Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2003 Internal Cave Gating for Protection of Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)
Keith W. Martin, David M. Leslie Jr., Mark E. Payton, William L. Puckette, Steve L. Hensley
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

–Persistent human disturbance is a major cause for the decline in populations of many cave-dwelling bats and other sensitive cave-obligate organisms. Cave gating has been used to eliminate human disturbance, but few studies have assessed directly the impact of such management activities on resident bats. In northeastern Oklahoma, USA, 25 entrances of caves inhabited by two endangered species and one endangered subspecies of bats are protected from human entry with internal gates. Because cave gates may impede ingress and egress of bats at caves, we evaluated the impacts of internal gates before and after their construction at six colonies of endangered gray bats (Myotis grisescens) from 1981 to 2001. No caves were abandoned by gray bats after the construction of internal gates; in fact, total numbers of gray bats using the six caves increased from 60,130 in 1981 to 70,640 in 2001. Two caves harbored more gray bats after gating, and three caves had no change in gray bat numbers after gating. We also compared initiations of emergences at three gated and three open-passage caves in June and July 1999–2000. No differences in timing of initiation of emergence were found between colonies in gated versus open-passage caves. Our results support the use of internal gates to protect and thereby enhance recovery of colonies of endangered gray bats. Additional research is encouraged to confirm that our observations on gray bats are generally applicable to other species of cave-dwelling bats.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

American Society of Mammalogists. 1992. Guidelines for the protection of bat roosts. Journal of Mammalogy, 73: 707–710. Google Scholar

2.

R. W. Barbour , and W. H. Davis . 1969. Bats of America. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, 286 pp. Google Scholar

3.

W. F. Blair , and T. H. Hubbell . 1938. The biotic districts of Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist, 20: 425–454. Google Scholar

4.

B. S. Clark 1991. Activity patterns, habitat use, and prey selection by the Ozark big-eared bat (Plecotus townsendii ingens). Ph.D. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 80 pp. Google Scholar

5.

B. K. Clark , B. S. Clark , D. M. Leslie Jr . and M. S. Gregory . 1996. Characteristics of caves used by the endangered Ozark big-eared bat. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24: 8–14. Google Scholar

6.

B. S. Clark , B. K. Clark , and D. M. Leslie Jr . 2002. Seasonal variation in activity patterns of the endangered Ozark big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii ingens). Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 590–598. Google Scholar

7.

E. M. Grigsby , and K. W. Martin . 1993. Comparative numbers of gray bats (Myotis grisescens) at six maternity caves in northeastern Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 73: 35–38. Google Scholar

8.

E. M. Grigsby , and W. L. Puckette . 1982. A study of three endangered species of bats occurring in Oklahoma. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 53 pp. Google Scholar

9.

E. M. Grigsby , and W. L. Puckette . 1984. A study of three endangered species of bats occurring in Oklahoma. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 22 pp. Google Scholar

10.

M. J. Harvey , J. J. Cassidy , and G G O'hagan . 1981. Endangered bats of Arkansas: distribution, status, ecology, and management: report to the Arkansas Game and Fish, United States Forest Service, and United States National Park Service-Buffalo National River. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, 137 pp. Google Scholar

11.

M. J. Harvey , J. S. Altenbach , and T. L. Best . 1999. Bats of the United States. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, Little Rock, 64 pp. Google Scholar

12.

G. G. Huffman 1959. Mississippian stratigraphy and tectonics of the Oklahoma Ozark area. Tulsa Geological Society Digest, 27: 104–176. Google Scholar

13.

S. R. Humphrey 1978. Status, winter habitat, and management of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Florida Scientist, 41: 65–76. Google Scholar

14.

S. R. Humphrey , and T H. Kunz . 1976. Ecology of a Pleistocene relic, the western big-eared bat (Plecotus townsendii), in the southern Great Plains. Journal of Mammalogy, 57: 470–194. Google Scholar

15.

T. H. Kunz 1974. Feeding ecology of a temperate insectivorous bat (Myotis velifer). Ecology, 55: 693–711. Google Scholar

16.

M. J. Lacki 1984. Temperature and humidity induced shifts in the flight activity of little brown bats. Ohio Journal of Science, 84: 264–266. Google Scholar

17.

M. E. Ludlow , and J. A. Gore . 2000. Effects of a cave gate on emergence patterns of colonial bats. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28: 191–196. Google Scholar

18.

K. W. Martin 2001. Effects of passage manipulation on cave climate and bat behavior: management implications for cave-dwelling bats. Ph.D. Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 96 pp. Google Scholar

19.

K. W. Martin , W. L. Puckette , S. L. Hensley , and D. M. Leslie Jr . 2000. Internal cave gating as a means of protecting cave-dwelling bat populations in eastern Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science, 80: 133–137. Google Scholar

20.

C. M. McAney , and J. S. Fairley . 1988. Activity patterns of the lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros at summer roosts. Journal of Zoology (London), 216: 325–338. Google Scholar

21.

G. F. McCracken 1989. Cave conservation: special problems of bats. National Speleological Society Bulletin, 51:49–51. Google Scholar

22.

M. J. O'farrell , and W. G. Bradley . 1970. Activity patterns of bats over a desert spring. Journal of Mammalogy, 51: 18–26. Google Scholar

23.

E. D. Pierson 1999. Tall trees, deep holes, and scarred landscapes: conservation biology of North American bats. Pp. 309–325, in Bat biology and conservation ( T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey , eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 686 pp. Google Scholar

24.

I. Prakash 1962. Times of emergence of the pipistrelle. Mammalia, 26: 133–135. Google Scholar

25.

A. R. Richter , S. R. Humphrey , J. B. Cope , and V. Brack Jr . 1993. Modified cave entrances: thermal effects on body mass and resulting decline of endangered Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis). Conservation Biology, 7: 407–415. Google Scholar

26.

J. Rydell , A. Entwistle , and P. A. Racey . 1996. Timing of foraging flights of three species of bats in relation to insect activity and predation risk. Oikos, 76: 243–252. Google Scholar

27.

SAS Institute Inc. 1999. Statistical analysis system, version 8.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

28.

H. P. Shen , and L. L. Lee . 2000. Mother-young interactions in a maternity colony of Myotis formosus. Journal of Mammaolgy, 81: 726–733. Google Scholar

29.

R. E. Stebbings 1968. Measurements, composition and behaviour of a large colony of the bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Journal of Zoology (London), 156: 15–33. Google Scholar

30.

M. D. Tuttle 1976. Population ecology of the gray bat (Myotis grisescens): factors influencing growth and survival of newly volant young. Ecology, 57: 587–595. Google Scholar

31.

M. D. Tuttle 1977. Gating as a means of protecting cave dwelling bats. Pp. 77–82, in Proceedings of the National Cave Management symposium. Speleobooks, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 146 pp. Google Scholar

32.

M. D. Tuttle 1979. Status, causes of decline, and management of endangered gray bats. Journal of Wildlife Management, 43: 1–17. Google Scholar

33.

M. D. Tuttle , and D. E. Stevenson . 1978. Variation in the cave environment and its biological implications. Pp. 108–120, in Proceedings of the National Cave Management Symposium. Speleobooks, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 140 pp. Google Scholar

34.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982. Gray bat recovery plan. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C, 94 pp. Google Scholar

35.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. A recovery plan for the Ozark big-eared bat and the Virginia big-eared bat. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities, Minnesota, 61 pp.  Google Scholar

36.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. Ozark big-eared bat recovery plan, revised. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 80 pp. Google Scholar

37.

A. Węgiel , and J. Węgiel . 1998. Bat protection in caves in Poland. Myotis, 36: 63–69. Google Scholar

38.

D. H. White , and J. T. Seginak . 1987. Cave gate designs for use in protecting endangered bats. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 15: 445–449. Google Scholar
©Museum and Institute of zoology PAS
Keith W. Martin, David M. Leslie Jr., Mark E. Payton, William L. Puckette, and Steve L. Hensley "Internal Cave Gating for Protection of Colonies of the Endangered Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens)," Acta Chiropterologica 5(1), 143-150, (1 June 2003). https://doi.org/10.3161/001.005.0112
Received: 6 January 2003; Accepted: 1 April 2003; Published: 1 June 2003
Back to Top