Ali ( 2003) Survival strategies of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) living in temporary habitats: a review. Eur J Entomol 100: 459–465 Google Scholar


MC Gambi , L Ramella , G Sella , P Protto , E Aldieri ( 1997) Variations in genome size in benthic Polychaetes: Systematic and ecological relationships. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 77: 1045–1057 Google Scholar


T Garland , SC Adolph ( 1994) Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations of inferring adaptation. Physiological Zoology 67: 797–828 Google Scholar


T Garland , AF Bennett , EL Rezende ( 2005) Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J Exp Biol 208: 3015–3035 Google Scholar


SS Gill , N Tuteja ( 2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48: 909–930 Google Scholar


TR Gregory ( 2002) Genome size and developmental complexity. Genetica 115: 131–146 Google Scholar


TR Gregory ( 2005) Genome size evolution in animals. In “The evolution of the genome” Ed by TR Gregory , Elsevier, Burlington (MA), pp 3–87 Google Scholar


TR Gregory ( 2014) Animal genome size database. (  http://www.genomesize.comGoogle Scholar


TR Gregory , PD Hebert ( 2003) Genome size variation in lepidopteran insects. Can J Zool 81: 1399–1405 Google Scholar


O Gusev , Y Nakahara , V Vanyagina , L Malutina , R Cornette , T Sakashita , et al. ( 2010) Anhydrobiosis-associated nuclear DNA damage and repair in the sleeping chironomid: linkage with radioresistance. PLoS One 5: e14008 Google Scholar


O Gusev , Y Suetsugu , R Cornette , T Kawashima , MD Logacheva , AS Kondrashov , et al. ( 2014) Comparative genome sequencing reveals genomic signature of extreme desiccation tolerance in the anhydrobiotic midge. Nat Commun. 5: 4784 Google Scholar


T Hankeln , C Amid , B Weich , J Niessing , E Schmidt ( 1998) Molecular evolution of the globin gene cluster E in two distantly related midges, Chironomus pallidivittatus and C. thummi thummi. J Mol Evol 46: 589–601 Google Scholar


HE Hinton ( 1951) A new chironomid from Africa, the larvae of which can be dehydrated without injury. Proc Zool Soc London 121: 371–380 Google Scholar


HE Hinton ( 1960a) Cryptobiosis in the larva of Polypedilum vanderplanki Hint. (Chironomidae). J Insect Physiol 5: 286–300 Google Scholar


HE Hinton ( 1960b) A fly larva that tolerates dehydration and temperatures of -270° to +102°C. Nature 188: 336–337 Google Scholar


JS Johnston , MD Bennett , AL Rayburn , DW Galbraith , HJ Price ( 1999) Reference standards for determination of DNA content of plant nuclei. Am J Bot 86: 609 Google Scholar


JS Johnston , LD Ross , L Beani , DP Hughes , J Kathirithamby ( 2004) Tiny genomes and endoreduplication in Strepsiptera. Insect Mol Biol 13: 581–585 Google Scholar


RE Jones ( 1975) Dehydration in an Australian rockpool chironomid larva, (Paraborniella tonnoiri). J Entomol 49: 111–119 Google Scholar


TS Kaiser , DG Heckei ( 2012) Genetic architecture of local adaptation in lunar and diurnal emergence times of the marine midge Clunio marinus (Chironomidae, Diptera). PLoS ONE 7(2): 632092 Google Scholar


JL Kelley , JT Peyton , AS Fiston-Lavier , NM Teets , MC Yee , JS Johnston , et al. ( 2014) Compact genome of the Antarctic midge is likely an adaptation to an extreme environment. Nat Commun 5: 4611 Google Scholar


T Kikawada , Y Nakahara , Y Kanamori , K Iwata , M Watanabe , B McGee , et al. ( 2006) Dehydration-induced expression of LEA proteins in an anhydrobiotic chironomid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 348: 56–61 Google Scholar


S Kohshima ( 1984) A novel cold-tolerant insect found in a Himalayan glacier. Nature 310: 225–227 Google Scholar


RE Lee Jr , MA Elnitsky , JP Rinehart , SAL Hayward , LH Sandro , DL Denlinger ( 2006) Rapid cold-hardening increases the freezing tolerance of the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica. J Exp Biol 209: 399–406 Google Scholar


RZ Ma , WC Black , JC Reese ( 1992) Genome size and organization in an aphid (Schizaphis graminum). J Insect Physiol 38: 161– 165 Google Scholar


CP Madden , AD Austin , PJ Suter ( 1995) Pollution monitoring using Chironomid larvae: what is a deformity? In “Chironomids, from genes to ecosystems” Ed by PS Cranston , CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, pp 89–94 Google Scholar


E Petitpierre ( 1996) Molecular cytogenetics and taxonomy of insects, with particular reference to the Coleoptera. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 25: 115–133 Google Scholar


LCV Pinder ( 1986) Biology of freshwater Chironomidae. Annu Rev Entomol 31: 1–23 Google Scholar


EM Rasch , HJ Barr , RW Rasch ( 1971) The DNA content of sperm of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 33: 1–18 Google Scholar


JP Rinehart , SA Hayward , MA Elnitsky , LH Sandro , RE Lee , DL Denlinger , et al. ( 2006) Continuous up-regulation of heat shock proteins in larvae, but not adults, of a polar insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 14223–14227 Google Scholar


HH Ruf , AG Altemüller , K Gersonde ( 1994) Preparation and characterization of insect hemoglobins from Chironomus thummi thummi. Methods in enzymology 231: 95–111 Google Scholar


OA Saether ( 2000) Phylogeny of the subfamilies of Chironomidae (Diptera). Sys Entomol 25: 393–403 Google Scholar


M Sakurai , T Furuki , K Akao , D Tanaka , Y Nakahara , T Kikawada , et al. ( 2008) Vitrification is essential for anhydrobiosis in an African chironomid, Polypedilum vanderplanki. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 5093–5098 Google Scholar


U Schmidt-Ott , AM Rafiqi , K Sander , JS Johnston ( 2009) Extremely small genomes in two unrelated dipteran insects with shared early developmental traits. Dev Genes Evol 219: 207–210 Google Scholar


T Sunose , T Fujisawa ( 1982) Ecological studies of the intertidal Chironomid Telmatogeton japonicus Tokunaga in Hokkaido. Res Popul Ecol 24: 70–84 Google Scholar


S Takagi , E Kikuchi , H Doi , S Shikano ( 2005) Swimming behavior of Chironomus acerbiphilus larvae in Lake Katanuma. Hydrobiologia 548: 153–165 Google Scholar


M Watanabe ( 2006) Anhydrobiosis in invetebrates. Appl Entomol Zool 41: 15–31 Google Scholar


M Watanabe , T Kikawada , N Minagawa , F Yukuhiro , T Okuda ( 2002) Mechanism allowing an insect to survive complete dehydration and extreme temperatures. J Exp Biol 205: 2799–2802 Google Scholar


MR Worland ( 2010) Eretmoptera murphyi: pre-adapted to survive a colder climate. Physiol Entomol 35: 140–147 Google Scholar


DK Yeates , BM Wiegmann ( 1999) Congruence and controversy: Toward a higher-level phylogeny of Diptera. Ann Rev Entomol 44: 397–428 Google Scholar


DK Yeates , BM Wiegmann ( 2005) Phylogeny and Evolution of Diptera: Recent Insights and New Perspectives. In “The evolutionary biology of flies” Ed by DK Yeates , BM Wiegmann, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 14–44 Google Scholar
© 2015 Zoological Society of Japan
Richard Cornette, Oleg Gusev, Yuichi Nakahara, Sachiko Shimura, Takahiro Kikawada, and Takashi Okuda "Chironomid Midges (Diptera, Chironomidae) Show Extremely Small Genome Sizes," Zoological Science 32(3), 248-254, (1 June 2015).
Received: 14 July 2014; Accepted: 13 February 2015; Published: 1 June 2015

Back to Top