Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2009 New Basal Synapsid Supports Laurasian Origin for Therapsids
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The distant evolutionary ancestry of mammals is documented by a rich therapsid fossil record. While sphenacodontid synapsids are considered the sister-group of therapsids, the place of origin of therapsids is an enigma, largely because of a long standing morphological and temporal gap (Olson's Gap) in their fossil record. We describe a new large predatory synapsid, Raranimus dashankouensis gen. et sp. nov., from the Middle Permian of Dashankou in China which has a unique combination of therapsid and sphenacodontid features. This specimen is of great significance as it is a basal therapsid which is the sister taxon to all other therapsids. The fact that it was found in association with Early Permian tetrapods (Anakamacops and Belebey) suggests that it is the oldest therapsid and provides the first evidence of therapsid-bearing rocks which cover Olson's Gap. It further supports that therapsids may have had a Laurasian rather than Gondwanan origin.

Introduction

A rich, nearly continuous 315 million year fossil record documents the evolutionary history of a diverse clade of synapsid amniotes that includes extant mammals and their stem-group, often called “mammal-like reptiles” (Rubidge and Sidor 2001; Kemp 2005). One of the major remaining problems in synapsid research is the presence of a morphological and temporal gap (so-called Olson's Gap) between the earliest therapsids and their supposed sphenacodontian-grade ancestors (Hopson 1991; Sidor and Hopson 1998; Kemp 2005). Even at their first appearance in the fossil record therapsids had already diversified into several distinct groups including small and large herbivores and predators (Chudinov 1983; Rubidge 1995).

The Middle Permian Dashankou fauna from Gansu Province, China is known to have produced a wide variety of basal tetrapod fossils (Battail 2000; Li 2001). Recently a remarkable new specimen, comprising the partial snout of a tetrapod, was discovered at the Dashankou locality and contributes to the diversity of this fauna. Although fragmentary, the fossil reveals a unique combination of therapsid and sphenacodontid features. This find helps us understand the morphological transition from sphenacodonts to therapsids and provides new insight into the long-standing debate on whether basal therapsids had a Laurasian or Gondwanan origin.

Institutional abbreviations.

  • BPI, Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research, Johannesburg, South Africa;

  • IGCAGS, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences;

  • IVPP, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China.

Geological setting

The Dashankou locality is located about 20 km southwest of Old Yumen City, 50 km west of Jiayuguan City, 2500 m above the sea level. It lies on the north side of the Qilian Mountains. This single locality produced all known tetrapods of the Dashankou Fauna. The Dashankou Fauna, including the taxon described in this paper, is from the Xidagou Formation. The Xidagou Formation is fluvial deposit which is characterized by a reddish medium to coarse sandstone containing pebbles, but the vertebrate fossils occur in a red mudstone in the upper part of the unit.

Material and methods

The skull, which is preserved in a red mudstone, was excavated in 1998. The specimen was prepared mechanically using an air-driven engraver fitted with a tungsten carbide stylus.

A phylogenetic analysis was performed with PAUP 4.0b10 (Swofford 2001). See Appendices 1, 2 for the list of characters, sources and data matrix.

Fig. 1.

Partial skull of the basal therapsid Raranimus dashankouensis gen. et sp. nov., IVPP V15424 (holotype) from Middle Permian Xidagou Formation, Dashankou, Xumen, Gansu, China, in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views. Photographs (A1, B1) and explanatory drawings (A2, B2). Abbreviations: c1–2, canine 1–2; ch, choana; en, external naris; i1–6, incisor 1–6; M, maxilla; N, nasal; p1–3, postcanine 1–3; Pf, prefrontal; P1, palatine; Pm, premaxilla; Pt, pterygoid; rc, replacement canine; ri, replacement incisor; Sm, septomaxilla; sp, small precanine maxillary tooth; V, vomer.

f01_393.eps

Systematic palaeontology

Therapsida Broom, 1905
Genus Raranimus nov.

  • Etymology: From Latin raro- (rare) and animus (soul, spirit).

  • Type species: Raranimus dashankouensis sp. nov.

  • Diagnosis.—As for the type species by monotypy.

  • Raranimus dashankouensis gen. et sp. nov.
    Figs. 1, 2.

  • Etymology: Specific name from Dashankou, the name of the fossil locality.

  • Holotype: IVPP V15424.

  • Type locality: Dashankou Locality, Yumen, Gansu Province, China.

  • Type horizon: Xidagou Formation, Middle Permian (Li et al. 2004).

  • Diagnosis.—A plesiomorphic therapsid characterised by: choana short, with the posterior margin lying at the level of the first pair of canines; long facial process of septomaxilla; presence of one precanine and two functional linguo-labially compressed canines on maxilla; six incisors.

  • Description.—The specimen consists of a well preserved though slightly laterally crushed, slender snout (length of 100 mm, height of 65 mm, width between canines 33 mm) with a marginal tooth series comprising incisors, precanines, canines and the roots of three postcanines (Figs. 1B, 2). Recurved and slender incisor teeth and the presence of serrations on the posterior edge of the second canine suggest that it belonged to a large predator with the complete skull probably exceeding 16 cm in length.

    A large oval external naris (Figs. 1A, 2) is positioned close to the anterior margin of the snout. The dorsal process of the premaxilla makes up most of the internarial bar, and terminates posteriorly beyond the posterior margins of the external nares where it is overlapped by the nasals. Paired nasals extend backwards from the posterodorsal margin of the external naris to meet the prefrontal posteriorly, and ventrally form a long sutural contact with the maxilla and septomaxilla. The latter bone comprises the floor of the external naris with its posterodorsal process wedged between the maxilla and the nasal and extending further posteriorly on the snout than the dorsal process of the premaxilla. While the posteriormost extent of the maxilla is not preserved, it contacts the nasal dorsally and the prefrontal posterodorsally. Anteriorly the vertical suture between the maxilla and the premaxilla descends from the front of the external naris to a point between the third and fourth incisor, and continues posteriorly along the ventral edge labial to the incisors before turning medially to reach the choana in front of the precanine. In lateral view the ventral margin of the maxilla turns sharply downwards forming a notch between the last incisor and canine. Bone sculpturing is present on the snout with small pits on the anterior surface of the premaxilla and radial striations converging on the concave area above the root of the canine on the maxilla, while longitudinal striations occur on the rest of the snout.

    In palatal view the premaxilla forms the anterior and most of the lateral margin of the choana up to the level of the precanine, while being anteroventrally overlain by the anterior process of the vomer as in dinocephalians. Long, thin and edentulous paired vomers form the medial border of the choana. Their ventral surface is flat with the anterior section being slightly ventrally convex and the lateral edges of the posterior interchoanal portion forming weak ridges. The choanae are short, extending from the level of the fourth incisor to that of the first canine, a character unknown in other therapsids. Only the anterior part of the left palatine is preserved. It underlies the maxilla, possibly contacts the vomer medially, and extends anteriorly to the level of the first postcanine. No palatine teeth are evident and only the anterior portions of the pterygoids are present.

    Six incisors were present on each premaxilla. Those with preserved crowns show them to be similar in size, recurved and unserrated, and therefore resembling the morphology of those of most theriodont therapsids (Fig. 1B). A diastema is present between the last incisor and the first canine on the left side and the last incisor and precanine on the right. Two recurved canines, ovoid in cross section, are present in each maxilla. The complete left second canine (c2 in Fig. 2B) is considered to be newly erupted as it only partially occupies its alveolus. No serrations are preserved on the first canine, but they do exist on the posterior ridge of the right second canine. A small replacement tooth, lingual to the left first canine indicates that the two canines are not simply replacements of one another, but functioned simultaneously. This makes Raranimus the only therapsid with two functional canines, a condition reminiscent of the caniniform teeth seen in the large predatory sphenacodontids (Romer and Price 1940; Reisz 1986). These canines, despite being doubled as in basal synapsids, have a more derived therapsid morphology in being quite slender and compressed linguo-labially, rather than having the massiveness seen in similarly sized sphenacodontids.

    A small precanine with fine serrations on its anterior ridge is present in the maxilla anterior to the right first canine (Fig. 1B) and is reminiscent of the small precanine teeth known in Dimetrodon (Romer and Price 1940) and Tetraceratops (Laurin and Reisz 1996). Roots of three postcanines are preserved in the left maxilla but the rest of this bone is missing. Judging by root diameter, the postcanines vary in size but are all much smaller than the canines.

  • Fig. 2.

    Partial skull of the basal therapsid Raranimus dashankouensis gen. et sp. nov., IVPP V15424 (holotype) from Middle Permian Xidagou Formation, Dashankou, Xumen, Gansu, China in right lateral (A) and left lateral (B) views.. Photographs (A1, B1) and explanatory drawings (A2, B2). Abbreviations: c1–2, canine 1–2; ch, choana; en, external naris; i1–6, incisor 1–6; M, maxilla; N, nasal; p1–3, postcanine 1–3; Pf, prefrontal; P1, palatine; Pm, premaxilla; Pt, pterygoid; rc, replacement canine; ri, replacement incisor; Sm, septomaxilla; sp, small precanine maxillary tooth; V, vomer.

    f02_393.eps

    Discussion

    To explore the phylogenetic position of Raranimus and to examine the effects of the new data upon current hypotheses of relationships amongst basal synapsids and therapsids, we built upon the data matrices from Sidor and Hopson (1998), Sidor and Rubidge (2006), and Rubidge et al. (2006). Therocephalians and cynodonts are excluded from this analysis because their position as advanced therapsids is confirmed in the primary analyses. Haptodus is used as the outgroup, and the alleged basalmost therapsid Tetraceratops is also included. Laurin and Reisz (1996) stated that the interpterygoid vacuity is closed posteriorly by an additional posteromedian flange of pterygoid. As we are unable to verify this we have coded character 41 as unknown. From all the characters used in analysis, Tetraceratops has only two derived states (Appendix 2) and our analysis supports that Tetraceratops is better considered as a sphenacodontid as suggested by Conrad and Sidor (2001). Our phylogenetic analysis shows Raranimus to be the most basal therapsid as it is closely allied to other well known therapsids (Fig. 3). Raranimus retains a number of plesiomorphic sphenacodontid characters (vomerine process of premaxilla absent, more than one functional canine, concave diastema with postero- ventrally sloping alveolar margin of the premaxilla, and nearly parallel-sided internarial portion of vomer) (Romer and Price 1940; Reisz 1986) which are unknown in any other therapsid. However, the presence of a greatly elongated dorsal process of the premaxilla, septomaxilla with a long facial process, maxilla which is increased in height so as to contact the prefrontal, and ventral surface of the vomer with lateral ridges and median trough distinguish Raranimus as a therapsid (Hopson and Barghusen 1986; Hopson 1991; Sidor and Hopson 1998). The very short choana which extends posteriorly only as far as the anterior margin of the canine, and six incisors are considered as autapomorphies.

    While Broom (1910) pointed out the similarities between “pelycosaurs” and therapsids, there has always been a morphological gap between the two groups (Kemp 2005, 2006). Pelycosaurian-grade synapsids are known predominantly from Carboniferous-Middle Permian rocks of North America, Europe and Asia, while therapsids are known predominantly from Middle Permian or younger rocks of South Africa and Russia, with little temporal overlap between them apart from some varanopid relicts in Russia and South Africa (Dilkes and Reisz 1996; Modesto et al. 2001; Botha-Brink and Modesto 2007), and caseids in Russia (Reisz 1986). Because the earliest Russian therapsid faunas are more primitive than those from the Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone of South Africa it was considered that therapsids had their origin in Russia (Laurasia) and arrived in southern Africa (Gondwana) by overland dispersal (Boonstra 1969). More recent discovery of a basal therapsid fauna from the underlying Eodicynodon Assemblage Zone of South Africa resulted in the opposite proposal of a Gondwanan origin for several therapsid clades (Rubidge 1995; Modesto and Rubidge 2000; Modesto and Rybczynski 2000; Abdala et al. 2008). Unfortunately, although the oldest and most basal therapsid faunas are known from Russia, South Africa and China (Battail 2000; Modesto and Rybczynski 2000; Li 2001; Kemp 2005), the current lack of reliable radiometric dates limits accurate age correlation of these geographically spaced faunas.

    Fig. 3.

    Phylogeny of Raranimus among basal therapsids. Tree (tree length = 169, consistency index = 0.54, retention index=0.75) is the strict consensus tree of four shortest trees resulting from our PAUP analysis (version 4.0b10, branch and bound search, with unordered multistate characters) of 71 cranial and dental characters. Numbers on tree indicate decay index of the respective clade. Shaded area indicates “Olson's Gap”. Abbreviations: Ca, Capitanian; Ch, Changhsingian; Ma, Million years; PEN, Pennsylvanian; Ro, Roadian; W, Wordian; Wu, Wuchiapingian.

    f03_393.eps

    Roadian tetrapod faunas from North America are very different from the oldest faunas from South Africa, Russia, and China with the major difference being the lack of therapsids in the North American faunas (Reisz and Laurin 2001; Lucas 2002, 2004, 2006). Tetraceratops from the Early Permian of Texas, has been considered the oldest therapsid (Laurin and Reisz 1996) but its therapsid identity has since been questioned (Sidor and Hopson 1998; Conrad and Sidor 2001) and our analysis shows it to be more basal than Raranimus (Fig. 3). Lack of a therapsid record in the early Roadian and their first appearance as an already diverse group at the Roadian-Wordian transition, suggests a gap (dubbed Olson's Gap) in the early therapsid fossil record (Lucas 2004; Ivakhnenko 2005), a crucial interval in which the initial evolution of this group must have occurred (Abdala et al. 2008).

    One of the great remaining unsolved problems in synapsid history is the sphenacodontid-therapsid transition and the early diversification of therapsids. It has been suggested that the origin and early diversification of the main therapsid lineages occurred either by a rapid process of apomorphy accumulation, or by gradual acquisition of apomorphies during an extended temporal interval of up to 35 Ma (Kemp 2006; Abdala et al. 2008). Choosing between these two scenarios is possible only if therapsid-bearing rocks from Olson's Gap are found. The presence of Raranimus at Dashankou, the basalmost Middle Permian therapsid known, in association with the dissorophoid Anakamacops, the bolosaurid Belebey (both families occur together only in the Early Permian) and the very primitive therapsids Biseridens, Stenocybus, and Sinophoneus (known only from China, Li et al. 1996; Cheng and Li 1997; Li and Cheng 1997; Li 2001), support the hypothesis of an early Roadian age for this locality, and helps to fill in Olson's Gap. In addition, the discovery of a new basal Laurasian therapsid which cannot be assigned to any major therapsid clade, suggests that the initial evolutionary radiation of therapsids occurred in Laurasia.

    Acknowledgements

    We acknowledge the assistance of Zhang Hong, Wang Zhao (IVPP) for preparation, Yang Minwang (IVPP) for illustration, Carl Mehling (American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA) for accessing Tetraceratops. Fernando Abdala (BPI), Tom Kemp (Oxford University, Oxford, UK), Michel Laurin (Université Paris 7, France), Sean Modesto (Cape Breton University, Sydney, Canada), Robert Reisz (University of Toronto, Canada), Adam Huttenlocker and Christian Sidor (University of Washington, Seattle, USA) are acknowledged for comments on early drafts. This study is supported by Knowledge Innovation Project of CAS (KZCX2-YW-BR-07), Ministry of Science and Technology of China (“973” project 2006CB806403) and the DST, NRF and PAST of South Africa.

    References

    1. F. Abdala , B.S. Rubidge , and J.A. van den Heever 2008. The oldest therocephalians (Therapsida,Eutheriodontia) and the early diversification of Therapsida. Palaeontology 51: 1011–1024. Google Scholar

    2. B. Battail 2000. A comparison of Late Permian Gondwanan and Laurasian amniote faunas. Journal of African Earth Sciences 31: 165–174. Google Scholar

    3. L.D. Boonstra 1936. The cranial morphology of some titanosuchid deinocephalians. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 72: 99–116. Google Scholar

    4. L.D. Boonstra 1969. The fauna of the the Tapinocephalus Zone (Beafort Beds of the Karoo). Annals of the South African Museum 56: 1–73. Google Scholar

    5. J. Botha-Brink and S.P. Modesto 2007. A mixed-age classed “pelycosaur” aggregation from South Africa: earliest evidence of parental care in amniotes? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 2829–2834. Google Scholar

    6. R. Broom 1910. A comparison of the Permian reptiles of North America with those of South Africa. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 28: 197–234. Google Scholar

    7. Z. Cheng and J. Li 1997. A new genus of primitive dinocephalian—the third report on Late Permian Dashankou lower tetrapod fauna [in Chinese with English summary]. Vertebrata Palasiatica 35: 35–43. Google Scholar

    8. P.K. Chudinov 1960. Upper Permian therapsids from the Ezhovo locality [in Russian]. Paleontologičeskij žurnal 1960: 81–94. Google Scholar

    9. P.K. Chudinov 1983. Early therapsids [in Russian]. Trudy Paleontologičeskogo Instituta AN SSSR 202: 1–230. Google Scholar

    10. J. Conrad and C.A. Sidor 2001. Re-evaluation of Tetraceratops insignis (Synapsida. Sphenacodontia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21: 42A. Google Scholar

    11. P.J. Currie 1977. A new haptodontine sphenacodont (Reptilia: Pelycosauria) from the Upper Pennsylvanian of North America. Journal of Paleontology 51: 927–942. Google Scholar

    12. D.W. Dilkes and R.R. Reisz 1996. First record of a basal synapsid (“mammal-like reptile”) in Gondwana. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences 263: 1165–1170. Google Scholar

    13. J.A. Hopson 1991. Systematics of the nonmammalian Synapsida and implications for patterns of evolution in Synapsida. In : H.-P. Schultze and L. Trueb (eds.), Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods: Controversy and Consensus , 635–693. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Google Scholar

    14. J.A. Hopson and H.R. Barghusen 1986. An analysis of therapsid relationships. In : N. Hotton III, P.D. MacLean , J.J. Roth , and E.C. Roth (eds.), The Ecology and Biology of Mammal-like Reptiles , 83–106. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington. Google Scholar

    15. M.F. Ivakhnenko 1999. Biarmosuches from the Ocher Faunal Assemblage of Eastern Europe. Paleontological Journal 33: 289–296. Google Scholar

    16. M.F. Ivakhnenko 2000. Estemmenosuchus and primitive theriodonts from the Late Permian. Paleontological Journal 34: 189–197. Google Scholar

    17. M.F. Ivakhnenko 2005. Comparative survey of Lower Permian tetrapod faunas of eastern Europe and South Africa. Paleontological Journal 39 (1): 66–71. Google Scholar

    18. T.S. Kemp 2005. The Origin and Evolution of Mammals. 331 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

    19. T.S. Kemp 2006. The origin and early radiation of the therapsid mammal-like reptiles: a palaeobiological hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19 (4): 1231–1247. Google Scholar

    20. M. Laurin 1993. Anatomy and relationships of Haptodus garnettensis, a Pennsylvanian synapsid. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13: 200–229. Google Scholar

    21. M. Laurin and R.R. Reisz 1996. The osteology and relationships of Tetraceratops insignis, the oldest known therapsid. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16: 95–102. Google Scholar

    22. J. Li 2001. The most primitive lower tetrapod fauna in China. Science in China (Series D) 44: 47–51. Google Scholar

    23. J. Li and Z. Cheng 1997. First discovery of eotitanosuchian (Therapsida, Synapsida) of China [in Chinese with English summary]. Vertebrata Palasiatica 35: 268–282. Google Scholar

    24. J. Li , B.S. Rubidge , and Z. Cheng 1996. A primitive anterosaurid dinocephalian from China—implications for the distribution of the earliest therapsid faunas. South African Journal of Science 92: 252–253. Google Scholar

    25. Y.a. Li , P. Li , D. Sun , and Z. Cheng 2004. Paleomagnetic Study of the Permian—Triassic in the Yumen Area, Gansu [in Chinese with English abstract]. Geological Review 50: 407–412. Google Scholar

    26. S.G. Lucas 2002. The reptile Macroleter: First vertebrate evidence for correlation of Upper Permian continental strata of North America and Russia: Discussion. Geological Society of America Bulletin 114: 1174–1175. Google Scholar

    27. S.G. Lucas 2004. A global hiatus in the Middle Permian tetrapod fossil record. Stratigraphy 1: 47–64. Google Scholar

    28. S.G. Lucas 2006. Global Permian tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology. In : S.G. Lucas , G. Cassinis , and J.W. Schneider (eds.), Non-Marine Permian Biostratigraphy and Biochronology , 65–93. Geological Society, London. Google Scholar

    29. S. Modesto and B. Rubidge 2000. A basal anomodont therapsid from the lower Beaufort Group, Upper Permian of South Africa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 515–521. Google Scholar

    30. S.P. Modesto and N. Rybczynski 2000. The amniote faunas of the Russian Permian: implications for Late Permian terrestrial vertebrate biogeography. In : M.J. Benton , M.A. Shishkin , D.M. Unwin , and E.N. Kurochkin (eds.), The Age of Dinosaurs in Russia and Mongolia , 17–34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    31. S. Modesto , C.A. Sidor , B.S. Rubidge , and J. Welman 2001. A second varanopseid skull from the Upper Permian of South Africa: Implications for late Permian “pelycosaur” evolution. Lethaia 34: 249–259. Google Scholar

    32. Y.A. Orlov 1958. Carnivorous dinocephalians from the fauna of Ishev (Titanosuchia) [in Russian]. Trudy Paleontologičeskogo Instituta AN SSSR 71: 1–114. Google Scholar

    33. R. Reisz 1986. Pelycosauria. 102 pp. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

    34. R.R. Reisz and M. Laurin 2001. The reptile Macroleter: First vertebrate evidence for correlation of Upper Permian continental strata of North America and Russia. Geological Society of America Bulletin 113: 1229–1233. Google Scholar

    35. A.S. Romer and L.I. Price 1940. Review of the Pelycosauria. Geological Society of America Special papers 28: 1–538. Google Scholar

    36. B.S. Rubidge 1995. Biostratigraphy of the Eodicynodon Assemblage Zone. South African Committee fot Stratigraphy, Biostratigraphic Series 1: 3–7. Google Scholar

    37. B.S. Rubidge and J.A. Hopson 1996. A primitive anomodont therapsid from the base of the Beaufort Group (Upper Permian) of South Africa. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 117: 115–139.} Google Scholar

    38. B.S. Rubidge and C.A. Sidor 2001. Evolutionary patterns among PermoTriassic therapsids. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 449–480. Google Scholar

    39. B.S. Rubidge and C.A. Sidor 2002. On the cranial morphology of the basal therapsids Burnetia and Proburnetia (Therapsida: Burnetiidae). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22: 257–267. Google Scholar

    40. B.S. Rubidge and J.A. van den Heever 1997. Morphology and systematic position of the dinocephalian Styracocephalus platyrhynchus. Lethaia 30: 157–168. Google Scholar

    41. B.S. Rubidge , C.A. Sidor , and S.P. Modesto 2006. A new burnetiamorph (Therapsida: Biarmosuchia) from the Middle Permian of South Africa. Journal of Paleontology 80: 740–749. Google Scholar

    42. N. Rybczynski 2000. Cranial anatomy and phylogenetic position of Suminia getmanovi, a basal anomodont (Amniota: Therapsida) from the Late Permian of Eastern Europe. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 130: 329–373. Google Scholar

    43. C.A. Sidor 2003. The naris and palate of Lycaenodon longiceps (Therapsida, Biarmosuchia), with comments on their early evolution in the Therapsida. Journal of Paleontology 11: 977–984. Google Scholar

    44. C.A. Sidor and J.A. Hopson 1998. Ghost Lineages and “Mammalness”: Assessing the Temporal Pattern of Character Acquisition in the Synapsida. Paleobiology 24: 254–273. Google Scholar

    45. C.A. Sidor and B.S. Rubidge 2006. Herpetoskylax hopsoni, a new Biarmosuchian (Therapsida: Biarmosuchia) from the Beaufort Group of South Africa. In : M.T. Carrano , R.W. Blob , T.J. Gaudin , and J.R. Wible (eds.), Amniote Paleobiology: Perspectives on the Evolution of Mammals, Birds, and Reptiles , 76–113. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

    46. C.A. Sidor and J. Welman 2003. A second specimen of Lemurosaurus pricei (Therapsida: Burnetiamorpha). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 23: 631–642. Google Scholar

    47. D. Sigogneau 1970. Révision systématique des Gorgonopsiens sud-africains. Cahiers de Paleontologie : 417. Google Scholar

    48. D. Sigogneau-Russell 1989. Theriodontia 1. Phthinosuchia, Biarmosuchia, Eotitanosuchia, Gorgonopsia. 127 pp. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

    49. D.L. Swofford 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10. , Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Appendix 1

    List of characters and character states used to construct the cladogram. The number preceding the character definition corresponds to that of the columns in the data matrix. Most of the characters are cited from SH: Sidor and Hopson (1998); SR: Sidor and Rubidge (2006); RSM: Rubidge et al. (2006). When an asterisk follows the citation, it denotes that the character definition has been modified or character state(s) has been added/deleted. Coding of characters is based on the coding of selected characters in original references, sources listed in the end of character list, and personal observation.

    1. Dorsal surface of snout: oblique convex (0), near straight and flat (1). (SH: 46*)

    2. Snout width/height ratio: height greater than width (0), height equal to width (1), height less than width (2). (SH: 45)

    3. External nares: terminal (0), retracted (1). (RSM: 4)

    4. Length of dorsal process of premaxillae: short (0), long, reaching to a level posterior to that of the upper canine (1). (SH: 1*;SR: 2; RSM: 2)

    5. Premaxilla alveolar margin shape: downturned (0), horizontal or slightly upturned (1), greatly upturned (2). (SH: 2*; SR: 3*; RSM: 3*)

    6. Antorbital region: long (0), short (1). (SR: 4)

    7. Septomaxilla: contained within external naris (0), escapes to have a short (1) or long facial exposure (2). (SH: 6; SR: 5*, 6*; RSM: 5)

    8. Maxilla contacts prefrontal: absent (0), present (1). (SH: 8; SR: 8; RSM: 7)

    9. Shape of dorsal surface of nasals: flat (0), with median boss (1). (SR: 9; RSM: 9*)

    10. Supraorbital margin: thin (0), moderately to greatly thickened (1). (SR: 12; RSM: 12)

    11. Orbit size smaller than that of the temporal fenestra: absent (0), present (1)

    12. Adductor musculature originates on lateral surface of postorbital: absent (0), present (1), on both postorbital and postfrontal (2). (SR: 13*, 17*; RSM: 13*)

    13. Postorbital bar: thin (A–P length less than one-third of height) (0), thickened such that A–P length is greater than 40% of its height (1). (RSM: 16)

    14. Length of posterior process of postorbital: stops above lateral temporal fenestra (0), descends onto posterior margin of lateral temporal fenestra (1). (RSM: 14)

    15. Boss above postorbital bar: absent (0), present (1). (RSM: 15)

    16. Postfrontal: without (0) or with (1) posterior extension along its medial contact with the frontal. (SR: 16; RSM: 18)

    17. Shape of dorsal surface of parietal surrounding parietal foramen: flat (0), low and diffuse swelling (1), forms well-defined chimney (2). (SH: 21*; SR: 18; RSM: 19)

    18. Temporal fenestra: small (0), expanded posterodorsally (1) so that adductor musculature origination on squamosal visible in dorsal view. (SH: 14*; SR: 19; RSM: 20)

    19. Intertemporal region: wider (0) or narrower (1) than interorbital region. (SH: 18*; SR: 20; RSM: 21)

    20. Ventral surface of zygomatic arch and suborbital bar: smooth (0), with bosses (1). (SR: 21, RSM: 22)

    21. Zygomatic arch elevated above margin of upper tooth row so as to fully expose quadrate and quadratojugal in lateral view: absent (0), present (1). (SR: 22)

    22. Anterior extension of anterior ramus of squamosal: stops under temporal fenestra (0), beyond the anterior margin of the temporal fenestra (1). (SR: 23*; RSM: 23*)

    23. Squamosal external auditory meatus groove: absent (0), present (1) (SH: 52*)

    24. Preparietal: absent (0), present (1). (SH: 48; SR: 24; RSM: 24*)

    25. Supratemporal: present (0), absent (1). (SH: 22; SR: 25; RSM: 25)

    26. Tabular: contacts paroccipital process of opisthotic (0), restricted dorsally (1). (SH: 54*; SR: 26*)

    27. The position of the posterior border of choana: close to the incisor (0), far behind the incisor (1)

    28. Length of vomerine process of premaxilla: short (0); long, extending posteriorly and forming part of the medial margin of the inner choana (1); absent in ventral view (2) so that vomer abuts body of premaxilla. (SH: 3*; SR: 1*; RSM: 1*)

    29. Vomer: paired (0), unpaired (1). (SH: 25*, 26*; SR: 27; RSM: 26)

    30. Vomer internarial part: nearly parallel-sided or slightly expanded backward (0), widest nearly middle (1), strongly constraining backwards (2). (SH: 23*)

    31. Interchoanal portion of vomer where it meets the postchoanal portion: broad (0), forms median ridge (1). (SH: 23*; RSM: 27)

    32. Vomer ventral surface: flat to convex (0), lateral ridges and median trough (1). (SH: 24*)

    33. Choanal and postchoanal portions of vomer: meet at similar level on palate (0), choanal portion is offset ventrally from postchoanal portion (1). (SR: 28)

    34. Lateral margin of the choana formed by the palatine: less than 1/3 (0), over 1/3 (1)

    35. Two palatines: separated by the vomer and pterygoid (0), join in midline (1)

    36. Palatine dentition: broadly distributed (0), restricted to small area (1), absent (2). (SH: 36*; SR: 29; RSM: 28*)

    37. Dentition on palatal ramus of pterygoid: present (0), absent (1). (SH: 37; SR: 33)

    38. Row of teeth on transverse flange of pterygoid: present (0), absent (1). (SR: 30*; RSM: 29)

    39. Position of transverse flange of pterygoid: under posterior half of orbit (0), under anterior half of orbit (1), preorbital (2). (SH: 73*; SR: 31; RSM: 30)

    40. Pterygoid: without (0) or with (1) shelf posterior to its transverse flange. (SR: 32; RSM: 31)

    41. Basicranial rami of pterygoids: broadly separated (0), narrowly separated with median trough formed (1), broadly contacting anterior to basicranium (2). (SR: 34; RSM: 32)

    42. Medial edge of pterygoid basicranial ramus forms parasagittal ridge on ventral surface: absent (0), present (1). (RSM: 33)

    43. Basipterygoid articulation located: high above primary palate (0), just dorsal to basicranial ramus of pterygoid (1), at level basicranial ramus (i.e., suture visible in ventral view) (2). (SR: 35)

    44. Ectopterygoid teeth: present (0), absent (1). (SH: 39; SR: 36; RSM: 34)

    45. Shape of postparietal: wider than tall (0), approximately square (1), or taller than wide (2). (SR: 37; RSM: 35)

    46. Forward rotation of occiput: none (0), moderate (= vertical) (1), pronounced (2). (SH: 42; SR: 38; RSM: 36)

    47. Paroccipital process orientation: strongly posteroventral and lateral (0), moderately posteroventral and lateral (1), transverse (2) (SH: 65)

    48. Quadrate contact: primarily paroccipital process (0), about equal paroccipital process and squamosal (1), mostly squamosal (2) (SH: 58*)

    49. Stapedial foramen: present (0), absent (1). (SH: 76; SR: 39; RSM: 37) [this foramen is present in Scylacops, and coded as 0 for all taxa of Gorgonopsia here]

    50. Dentary height in canine versus anterior postcanine regions: nearly equivalent (0), shows pronounced difference (1). (SH: 79*; SR: 40; RSM: 38)

    51. Dentary: coronoid eminence (0), coronoid process (1) (SH: 80)

    52. Dentary-angular suture: runs diagonally across lateral surface of mandible (0), posterior margin of dentary deeply incised (1). (SR: 41; RSM: 39)

    53. Coronoid (posterior): present (0), absent or greatly reduced (1). (SH: 91*; SR: 47)

    54. Lateral mandibular fenestra: absent (0), present (1). (SH: 93, 94*; SR: 46)

    55. Angular reflected lamina dorsal notch: near articular (0), midway between articular and dentary (1), close to dentary (2) (SH: 97)

    56. Angular with pattern of ridges and fossae on its lateral surface: absent (0), present (1). (SH: 98*; SR: 42; RSM: 40)

    57. Dorsal edge of surangular just posterior to dentary with laterally projecting ridge: absent (0), or present (1). (SR: 43; RSM: 41)

    58. Foramen between prearticular and angular (sometimes bordered by splenial as well) on medial surface of lower jaw: absent (0), present (1). (SR: 44; RSM: 42)

    59. Articular dorsal process: absent (0), present (1). (SR: 45; RSM: 43)

    60. Differentiation of upper tooth row: more than one caniniform teeth (0), one canine (1), barely differentiated (1). (SR: 48*)

    61. Premaxillary teeth number: 5 (0), 4 or less (1), 6 (2)

    62. Upper and lower incisors intermesh: absent (0), present in anterior incisors (1), present in all incisors (2). (SH: 105*;SR: 49; RSM: 44)

    63. Incisor heels: absent (0), present (1) (SH: 106)

    64. Upper incisors: much larger (0) or roughly equivalent in size to postcanines (1). (SR: 50; RSM: 46)

    65. Precanine maxillary teeth: present (0), absent (1) (SH: 110)

    66. Lower canine: fits into choana (0), or into fossa roofed by premaxilla and maxilla (1), or passes anterior and external to upper canine (2). (SR: 51; RSM: 47)

    67. Upper and lower canines: without heels (0) or small heels present (1). (SR: 52; RSM: 45)

    68. Postcanine diastema on upper jaw: absent (0), present (1)

    69. Number of upper postcanines: twelve or greater (0), fewer than 12(1). (SH: 112; SR: 53; RSM: 48)

    70. Postcanine teeth with triangular crown bearing coarse serrations along both anterior and posterior carinae: absent (0), present (1). (SH: 113*; SR: 56; RSM: 51)

    71. Upper postcanine teeth confluent with upper incisor row medial to canine: absent (0), present (1). (SR: 55; RSM: 50)

    Taxa included and the coding basis:

    Appendix 2

    Character matrix used to analyze the phylogenetic position of Raranimus

    tA01_393.gif
    Jun Liu, Bruce Rubidge, and Jinling Li "New Basal Synapsid Supports Laurasian Origin for Therapsids," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 54(3), (1 September 2009). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2008.0071
    Received: 18 November 2008; Accepted: 1 May 2009; Published: 1 September 2009
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    8 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top