Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2003 A Prospective Power Analysis and Review of Habitat Characteristics Used in Studies of Tree-Roosting Bats
Michael J. Lacki, Michael D. Baker
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We identified 25 studies published between 1988 and 2001 that measured characteristics of roosting sites of tree-roosting bats, and where measures were compared to characteristics of random or available locations. The most frequently measured habitat characteristics were roost-tree diameter (n = 23), roost-tree height (21), roost-tree canopy cover (16), roost height (14), and slope (10). Habitat characteristics of the roost tree itself were measured more frequently than stand or landscape characteristics; a total of 31 different habitat characteristics was used to describe stand or landscape conditions as opposed to 23 different habitat characteristics used to describe features of the roost tree. The overall mean (± SE) number of habitat characteristics examined per study was 8.0 ± 1.1, with an average of 4.2 ± 0.7 characteristics reported to be significant (P < 0.05). Mean estimated effect size, or the absolute value of the difference between means divided by the population standard deviation, of habitat characteristics ranged from 0.83 to 1.52. A sample size of 11 radio-tagged bats was sufficient to achieve acceptable power, i.e., 0.80, for all habitat characteristics examined when only using the upper limit of the 95% confidence intervals for estimated effect sizes. In contrast, a sample size of 39 radio-tagged bats was sufficient in achieving the same level of power for only 50% of the habitat characteristics evaluated at the lower end of the 95% confidence intervals. We encourage researchers to conduct pilot studies, and estimate effect sizes and variances to assess the level of sampling effort required to evaluate habitat characteristics in studies of tree-roosting bats.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

D. R. Anderson , K. P. Burnham , W. R. Gould , and S. Cherry . 2001. Concern about finding effects that are actually spurious. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29: 311–316. Google Scholar

2.

R. M. R. Barclay , P. A. Faure , and D. R. Farr . 1988. Roosting behavior and roost selection by migrating silver-haired bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans). Journal of Mammalogy, 69: 821–825. Google Scholar

3.

B. J. Betts 1996. Roosting behavior of silver-haired bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans) and big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in Northeast Oregon. Pp. 55–61, in Bats and forests symposium ( R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, 292 pp. Google Scholar

4.

B. J. Betts 1998. Roosts used by maternity colonies of silver-haired bats in northeastern Oregon. Journal of Mammalogy, 79: 643–650. Google Scholar

5.

M. Boonman 2000. Roost selection by noctules (Nyctalus noctula) and Daubenton's bats (Myotis daubentonii). Journal of Zoology (London), 251: 385–389. Google Scholar

6.

N. E. Breslow , and N. E. Day . 1980. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume 1: The analysis of case control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer Scientific Publication, Lyon, 32: 1–350. Google Scholar

7.

R. M. Brigham , and R. M. R. Barclay . 1996. Bats and forests. Pp. xi –xiv, in Bats and forests symposium ( R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, 292 pp. Google Scholar

8.

R. M. Brigham , M. J. Vonhof , R. M. R. Barclay , and J. C. Gwilliam . 1997. Roosting behavior and roost-site preferences of forest-dwelling California bats (Myotis californicus). Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 1231–1239. Google Scholar

9.

E. V. Callahan , R. D. Drobney , and R. L. Clawson . 1997. Selection of summer roosting sites by Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in Missouri. Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 818–825. Google Scholar

10.

L. A. Campbell , J. G. Hallett , and M. A. O'Connell . 1996. Conservation of bats in managed forests: use of roosts by Lasionycteris noctivagans. Journal of Mammalogy, 77: 976–984. Google Scholar

11.

J. Cohen 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 567 pp. Google Scholar

12.

L. H. Crampton , and R. M. R. Barclay . 1998. Selection of roosting and foraging habitat by bats in different-aged aspen mixedwood stands. Conservation Biology, 12: 1347–1358. Google Scholar

13.

P. M. Cryan , M. A. Bogan , and G. M. Yanega . 2001. Roosting habits of four bat species in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Acta Chiropterologica, 3: 43–52. Google Scholar

14.

K. Dear , and C. Begg . 1992. An approach for assessing publication bias prior to performing a meta-analysis. Statistical Science, 7: 237–245. Google Scholar

15.

L. L. Eberhardt , and J. M. Thomas . 1991. Designing environmental field studies. Ecological Monographs, 61: 53–73. Google Scholar

16.

M. B. Fenton 1997. Science and the conservation of bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 1–14. Google Scholar

17.

R. W. Foster , and A. Kurta . 1999. Roosting ecology of the northern bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and comparisons with the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 659–672. Google Scholar

18.

P. D. Gerard , D. R. Smith , and G. Weerakody . 1998. Limits of retrospective power analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62: 801–807. Google Scholar

19.

S. D. Grindal 1999. Habitat use by bats, Myotis spp., in western Newfoundland. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 113: 258–263. Google Scholar

20.

J. P. Hayes In press. Habitat ecology and conservation of bats in western coniferous forests. In Conservation of small mammals in western coniferous forests ( C. J. Zabel and R. G. Anthony, eds.). Island Press, Covela, CA. Google Scholar

21.

J. P. Hayes , and R. J. Steidl . 1997. Statistical power analysis and amphibian population trends. Conservation Biology, 11: 273–275. Google Scholar

22.

J. T. Hutchinson , and M. J. Lacki . 2000. Selection of day roosts by red bats in mixed mesophytic forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64: 87–94. Google Scholar

23.

D. H. Johnson 1995. Statistical sirens: the allure of nonparametrics. Ecology, 76: 1998–2000. Google Scholar

24.

D. H. Johnson 2002. The importance of replication in wildlife research. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66: 919–932. Google Scholar

25.

A. Kurta , D. King , J. A. Teramino , J. M. Stribley , and K. J. Williams . 1993. Summer roosts of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) on the northern edge of its range. The American Midland Naturalist, 129: 132–138. Google Scholar

26.

A. Kurta , K. J. Williams , and R. Mies . 1996. Ecological, behavioural, and thermal observations of a peripheral population of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis). Pp. 102–117, in Bats and forests symposium ( R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, 292 pp. Google Scholar

27.

M. J. Lacki 2002. Conference summary. Pp. xi–xii, in The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species ( A. Kurta and J. Kennedy, eds.). Bat Conservation International, Inc., Austin, TX, 253 pp. Google Scholar

28.

M. J. Lacki , and J. H. Schwierjohann . 2001. Dayroost characteristics of northern bats in mixed mesophytic forest. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65: 482–488. Google Scholar

29.

S. E. Lewis 1995. Roost fidelity of bats: a review. Journal of Mammalogy, 76: 481–496. Google Scholar

30.

D. Lunney , J. Barker , T. Leary , D. Priddel , R. Wheeler , P. O'Connor , and B. Law . 1995. Roost selection by the north Queensland longeared bat Nyctophilus bifax in littoral rainforest in the Iluka World Heritage Area, New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20: 532–537. Google Scholar

31.

T. A. Mattson , S. W. Buskirk , and N. L. Stanton . 1996. Roost sites of the silver-haired bat (Lasionycteris noctivagans) in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Great Basin Naturalist, 56: 247–253. Google Scholar

32.

M. A. Menzel , T. C. Carter , B. R. Chapman , and J. Laerm . 1998. Quantitative comparison of tree roosts used by red bats (Lasiurus borealis) and Seminole bats (L. seminolus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76: 630–634. Google Scholar

33.

J. J. Millspaugh , J. R. Skalski , B. J. Kernohan , K. J. Raedeke , G. C. Brundige , and A. B. Cooper . 1998. Some comments on spatial independence in studies of resource selection. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26: 232–236. Google Scholar

34.

P. C. Ormsbee , and W. C. McComb . 1998. Selection of day roosts by female long-legged myotis in the Central Oregon Cascade range. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62: 596–603. Google Scholar

35.

E. D. Pierson 1998. Tall trees, deep holes, and scarred landscapes: conservation biology of North American bats. Pp. 309–325, in Bat biology and conservation. ( T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 365 pp. Google Scholar

36.

M. J. Rabe , T. E. Morrell , H. Green , J. C. deVos Jr ., and C. R. Miller . 1998. Characteristics of ponderosa pine snag roosts used by reproductive bats in northern Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62: 612–621. Google Scholar

37.

F. L. Ramsey , M. McCracken , J. A. Crawford , M. S. Drut , and W. J. Ripple . 1994. Habitat association studies of the northern spotted owl, sage grouse, and flammulated owl. Pp. 189–209, in Case studies in biometry ( N. Lange, L. Ryan, L. Billard, D. Brillinger, L. Conquest, and J. Greenhouse, eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 462 pp. Google Scholar

38.

J. M. Reed , and A. R. Blaustein . 1995. Assessment of ‘nondeclining’ amphibian populations using power analysis. Conservation Biology, 9: 1299–1300. Google Scholar

39.

D. B. Sasse , and P. J. Pekins . 1996. Summer roosting ecology of northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis) in the White Mountain National Forest. Pp. 91–101, in Bats and forests symposium ( R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, 292 pp. Google Scholar

40.

J. A. Sedgeley, and C. F. J. O'Donnell. 1999a. Roost selection by the long-tailed bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus, in temperate New Zealand rainforest and its implications for the conservation of bats in managed forests. Biological Conservation, 88: 261–276. Google Scholar

41.

J. A. Sedgeley, and C. F. J. O'Donnell. 19996. Factors influencing the selection of roost cavities by a temperate rainforest bat (Vespertilionidae: Chalinolobus tuberculatus) in New Zealand. Journal of Zoology (London), 249: 437–446. Google Scholar

42.

R. J. Steidl , and L. Thomas . 2001. Power analysis and experimental design. Pp. 14–36, in Design and analysis of ecological experiments ( S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, eds.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 415 pp. Google Scholar

43.

R. J. Steidl , J. P. Hayes , and E. Schauber . 1997. Statistical power analysis in wildlife research. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61: 270–279. Google Scholar

44.

T. C. Tacha , W. D. Warde , and K. P. Burnham . 1982. Use and interpretation of statistics in wildlife journals. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 10: 355–362. Google Scholar

45.

B. L. Taylor , and T. Gerrodette . 1993. The uses of statistical power in conservation biology: the Vaquita and northern spotted owl. Conservation Biology, 7: 489–500. Google Scholar

46.

D. J. Taylor , and K. E. Muller . 1995. Computing confidence bounds for power and sample size of the general linear univariate model. The American Statistician, 49: 43–47. Google Scholar

47.

The Wildlife Society . 1995. Journal news. Journal of Wildlife Management, 59: 196–198. Google Scholar

48.

L. Thomas 1997. Retrospective power analysis. Conservation Biology, 11: 276–280. Google Scholar

49.

M. J. Vonhof 1996. Roost-site preferences of big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) and silver-haired bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans) in the Pend d'Oreille Valley in southern British Columbia. Pp. 62–80, in Bats and forests symposium ( R. M. R. Barclay and R. M. Brigham, eds.). British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria, British Columbia, 292 pp. Google Scholar

50.

M. L Vonhof , and R. M. R. Barclay . 1996. Roostsite selection and roosting ecology of forestdwelling bats in southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 74: 1797–1805. Google Scholar

51.

D. L. Waldien , J. P. Hayes , and E. B. Arnett . 2000. Day-roosts of female long-eared myotis in western Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64: 785–796. Google Scholar

52.

T. J. Weller , and C. J. Zabel . 2001. Characteristics of fringed myotis day roosts in northern California. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65: 489–497. Google Scholar

53.

N. G. Yoccoz 1991. Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 72: 106–111. Google Scholar
© Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS
Michael J. Lacki and Michael D. Baker "A Prospective Power Analysis and Review of Habitat Characteristics Used in Studies of Tree-Roosting Bats," Acta Chiropterologica 5(2), 199-208, (1 December 2003). https://doi.org/10.3161/001.005.0211
Received: 3 February 2003; Accepted: 24 April 2003; Published: 1 December 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
bats
effect size
habitat
power analysis
sample size
tree roosts
variance
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top