Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2007 Variation in Bird Diversity in Relation to Habitat Size in the Urban Landscape of Seoul, South Korea
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study was carried out to find what factors could affect bird diversity in green areas in an urban landscape. We selected 83 sites of different size and type of urban landscapes in Seoul, South Korea and surveyed bird diversity. Urban green patches were grouped into three subclasses: < 1 ha, 1–10 ha and > 10 ha. The cumulative bird diversity was greater in the subclass 1–10 ha than in < 1 ha or in > 10 ha. We suggest that bird diversity was closely related to habitat size, especially in the category 1–10 ha, and recommend this area be used to establish new bird habitats in urban landscapes. The number of bird species was significantly correlated with the number of insect species in studied patches, but was not correlated with the size of green areas or the distance to roads. Therefore, we suggest that the number of insect species is the most important factor affecting bird diversity within our urban study area.

REFERENCES

  1. L. W. Adams 1994. Urban Wildlife Habitats: A Landscape Perspective. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. Google Scholar

  2. P. Clergeau , F. Burel 1997. The role of spatio-temporal patch connectivity at the landscape level: an example in a bird distribution. Landsc. Urban Plann. 38: 37–43. Google Scholar

  3. B. J. L. Berry 1990. Urbanization. In: II B. L. Turner , W C. Clark , R. W. Kates , J. E Richards , J. T. Mathews , W. B. Meyers (eds). The Earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 103–119. Google Scholar

  4. N. T. Bischoff , R. G. H. Jongman 1993. Development of rural areas in Europe: the claim for nature. Netherlands scientific council for government policy. Hague, Sduuitgeverij, Plantijnstraat. Google Scholar

  5. R. B. Blair 1996. Land-use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol. Appl. 6: 506–519. Google Scholar

  6. M. Buechner , R. Sauvajot 1996. Conservation and zones of human activity: the spread of human disturbance across a protected landscape. In: R. C. Szaro , D. W. Johnston (eds). Biodiversity in managed landscapes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 605–629. Google Scholar

  7. P. Clergeau 1993. Utilisation des concepts de l'ecologie du paysage pour l'elaboration d'un nouveau type de passage a faune. Gibier et Faune Sauvage 10: 47–57. Google Scholar

  8. P. Clergeau , Savard , L. J.-P. , G. Mennechez , G. Falardeau 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100: 413–425. Google Scholar

  9. R. M. DeGraaf , A. D. Geis , P. A. Healy 1991. Bird population and habitat surveys in urban areas. Landsc. Urban Plann. 21: 181–188. Google Scholar

  10. R. M. Degraaf , J. M. Wentworth 1981. Urban bird communities and habitats in New England. In: Proc. 46th North Amer. Wildl. Conf., Washington, pp. 396–412. Google Scholar

  11. K. Dmowski , M. Kozakiewicz 1990. Influence of a shrub corridor on movements of passerine birds to a lake littoral zone. Landsc. Ecol. 4: 99–108. Google Scholar

  12. R. Donnelly , J. M. Marzluff 2004. Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv. Biol. 18: 733–745. Google Scholar

  13. R. Donnelly , J. M. Marzluff 2006. Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst. 9: 99–117. Google Scholar

  14. J. T. Emlen 1974. An urban bird community in Tucson, Arizona: derivation, structure, regulation. Condor 76: 184–197. Google Scholar

  15. J. Fenton 1997. A primary producer's perspective on nature conservation. In: P. Hale , D. Lamb (eds). Conservation Outside Nature Reserves. Univ. Queensland, Brisbane, pp.3–9. Google Scholar

  16. J. Fischer , D.B. Lindenmayer 2002. Small patches can be valuable for biodiversity conservation: two case studies on birds in southeastern Australia. Biol. Conserv. 106:129–136. Google Scholar

  17. R. Foppen , R. Reijnen 1994. The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland II. Breeding dispersal of male willow warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) in relation to the proximity of a highway. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 95–101. Google Scholar

  18. G. W. Gabrielson , E. N. Smith 1995. Physiological responses of wildlife to disturbance. In: R. L. Knight , K. J. Gutzwiller (eds). Wildlife and Recreationists. Island Press, Washington, pp. 95–107. Google Scholar

  19. S. S. Germaine , S. S. Rosenstock , R. E. Schweinsburg , W. S. Richardson 1998. Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl. 8: 608–691. Google Scholar

  20. L. Gilfedder , J. B. Kirkpatrick 1998. Factors influencing the integrity of remnant bushland in subhumid Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 84: 89–96. Google Scholar

  21. D. Hockin , M. Ounsted , M. Gorman , D. Hill , V Keller , M. A. Barker 1992. Examination of the effects of disturbance on birds with reference to its importance in ecological assessments. J. Environ. Manage. 36: 253–286. Google Scholar

  22. M. Hostetler 1999. Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landsc. Urban Plann. 45: 15–19. Google Scholar

  23. M. Hostetler , K. Knowles-Yanez 2003. Land use, scale, and bird distributions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landsc. Urban Plann. 62: 55–68. Google Scholar

  24. W. C. Johnson , C. S. Adkisson 1985. Dispersal of beechnuts by blue jays in fragmented landscapes. Am. Midland Nat. 113: 319–324. Google Scholar

  25. J. Jokimäki , J. Suhonen 1998. Distribution and habitat selection of wintering birds in urban environments. Landsc. Urban Plann. 39: 253–263. Google Scholar

  26. R. L. Knight , G. N. Wallace , Riebsame , WE . 1995. Ranching the view: subdivisions versus agriculture. Conserv. Biol. 9: 459–461. Google Scholar

  27. J. M. Marzluff , K. Ewing 2001. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: A general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecol. 9: 280–292. Google Scholar

  28. J. M. Marzluff 2005. Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 8: 157–177. Google Scholar

  29. W. B. Meyer , II B. L. Turner 1992. Human population growth and global landuse/cover change. Ann. Review Ecol. Syst. 23: 39–61. Google Scholar

  30. J. Middleton 1994. Effects of urbanization on biodiversity in Canada. In: Biodiversity in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp. 15–20. Google Scholar

  31. G. S. Mills , J. B. Dunning Jr , J. M. Bates 1989. Effects of urbanization on breeding bird community structure in southwestern desert habitats. Condor 91: 416–428. Google Scholar

  32. R. F. Noss 1993. Wildlife corridors. In: D. S. Smith , Hellmund P. Calwood (eds). Ecology of Greenways. Univ. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 43–68. Google Scholar

  33. K. Oh 2001. Landscape Information System: A GIS approach to managing urban development. Landsc. Urban Plann. 54: 79–89. Google Scholar

  34. P. Opdam 1990. Dispersal in fragmented populations: the key to survival. In: R. G. Bunce , D. C. Howard (eds). Species dispersal in agricultural habitats. Belhaven Press, London, pp. 3–17. Google Scholar

  35. B. Peterson 1985. Extinction of an isolated population of the middle spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in Sweden and its relation to general theories on extinction. Biol. Conserv. 32: 335–353. Google Scholar

  36. J. F. Quinn , S. P. Harrison 1988. Effects of habitat fragmentation and isolation on species richness: evidence from biogeographic patterns. Oecologia 75: 132–140. Google Scholar

  37. R. Reijnen , R. Foppen 1994. The effects of car traffic on breeding bird populations in woodland. Evidence of reduced habitat quality for willow warblers (Phylloscopus trochilus) breeding close to a highway. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 85–94. Google Scholar

  38. D. A. Saunders , R. J. Hobbs 1991. Nature conservation: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Australia. Google Scholar

  39. J.-P. L. Savard 1978. Birds in metropolitan Toronto: distribution, relationships with habitat features and nesting sites. M.Sc. Thesis, Dept. Zoology, Univ. Toronto, Ontario. Google Scholar

  40. J.-P. L. Savard , P. Clergeau , G. Mennechez 2002. Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landsc. Urban Plann. 48: 131–142. Google Scholar

  41. J.-P. L. Savard , B. J. Falls 1982. Influence of habitat structure on the nesting height of birds in urban areas. Can. J. Zool. 59: 924–932. Google Scholar

  42. R. D. Semlitsch , J. R. Bodie 1998. Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conserv. Biol. 12: 1129–1133. Google Scholar

  43. Development Institute. Seoul 2002. Report of plan study ecosystem restoration and biodiversity promotion with biotope type in Seoul. Seoul, Korea. Google Scholar

  44. Development Institute. Seoul 2003. Report of plan study ecosystem restoration and biodiversity promotion with biotope type in Seoul. Seoul, Korea. Google Scholar

  45. T. G. Shreeve 1992. Monitoring butterfly movements. In: R. L. H. Dennis . The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford Science Publication, pp. 120–138. Google Scholar

  46. W. R. Turner 2003. Citywide biological monitoring as a tool for ecology and conservation in urban landscapes: the case of the Tucson Bird Count. Landsc. Urban Plann. 65: 149–166. Google Scholar

  47. C. Walcott 1974. Changes in bird life in Cambridge, MA, from 1860 to 1964. Auk 91: 151–160. Google Scholar

  48. G. Woolfenden , S. Rohwer 1969. Breeding birds in a Florida suburban. Fla. State Mus. Bull. No. 13. Google Scholar

  49. P. A. Zuidema , J. A. Sayer , W. Dijkman 1996. Forest fragmentation and biodiversity: the case for intermediate-sized conservation areas. Environ. Conserv. 23: 290–297. Google Scholar

Jungsoo Kim, Jinhwak Chae, and Tae-Hoe Koo "Variation in Bird Diversity in Relation to Habitat Size in the Urban Landscape of Seoul, South Korea," Acta Ornithologica 42(1), (1 July 2007). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.042.0111
Received: 1 August 2006; Accepted: 1 June 2007; Published: 1 July 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top