Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2009 A New Y-Shaped Trace Fossil Attributed to Upogebiid Crustaceans from Early Pleistocene of Italy
Author Affiliations +

Y-shaped trace fossil (U-shaped upper part with a basal shaft), Parmaichnus stironensis igen. nov. et isp. nov. penetrates from a discontinuity surface cut in Early Quaternary mudstones in the Stirone Valley, Northern Italy. It is attributed to upogebiid decapod crustaceans. Parmaichnus differs from Psilonichnus by the presence of turning chambers in the upper part of the burrow. The turning chambers are considered to be an important taxonomic feature of upogebiid burrows. P. stironensis occurs together with Thalassinoides cf. paradoxicus (produced probably by callianassid crustaceans) and wide U-shaped pyritised cylinders (supposedly produced by balanoglossid hemichordates).


Upogebiid crustaceans are common burrowers in the intertidal and upper subtidal zone (e.g., Dworschak 1983). Along the coast of the Adriatic Sea, these burrows are produced mainly by Upogebia pusilla (Petagna, 1792) = U. litoralis (Risso, 1816) (Ott et al. 1976; Dworschak 1983, 1987a). It is surprising that very few trace fossils are referred to upogebiids (Nara and Kotake 1997; Nesbitt and Campbell 2002; Curran and Martin 2003). Psilonichnus Fürsich, 1981 with its type ichnospecies, P. tubiformis Fürsich, 1981 was compared to burrows of Upogebia affinis (Holmes, 1900) illustrated by Bromley and Frey (1974: fig. 9) (Fürsich 1981). Psilonichnus lutimuratus Nesbitt and Campbell, 2002 was interpreted as an upogebiid burrow (Nara and Kotake 1997; Nesbitt and Campbell 2002). Nara and Kotake (1997) described up to 2 m long “Psilonichnus isp.” with short side branches and referred it to Upogebia major (de Haan, 1841). However, these Psilonichnus ichnospecies and P. upsilon Frey, Curran, and Pemberton, 1984 differ from recent upogebiid burrows (Dworschak 1983, 1987a, 2004) by the presence of turning chambers, which are considered herein as a significant ichnotaxobase at the ichnogenus level.

Early Quaternary marine sediments of the Stirone section in the Parma region, Italy (Fig. 1), contain trace fossils that share many morphological features with Recent upogebiid crustacean burrows. These trace fossils penetrate from a distinct discontinuity surface. Their description, ichnotaxonomy, and discussion of their ethology and palaeoecology are the main focus of the paper.

Institutional abbreviation.

  • INGUJ, Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Geological setting

The Late Pliocene to early Pleistocene sediments in the Western Emilia Romagna (Parma and Piacenza provinces) were deposited in the north-western extension of the Palaeo-Adriatic Sea. They are part of the Po Plain-Adriatic Foredeep, which is filled with sediments deriving from the Southern Alps and Apennines. The Late Pliocene sediments are interpreted as a regressive succession deposited in the transition from outer to inner shelf. The overlying Pleistocene sediments represent deeper shelf, nearshore, and transitional deposits in a shallo wing-up wards trend (Dominici 2001, 2004).

The Upper Pliocene-Lower Pleistocene sections along the Stirone river valley have been more intensively investigated since the 1960s with regard to their sedimentology, palaeoecology, micropalaeontology, taphonomy, and sequence stratigraphy (Pelosio 1960, 1964; Papani and Pelosio 1962; Pelosio and Raffi 1974, 1977; Iaccarino 1996; Mutti 1996; Molinari 1997; Mutti et al. 2000; Dominici 2001, 2004; Monegatti et al. 2001. The initial ichnological report was by Dominici (2001). Uchman and Pervesler (2007) described trace fossils from the Late Pliocene part of the section.

The new trace fossil described in this paper penetrates from a distinct discontinuity surface developed at the top of a 3.2 m thick interval of lower Pleistocene light grey, calcareous, clayey siltstone, which occurs 17 m above the top of Pliocene sediments (sensu Dominici 2001, 2004) marked by a sequence boundary (Figs. 1, 2). The sequence stratigraphic meaning of this discontinuity surface is not so far decided. This surface was followed for more than 600 m along the river and is sharply demarcated and gently undulated, probably due to erosional truncation. It is covered by discontinuous layers of poorly sorted fine- to medium-grained siliciclastic sands, with poorly expressed bedding surfaces, down-lapping the discontinuity at a low angle across the outcrop. The sands are rich in bioclasts, mostly mollusc shells and tubes of the serpulid Ditrupa. The trace fossils are filled with the overlying sandy sediment, and their margins are commonly ferruginized or pyritised. Therefore they are highly visible in contrast with the siltstone background (Figs. 3,4). The geological situation of the discussed trace fossils is similar to that from the Willlapa Bay, Washington, U.S.A, where Y-shaped crustacean burrows penetrate Pleistocene firm-ground muds (Glossifungites ichnofacies) covered by sands in an estuarine setting (Gingras et al. 1999, 2000).

Fig. 1.

Location map and the geological section. A. The study region on the map of Italy. B. Location of the study area. C. Location of the studied section. D. The studied section with indication of Parmaichnus stironensis igen. nov. et isp. nov.


Fig. 2.

View of the Early Pleistocene part of the Stirone section (about 90 m), with the distinct unconformity in the middle (pointed by arrow) separating silts covered by sands.


Systematic ichnology

Ichnogenus Parmaichnus nov.

  • Type ichnospecies: Parmaichnus stironensis isp. nov.

  • Etymology: After the Parma region, in which the trace fossil occurs.

  • Diagnosis.—Vertical to oblique, tubular burrows, circular in cross section, and composed of the U-shaped upper part and a basal shaft. Sub-spherical swellings are present in the upper part of the burrow.

  • Remarks.—To date, only three Y-shaped ichnogenera (U-shaped upper part with a basal shaft) are distinguished. They can be compared to Parmaichnus. Psilonichnus Frey, Curran, and Pemberton, 1984, typified by Psilonichnus tubiformis (Fürsich, 1981), has no turning chambers and is much larger (Fig. 5U). Solemyatuba Seilacher, 1990, with two ichnospecies S. subcompressa (Eichwald, 1855) and S. ypsilon Seilacher, 1990, and Recent burrows of the bivalve Solemya velum Say, 1822 are of comparable size but they do not display turning chambers and their tubes are elliptical in cross section (Fig. 5F, G). Polykladichnus Fürsich, 1981, typified by P. irregularis Fürsich, 1981 (Fig. 5D), displays multiple Y- or U-shaped bifurcation and slight enlargement at junctions (see Schlirf and Uchman 2005).

  • Fig. 3.

    Holotype (INGUJ 200P 11) of allegedly upogebiid trace fossil Parmaichnus stironensis igen. nov. et isp. nov. Scale bar 100 mm.


    Parmaichnus stironensis isp. nov.
    Figs. 3, 4, 5P-S.

  • Etymology: After Stirone river, along which the type horizon is located.

  • Type material: Holotype: INGUJ 200P 11 (a block of impregnated silt containing the burrow) and five photographed and measured specimens in the field.

  • Type horizon: Distinct discontinuity surface in the Early Pleistocene sediments 17 m above top of the Pliocene.

  • Type locality: Stirone river valley close to the chapel San Nicomede, 2 km NE from Scipione Ponte, Parma region (Fig. 1).

  • Diagnosis.—Y-shaped, vertical to oblique tubular, unlined trace fossil; tubes circular in cross section, composed of the U-shaped upper part and a basal shaft coming out from its lower part. Sub-spherical swellings are present close to the two inflection points in the lower part of the U. Moreover, the swellings occur commonly in the lower part of the shaft and, in some specimens, at the shaft entrance.

  • Description.—As in the diagnosis, with the following additions: The trace fossil is unlined. The burrow margins are sharp, and commonly ferruginised. The surface is smooth, i.e. with no scratch marks. The burrow is filled with the overlying sandy sediment, commonly containing shell debris. The holotype displays all the described features. It is inclined to the discontinuity surface: the plane of the U-part no more than 40° and the basal shaft less than 35° in the upper part and only up to 10° in the lower part. Other specimens observed in the field are nearly vertical. The tube diameter ranges from 9 to 26 mm and in the holotype from 16 to 20 mm. The chambers are irregularly ovoid to ovoid in shape. In the holotype, two chambers are located in the lower part of the U-shaped burrow, and one chamber is located in the lower part of the shaft. The chambers are 25–36 mm wide. In smaller specimens, the chambers are no less than 15 mm wide. The chambers are irregular sub-ovoid in shape. They are located aside of the axis of the tubes. The distance between the U-part openings is 70 mm in the holotype and ranges from 55 to 70 mm in other specimens. The total vertical extent is at least 120 mm in the holotype, but the trace fossils was originally longer (the basal terminus of the shaft is apparently broken. Given that the shaft is inclined, its length is greater than its vertical extent, and it attains a length of 170 mm (at least 95 mm to at least 145 mm in other specimens). The morphometric parameters of the holotype and other five specimens photographed in the field are listed in Table 1. The basal shaft is curved, commonly in its distal part. It starts from the base of the U, commonly aside from the vertical axis of the U and frequently almost in continuation of one of the U limbs. The juncture with the U is slightly swollen.

  • Remarks.—This is the only known ichnospecies of Parmaichnus. Potentially, other ichnospecies can be distinguished in the future on the basis of position of the swellings and other morphological features.

    Probably, the upper part of Parmaichnus stironensis is truncated by erosion, at least in some cases. This can be judged from significant differences in vertical extent of the U-part of the burrows.

  • Table 1.

    Morphometric parameters of the holotype and the specimens of Parmaichnus stironensis igen. nov. et isp. nov. observed in the field. All values in mm. Specimens abbreviated with P are left in the field.



    Probable tracemaker organisms.—Comparison of the trace fossil morphology with extant burrows—especially considering the Y-shape with turning chambers (Fig. 5A-U)— strongly suggests that thalassinidean shrimp, especially upogebiids, are the tracemakers. Parmaichnus stironensis shows the closest similarities to the Recent burrows of Upogebia mediterranea Noël, 1992 (Fig. 5O), found in firmground mud of Rhodes, Greece (Asgaard et al. 1997).

    Fig. 4.

    Allegedly upogebiid Y-shaped trace fossil Parmaichnus stironensis igen. nov. et isp. nov. (specimens left in the field) from Early Pleistocene of Italy. A. Specimen P1070182 (numbering from the field photograph collection). B. Specimen P1070193. C. Specimen P1070194. D. Specimen P1070196. Scale bars 50 mm.


    Recent upogebiid burrows.—A synopsis of the burrow features of U. pusilla given by Dworschak (2004) describes the burrows as Y-shaped, consisting of a U- or double U-shaped gallery and a basal shaft. The burrow openings are simple holes, flush with the substrate surface. The burrows occur in intertidal areas and can penetrate to a depth of up to 0.8 m. Turning chambers occur on each side of the U, and one or more along the shaft. In the Gulf of Trieste, U. pusilla occurs also in water depths of more than 7 m. In the subtidal environment, U. pusilla burrows (Fig. 5H, J, K) are much shallower than those from the intertidal and generally have mostly one turning chamber on one side; the shaft has none (Dworschak 2004). Pervesler and Hohenegger (2006) show resin casts of subtidal U. pusilla burrows from shelly coarse gravels close to the steep coast near Sorgenti di Aurisina in the Gulf of Trieste. The burrows are Y-shaped with two turning chambers in the U-portion, the shafts starting from one turning chamber branch with angles 10–60°. The total depth of these burrows does not exceed 18 cm.

    Functional morphology.—Turning chambers (Fig. 5H) are obligatory features of Upogebia burrows. They are used to facilitate changes in direction of movement by the shrimp inhabitants of the burrows and also are the place where the tracemaker spends about 40% of its time for feeding. The trace maker is mainly feeding on suspended particles entering the burrow via the ventilation current created by intermittent beating of the pleopods. The animal can also come out of its burrow and browse the sediment around the burrow openings (Dworschak 1987b).

    In contrast to the feeding function of Upogebia burrows, the burrows of ocypodid crabs are used for shelter against heat and desiccation and as a refuge against predation (Chakrabarti 1981; Chan et al. 2006). Ocypodids can produce Y-shaped burrows (Fig. 5A) consisting of a primary arm, which extends to the surface forming the opening, and a secondary arm that terminates in a blind hemispherical ending or communicates with the surface. The two arms join in a single shaft and end with a turning chamber at the base. Such burrows closely resemble the ichnofossil Psilonichnus, e.g., Psilonichnus upsilon Frey, Curran, and Pemberton, 1984 (Fig. 5B) and do not show turning chambers in the upper part of the burrow.

    Fig. 5.

    Different Y-shaped trace fossils (B, D, G, U) and Recent burrows compared to Parmaichnus stironensis (P-S). Redrawn from photographs. A. After Seike and Nara (2007: fig. 3c). B. Holotype of Psilonichnus upsilon, Hanna Bay, San Salvador, Bahamas, from AU photograph. C. After Bruce (1987: fig. 6). D. After Fürsich (1981: pl. 3: 2). E. After Curran and Frey (1977: pl. le). F. After Frey (1968: text-fig. 1). G. After Seilacher (1990: fig. 5D). H. After Dworschak (2004: fig. 2B); arrows point the turning chambers. I. After Swinbanks and Luternauer (1987: fig. 2.1). J. After Ott et al. (1976: pl. 1: 2). K. After Ott et al. (1976: pl. 1: 3). L. After Dworschak et al. (2006: fig. 1A). M. After Nash et al. (1984: pl. 2a); see also Bromley (1996: fig. 4.32). N. After Curran and Martin (2003: fig. 6). O. After Asgaard et al. (1997: fig. 6). P-S. Parmaichnus stironensis igen. nov. et isp. nov. P. Holotype, ING UJ 200P11, see also Fig. 3. Q. P1070193, see also Fig. 4B. R. P1070182, see also Fig. 4A. S. P1070196, see also Fig. 4D. T. After Atkinson and Taylor (1991: fig. 1f). U. Psilonichnus tubiformis, after Fürsich (1981: p1. 1: 1).


    Turning chambers in Y-shaped burrows are the important ichnotaxobase to distinguish Psilonichnus from Parmaichnus. Fossil burrows without turning chambers should not be attributed to the work of upogebiids.

    Ecology of Recent upogebiids.—Upogebiids are known from tropical, subtropical and temperate seas. The subtidal tropical species Upogebia amboinensis (de Man, 1888) (Australia) and U. operculata Schmitt, 1924 (Caribbean) live in corals (Kleemann 1984) while Upogebia. sp. from the Carib-bean lives in sponges (Griffis and Suchanek 1991). Upogebia vasquezi Ngoc-Ho, 1989 was reported from intertidal tropical sediments (Curran and Martin 2003). Temperate species settling on soft substrates are described from Southeastern USA (U. affinis), Western USA (U. pugettensis (Dana, 1852), U. macginitieorum Williams, 1986), Southern Africa (U. africana (Ortmann, 1894)), India (U. carinicauda (Stimpson, 1860)), Japan (U. major), and the Mediterranean Sea (U. tipica (Nardo, 1868)), U. pusilla, U. deltaura (Leach, 1815)). The widespread U. pusilla was also reported from the Atlantic Ocean, from Mauretania to Britanny (De Saint Laurent and LeLoeuff 1979), and from Norway (Pesta 1918; Bouvier 1940; Zariquiey Álvarez 1968).

    Fig. 6.

    Trace fossils associated with Parmaichnus stironensis. They penetrate from the discontinuity surface in the Quaternary sediments of the Stirone section. A-C. Thalassinoides cf. paradoxicus (Woodward, 1830). D. Pyritised tube indicated by arrow.


    Upogebia affinis, U. africana, and U. pusilla live in intertidal as well as subtidal areas. U. pusilla can be found from the intertidal (Ott et al. 1976; Dworschak 1983, 1987a, 2004) down to a water depth of 45 m (Black Sea, Popovici 1940). U. pugettensis, U. macginitieorum, U. carinicauda, and U. major are restricted to the intertidal, U. tipica and U. deltaura to the subtidal. Substrates used by upogebiids are variable, ranging from hardrock, corals (Kleemann 1984) and gravel (Pervesler and Hohenegger 2006) to muds consisting of muddy fine sand or silt (Dworschak 1983).

    Densities can go up to several hundred burrows per square meter (Ott et al. 1976; Griffis and Suchanek 1991). Salinity range is from normal marine (36‰) in subtidal areas down to 9‰ in freshwater-influenced areas (Dworschak 1987b). Due to the ventilation activity, the wall of modern burrows throughout its length has the same tan colour as the oxidized sediment surface, whereas the surrounding reduced sediment appears black. Following Griffis and Suchanek's (1991) classification, the trace fossil Parmaichnus stironensis can be interpreted as an upogebiid shrimp burrow of the type 5 (simple Y) constructed on seafloors without mounds and eelgrass. Such burrow shapes are used for suspension and filter feeding behaviour. The basal pattern of morphology in Recent Adriatic upogebiid burrows is a simple Y-shape, with turning chambers similar to the fossil examples from the Stirone River Quaternary.

    Associated trace fossils

    Two different trace fossils, Thalassinoides cf. paradoxicus (Woodward, 1830) and pyritised cylinders are associated with Parmaichnus stironensis. They penetrate from the same discontinuity surface.

    Thalassinoides cf. T. paradoxicus (Woodward, 1830).— This trace fossil occurs as branched, cylindrical, unlined burrows, 10–22 mm in diameter, which penetrate obliquely down (commonly under 30–40°) from the discontinuity surface up to at least 32 cm. Some of them contain wide, shallow, irregular, branched U-shaped elements of the same morphology (Fig. 6A-C). Some of the joints are swollen, and measure up to 25 mm in diameter. Also, chambers of the same diameter are scattered along the cylinders. The overlying sand fills this trace fossil. Commonly, its margin is ferruginised. Some specimens display wide and shallow funnel entrances or constrictions.

    These branching burrows can be assigned to the trace fossil Thalassinoides Ehrenberg, 1944, and are similar to Thalassinoides paradoxicus (Woodward, 1830) in their differently oriented elements and lack of dominant horizontal galleries. However, the Parma trace fossils do not display common T-shaped branches without swellings, which are typical of T. paradoxicus.

    The morphology of these trace fossils, inclined cylinders and wide, irregular U-shaped elements in particular, are typical of unlined callianassid crustacean burrows (Dworschak 1983, 2004).

    Pyritised cylinders.—Differently inclined, from sub-vertical to sub-horizontal, long, almost straight to slightly curved, rarely branched, smooth, cylindrical tubes are ascribed to this trace fossil. They are 5–7 mm diameter and at least 90 cm long (Fig. 6D). Some of the longer cylinders form gentle, open up arcs. Their length is probably much larger, because burrow fragments are found up to 53 cm below the discontinuity surface. This trace fossil is filled by pyritised material and is coated by limonite-like iron minerals, which originated probably from oxidisation of the pyrite. The coating probably enlarges the original width of the burrow. The trace fossil displays only rare, short branches up to 30 mm long, coming out from the sub-horizontal part of the burrow.

    It is possible that this trace fossil forms very wide and deep U-shaped structures when complete, but only their fragments are observed in outcrops. Thus it is hard to assign this trace fossil to any known ichnotaxon. Strong pyritization and large depth of sediment penetration in comparison to width suggest anoxic conditions inside the burrow. In analogy with much smaller (<1 mm wide) Trichichnus Frey, 1970, it can be supposed that this trace fossil was produced by a chemosymbiotic invertebrate. Some enteropneusts produce thin and long burrows, like Balanoglossus aurantiacus (Girard, 1853) (Duncan 1987a) (Fig. 5C). It is not excluded that the tracemaker of the pyritised tubes belongs to this group of hemichordates. Other candidates are echiuran worms, like Maxmuelleria lankesteri (Herdman, 1898), that produces long, thin horizontal tunnels at about 50 cm depth connected to the substrate surface by two steep shafts (Huges et al. 1996).


    Parmaichnus stironensis is a new trace fossil attributed to upogebiid crustaceans, which can be distinguished by its U-shaped cylinders with swellings and a basal shaft. The swellings are significant morphological elements considered as an ichnotaxobase at the ichnogenus level. This element allows separating Psilonichnus produced mostly by crabs from Parmaichnus produced by upogebiid crustaceans. Morphology of Parmaichnus stironensis is very close to morphology of Upogebia mediterranea burrows.


    The study was supported by the Department of Palaeontology at the University of Vienna (Austria) and the Jagiellonian University in Krakow (Poland). We thank Sergio Tralongo (Consorzio Parco Fluviale Regionale dello Stirone, Parma, Italy) and Gianluca Rainieri (Consorzio Gestione Riserva Naturale Geologica del Piacenziano, Piacenza, Italy) for the permission to enter the conservation areas. Thanks are due to the technical staff of the Department of Palaeontology of the University of Vienna, Austria for help with preparation of the holotype. We thank Stefano Dominici (Museo di Storia Naturale di Firenze, Italy) for discussion during fieldwork and a critical reading of the manuscript. H. Allen Curran (Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA) and Murray K. Gingras (University of Alberta, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) provided helpful reviewer comments.


    1. U. Asgaard , R. Bromley , and N.-M. Hanken 1997. Recent firmground burrows produced by a upogebiid crustacean: palaeontological implications. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 201: 23–28. Google Scholar

    2. R.J.A. Atkinson and A.C. Taylor 1991. Burrows and burrowing behaviour of fish. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 63: 133–155. Google Scholar

    3. E.L. Bouvier 1940. Faune de France 37, Décapodes Marcheurs. 404 pp. Paul Lechevalier et Fils, Paris. Google Scholar

    4. R.G. Bromley 1996. Trace Fossils: Biology, Taphonomy and Applications, 2nd Edition. 361 pp. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

    5. A. Chakrabarti 1981. Burrow patterns of Ocypode ceratophthalma (Palls) and their environmental significance. Journal of Paleontology 55: 431–441. Google Scholar

    6. B. Chan , K. Chan , and P. Leung 2006. Burrow architecture of the ghost crab Ocypode ceratophthalma on a sandy shore in Hong Kong. Hydrobiologia 560: 43–49. Google Scholar

    7. H.A. Curran and R.W. Frey 1977. Pleistocene trace fossils from North Carolina (U.S.A.), and their Holocene analogues. In : T.P. Crimes and J.C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils 2. Geological Journal Special Issue 9: 138–162. Google Scholar

    8. H.A. Curran and A.J. Martin 2003. Complex decapod burrows and ecological relationships in modern and Pleistocene intertidal carbonate environmentes, San Salvador Island, Bahamas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 192: 229–245. Google Scholar

    9. S. Dominici 2001. Taphonomy and paleoecology of shallow marine macrofossil assemblages in a collisional setting (late Pliocene-early Pleistocene, western Emilia, Italy). Palaios 16: 336–353. Google Scholar

    10. S. Dominici 2004. Quantitative taphonomy in sandstones from an ancient fan delta system (Lower Pleistocene, Western Emilia, Italy). Palaios 19: 193–205. Google Scholar

    11. P.B. Duncan 1987. Burrow structure and burrowing activity of the funnel-feeding enteropneust Balanoglossus aurantiacus in Bogue Sound, North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology 8: 75–95. Google Scholar

    12. P.C. Dworschak 1983. The biology of Upogebia pusilla (Petagna) (Decapoda, Thalassinoidea. I. The burrows. Marine Ecology 4: 19–43. Google Scholar

    13. P.C. Dworschak 1987a. The biology of Upogebia pusilla (Petagna) (Decapoda, Thalassinoidea. II. Environments and zonation. Marine Ecology 8: 337–358. Google Scholar

    14. P.C. Dworschak 1987b. Feeding behaviour of Upogebia pusilla and Calianassa tyrrhena (Crustacea, Decapoda, Thalassinidea). Investigatión Pesqueras 51: 421–429. Google Scholar

    15. P.C. Dworschak 2004. Biology of Mediterranean and Caribbean Thalassinidea (Decapoda). In : A. Tamaki (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on “Ecology of Large Bioturbators in Tidal Flats and Shallow Sublittoral Sediments-From Individual Behavior to Their Role as Ecosystem Engineers” , 15–22. Nagasaki University. Nagasaki. Google Scholar

    16. P.C. Dworschak , H. Koller , and D. Abed-Navandi 2006. Burrow structure, burrowing and feeding behaviour of Corallianassa longiventris and Pestarella tyrrhena (Crustacea, Thalassinidea, Calianassidae). Marine Biology 148: 1369–1382. Google Scholar

    17. K. Ehrenberg 1944. Ergänzende Bemerkungen zu den seinerzeit aus dem Miozän von Burgschleinitz beschrieben Gangkernen und Bauten dekapoder Krebse. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 23: 354–359. Google Scholar

    18. CE. von Eichwald 1860–1868. Lethaea Rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie décrite et figurée , vol. 1: 1657 pp. (1860); vol. 2: 1304 pp., atlas (1865–1868). E. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

    19. R.W. Frey 1968. The lebensspuren of some common marine invertebrates near Beaufort, North Carolina. I. Pelecypod burrows. Journal of Paleontology 42: 570–574. Google Scholar

    20. R.W. Frey 1970. Trace fossils of Fort Hays Limestone Member of Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) West-Central Kansas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions 53: 1–41. Google Scholar

    21. R.W. Frey , H.A. Curran , and G.S. Pemberton 1984. Trace making activities of crabs and their environmental significance: the ichnogenus Psilonichnus. Journal of Paleontology 58: 333–350. Google Scholar

    22. F.T. Fürsich 1981. Invertebrate trace fossils from the Upper Jurassic of Portugal. Comunicaçôes dos Serviços Geologicos de Portugal 67: 153–168. Google Scholar

    23. M.K. Gingras , S.M. Hubbard , S.G. Pemberton , and T. Saunders 2000. The significance of Pleistocene Psilonichnus at Willapa Bay, Washington. Palaios 15: 142–151. Google Scholar

    24. M.K. Gingras , S.G. Pemberton , C.A. Mendoza , and F. Henk 1999. Assessing the anisotropic permeability of Glossifungites surfaces. Petroleum Geoscience 5: 349–357. Google Scholar

    25. R.B. Griffis and T.H. Suchanek 1991. A model of burrow architecture and trophic modes in thalassinoidean shrimp (Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Marine Ecology Progress Series 79: 171–183. Google Scholar

    26. D.J. Huges , A.D. Ansell , and R.J.A. Atkinson 1996. Sediment bioturbation by the echiuran worm Maxmuelleria lankesteri (Herdman) and its consequences for radionuclide dispersal in Irish Sea sediments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 195: 203–220. Google Scholar

    27. S. Iaccarino 1996. Il Plio-Pleistocene del Torrente Stirone: Evoluzione delle conoscenze: XIII Convegno Società Paleontologica Italiana. Excursion Guidebook, 19–26. Università di Parma, Parma. Google Scholar

    28. K. Kleemann 1984. Lebensspuren von Upogebia operculata (Crustacea, Decapoda) in karibischen Steinkorallen (Madreporaria, Anthozoa). Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreichs 11: 35–57. Google Scholar

    29. E. Linsenmaier 1967. Konstruktion und Signalfunktion der Sandpyramide der Reiterkrabe Ocypode saratan Forsk (Decapoda, Brachyura, Ocypodidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 24: 403–456. Google Scholar

    30. F. Molinari 1997. Analisi di facies e stratigrafia fisica delle successioni plio-pleistoceniche affioranti lungo i torrenti Stirone, Arda e Chero. 80 pp. Unpublished M.S. thesis, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Parma, Parma. Google Scholar

    31. P. Monegatti , S. Raffi , M. Roveri , and M. Taviani 2001. One Day Trip in the Outcropsof Castell'Arquato Plio-Pleistocene Basin: From the Badlands of Monte Giogo to the Stirone River. 26 pp. Universitŕ di Parma, Parma. Google Scholar

    32. E. Mutti 1996. Il Plio-Pleistocene del torrente Stirone: evoluzione delle conoscenze., Excursion Guidebook Tredicesimo Convegno della Società Paleontologica Italiana, Parma , 33–34. Parma. Google Scholar

    33. E. Mutti , R. Tinterri , D. Di Biase , L. Fava , N. Mavilla , S. Angella , and L. Calabrese 2000. Delta-front facies associations of ancient flooddominated fluvio-deltaic systems. Revista Società Geologica de España 13: 165–190. Google Scholar

    34. M. Nara and N. Kotake 1997. Trace fossil Psilonichnus in the middle to late Pleistocene Shimosa Group. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan 103: 971–981. Google Scholar

    35. R.D.M. Nash , C.J. Chapman , R.J.A. Atkinson , and P.J. Morgan 1984. Observations on burrows and burrowing behaviour of Colocaris macandreae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Journal of Zoology 202: 425–439. Google Scholar

    36. E.A. Nesbitt and K.A. Campbell 2002. A new Psilonichnus ichnospecies attributed to mud-shrimp Upogebia in estuarine settings. Journal of Paleontology 76: 892–901. Google Scholar

    37. J.A. Ott , B. Fuchs , and A. Malasek 1976. Observations on the biology of Callianasssa stebbingi Borrodaille and Upogebia litoralis Risso and their effect upon the sediment. Senckenbergiana maritima 8: 61–79. Google Scholar

    38. G. Papani and G. Pelosio 1962. La serie Plio-Pleistocenica del Torrente Stirone (Parmense Occidentale). Bolletino della Società Geologica Italiana 81: 293–335. Google Scholar

    39. G. Pelosio 1960. Affioramenti fossiliferi del calabriano nei preappennino parmense. I. Il giacimento di Rio Ferraio, Noceto. Giornale di Geologia 28: 132–174. Google Scholar

    40. G. Pelosio 1964. Nuovi dati sul Calabriano a Cyprina islandica nel Parmense occidentale. Ateneo Parmense 35: 57–74. Google Scholar

    41. G. Pelosio and S. Raffi 1974. Osservazioni su Arctica islandica ed altri lamellibranchi del Calabriano dell'Emilia occidentale. Ateneo Parmense 10: 347–367. Google Scholar

    42. G. Pelosio , and S. Raffi 1977. Preliminary remarks on mollusc assemblages of the Stirone River Pleistocene series (Parma Province, Northern Italy). X INQUA Congress, Birmingham, 1–19. University of East Anglia, Norwich. Google Scholar

    43. P. Pervesler and J. Hohenegger 2006. Orientation of crustacean burrows in the Bay of Panzano (Gulf of Trieste, Northern Adriatic Sea). Lethaia 39: 173–186. Google Scholar

    44. O. Pesta 1918. Die Decapodenfauna der Adria. Versuch einer Monographie. 500 pp. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig, Wien. Google Scholar

    45. Z. Popovici 1940. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung von Upogebia littoralis R. an der Rumänischen Südküste des Schwarzen Meeres. Bulletin de la Section Scientifique de l' Académie Roumaine 22: 423–427. Google Scholar

    46. M. Saint Laurent , P. de and LeLoeuff 1979. Crustacés décapodes: Thalassinidea. I. Upogebiidae et Callianassidae. Annales de l'Institut Océanographique — Nouvelle Serie 55: 29–101. Google Scholar

    47. M. Schlirf and A. Uchman 2005. Revision of the ichnogenus Sabellarifex Richter, 1921 and its relationship to Skolithos Haldeman, 1840 and Polykladichnus Fürsich, 1981. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 3: 115–131. Google Scholar

    48. K. Seike and M. Nara 2007. Occurrence of bioglyphs on Ocypode crab burrows in a modem sandy beach and its palaeonvironmental implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 252: 458–463. Google Scholar

    49. A. Seilacher 1990. Aberration in bivalve evolution related to photo- and chemosymbiosis. Historical Biology 3: 289–311. Google Scholar

    50. D.D. Swinbanks and J.L. Luternauer 1987. Burrow distribution of the thalassinidean shrimp on a Fraser delta tidal flat, British Columbia. Journal of Paleontology 61: 315–332. Google Scholar

    51. A. Uchman and P. Pervesler 2007. Trace fossil Dactyloidites peniculus associated with a marine flooding surface in Pliocene deposits of the Stirone Valley. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52: 799–808. Google Scholar

    52. S. Woodward 1830. A Synoptic Table of British Organic Remains. 50 pp. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green, London. Google Scholar

    53. R. Zariquiey Álvarez 1968. Crustáceos Decápodos Ibéricos. Investigatión Pesquera 32: 1–510. Google Scholar

    Peter Pervesler and Alfred Uchman "A New Y-Shaped Trace Fossil Attributed to Upogebiid Crustaceans from Early Pleistocene of Italy," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54(1), 135-142, (1 March 2009).
    Published: 1 March 2009
    8 PAGES

    Back to Top