Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2007 How Urban Kestrels Falco tinnunculus Divide Their Hunting Grounds: Partitioning or Cohabitation?
Jan Riegert, Drahomíra Fainová, Václav Mikeŝ, Roman Fuchs
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The hunting ranges of 34 male urban Kestrels were studied in a small city (40 km2) in S Bohemia (Czech Republic). It was assumed that males from the city center and periphery hunt for voles mainly on the city's outskirts. The “city-center” males are unable to defend their hunting ranges on the periphery because of aggression on the part of the “periphery” Kestrels. To counter this, they may either 1) invade the hunting ranges of periphery males or 2) establish their own exclusive hunting ranges. Our data supported the first suggestion. Hunting range size varied greatly, from 0.8 to 25.0 km2 (7.2 ± 6.9 km2), with large overlaps of between 0.3% and 51.4% (12.5 ± 11.6%). The ranges of city-center males were several times larger than those of the periphery males, and greatly overlapped the ranges of other city center and periphery males. Overlapping of the hunting ranges of periphery males was less extensive. The higher energy costs in terms of flying to distant suitable hunting areas and frequent changes of hunting grounds should decrease the preference for nesting in the city center. Therefore, we suggest that Kestrels derive other advantages from living in the city center (e.g., the high quality of nest sites). Cohabitation, whereby city center males invade the hunting grounds of periphery males, appears to be a more effective strategy than partitioning.

REFERENCES

1.

M. Anděra , I. Horáček 1982. [Determining of our mammals], Mladá fronta, Praha. Google Scholar

2.

R. Bowman , D. Bird 1986. Ecological correlates of mate replacement in the American Kestrel. The Condor 88: 440–445. Google Scholar

3.

A. J. Cavé 1968. The breeding of the kestrel, Falco tinnunculus L., in the reclaimed area Oostelijk Flevoland. Neth. J. Zool. 18: 313–407. Google Scholar

4.

S. Cramp , K. E. L. Simmons (eds). 1980. The Birds of Western Palearctic. Vol. II. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar

5.

J. Čiháková , D. Frynta 1996. Abundance fluctuation in Apodemus spp. and Clethrionomys glareolus (Mammalia: Rodentia): a seven year study in an isolated suburban wood. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 60: 3–12. Google Scholar

6.

A. Darolová 1986. [Some aspects of breeding ecology of Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L. 1758) population in Bratislava agglomeration]. CSc. Thesis, SAV, Bratislava. Google Scholar

7.

A. Darolová 1992. Nesting of Falco tinnunculus (Linnaeus, 1758) in the urban agglomeration of Bratislava. Biológia (Bratislava) 47: 389–397. Google Scholar

8.

J. R. Dunk , R. J. Cooper 1994. Territory-size regulation in Blackshouldered Kite. Auk 111: 588–595. Google Scholar

9.

D. Fainová 2005: [Feeding strategy of the Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in České Budějovice]. Bc. Thesis, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice. Google Scholar

10.

R. G. Ford , J. P. Myers 1981. An evaluation and comparison of techniques for estimating home range and territory size. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 461–465. Google Scholar

11.

K. Hudec , V. Mrlík , Z. Bauerová 1981. [Common Kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in the city Brno in 1979]. Folia Zool. 30: 53–58. Google Scholar

12.

S. Kübier , S. Kupko , U. Zeller , 2005. The kestrel (Falco tinnunculus L.) in Berlin: investigation of breeding biology and feeding ecology. J. Ornithol. 146: 271–278. Google Scholar

13.

A. W. Leary , R. Mazaika , M. J. Bechard 1998. Factors affecting the size of Ferruginous Hawk home ranges. Wilson Bull. HO: 198–205. Google Scholar

14.

C. L. Mallows 1973. Some comments on Cp. Technometrics 15: 661–667. Google Scholar

15.

P. McCullagh , J. A. Neider 1989. Generalized linear models. 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

16.

V. Mikeš 2003. [Feeding behaviour of urban and farmland Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus)]. University of South Bohemia, Bc. Thesis, České Budějovice. Google Scholar

17.

M. Z. Peery 2000. Factors affecting interspecies variation in home-range size of raptors. Auk 117: 511–517. Google Scholar

18.

J. Plesník 1992. [Numbers, breeding success and diet of Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in urban and natural habitats]. Ph.D. Thesis. PřF UK Praha. Google Scholar

19.

J. P. Quere 1990. [Study of the kestrel's (Falco tinnunculus) diet in a urban environment (Paris) during the breeding period]. Le Passer 27: 92–107. Google Scholar

20.

Ł. Rejt , K. Turlejski , K. Bronche , A. M. Topczewski 2000. Can food caching increase the frequency of chicks' feeding in urban kestrel Falco tinnunculus? Acta Ornithol. 35: 217–221. Google Scholar

21.

J. Riegert , R. Fuchs 2004. Insects in the diet of urban kestrels from central Europe: An alternative prey or constant component of the diet? Ornis Fennica 81: 23–32. Google Scholar

22.

A. Rijnsdorp , S. Daan , C. Dijskra 1981. Hunting in the Kestrel, Falco tinnunculus, and the adaptive significance of daily habits. Oecologia (Berl.) 50: 391–406. Google Scholar

23.

J. Romanowski 1996. On the diet of urban Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) in Warsaw. Buteo 8: 123–130. Google Scholar

24.

L. Salvati , A. Manganaro , S. Fattorini , E. Piattella 1999. Population features of Kestrels Falco tinnunculus in urban, suburban and rural areas in Central Italy. Acta Ornithol. 34: 53–58. Google Scholar

25.

E. J. Sparks , J. R. Belthoff , G. Ritchinson 1994. Habitat use by Eastern Screech-Owls in Central Kentucky. J. Field Ornithol. 65: 83–95. Google Scholar

26.

Statsoft Inc. 1996. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). StatSoft., Tulsa OK. Google Scholar

27.

A. Village 1982. The home range and density of kestrels in relation to vole abundance. J. Animal Ecol. 51: 413–428. Google Scholar

28.

A. Village 1987. Numbers, territory size and turnover of Short-eared Owls Asio flammeus in relation to vole abundance. Ornis Scand. 18: 198–204. Google Scholar

29.

A. Village 1990. The Kestrel. T. & A. D. Poyser London. Google Scholar

30.

S. S. Walls , R. E. Kenward 2001. Spatial consequences of relatedness and age in buzzards. Animal Behav. 61: 1069–1078. Google Scholar

31.

B. Wassmer 2001. [The status and distribution of Common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in urban environment of Strasbourg]. Ciconia 21: 1–18. Google Scholar

32.

C. G. Wiklund , A. Village 1992. Sexual and seasonal variation in territorial behaviour of kestrels, Falco tinnunculus. Anim. Behav. 43: 823–830. Google Scholar

33.

D. Yalden 1980. Notes on the diet of urban kestrels. Bird Study 27: 235–238. Google Scholar
Jan Riegert, Drahomíra Fainová, Václav Mikeŝ, and Roman Fuchs "How Urban Kestrels Falco tinnunculus Divide Their Hunting Grounds: Partitioning or Cohabitation?," Acta Ornithologica 42(1), 69-76, (1 July 2007). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.042.0101
Received: 1 November 2006; Accepted: 1 March 2007; Published: 1 July 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
Falco tinnunculus, urban
hunting range
Kestrel
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top