Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2009 Middle Cambrian Gogiid Echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, Palaeoecology, and Palaeogeographic Implications
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. and Gogia sp. are described from two different echinoderm assemblages, both from the middle Cambrian of the Murero Formation (Iberian Chains, NE Spain). Gogia parsleyi is reconstructed and described on the basis of fifteen complete or partial specimens and numerous isolated plates. It is characterised by spiralled brachioles, simple epispires, sometimes covered by stereomic domes or tiny cover plates, and by thecal plates arranged in subregular circlets. This gogiid population comprises juveniles, advanced juveniles and mature individuals. The material was found in the upper part of the Murero Formation (upper Caesaraugustian—lower Languedocian). Gogia sp. is represented by two almost complete specimens and several isolated plates from the lower part of the Murero Formation (lower Caesaraugustian). The genus Gogia was first described in Western Gondwana from the Languedocian (upper middle Cambrian) of France, but the material from Spain is older and represents the oldest record of this genus in Gondwana, suggesting an early migration from Laurentia. The gogiids are well preserved in two echinoderm Lagerstätten, which, together with other echinoderms, comprise the majority of the fossil fauna. Both levels are derived from obrution deposits produced in calm and open marine conditions, sometimes affected by sporadic storms. Their holdfast morphology suggests that these gogiids were low-tier suspension feeders, living attached to trilobite fragments in a soft, muddy environment.

Introduction

Echinoderms are an important component of middle Cambrian fossil assemblages from North Western Perigondwana. Two problems restrict their study: (i) complete and articulated echinoderms are rare; and (ii) isolated plates have limited taxonomic value, usually only assignable to class level or above (Donovan and Paul 1982). Of the eleven echinoderm classes recorded worldwide from the Cambrian (Sprinkle 1976), one of the most common is the Eocrinoidea Jaekel, 1918. This Linnaean class is a paraphyletic group that comprises stem-group members of the better known blastozoan clades (Sprinkle 1973; Smith 1984; Paul 1988). Major anatomical innovations of the eocrinoids include the development of erect brachioles for feeding and a long multiplated stalk, and later, a columnal-bearing stem to elevate the theca above the sea floor (Sprinkle and Collins 2006).

Among eocrinoids, representatives of the family Eocrinidae Jaekel, 1918 are the most common, primarily from Laurentia (Sprinkle 1973). Only a few fossils from Gondwana are considered as eocrinids. These are from the lower Cambrian of Spain (Ubaghs and Vizcaíno 1991), Morocco (Nardin 2006) and China (Zhao et al. 2007), and from the middle Cambrian of Bohemia (Barrande 1887; Fatka and Kordule 1984, 1991), France (Ubaghs 1987) and China (Zhao et al. 1994, 2007, 2008; Parsley and Zhao 2006).

At present, only two complete and articulated eocrinoid taxa are known from the Cambrian of Spain, Alanisicystis andalusiae Ubaghs and Vizcaïno, 1991 (Fig. 1) and Ubaghsicystis segurae Gil-Cid and Domínguez, 2002. The first is from the lower Cambrian of the Ossa Morena zone (South Spain). It was originally included as a subgenus within the genus Gogia, but certain features (for example the stereomic domes covering complex epispires) suggest a taxonomic position independent of, but closely related to Gogia. The second, Ubaghsicystis segurae, comes from the middle Cambrian of the Cantabrian zone (North Spain). It is the oldest articulated eocrinoid, with a xenomorphic stem composed of holomeric columnals (Gil-Cid and Domínguez 2002); these features suggest a derived position amongst Cambrian eocrinoids. In addition to these complete eocrinoids, isolated plates belonging to the eocrinoid Rhopalocystis? mesonesensis Clausen, 2004 from the upper lower Cambrian of the Iberian Chains, the enigmatic blastozoan Eocystites sp. (Gil-Cid and Domínguez 1998) from the middle Cambrian of Ossa Morena zone (South Spain), indeterminate eocrinoid plates (Álvaro and Vennin 1997) from the middle Cambrian (Mansilla Formation, Iberian Chains) and columnals of uncertain affinity from the Furongian (Acón Group, Iberian Chains) (Zamora et al. in press), have also been described.

Fig. 1.

Holotype (MGM2005K) of gogiid echinoderm Alanisicystis andalusiae Ubaghs and Vizcaíno, 1991 from the lower Cambrian of the Ossa Morena zone (South Spain). Photograph of latex cast whitened with NH4Cl.

f01_253.eps

Echinoderms from the Murero Formation are extremely diverse, with a long and complete fossil record (Zamora et al. 2007), but few have been formally described so far (Friedrich 1993; Zamora and Rahman 2008). In this paper we report two new gogiid eocrinoids from the middle Cambrian Murero Formation. Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. and Gogia sp. are the first representatives of the group reported from the Iberian Chains. Gogia sp. is also the oldest representative of this genus in Western Gondwana and suggests taxa migrated to Gondwana from the Laurentian palaeocontinent.

These eocrinoids possess some plesiomorphic (primitive) characters, including an irregularly plated theca with larger primary and smaller secondary plates, epispires (suturai pores) for respiration, biserial brachioles and an expanded, probably short holdfast for attachment to hard substrates. The aims of this paper are twofold, firstly to describe new taxa from Spain, and secondly to analyse the geographic and stratigraphic distribution of gogiids. Some preliminary data on the palaeoecology of eocrinoids and other echinoderms from the Murero Formation is also discussed.

Institutional abbreviation.

  • MGM, Museo Geominero, Madrid, Spain;

  • MPZ, Museo de Paleontología, University of Zaragoza, Spain.

Geological setting and stratigraphy

The Murero Formation is exposed in several Cambrian localities (Fig. 2) in the Iberian Chains (NE Spain), all of which are rich in trilobites, echinoderms, brachiopods, and Burgess Shale-type fossils. Trace fossils are also present. Two large Palaeozoic outcrops trending NW-SE, separated by the Tertiary Calatayud-Teruel basin, constitute the central part of the Iberian Chains. In this region, Palaeozoic rocks are structured into three tectonostratigraphic units, the Mesones Unit, Herrera Unit and Badules Unit (Gozalo and Liñán 1988), and Cambrian rocks are common in all three.

The Cambrian stratigraphy of the Iberian Chains was established by Lotze (1929); the lithostratigraphic nomenclature has subsequently undergone minor modifications (Lotze 1958, 1961; Schmitz 1971; Liñán et al. 1992; Álvaro 1995). The units in this sequence (in ascending stratigraphic order) are: the Bámbola Formation, Embid Formation, Jalón Formation, Ribota Formation, Huérmeda Formation and Daroca Formation for the lower Cambrian; the Mesones Group (Valdemiedes, Mansilla and Murero formations) for the lower-middle Cambrian; and the Aeón Group for the middle Cambrian—Furongian. The palaeontological contents of each unit were summarised by Liñán et al. (1996, 2002) and Gozalo et al. (2008).

The fossils described herein came from two different localities, Murero and Purujosa villages; both are situated in the Badules unit, which is considered to be the prolongation of the West Asturian-Leonese Zone to the southeast (Fig. 2A). They are from two different beds in the Murero Formation. This formation represents a monofacial deposit of green lutites with interbedded carbonate nodules and very fine sandstones. The original sediments were deposited in a shallow marine environment (sublittoral facies, sensu Liñán 1995). The DyctioninaAcrothele brachiopod assemblage is well represented throughout the formation and indicates the predominance of low-energy deposits (Liñán and Mergl 2001).

The presence of agnostoid and polimeroid cosmopolitan trilobites suggests an outer sublittoral facies for the Murero Formation.

Locality 1.—Murero is a small village situated on the western branch of the Iberian Chains, located 80 km south of Zaragoza (Fig. 2B). The Cambrian rocks in this area show a lower and middle Cambrian sequence divided into Valdemiedes, Mansilla, and Murero formations in a normal succession dipping to the south (Liñán and Gozalo 1986). Eocrinoids were collected in the upper part of level 12 of Rambla de Valdemiedes 1 section, which represents the base of the Murero Formation (Fig. 3). This level is five metres thick, comprising green shales and carbonate nodules (see Liñán and Gozalo 1986, and García-Bellido et al. 2007), and containing trilobites, echinoderms, brachiopods, sponges, and ichnofossils. The presence of the trilobite Badulesia granieri (Thoral, 1935), indicates that the level belongs to the Badulesia granieri Zone (lower Caesaraugustian).

Fig. 2.

Geological setting of the two discussed localities in the Iberian Chains (after Liñán et al. 2008). A. Pre-Hercynian outcrops and tectono-stratigraphic zones of the Iberian Peninsula; the Iberian Chains are framed. Zones: CZ, Cantabrian; WALZ, West Asturian-Leonese; GCZ, Galician-Castilian; ELAZ, East Lusitanian-Alcudian; OMZ, Ossa-Morena Zone; SPZ, South Portuguese. B. Pre-Hercynian outcrops and tectono-stratigraphic zones and units of the Iberian Chains; Murero and Purujosa (indicated by stars) (Modified from Gozalo and Liñán 1988).

f02_253.eps

The eocrinoids from this locality were found in a thin level associated with the trilobites Eccaparadoxides asturianus (Sdzuy, 1968), Badulesia granieri (Thoral, 1935), Conocoryphe (Parabailiella) languedocensis Thoral, 1946 and Condylopyge sp. The presence of both agnostoid and polimeroid trilobites suggests open marine conditions; however, the sponge Leptomitus conicus is also present, which is typical of soft substrates in low or moderately low energy conditions (García-Bellido et al. 2007).

Locality 2.—Purujosa is located in the Moncayo Natural Park at the Tablado Range, 75 km west of Zaragoza in the north of the Iberian Chains (Fig. 2B). Eocrinoids were collected from the top of the Murero Formation in the Purujosa-4 section (Fig. 3); in the study area, this formation occurs as a 75 m sequence of shales, nodular carbonates and fine sandstones. Fossils were collected in a thin (35 cm) level of green-grey shale, rich in cinctans (Gyrocystis platessa Jaekel, 1918) and eocrinoideans. Trilobite fragments and trace fossils are also present, but so far only the trilobite Eccaparadoxides brachyrachys (Linnarsson, 1883) has been identified. The trilobite assemblage in the overlying level is composed of Eccaparadoxides? pradoanus (Verneuil and Barrande, 1860), Peronopsis acadica (Hart, 1868), Peronopsis ferox (Tullberg, 1880), Solenopleuropsis simula Sdzuy, 1958, S. marginata Sdzuy, 1958, S. thorali Sdzuy, 1958, Conocoryphe (Conocoryphe) heberti Munier-Chalmas and Bergeron, 1889, and Ctenocephalus aff. coronatus (Barrande, 1846); these taxa suggest a lower Languedocian age (middle Cambrian). Thus, the age of the echinoderm level containing eocrinoidean fossils is likely to be uppermost Caesaraugustian or lowermost Languedocian.

Fig. 3.

Sections of the middle Cambrian Murero Formation in Murero and Purujosa indicating the levels with Gogia sp. and Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. no v.

f03_253.eps

The oldest cinctan echinoderm is also reported from this section, in the underlying Mansilla Formation (Rahman and Zamora in press).

Systematic palaeontology
(by Samuel Zamora)

Phylum Echinodermata Bruguière, 1791 (ex Klein, 1734)
Subphylum Blastozoa Sprinkle, 1973
Class Eocrinoidea Jaekel, 1918
Order Gogiida Broadhead, 1982
Family Eocrinidae Jaekel, 1918
Genus Gogia Walcott, 1917

  • Type species: Gogia prolifica Walcott, 1917, lower Middle Cambrian, British Columbia (Canada).

  • Discussion.Gogia is the most abundant and diverse Cambrian eocrinoid (Sprinkle 1973). Thirteen species have been described in the lower and middle Cambrian of Laurentia; only one of these, Gogia ojenai Durham, 1973, is from the lower Cambrian (Robison 1965; Sprinkle 1973; Sprinkle and Collins 2006). There are, however, several new species from the lower Cambrian of Laurentia that still require formal description (Bryan C. Wilbur, personal communication 2005). Until now, the first convincing appearance of Gogia in Western Perigondwana was in the upper middle Cambrian of Montagne Noire (France), where Gogia gondi Ubaghs, 1987 is reported. The Spanish material described here suggests an older first occurrence of the genus Gogia in Gondwana, in the lower middle Cambrian.

    One point of discussion within the genus Gogia is the subgenus Alanisicystis Ubaghs and Vizcaíno, 1991, from the lower Cambrian of Southern Spain (Fig. 1). This subgenus is characterised by “single or partioned epispires provided with external dome-like stereomic cover”. There are no other Gogia species that show this peculiar type of epispire (complex and covered) (Sprinkle 1976; Ubaghs 1987). For this reason, we believe that Alanisicystis Ubaghs and Vizcaino, 1991 should be a separate genus rather than a subgenus of Gogia (note, type material of Alanisicystis andalusiae Ubaghs and Vizcaíno, 1991 previously deposited in Carcassone, France [Vizcaino collection numbers: VCE 11,13, 23, 24, 25, 26] is now deposited in the MGM. New collection numbers are MGM2003K 13, MGM2004K, MGM2005K, MGM2006K, MGM2007K).

  • Fig. 4.

    A–E. Eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. A. Paratype MPZ2006/556a, b; part (A1) and counterpart (A2) of a slightly disturbed small specimen attached to a free cheek of Eccaparadoxides sp. fragment. The arrow indicates where the holdfast attaches to the trilobite element. B. MPZ2006/559b; accumulation of disarticulated plates from eocrinoids (Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov.) and cinctans. C. Paratype MPZ2006/557a, b; nearly complete specimen with thecal plates slightly disturbed. D. Paratype MPZ2004/215; partial theca with ornamented plates and a very short holdfast (indicated by the arrow). E. Paratype MPZ2004/214; specimen with an almost complete theca. F, G. Gogia sp. F. MPZ2004/194a; partly complete specimen with a possible periproct on the lateral surface (see white arrow). G. MPZ2004/195a, b; partially disarticulated specimen (G1), counterpart of the same specimen (G2), detail of two adjoined plates with epispires (G3). Photographs of latex casts whitened with NH4Cl.

    f04_253.eps

    Fig. 5.

    Slab with two nearly complete, articulated and exquisitely preserved specimens of eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov., with some isolated plates belonging to cinctan carpoids. Both specimens probably represent an early mature stage (TH = 12 mm). The left specimen (holotype MPZ2004/162a) shows many of the diagnostic features referred to in the text. The right specimen (paratype MPZ2004/161a) shows the holdfast separated from the theca (indicated by an arrow). Photograph of latex cast whitened with NH4Cl.

    f05_253.eps

    Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov.
    Figs. 4A–F, 59.

  • Etymology: In honour of Prof. Ronald L. Parsley (Tulane University, New Orleans), for his contributions to the understanding of gogiid eocrinoids and Palaeozoic echinoderms in general.

  • Type material: Holotype: MPZ2004/162a, b, almost complete specimen without holdfast (Fig. 5). Paratypes: MPZ2004/161,163,214,215,238; MPZ2006/556-558,560; MPZ2008/160-164, complete or partial specimens.

  • Type locality: La Borraca Creek, four kilometers to the southwest of Purujosa village (Zaragoza, NE Spain) in the Moncayo Natural Park.

  • Type horizon: Murero Formation, uppermost Caesaraugustian or lowermost Languedocian, Middle Cambrian.

  • Diagnosis.—Eocrinid with globular-shaped theca and large, slightly convex thecal plates (slightly ornamented). Epispires are simple and numerous, with a well developed raised rim sometimes covered by a stereomic dome or by small plates. Thecal plates are arranged into six or seven subregular circlets. At least seven long, narrow biserial and spiralled brachioles. Almost no stalk, except for an expanded holdfast composed of tiny globular plates.

  • Material.—14 articulated and nearly complete specimens (ten with both part and counterpart), MPZ2004/161–163, 214, 215, 238; MPZ2006/556–558,560; MPZ2008/160–162,164. Two disarticulated specimens, MPZ2006/559 and MPZ2008/ 163, and 23 isolated plates (MPZ2004/216–237,239). All fossils are preserved as natural moulds in a grey-green shale. Articulated specimens with delicate, intact structures suggest rapid burial while alive by a storm-induced obrution deposit.

  • Description.—The shape of the theca is ellipsoidal to rounded; the size of the holotype theca is 12 × 11 mm (Fig. 5). All the recovered specimens have been flattened by collapse and/or compaction. There are 35 thecal plates per exposed side, which exhibit polygonal outlines and subregular arrangements in 6 or 7 circlets; a number of the plates are large (up to 3 mm) (see reconstruction, Fig. 6). There is no clear gradient in the size of the plates, but the larger ones are concentrated in the lower—middle portions of the theca; plates decrease in size aborally and especially adorally. Additional plates are intercalated along sutures, as shown by the juvenile specimen MPZ2006/556 (Fig. 4A). Plates are slightly domed on their external surface and are typically ornamented with tiny granules (Fig. 4D). On the internal surface, they are unornamented and slightly concave (Fig. 4B). Some stereomic structures are well preserved (Fig. 7).

    Suturai pores (epispires) occur over the entire theca, with a regular distribution and size (Figs. 5, 7B, C, 8A, B, 9C). Epispires are surrounded by a prominent raised rim (Figs. 6, 7C, 8E, F, 9C), which usually crosses the associated plate suture(s). Epispires are present on the sutures between two plates or at the corners between three plates (Fig. 8F); and they are sometimes more developed in one of the two adjacent plates. The pores show an almost uniform diameter. The number of epispires per plate ranges from 4 (MPZ2004/162a) to 17 (MPZ2004/217) and there are up to four epispires per plate side. Some epispires show an external dome-like stereomic cover (Figs. 6, 8E), others are covered by numerous tiny plates (Figs. 4E, 8F). The covered epispires are only present in the lower-middle theca and sometimes these structures do not cover the whole pore. These epispires are rounded to elliptical and have an epispire H/W ratio varying from 1 to 3.

    Brachioles are attached in groups of two to a modified single thecal plate, which is projected at the periphery of the oral region (Fig. 8C). They are spiralled with a quite loose twist (approximately 0.5 mm) (Fig. 8G) and are sometimes coiled at their tips (Figs. 5, 8D). The length of the brachioles is at least 25 mm, twice the length of the theca. Seven brachioles are preserved in the most complete specimens (MPZ2004/162a), there were probably more in living animals. Brachioles are biserial, with the alternating brachiolar plates numbering about three or four per millimetre (Figs. 8A, G, 9A). Cover plates are not well preserved; there are two on a brachiolar plate, with a spinous projection in lateral view. The preservation of the brachioles in the holotype suggests that they were flexible.

    The holdfast is preserved in some specimens, but no stalk is apparently present. In MPZ2004/161a (Fig. 5) the holdfast appears disarticulated, in specimens MPZ2004/215 (Fig. 4D) and MPZ2008/162 (Fig. 9A) it is apparently still connected to the base of the theca. It is composed of numerous tiny, globular plates, which are clearly visible in SEM images (Fig. 7A). The transition between the holdfast and theca is abrupt, consisting of a change in the type and size of plates.

  • Discussion.Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. conforms to the diagnosis proposed by Walcott 1917 (see also, Sprinkle 1973; Sprinkle and Collins 2006) for the genus Gogia. It has a unique character combination of simple covered epispires; large thecal plates arranged in subregular circlets; spiralled brachioles; and the absence of a stalk connecting the expanded holdfast with the theca.

    The general body structure of Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. (Fig. 6) shows many features that are shared with other gogiids, such as erect biserial brachioles, thecal plates arranged in poorly developed circlets, epispires and an attachment appendage consisting of only a holdfast.

    This species differs from other Cambrian gogiids in several characteristics; for example, thecal plates organised into subregular arranged circlets and the presence of covered epispires. One undescribed species of Gogia from North America also shows stereomic domes covering epispires (James Sprinkle, personal communication 2008). Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. is similar to Gogia hobbsi Sprinkle, 1973, particularly in the ornamentation of the thecal plates and the spiralled brachioles; however, Gogia hobbsi has a conical thecal shape, is smaller in size with fewer plates and has a stalk.

  • Gogia parsleyi is likely to be closely related to Alanisicystis Ubaghs and Vizcaíno, 1991, because both have stereomic cover domes on some epispires in the lower part of the theca, but it differs from this species by having simple epispires and plate ornamentation composed of a slightly rough surface texture. Moreover, in Gogia parsleyi some epispires are covered by tiny plates rather man domes, which are always observed in Alanisicystis (Fig. 1). This feature is equally well shown in Rhopalocystis destombesi Ubaghs, 1963, in which a group of small plates covers the suturai pores (Ubaghs 1963: fig. 8.5–7) and in Globoeocrinus globulus Zhao, Parsley, and Peng, 2008. A new gogiid from Morocco that is under description (Nardin 2006) shares many features with Gogia parsleyi, such as the presence of covered epispires, but they differ mainly in the type of epispires, which are simple in the Spanish material and complex in the Moroccan specimen (Elise Nardin, personal communication 2006).

  • Sinoeocrinus Zhao, Huang, and Gong, 2004 differs by lacking the stereomic domes or tiny plates covering epispires. Gogia parsleyi differs from Akadocrinus Prokop, 1962 in the stalk, which is nearly absent in the former and composed of many fusular rings in the later. Furthermore, they differ in general thecal shape.

  • Marjumicystis Ubaghs and Robison, 1985 also appears to lack a stalk, but differs principally in lacking well developed epispires.

    Parsley and Zhao (2006) provided a complete ontogenetic sequence for the Cambrian eocrinoid Sinoeocrinus lui Zhao, Huang, and Gong, 2004, describing, for the first time, the ontogenetic changes occurring in a gogiid population. These ontogenetic stages were described in terms of thecal height (TH) and were thus divided into juvenile, advanced juvenile, mature and advanced mature, or gerontic, stages. The material of Gogia parsleyi described in this paper is not very abundant, but a few different ontogenetic stages can be recognised; these stages are important to understand feature changes in specimens of different sizes. The TH of specimens ranges from 5 mm to 12 mm. The smallest specimens (Figs. 4A, 9A), with a TH of 6 mm and 5 mm, respectively, probably represent juveniles or early advanced juveniles (sensu Parsley and Zhao 2006). They have a 2–2 ambulacral pattern (Fig. 9A), lack of ornamentation and very small epispires without a raised rim. The specimen which is intermediate in size, with a TH of ca. 7.5 mm (Fig. 9B), shows intermediate features, lacking ornamentation and possessing an incipient raised rim bordering epispires, which are very small. It probably represents an advanced juvenile. The largest specimens have a TH of ca. 12 mm and show some very distinctive features. They possess more than five brachioles, probably in a 2-1-2 pattern, ornamented thecal plates and well developed, sometimes covered epispires with prominent raised rims. All these features are probably indicative of early mature specimens.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic distribution.—Upper part of Murero Formation, uppermost Caesaraugustian or lowermost Languedocian (middle Cambrian).

  • Fig. 6.

    Reconstruction of eocrinoidean blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. (by Santiago Alberto, after a sketch by SZ), based on the holotype MPZ2004/162a. The holdfast, not preserved in the holotype, is reconstructed based on paratypes MPZ2004/161 and MPZ2004/215.

    f06_253.eps

    Fig. 7.

    Details of element structures in eocrinoidean blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. (SEM photos of latex casts). A. Fragment of a holdfast from the specimen MPZ2004/161, consisting of an aggregate of globular plates (A1), details of specimen (A2, A3). B. Internal view of a plate showing suturai pores of epispires (MPZ2004/225); general view of an isolated plate (B1), detail of the epispire (B2). C. External surface of a plate (MPZ2004/232) (C1), details of the epispires showing the raised rim and stereomic structures (C2, C3). Arrows indicate enlarged details.

    f07_253.eps

    Fig. 8.

    Camera lucida drawings of eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. A. General view of the paratype MPZ2004/161, detached holdfast below. B. Thecal plate, half-epispires with their prominent rim indicated. C. Two brachioles on a single thecal plate. D. Biserial brachiole terminally enrolled. E. Epispire covered by a single domal plate. F. Epispire covered by tiny plates. G. Spiralled brachiole.

    f08_253.eps

    Fig. 9.

    Eocrinoid blastozoan Gogia parsleyi Zamora sp. nov. A. Paratype MPZ2008/162. Complete juvenile specimen (length of theca is about 5 mm); brachioles are spiralled and probably show a 2–2 pattern. B. Paratype MPZ2006/558a. Advanced juvenile specimen (length of theca is 11 mm). C. Paratype MPZ2008/164b. Fragment of theca with tessellated plates, epispires with characteristic rim. D. Paratype MPZ2008/161, upper part of theca. Photographs are of latex casts taken from natural moulds whitened with NH4Cl.

    f09_253.eps

    Gogia sp.
    Fig. 4F, G.

  • Material.—Two incomplete specimens partially articulated (MPZ2004/194,195) and several isolated plates that probably belong to a single disarticulated specimen (MPZ2004/196). All the material is preserved as natural moulds coated with limonite in green shale.

  • Description.—The most complete specimen (Fig. 4F) (MPZ2004/194) possesses a rounded, conical theca, with a narrow base and expanded adorai surface. The theca height/ width ratio is approximately 2; the number of plates is approximately 70 per exposed surface. Plates are irregular in shape and ornamented with small crests; they are irregularly arranged with the primary plates surrounded by many small secondary ones. Plates are thick compared to those of other gogiids. Epispires are rare and confined to larger plates. They are small and lack a raised rim (Fig. 4G3), with a height/width ratio of about 1.7. A rounded lateral opening is observed in one specimen, with a diameter of 0.65 mm (Fig. 4F), which corresponds (in position) to the anal pyramids of other gogiids.

    Brachioles are disarticulated in two of the specimens; as a result it is impossible to know their exact number and detailed morphology. They were probably quite low in number (4?), and fairly long and large. The brachiolar plates show a well developed food groove.

  • Discussion.—The general morphology of the theca, disposition of plates and the structure of epispires suggest that the material should be included in the genus Gogia.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic distribution.—Lower part of the Murero Formation, Badulesia granieri Zone, lower Caesaraugustian.

  • Fig. 10.

    Stratigraphic distribution of gogiids (indicated by stars) in the early and middle Cambrian. The biostratigraphy for the Czech Republic is based on Fatka (2006); the stages for the Mediterranean area are from Liñán et al. (2002) and Gozalo et al. (2008); the stages for South China are taken from Peng and Babcock (2001) and Peng (2003); the stages for USA and Canada (Laurentia) are from Sundberg and McCollum (2003) and Sundberg (2005). The Subdivision proposal of ISC for the Cambrian System is from Zhu et al. (2006).

    f10_253.eps

    Palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of gogiids

    Stratigraphic occurrence and palaeobiogeography.—The oldest known gogiids were reported from the early Cambrian of California, USA (see Sprinkle 1976), Ossa Morena, Spain (Ubaghs and Vizcaino 1991), Anti-Atlas, Morocco (Nardin 2006), and China (Zhao et al. 2007); all of these are approximately the same age (Fig. 10). The next oldest records also occur in the USA; there is a nearly continuous sequence of different Gogia species from the basal Delamaran to the middle Marjuman (stages from the North American chrono-stratigraphic scale, see Sprinkle 1976). This extensive record strongly suggests that North America was the area where Gogia first evolved, although it probably migrated, at least once, to northern Perigondwana (France, Ubaghs 1987; and Spain, herein).

    All other gogiids found in parts of Gondwana are middle Cambrian (Fig. 10), these generally occur as isolated records of single species in different levels. The earliest are Sinoeocrinus lui Zhao, Huang, and Gong, 1994 and Globoeocrinus globulus Zhao, Parsley, and Peng, 2008, from the base of the Taijiangan stage of China (Peng and Babckock 2001; Peng 2003). The next representative, in ascending stratigraphical order, is Gogia sp., from the lower Caesaraugustian of Spain (herein). Finally, the latest occurrences are known from four horizons in the Czech Republic (Fatka 2006), France (Ubaghs 1987), and Spain (herein); these horizons all have a similar age, uppermost Caesaraugustian to lowermost Languedocian (Fig. 10). The youngest gogiids from Europe and North America are similar in age.

    Fig. 11.

    Palaeogeographic distribution of gogiids in the early and middle Cambrian; reconstruction after McKerrow et al. (1992).

    f11_253.eps

    Gogiids are known from three distinct biogeographic areas: the Rocky Mountains (western North America), with the exclusive presence of the genus Gogia; northern Perigodwana (Europe and North Africa), where Gogia and another three genera have been found; and South China, where three additional genera are reported.

    The distribution of gogiids (Fig. 11) is apparently restricted to tropical and subtropical regions when we plot their occurrences on the Cambrian palaeogeographic reconstruction of McKerrow et al. (1992). This pattern has also been described for other groups, including trilobites, bradoriids, and demosponges, and could be interpreted as a climatic control on the geographic distribution of gogiids.

    Another suggestion is that two main lineages existed; one is the genus Gogia that evolved in the Rocky Mountains, which migrated to Europe during the middle Cambrian. The other lineage comprises genera of gogiids that are exclusively from Gondwana regions.

    Palaeoecology.—The gogiids from the Iberian Chains provide a good opportunity to document the palaeoecology of this group in the Perigondwanan margin during the middle Cambrian. Fossil echinoderms from the two studied beds are exquisitely preserved, with some examples of complete and articulated eocrinoids with the brachioles still attached, and the theca and holdfast intact; furthermore, cinctan carpoids are preserved with the delicate labrum in place and with complete steles. All these features of excellent preservation are associated with the same lithology type, suggesting that echinoderms were living together and killed, probably by obrution processes caused by storms. In all cases, abundant isolated echinoderm plates appear unabraded, perhaps indicating a time averaging process, compaction of the surrounding sediment or the action of infaunal animals. Further work is needed to explain the association of both articulated specimens and disarticulated plates. Similar modes of origin have been proposed for other Cambrian echinoderm assemblages (Sprinkle 1976; Bell and Sprinkle 1978; Ubaghs and Robison 1985; Ubaghs 1987; Friedrich 1993; Lin et al 2008).

    Locality 1, in the lower part of the Murero Formation (Badulesia granieri Zone), is a clay-shale containing a fossil assemblage made up of abundant echinoderms, sponges and trilobites. The echinoderms include the eocrinoid Gogia sp., the enigmatic blastozoan Eocystites sp., and a new cinctan carpoid.

    Locality 2 is located in the upper part of the Murero Formation (uppermost Caesaraugustian or lowermost Languedocian). The echinoderms are the eocrinoid Gogia parsleyi, the cinctan Gyrocystis platessa Jaekel, 1918 and isolated plates that probably belong to the stylophoran carpoid Ceratocystis?

    As has been suggested for other Cambrian echinoderm groups (Lefebvre 2007), dense assemblages of echinoderms seem relatively incompatible with a rich and diverse associated fauna. This is illustrated in the two assemblages described herein, where echinoderms are the major fossil group and trilobites show little diversity. Furthermore, the complete absence of phosphatic brachiopods and the scarcity of agnostoid trilobites, which are common in other levels of the Murero Formation, may imply relatively shallow water conditions for the two echinoderm assemblages.

    Different strategies of attachment have been proposed for primitive eocrinoids living on this poorly consolidated sediment (Sprinkle 1973; Parsley and Prokop 2004; Sprinkle and Wilbur 2005; Dornbos 2006). The most common hypothesis is attachment by bioglue to hard elements, such as brachiopods or trilobite carapace fragments. Gogiids from the middle Cambrian of China recently provided further information on attachment strategies. Based on a large collection, Lin et al. (2008) indicated that 73% of gogiids are preserved attached to skeletal substrates. One specimen of G. parsleyi appears to be fixed to a trilobite fragment (Fig. 4A), in this case a librigena of Eccaparadoxides sp.; the attachment structure of this specimen is composed of numerous tiny globular plates that make a holdfast.

    In summary, the eocrinoids described herein were one of the most important components of the soft-bottom communities that lived in the calm, shallow, open marine conditions associated with the Murero Formation. They coexisted with other echinoderms that make up the most important component of these fossil assemblages within eocrinoids. Other fossils associated with echinoderms include trilobites, sponges, and small shelly fossils, which are always a minor part of the community. This peculiarity has been observed in other Cambrian and lower Ordovician areas where echinoderms are the most important fossil group (Sprinkle 1973; Sprinkle 1976; Ubaghs and Robison 1985; Lefebvre 2007). The most common feature of the two echinoderm assemblages described herein is that eocrinoids commonly show low diversity, being represented by one taxon per bed. When other echinoderms appear, they show a distinct body plan that suggests a different ecological niche. “One-species-to-one-locality” (sensu Sprinkle 1976) is the most common situation among eocrinoids from the early-middle Cambrian of Laurentia (Sprinkle 1976; Ubaghs and Robison 1985), but the data reported in this paper (as well as previous works by Ubaghs [1987] and Ubaghs and Vizcaino [1991]) confirms this scenario also for Gondwana. Perhaps this comes from the apparent gregarious nature of the individuals in each species, which exclude other species from a single “garden” or colony (Sprinkle 1976). Finally, the association of different types of echinoderms in the same levels was probably controlled for the relatively similar ecological requirements (Lefebvre 2007).

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Ronald L. Parsley (Tulane University, New Orleans, USA) not only for accepting the dedication of the new species described herein, but also for reviewing this paper and making useful comments. We also thank Elise Nardin (University of Rennes, France) for sending latex casts of French specimens and comments on Moroccan eocrinoids, Daniel Vizcaíno (Carcassone, France) for his comments on the Cambrian stratigraphy of Montagne Noire (France) and Bryan C. Wilbur (University of Texas, Austin, USA) for interesting discussions about lower Cambrian eocrinoids from the western USA. We thank Isabel Pérez (Zaragoza University, Spain) for photographs and help us with Fig. 3. Imran Rahman (Imperial College, London, UK) and Sarah Shackleton (Zaragoza, Spain) reviewed the English grammar of this paper. Fernando Gracia and Jorge Esteve (Zaragoza University, Spain) provided field support. Two reviewers, James Sprinkle (University of Texas, Austin, USA) and Reimund Haude (University of Göttingen, Germany), made many useful suggestions for improvement. The research was partly supported by the Project BTE2006-12975 of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, and by the Grupo Consolidado E-17 and PM067/2006 of the Aragón Government. SZ holds a pre-doctoral research grant from the Departamento de Educación, Cultura y Deporte of the Aragón Government.

    References

    1.

    J.J. Älvaro 1995. Propuesta de una nueva unidad litoestratigráfica para el Cámbrico Medio-Superior de las Cadenas Ibéricas (NE Espana): El Grupo Acón. Boletín de la Real Sociedad Española de Historia Natural (Geología) 90: 95–106. Google Scholar

    2.

    J.J. Älvaro and E. Vennin 1997. Episodic Development of Cambrian Eocrinoid-Sponge Meadows in the Iberian Chains (NE Spain). Facies 37: 49–64. Google Scholar

    3.

    J. Barrande 1887. Système Silurien du centre de la Bohême. Vol. VII. Classe des échinodermes, ordre des Cystidées. 233 pp. Rivnac-Gerhard, Prague. Google Scholar

    4.

    B.M. Bell and J. Sprinkle 1978. Totiglobus, an unusual new edrioasteroid from the Middle Cambrian of Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 52: 243–266. Google Scholar

    5.

    S.K. Donovan and C.R.C. Paul 1982. Lower Cambrian echinoderm plates from Comley, Shropshire, England. Geological Magazine 119: 611–614. Google Scholar

    6.

    S.Q. Dornbos 2006. Evolutionary palaeoecology of early epifaunal echinoderms: Response to increasing bioturbation levels during the Cambrian radiation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 237: 225–239. Google Scholar

    7.

    O. Fatka 2006. Biostratigraphy of the Jince Formation (Middle Cambrian) in the Príbram-Jince Basin: Historical review. Acta Universitatis Carolinae — Geologica 47: 53–61. Google Scholar

    8.

    O. Fatka and V. Kordule 1984. Acanthocystites Barrande, 1887 (Eocrinoidea) from the Jince Formation (Middle Cambrian) of the Barrandian area. Věstník Ústředního ústavu geologického 59: 299–302. Google Scholar

    9.

    O. Fatka and V. Kordule 1991. Akadocrinus knizeki sp. nov., gogiid eocrinoid from Czechoslovakia (Echinodermata, Middle Cambrian). Vëstník Ústředního ústavu geologického 66: 239–243. Google Scholar

    10.

    W.P. Friedrich 1993. Systematik und Funktionsmorphologie mittelkambrischer Cincta (Carpoidea, Echinodermata). Beringeria 7: 1–190. Google Scholar

    11.

    D.C. García-Bellido , R. Gozalo , J.B. Chirivella Martorell , and E. Liñán 2007. The Demosponge genus Leptomitus and a new species from the Middle Cambrian of Spain. Palaeontology 50: 467–478. Google Scholar

    12.

    M.D. Gil Cid and P. Domínguez 1998. “Carpoidea” and Pelmatozoa from the Middle Cambrian of Zafra (SW Spain). In : R. Mooi and M. Telford (eds.), Echinoderms: San Francisco , 93–98. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar

    13.

    M.D. Gil Cid and P. Domínguez 2002. Ubaghsicystis segurae nov. gen. y sp., nuevo Eocrinoide (Echinodermata) del Cámbrico Medio del Norte de España. Coloquios de Paleontología 53: 21–32. Google Scholar

    14.

    R. Gozalo and E. Liñán 1988. Los materiales hercínicos de la Cordillera Ibérica en el contexto del Macizo Ibérico. Estudios geológicos 44: 399–404. Google Scholar

    15.

    R. Gozalo , E. Liñán , J.A. Gámez Vintaned , M.E. Dies Álvarez , J.B. Chirivella Martorell , S. Zamora , J. Esteve , and E. Mayoral 2008. The Cambrian of the Cadenas Ibéricas (NE Spain) and its trilobites. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero 9: 137–151. Google Scholar

    16.

    J.-P. Lin , W.I. Ausich , Y.L. Zhao , and J. Peng 2008. Taphonomy, palaeoecological implications, and colouration of Cambrian gogiid echinoderms from Guizhou Province, China. Geological Magazine 145: 17–36. Google Scholar

    17.

    B. Lefebvre 2007. Early Palaeozoic palaeobiogeography and palaeoecology of stylophoran echinoderms. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 245: 156–199. Google Scholar

    18.

    E. Liñán 1995. Una aproximación a los ecosistemas marinos cámbricos. In : J.A. Gámez-Vintanez and E. Liñán (eds.), La expansión de la vida en el Cámbrico , 27–48. Institución “Fernando el Catolico”, Zaragoza. Google Scholar

    19.

    E. Liñán and R. Gozalo 1986. Trilobites del Cámbrico Inferior y Medio de Murero (Cordillera Ibérica). Memorias del Museo Paleontológico de la Universidad de Zaragoza 2: 1–104. Google Scholar

    20.

    E. Liñán and M. Mergl 2001. Lower and Middle Cambrian brachiopods from the Iberian Chains and Sierra Morena (Spain). Revista Española de Paleontología 16: 317–337. Google Scholar

    21.

    E. Liñán , R. Gozalo , M.E. Dies Álvarez , J.A. Gámez Vintaned , E. Mayoral , J.B. Chirivella Martorell , J. Esteve , S. Zamora , A.Yu Zhuravlev , and J.A. Andrés 2008. Lower and Middle Cambrian trilobites of selected localities in Cadenas Ibéricas (NE Spain). Fourth International Trilobite Conference Trilo 08 Toledo, Spain, 2008. Post-Conference Field Trip. 52 pp. Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza. Google Scholar

    22.

    E. Liñán , R. Gozalo , J.A. Gámez , and J.J. Álvaro 1992. Las formaciones del Grupo Mesones (Cámbrico Inferior-Medio) en las Cadenas Ibéricas. III Congreso Geológico de España y VIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Geología, Salamanca, Actas 1: 517–523. Google Scholar

    23.

    E. Liñán , E. Villas , J.A. Gámez-Vintanez , J. Álvaro , R. Gozalo , T. Palacios , and K. Sdzuy 1996. Síntesis paleontológica del Cámbrico y Ordovícico del Sistema Ibérico (Cadenas Ibéricas y Cadenas Hespéricas). Revista Española de Palentología n° extraordinario: 21–32. Google Scholar

    24.

    E. Liñán , R. Gozalo , T. Palacios , J.A. Gámez Vinaned , J.M. Ugidos , and E. Mayoral 2002. Cambrian. In : W. Gibbons and T. Moreno (eds.), The Geology of Spain , 17–29. The Geological Society, London. Google Scholar

    25.

    F. Lotze 1929. Stratigraphie und Tektonik des Keltiberischen Grundgebirges (Spanien). Abhandlungen der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, Neue Folge 14 (2): 1–320. Google Scholar

    26.

    F. Lotze 1958. Zur Stratigraphie des spanischen Kambriums. Geologie 7: 727–750. Google Scholar

    27.

    F. Lotze 1961. Das Kambrium Spaniens. Teil I: Stratigraphie. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1961 (6): 1–216. Google Scholar

    28.

    W.S. McKerrow , C.R. Scotese , and M.D. Brasier 1992. Early Cambrian continental reconstructions. Journal of the Geological Society London 149: 599–606. Google Scholar

    29.

    E. Nardin 2006. A new species of Gogia from the Lower Cambrian of western Anti-Atlas (Morocco). In : B. Lefebvre , B. David , E. Nardin , and E. Poty (eds.), Journees G. Ubaghs, Programme and Abstracts , 49–50. Biogeosciences, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon. Google Scholar

    30.

    R.L. Parsley and R.J. Prokop 2004. Functional morphology and palaeoecology of some sessile Middle Cambrian echinoderms from Barrandian region of Bohemia. Bulletin of Geosciences 79: 147–156. Google Scholar

    31.

    R.L. Parsley and Y. Zhao 2006. Long-stalked eocrinoids in the basal Middle Cambrian Kaili Biota, Taijiang County, Guizhou Province, China. Journal of Paleontology 80: 1058–1071. Google Scholar

    32.

    C.R.C. Paul 1988. The phylogeny of the cystoids. In : C.R.C. Paul and A.B. Smith (eds.), Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology , 199–213. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

    33.

    S. Peng 2003. Chronostratigraphic Subdivision of the Cambrian of China. Geologica Acta 1: 135–144. Google Scholar

    34.

    S.C. Peng and L.E. Babcock 2001. Cambrian of the Hunan-Guizhou region, South China. In : S.C. Peng , L.E. Babcock , and M. Zhu (eds.), Cambrian System of South China. Palaeoworld 13: 3–51. Google Scholar

    35.

    I.A. Rahman and S. Zamora (in press). The oldest cinctan carpoid (stemgroup Echinodermata) and the evolution of the water vascular system. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.  Google Scholar

    36.

    R.A. Robison 1965. Middle Cambrian eocrinoids from western North America. Journal of Paleontology 39: 355–364. Google Scholar

    37.

    U. Schmitz 1971. Stratigraphie und Sedimentologie im Kambrium und Tremadoc der Westlichen Iberischen Ketten nördlich Ateca (Zaragoza), NE-Spanien. Münstersche Forschungen zur Geologie und Paläontologie 22: 1–123. Google Scholar

    38.

    A.B. Smith 1984. Classification of the Echinodermata. Palaeontology 27: 431–459. Google Scholar

    39.

    J. Sprinkle 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms. 283 pp. Museum of Comparative Zoology Special Publication, Harvard University, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    40.

    J. Sprinkle 1976. Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of Cambrian echinoderms from the Rocky Mountains. Brigham Young University Geology Studies 23: 61–74. Google Scholar

    41.

    J. Sprinkle and D. Collins 2006. New eocrinoids from the Burgess Shale, southern British Columbia, Canada, and the Spence Shale, northern Utah, USA. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 43: 303–322. Google Scholar

    42.

    J. Sprinkle and B.C. Wilbur 2005. Deconstructing helicoplacoids: reinterpreting the most enigmatic Cambrian echinoderms. Geological Journal 40: 281–293. Google Scholar

    43.

    F.A. Sundberg 2005. The Topazan Stage, a new Laurentian stage (Lincolnian series—“Middle” Cambrian). Journal of Paleontology 79: 63–71. Google Scholar

    44.

    F.A. Sundberg and L.B. McCollum 2003. Early and Mid Cambrian trilobites from the outer-shelf deposits of Nevada and California, USA. Palaeontology 46: 945–986. Google Scholar

    45.

    G. Ubaghs 1963. Rhopalocystis destombesi n. g., n. sp. Eocrinoïde de l'Ordovicien inférieur (Trémadocien supérieur) du Sud marocain. Notes et Mémoires du Service Géologique du Maroc 23 (172): 25–40. Google Scholar

    46.

    G. Ubaghs 1987. Echinodermes nouveaux du Cambrien moyen de la Montagne Noire (France). Annales de Paléontologie 73: 1–27. Google Scholar

    47.

    G. Ubaghs and R.A. Robison 1985. A new homoiostelean and a new eocrinoid from the Middle Cambrian of Utah. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions 115: 1–24. Google Scholar

    48.

    G. Ubaghs and D. Vizcaino 1991. A new eocrinoid from the Lower Cambrian of Spain. Palaeontology 33: 249–256. Google Scholar

    49.

    C.D. Walcott 1917. Cambrian geology and paleontology IV. Fauna of the Mount Whyte Formation. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 67 (3): 61–114. Google Scholar

    50.

    S. Zamora and I.A. Rahman 2008. Nuevos datos sobre el génera Sucocystis (Cincta, Echinodermata) en el Cámbrico medio de España: Implicaciones bioestratigráficas y filogenéticas. Revista Española de Paleontología 23: 301–313. Google Scholar

    51.

    S. Zamora , J.J. Álvaro , and D. Vizcaíno (in press). Pelmatozoan echinoderms from the Cambrian—Ordovician transition of the Iberian Chains, NE Spain: an early diversification of anchoring strategies. Swiss Journal of Geosciences.  Google Scholar

    52.

    S. Zamora , E. Liñán , P. Domínguez Alonso , R. Gozalo , and J.A. Gámez Vintaned 2007. A Middle Cambrian edrioasteroid from the Murero biota (NE Spain) with Australian affinities. Annales de Paléontologie 93: 249–260. Google Scholar

    53.

    Y-L. Zhao , Y-Z. Huang , and X-Y. Gong 1994. Echinoderm fossils of Kaili fauna from Taijiang, Guizhou. Acta Paleontologica Sinica 33: 317–325. Google Scholar

    54.

    Y-L. Zhao , R.L. Parsley , and J. Peng 2007. Early Cambrian echinoderms from Guizhou Province, South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 254: 317–327. Google Scholar

    55.

    Y-L. Zhao , R.L. Parsley , and J. Peng 2008. Basal Middle Cambrian short-stalked eocrinoids from the Kaili biota: Guizhou province, China. Journal of Paleontology 82: 415–422. Google Scholar

    56.

    M.-Y. Zhu , L.E. Babcock , and S.-C Peng 2006. Advances in Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology: Integrating correlation techniques, paleobiology, taphonomy and paleoenvironmental reconstruction. Palaeoworld 15: 217–222. Google Scholar
    Samuel Zamora, Rodolfo Gozalo, and Eladio Linñán "Middle Cambrian Gogiid Echinoderms from Northeast Spain: Taxonomy, Palaeoecology, and Palaeogeographic Implications," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54(2), 253-265, (1 June 2009). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0010
    Published: 1 June 2009
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    13 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top