Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2000 Habitat use by the Partridge Perdix perdix During the Breeding Season in the Diversified Agricultural Landscape of Western Poland
Marek Panek, Robert Kamieniarz
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The study was carried out in 1994-96 in an area of western Poland where field sizes range widely —from < 1 to 50 ha. The spring population density of Partridges was estimated by call counts on 1 km2 study plots. The landscape structure was described by the proportion of crops and orchards, the number of arable fields and the length of permanent cover with spontaneous vegetation. Radio-tagged individuals (24 pairs and 6 single males) were tracked during the breeding season. The Partridge density in the study plots ranged from 0 to 7.7 pairs per km2, and increased with the number of fields per km2 and the proportion of small orchards among the arable fields. Radio-tagged pairs on small fields (< 10 ha) preferred field edges with permanent treeless plant cover and edges without permanent plant cover. On large fields (> 10 ha), a preference was shown for field edges with both wooded and treeless permanent plant cover. Partridges avoided the centres of both types of fields. Preferred nesting sites were in permanent plant cover and orchards; crops were used less frequently than expected. The spring carrying capacity of the field habitat for Partridges was dependent on the availability of field edges, including those devoid of permanent plant cover.

REFERENCES

1.

M. Birkan , D. Serre , E. Pelard , S. Skibniewski 1990. Effect of irrigation on adult mortality and reproduction of gray partridge in a wheat farming system. In: K. E. Church , R. E. Warner , S. J. Brady (eds.). Perdix V: gray partridge and ringnecked pheasant workshop. Kansas Dept. of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia, pp. 257–271. Google Scholar

2.

C. R. Byers , R. K. Steinhorst , P. R. Kraussman 1984. Clarification of a technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J. Wildl. Manage. 48: 1050–1053. Google Scholar

3.

J. R. Carroll 1992. A model of gray partridge (Perdix perdix) population dynamics in North Dakota. In: M. Birkan , G. R. Potts , N. J. Aebischer , S. D. Dowell (eds.). Perdix VI, I Intern. Symp. on Partridges, Quails and Francolins. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 337–349. Google Scholar

4.

J. P. Carroll , R. D. Crawford , J. W Schulz 1990. Nesting and brood-rearing ecology of gray partridge in North Dakota. In: K. E. Church , R. E. Warner , S. J. Brady (eds.). Perdix V: gray partridge and ring-necked pheasant workshop. Kansas Dept. of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia, pp. 272–294. Google Scholar

5.

K. E. Church , H. J. Harris , R. B. Stiehl 1980. Habitat utilization by gray partridge (Perdix perdix L.) prenesting pairs in Eastcentral Wisconsin. In: S. R. Peterson , L. Nelson (eds.). Perdix II, gray partridge workshop. Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, pp. 9–20. Google Scholar

6.

J. Dahlgren 1992. Boundary free headlands, a partridge (Perdix perdix) habitat inexpensive to improve. Trans. of the Intern. Cong. of Game Biologists 20: 263–270. Google Scholar

7.

W. Dudziński 1992a. Grey partridge (Perdix perdix) — predator relationships in cropland and forest habitat of central Poland. In: M. Birkan , G. R. Potts , N. J. Aebischer , S. D. Dowell (eds.). Perdix VI, I Intern, symp. on partridges, quails and francolins. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 455–466. Google Scholar

8.

W. Dudziński 1992b. Some aspects of the effect of predators on a partridge, Perdix perdix L., population. Trans, of the Intern. Cong, of Game Biologists 18: 245–248. Google Scholar

9.

G. W. Mendel , S. R. Peterson 1983. Management implications of gray partridge habitat use on the Palouse Prairie, Idaho. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 11: 348–356. Google Scholar

10.

A. Meriggi , D. Montagna , D. Zacchetti 1991. Habitat use by partridges (Perdix perdix and Alectoris rufa) in an area of northern Apennines, Italy. Boll. Zool. 58: 85–90. Google Scholar

11.

A. Meriggi , D. Montagna , D. Zacchetti , C. Matteucci , S. Toso 1990. Population dynamics of the gray partridge in relation to agriculture and weather in northern Italy. In: K. E. Church , R. E. Warner , S. J. Brady (eds.). Perdix V: gray partridge and ring-necked pheasant workshop. Kansas Dept. of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia, pp. 241–256. Google Scholar

12.

A. Meriggi , N. Saino , D. Montagna , D. Zacchetti 1992. Influence of habitat on density and breeding success of grey and red-legged partridges. Boll. Zool. 59: 289–295. Google Scholar

13.

C. W. Ney , C. R. Byers , J. M. Peek 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J. Wildl. Manage. 38: 541–545. Google Scholar

14.

M. Panek 1992. Mechanisms determining population levels and density regulation in Polish grey partridges (Perdix perdix). In: M. Birkan , G. R. Potts , N. J. Aebischer , S. D. Dowell (eds.). Perdix VI, I intern, symp. on partridges, quails and francolins. Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 325–335. Google Scholar

15.

M. Panek 1994. The effect of land-use changes on populations of partridge (Perdix perdix) in Poland. In: Ryszkowski L., Bałazy S. (eds.). Functional appraisal of agricultural landscape in Europe, EUROMAB and INTECOL Seminar 1992, Poznań, pp. 197–203. Google Scholar

16.

M. Panek 1997a. Density-dependent brood production in the grey partridge (Perdix perdix) in relation to habitat quality. Bird Study 44: 235–238. Google Scholar

17.

M. Panek 1997b. The effect of agricultural landscape structure on food resources and survival of grey partridge (Perdix perdix) chicks in Poland. J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 787–792. Google Scholar

18.

M. Panek 1998. Use of call counts for estimating spring density of grey partridge Perdix perdix. Acta orn. 33: 143–148. Google Scholar

19.

M. Panek , R. Kamieniarz 1998. Agricultural landscape structure and density of partridge (Perdix perdix) populations in Poland. In: M. Birkan , L. M. Smith , N. J. Aebischer , F. J. Purroy , P. A. Robertson (eds.). Perdix VII: symposium on partridges, quails and pheasants. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15: 309–320. Google Scholar

20.

G. R. Potts 1980. The effects of modern agriculture, nest predation and game management on the population ecology of partridges Perdix perdix and Alectoris rufa.Advances in Ecological Research 11: 2–79. Google Scholar

21.

G. R. Potts 1986. The partridge. Pesticides, predation and conservation. Collins, London, 274 pp. Google Scholar

22.

E. Pulliainen 1967. On the winter ecology of the partridge (Perdix perdix L.) in Finland. Suomen Riista 19: 46–62. Google Scholar

23.

M. R. W. Rands 1986. Effect of hedgerow characteristics on partridge breeding densities. J. Appl. Ecol. 23: 479–487. Google Scholar

24.

M. R. W. Rands 1987. Recruitment of grey and red-legged partridges (Perdix perdix and Alectoris rufa) in relation to population density and habitat. J. Zool. 212: 407–418. Google Scholar

25.

J-C. Ricci , R. Garrigues 1986. [The influence of certain characteristics of agricultural systems on populations of grey partridges (Perdix perdix L.) in the Nord-Bassin Parisien Region of France]. Gibier Faune Sauvage 3: 369–392. Google Scholar

26.

L. M. Smith , J. W. Hupp , J. T. Ratti 1982. Habitat use and home range of gray partridge in eastern South Dakota. J. Wildl. Manage. 46: 580–587. Google Scholar

27.

J. P. Weigand 1980. Ecology of the Hungarian partridge in north-central Montana. Wildl. Monogr. 74, 106 pp. Google Scholar
Marek Panek and Robert Kamieniarz "Habitat use by the Partridge Perdix perdix During the Breeding Season in the Diversified Agricultural Landscape of Western Poland," Acta Ornithologica 35(2), 183-189, (1 December 2000). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.035.0211
Received: 1 January 2000; Accepted: 1 May 2000; Published: 1 December 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top