Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2002 An Important 18th Century Italian Paper on Penduline Tit Remiz pendulinus
Piotr Daszkiewicz
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In 1773 Caetano Monti's paper “Sur l'oiseau qui porte à Bologne le nom de Pendulino, et en Pologne celui de remiz” was reprinted in Paris. It played a decisive role in the scientific description of Penduline Tit and it's nest, and provided the first significant information relativing to the biology of this species. Monti was also the first to correct number of inaccuracies in earlier zoological treatises considered as “classics”. His own work was recognized throughout Europe, and quoted by German and French naturalists as Buffon. Linnaeus referred to it in his own description. Monti's analysis also enables us to gain precious information concerning the way in which ornithologists worked at the time, and the methods they used: analysing classical writings, “interviewing” bird catchers and peasants, information from missionaries, field work, analysis of specimens from zoological collections, and preparing descriptions and iconographies.

REFERENCES

1.

U. Aldrovandi 1599–1603. Ornithologiae, hoc est de avibus historiae libri XII. Cum indice septendecim linguarum copiosissimo. Apud Franciscum de Franciscis Senensem. Bononiae. Google Scholar

2.

P. Belon 1555. L'Histoire de la nature des oyseaux, avec leurs descriptions, & naïfs portraicts retirez du naturel: escrite en sept livres, par Pierre Belon du Mans. G. Cauellat. Paris. Google Scholar

3.

G. L. Buffon , G. Bexon , M. Daubenton , F. Martinet , de Montbéliard P. Guéneau 1770–1786. Histoire naturelle des oiseaux. Vol. VI. Paris, pp. 275–281. Google Scholar

4.

P. Buonanni 1709. Musaeum Kircherianum; sive, Musaeum a p. Athanasio Kirchero in Collegio romano Societatis Jesu, jam pridem incoeptum nuper restitutum, auctum, descriptum, & iconibus illustratum a p. Philippo Bonanni. Roma, pp. 228–229. Google Scholar

5.

P. L. Farber 1997. Discovering birds: the emergence of ornithology as a scientific discipline, 1760–1850. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. Google Scholar

6.

J. G. Gmelin 1751–1752. Reise durch Sibirien, von Jahre 1733 bis 1743. Gottingen. Google Scholar

7.

C. Gesner 1617. Historiae animalium Liber III qui est de avium natura. Nunc denuo recognitus ac pluribus in locis emendatus, multisque novis iconibus & descriptionibus locupletatus, ac denique brevibus in margine annotationibus illustratus. Officina typographica Egenolphi Emelii. Francofurti. Google Scholar

8.

M. C. Hanovius 1753. Seltenheiten der Natur und Oekonomie: nebst deren kurzen Beschreibung und Erörterung aus den Danziger Erfahrungen und Nachrichten zu mehrerem Nutzen und Vergnügen. Friedrich Lankischens Erben. Leipzig. Google Scholar

9.

J. Jonston 1650. Theatrum Universale Historiae Naturalis. Historiae naturalis de avibus: libri VI, cum aeneis figuris. Impensa M. Meriani. Francofurti ad Moenum. Google Scholar

10.

J. T. Klein 1750. Historiae Avium prodromus, cum praefatione de ordine Animalium in genere: Accessit historia Muris Alpini et vetus vocabularium Animalium. Lubecae. Google Scholar

11.

J. T. Klein 1759. Stemmata Avium: Accedunt nomenclatores: Polono-Latinus et Latino-Polonus: Geschlechtstafeln der Vögel. Lipsiae. Google Scholar

12.

C . Linnaeus 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. T. Impensis Direct. Maurentii Salvii. Holmsiae. Google Scholar

13.

C. Monti 1773. Sur l'oiseau qui porte à Bologne le nom de Pendulino, et en Pologne celui de remiz. Collection académique composée des mémoires, Actes ou Journaux des plus célèbres Académies et Sociétés Littéraire de l'Europe. T. X de la partie étrangere, contenant les Mémoires de l'académie des Sciences de l'Institutu de Bologne. Paris. Google Scholar

14.

G. Rzączyński 1721. Historia Naturalis curiosa Regni Poloniae, Magni Ducatus, Litvaniae annexarumque provinciarum, in tractatus XX divisa. Sandomiriae, pp. 294–295. Google Scholar

15.

G. Rzączyński 1737. Auctarium Historiae naturalis-curiosae Regni Poloniae, Magni Ducatus, Litvaniae annexarumque provinciarum in puncta duodecim divisum studio. Typis Ioannis Iacobi Preusii. Gedani. Google Scholar

16.

C. Temminck 1807. Catalogue systématique du cabinet d'ornithologie et de la collection de quadrumes de Crd. Jb. Temminck, avec courte description des oiseaux nondécrites; suivi d'une note d'oiseaux doubles et de quelques autres objets d'histoirenaturelle offerts en échange. Amsterdam. Google Scholar

17.

J. D. Titius 1755. Parus minimus Polonorum remiz Bononiensium pendulinus descriptus. Lipsiae. Google Scholar

18.

Tomasi L. Tongiorgi 2001. The study of the natural sciences and botanical and zoological illustration in Tuscany under the Medicis from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. Archives of Natural History 28: 179–193. Google Scholar
Piotr Daszkiewicz "An Important 18th Century Italian Paper on Penduline Tit Remiz pendulinus," Acta Ornithologica 37(1), 47-50, (1 July 2002). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.037.0106
Received: 1 September 2001; Accepted: 1 February 2002; Published: 1 July 2002
KEYWORDS
history of ornithology
Penduline Tit
Remiz pendulinus
zoology in Italy
zoology in Poland
Back to Top