Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2004 Data, Sample Sizes and Statistics Affect the Recognition of Species of Bats by Their Echolocation Calls
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Identification of bat species based on analysis of echolocation calls can be affected by the way data are manipulated, the diversity of species, and call variability. We document the effects of sample sizes and a priori assignment of calls by species on the outcome of discriminant function analysis (DFA) and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) of features of echolocation calls, and determine which features of calls are most useful for identification. We used recorded echolocation calls of eight species readily distinguishable by call features, including molossids, emballonurids and a moormopid recorded at sites in Belize, Brazil, and Mexico. On individual calls, we measured four features: frequency with most energy, highest and lowest frequencies and call durations obtained from sequences consisting of 10 calls. Cluster analysis and multiple analyses of variance indicated significant differences between the calls of different species. Outcomes of DFA and MLR were affected by both sample sizes (numbers of calls, numbers of sequences) and the subjective approach that researchers take to their data (i.e., categorizing calls or sequences of calls by species). Levels of variation in calls of some species in our sample often precluded the use of single calls in making call-based identifications. Accurate documentation of variability in echolocation behavior of sympatric bats is a prerequisite for an effective sound-based bat survey.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. A. A. Afifi , and V. Clark . 1990. Computer-aided multivariate analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 512 pp. Google Scholar
  2. I. Ahlén 1990. Identification of bats in flight. Swedish Society for Conservation of Nature and the Swedish Youth Association for Environmental Studies and Conservation. Google Scholar
  3. R. M. R. Barclay 1983. Echolocation calls of emballonurid bats from Panama. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 151: 515–520. Google Scholar
  4. R. M. R. Barclay 1999. Bats are not birds — a cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats: a comment. Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 290–296. Google Scholar
  5. E. Bernard 2001. Species list of bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) of Santarén area, Parà State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia,18: 455–463. Google Scholar
  6. E. Bernard , and M. B. Fenton . 2002. Species diversity of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in forest fragments, primary forest and savannas in central Amazon, Brazil. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80: 1124–1140. Google Scholar
  7. J. W. Boughman , and G. S. Wilkinson . 1998. Greater spear-nosed bats discriminate group mates by vocalizations. Animal Behaviour, 55: 1717–1732. Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Brigham , J. E. Cebek , and M. B. C. Hickey . 1989. Intraspecific variation in the echolocation calls of two species of insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 70: 426–428. Google Scholar
  9. A. R. C. Britton , G. Jones , J. M. V. Rayner , A. M. Boonman , and B. Verboom . 1997. Flight performance, echolocation and foraging behaviour in pond bats, Myotis dasycneme (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Zoology (London), 241: 503–522. Google Scholar
  10. G. Ceballos , and A. Miranda . 2000. Guía de campo de los mamíferos de la Costa de Jalisco, México. Fundación Ecologica de Cuixmala. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 502 pp. Google Scholar
  11. C. Chávez , and G. Ceballos . 2001. Diversidad y abundancia de murciélagos en selvas secas de estacionalidad contrastante en el oeste de México. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología, 5: 27–44. Google Scholar
  12. J. Cohen 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 567 pp. Google Scholar
  13. A. Denzinger , B. M. Siemers , A. Schaub , and H.-U. Schnitzler . 2001. Echolocation by the barbastelle bat, Barbastella barbastellus. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 187: 521–528. Google Scholar
  14. W. R. Dillon , and M. Goldstein . 1984. Multivariate analysis: methods and applications. Wiley, New York, 608 pp. Google Scholar
  15. M. B. Fenton , and G. P. Bell . 1981. Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. Journal of Mammalogy, 62: 233–243. Google Scholar
  16. M. B. Fenton , E. Bernard , S. Bouchard , L. Hollis , D. S. Johnston , C. L. Lausen , J. M. Ratcliffe , D. K. Riskin , J. R. Taylor , and J. Zigouris . 2001. The bat fauna of Lamanai, Belize: roosts and trophic roles. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 17: 511–524. Google Scholar
  17. M. B. Fenton , Jacobs , E. J. Richardson , P. J. Taylor , and W. White . 2004. Individual signatures in the frequency-modulated sweep calls of large African large-eared free-tailed bats (Otomops martiensseni; Chiroptera: Molossidae). Journal of Zoology (London), 262: 11–19. Google Scholar
  18. D. R. Griffin 1958. Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New Haven, 415 pp. Google Scholar
  19. D. R. Griffin , F. A. Webster , and C. R. Michael . 1960. The echolocation of flying insects by bats. Animal Behaviour, 8: 141–154. Google Scholar
  20. A. Herr, N. I. Klomp, and J. S. Atkinson. 1997. Identification of bat echolocation calls using a decision tree classification system. Complexity International, Volume 4, URL:  http://www.csu.edu.au/ci/vol4/herr/batcall.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Ibáñez , J. Juste , J. Lopez-Wilchis , L. Albuja , and A. Nunez-Garduno . 2002. Echolocation of three species of sac-winged bats (Balantiopteryx). Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 1049–1057. Google Scholar
  22. G. Jones , and T. Kokurewicz . 1994. Sex and age variation in echolocation calls and flight morphology of Daubenton's bat Myotis daubentonii. Mammalia, 58: 41– 50. Google Scholar
  23. G. Jones , and R. D. Ransome . 1993. Echolocation calls of bats are influenced by maternal effects and change over a lifetime. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 252: 125–128. Google Scholar
  24. G. Jones , T. Gordon , and J. Nightingale . 1992. Sex and age-differences in the echolocation calls of the lesser horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus hipposideros. Mammalia, 56: 89–193. Google Scholar
  25. G. Jones , N. Vaughan , and S. Parsons . 2000. Acoustic identification of bats from directly sampled and time expanded recordings of vocalizations. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 155–170. Google Scholar
  26. E. K. V. Kalko 1995. Echolocation signal design, foraging habitats and guild structure in six Neotropical sheath-tailed bats (Emballonuridae). Pp. 259–273, in Ecology, evolution and behaviour of bats ( P. A. Racey and S. M. Swift, eds.). The Zoological Society of London, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 421 pp. Google Scholar
  27. E. K. V. Kalko 1997. Diversity in tropical bats. Pp. 13–43, in Tropical biodiversity and systematics. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biodiversity and Systematics in Tropical Ecosystems, Bonn, 1994 ( H. Ulrich, ed.). Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, 357 pp. Google Scholar
  28. E. K. V. Kalko , and H.-U. Schnitzler . 1993. Plasticity in echolocation signals of European pipistrelle bats in search flight -implications for habitat use and prey detection. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33: 415–428. Google Scholar
  29. K. A. Kazial , S. C. Burnett , and W. M. Masters . 2001. Individual and group variation in echolocation calls of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 8: 339–351. Google Scholar
  30. M. Kossl , E. Mora , F. Coro , and M. Vater . 1999. Two-toned echolocation calls from Molossus molossus in Cuba. Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 929–932. Google Scholar
  31. P. A. Lachenbruch 1975. Discriminant analysis. Hafner Press, New York, 128 pp. Google Scholar
  32. B. S. Law , L. Reinhold , and M. Pennay . 2002. Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of Vespadelus spp. (Vespertilionidae) from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Acta Chiropterologica, 4: 201–215. Google Scholar
  33. B. D. Lawrence , and J. A. Simmons . 1982. Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocating bats. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71: 585–590. Google Scholar
  34. W. M. Masters , S. C. Jacobs , and J. A. Simmons . 1991. The structure of echolocation sounds used by the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus: some consequences for echo processing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89: 1402–1413. Google Scholar
  35. G. Neuweiler , W. Metzner , U. Heilmann , R. Rubsamen , M. Eckrich , and H. H. Costa . 1987. Foraging behavior and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi) of Sri Lanka. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 20: 53–67. Google Scholar
  36. M. K. Obrist 1995. Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36: 207–219. Google Scholar
  37. M. K. Obrist , R. Boesch , P. F. Flückiger , and U. Dieckmann . 2004. Who's calling? Acoustic bat species identification revised with synergetics. Pp. 468–477, in Advances in the study of echolocation in bats and dolphins. Proceedings of the Biosonar Conference 1998 ( J. Thomas, C. Moss, and M. Vater, eds.). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 604 pp. Google Scholar
  38. J. Ochoa , M. J. O'Farrell , and B. W. Miller . 2000. Contribution of acoustic methods to the study of insectivorous bat diversity in protected areas from northern Venezuela. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 171–183. Google Scholar
  39. M. J. O'Farrell , and B. W. Miller . 1997. A new examination of echolocation calls of some neotropical bats (Emballonuridae and Mormoopidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 954–963. Google Scholar
  40. M. J. O'Farrell , and B. W. Miller . 1999. Use of vocal signatures for the inventory of free-flying neotropical bats. Biotropica, 31: 507–516. Google Scholar
  41. J. D. Olden , and D. A. Jackson . 2002. A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions. Freshwater Biology, 47: 1976–1995. Google Scholar
  42. S. Parsons 1997. Search-phase echolocation calls of the New Zealand lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) and long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75: 1487–1494. Google Scholar
  43. S. Parsons , and G. Jones . 2000. Acoustic identification of 12 species of echolocating bats by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203: 2641–2656. Google Scholar
  44. K. J. Patriquin , L. K. Hogberg , B. J. Chruszcz , and R. M. R. Barclay . 2003. The influence of habitat structure on the ability to detect ultrasound using bat detectors. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31: 475–481. Google Scholar
  45. D. L. Pearl, and M. B Fenton. 1996. Can echolocation calls provide information about group identity in the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus)? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 74: 2184–2192. Google Scholar
  46. S. J. Press , and S. Wilson . 1978. Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73: 699–705. Google Scholar
  47. J. M. Ratcliffe , and J. W. Dawson . 2003. Behavioural flexibility: the little brown bat,Myotis lucifugus, and the northern long-eared bat, M. septentrionalis, both glean and hawk prey. Animal Behaviour, 66: 847–856. Google Scholar
  48. J. M. Ratcliffe, H. M. Ter Hofstede, R. Avilaflores, M. B. Fenton, G. F. McCracken, S. Biscardi, J. Blasko, E. Gillam, J. Orprecio, and G. Spanjer. In press. Conspecifics influence call design in the Brazilian free-tailed bat, Tadarida brasiliensis. Canadian Journal of Zoology. Google Scholar
  49. D. Russo , and G. Jones . 2002. Identification of twenty-two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time-expanded recordings of echolocation calls. Journal of Zoology (London), 258: 91–103. Google Scholar
  50. D. Russo, G. Jones, and M. Mucedda. 2001. Influence of age, sex and body size on echolocation calls of Mediterranean (Rhinolophus euryale) and Mehely's (Rhinolophus mehelyi) horseshoe bats (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae), Mammalia 65: 429–436. Google Scholar
  51. J. Rydell , H. T. Arita , M. Santos , and J. Granados . 2002. Acoustic identification of insectivorous bats (order Chiroptera) of Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Zoology (London), 257: 27–36. Google Scholar
  52. O. Sanchez , G. Lopez-Ortega , and R. Lopezwilchis . 1989. Murcielagos de la cuidad de Mexico y sus alrededores. Pp. 141–165, in Ecología urbana ( R. Gío-Argáez, I. Hernández-R., and E. Sáinz-H, eds.). DDF, Mexico City, 220 pp. Google Scholar
  53. H.-U. Schnitzler, and E. K. V. Kalko. 1998. How echolocating bats search and find food. Pp. 183–196, in Bat biology and conservation ( T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 365 pp. Google Scholar
  54. H.-U. Schnitzler , and E. K. V. Kalko . 2001. Echolocation by insectivorous bats. BioScience, 51: 557–569. Google Scholar
  55. A. Surlykke , and C. F. Moss . 2000. Echolocation behavior of big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, in the field and the laboratory. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108: 2419–2429. Google Scholar
  56. B. G. Tabachnick , and L. S. Fidell . 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4th edition. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, 966 pp. Google Scholar
  57. N. H. Timm 2002. Applied multivariate statistics. Springer, Berlin, 720 pp. Google Scholar
  58. D. W. Thomas , G. P. Bell , and M. B. Fenton . 1987. Variation in echolocation call frequencies recorded from North American vespertillionid bats: a cautionary note. Journal of Mammalogy, 68: 842–847. Google Scholar
  59. N. Ulanovsky, M. B. Fenton, A. Tsoar, and C. Korine. In press. Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolocating bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Google Scholar
  60. N. Vaughan , G. Jones , and S. Harris . 1997. Identification of British species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters. Bioacustics, 7: 189–207. Google Scholar
  61. L. Wollerman , and R. H. Wiley . 2002. Possibilities for error during communication by neotropical frogs in a complex acoustic environment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52: 465–473. Google Scholar
© Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS
Stefania Biscardi, Jazmine Orprecio, M. Brock Fenton, Asaf Tsoar and John M. Ratcliffe "Data, Sample Sizes and Statistics Affect the Recognition of Species of Bats by Their Echolocation Calls," Acta Chiropterologica 6(2), (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.3161/001.006.0212
Received: 29 April 2004; Accepted: 1 July 2004; Published: 1 December 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
17 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top