Translator Disclaimer
23 October 2009 Late Palaeozoic Foliage from China Displays Affinities to Cycadales Rather than to Bennettitales Necessitating a Re-Evaluation of the Palaeozoic Pterophyllum Species
Christian Pott, Stephen McLoughlin, Anna Lindström
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The epidermal anatomy of Pseudoctenis samchokense is described revealing non-bennettitalean characters of these leaves from the Permo-Carboniferous of China (and Korea). The specimens were originally described as Pterophyllum samchokense suggesting a bennettitalean affinity. They can no longer be considered bennettitalean since their cuticles lack the distinctive brachyparacytic stomata of that clade. Pterophyllum was originally erected as a morphogenus for segmented leaves from the Mesozoic and has subsequently been clearly assigned to the Bennettitales. The segmented leaves from the Permo-Carboniferous of Shanxi and Hebei, China described herein require a new ordinal and generic assignment since the non-bennettitalean cuticular characters documented reinforce the uncertainties in attribution of any foliage older than Late Triassic to the Bennettitales. Based on leaf-architecture and epidermal anatomical characters, the specimens are at best assigned to the cycadalean genus Pseudoctenis. This genus was formerly known only from Mesozoic rocks. Consequently, the specimens are highly significant, as they are among the oldest known vegetative remains of cycads. Re-evaluation of the affinities of all specimens assigned to Pterophyllum from Palaeozoic rocks is thus essential. Based on a review of other Permian—Carboniferous fossil leaves assigned to Pterophyllum, we conclude that none yet reveals definitive bennettitalean characters.

Introduction

The earliest persuasive records of bennettitaleans come from the Late Triassic (Leuthardt 1903; Kräusel and Schaarschmidt 1966; Anderson and Anderson 1989, 2003; Pott et al. 2007c, d). Examples from the Molteno Formation in South Africa are considered to be early to middle Carnian (Anderson and Anderson 2003), whereas those from Lunz, Austria, and Neuewelt, Switzerland, are slightly younger (late Carnian; Cleal 1993; Taylor et al. 2009). Bennettitaleans were widespread and abundant in the Late Triassic-Middle Jurassic, remained locally common in the Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous, and apparently became extinct in the Late Cretaceous (Mägdefrau 1968; Willis and McElwain 2002). Bennettitaleans reported from older deposits (i.e., pre-Carnian assemblages) need to be considered with caution, since most of those species lack studied or preserved cuticles. The accommodation of species such as Pterophyllum cultelliforme Sze, 1936, Pt. cottaeanum Gutbier, 1835, Pt. blechnoides Sandberger, 1864, Pt. daihoense Kawasaki, 1934, Pt. pruvostii Stockmans and Mathieu, 1939, Pt. fayolii Renault and Zeiller, 1890, Pt. grandeuryi Saporta and Marion, 1885 (taxa names in caption of fig. 58 on p. 109 erroneously swapped) or Pt. eratum Gu and Zhi, 1974 from the Pennsylvanian and Permian of China, Korea, Germany and France in the genus Pterophyllum and thus, in the Bennettitales, remains equivocal.

Although the oldest compelling cycad foliage fossils (i.e., Pseudoctenis) in the Northern Hemisphere derive from the late Carnian (Pott et al. 2007b), the earliest evidence for this genus in the Southern Hemisphere is from the early Carnian (e.g., from the Molteno Formation, cf. Anderson and Anderson 1989). Reports of Pseudoctenis from other early Late Triassic floras (e.g., from the Santa Juan Formation, cf. Leppe and Moisan 2003; Nielsen 2005) are questionable because the macromorphology of the fossils closely corresponds to that of certain Pterophyllum species rather than to Pseudoctenis, and data on the epidermal anatomy are missing. The earliest unequivocal reproductive organs of the true cycads come from the Permian of China (i.e., Primocycas chinensis Zhu and Du, 1981; but compare Norinia cucullata Halle, 1927) and cycad-like foliage was reported from closely related deposits. Gao and Thomas (1989) assumed that foliage assigned to Yuania might be linked to Primocycas megasporophylls due to their occurrence in equivalent beds but since Yuania is now considered to be a noeggerathian, a search for other foliage belonging to the Primocycas plant is needed.

Fig. 1.

Map of NE China and Korea showing the localities from which Pseudoctenis samchokense fossils have been collected (grey symbols) and the locality from which Primocycas chinensis fossils have been described (black symbol).

f01_157.eps

Many cycadalean and bennettitalean leaves are macromorphologically similar, and can usually be distinguished only on epidermal anatomy following the pioneering work of Thomas and Bancroft (1913). Stomatal morphology is especially significant in the discrimination of the two foliage types (Florin 1933; Martens 1971). Bennettitalean leaves are characterised by syndetocheilic stomata, whereas cycadalean leaves possess haplocheilic stomata. These terms were introduced by Florin (1933), and refer to the development (cellular division) and the resulting morphotype of the stomatal apparatus. However, today the term “brachyparacytic” is the preferred term for bennettitalean stomatal architecture (Martens 1971; Crane 1988; LAWG 1999), rather than the ontogenetic term “syndetocheilic” (Thomas and Bancroft 1913; Florin 1933). Within the gymnosperms, the stomatal type of the Bennettitales is regarded as an autapomorphy with the exception of its occurrence (probably via homoplasy) in two enigmatic groups (i.e., the Welwitschiaceae and the Gnetaceae).

Since the record of possible Pterophyllum species (and other potential bennettitaleans) from Permian and Carboniferous deposits, mainly from south-eastern and eastern Asia, has increased in recent decades (up to 20 species known to us; see references below), critical evaluation of the morphology and relationships of these fossils is necessary. Here, we describe fossils from the Permo-Carboniferous of China held in the collections of the NRM that were originally assigned to the Bennettitales but yield cuticles with non-bennettitalean stomata. Although the cuticles are very brittle and poorly preserved, they provide useful information to clearly separate these leaves from the bennettitaleans, thus calling into question the identifications of other reported Palaeozoic Pterophyllum species.

Institutional abbreviations.

  • NRM, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden;

  • specimen numbers are preceded by the letter S (i.e., S141652).

Material and methods

The twenty-six studied specimens (specimen numbers given below) housed in the NRM were collected almost 90 years ago at three localities in northern China (Fig. 1). The specimen from Linxi (also spelt Linsi or Linshi), Tangshan area, Hebei, was collected in 1920 by Yao. Eight specimens from Yangjialiang (also spelt Yang-chia-liang), approximately 45 km to the south and 1.5 km to the west of Baode in the valley of Paloukou, north-western Shanxi, were collected in 1921 by T.C. Wang. Seventeen specimens from Damugou (also spelt Ta-mu-kou) near Hua-pi-chuang, Gaoping district, southeastern Shanxi, were obtained by an anonymous collector (accessioned in 1929).

Hand specimens were photographed with a high-resolution Nikon D80 digital camera using polarised light to increase contrast (Schaarschmidt 1973; Crabb 2001). The use of polarised light and high resolution imaging revealed several details (venation, raised surface structures) that are indiscernible to the naked eye. To make the cuticular features visible before destroying the specimens for cuticular analysis, a Leica Diaplan epifluorescence microscope was used. Cuticles were prepared according to procedures outlined by Kerp (1990) and Kerp and Krings (1999). Rock samples with plant remains were dissolved in hydrofluoric acid (40% HF) in order to remove the sediment. Cuticles were macerated according to the standard procedure using Schulze's reagent (35% HNO3 with a few crystals of KC1O3) and 5–10% potassium hydroxide (KOH). Macerated cuticles were washed in distilled water, gently dehydrated in pure glycerine, and finally mounted in permanent glycerine-jelly microscope slides.

Geological setting

Shallow marine and continental coal-bearing strata were deposited extensively across the North China Platform through the Pennsylvanian and Permian. These deposits can be broadly subdivided on lithological criteria into several formations, each unit being generally greater than 100 m in thickness, as summarised by Yang (1986a, b). These formations can be correlated between several basins and structural outliers across northern China on the basis of their macrofloral, palynofloral and invertebrate fossil content (Shen 1995; Wu 1995; Shen et al. 2006; Liu et al. 2008). However, precise stratigraphic placement of assemblages from historical collections, such as the material described herein, remains difficult where precise locality details are lacking and where local mapping of lithostratigraphic units is inadequate. Given these limitations, we tentatively ascribe stratigraphic positions and ages for the studied material on the basis of associated macrofossils as outlined below. All studied assemblages derive from the North China-Cathaysian palaeofloristic subprovince of Li and Wu (1996).

Linxi (Tangshan area).—Fossiliferous coal-bearing strata of the Linxi area, Hebei, were assigned to the Kaiping Series/ Formation by Stockmans and Mathieu (1939) and are considered to be broadly correlative with the Taiyuan Formation (Wu 1995). Most of the fossils from this site in the NRM collections provide poor age constraints being only identifiable to generic level (e.g., Neuropteris, Annularia, Sphenophyllum, Cordaites, Pecopteris, and Samaropsis spp.). However, the absence of typical Permian taxa (e.g., Taeniopteris, Callipteridium, Emplecopteridium or Emplecopteris) favours a Pennsylvanian (Stephanian or Gzhelian) age for this assemblage, and correlation with the lower part of the Taiyuan Formation (Wu 1995).

Yangjialiang (south of Baode).—This site is located in exposures of late Palaeozoic strata on the northeastern margin of the Ordos Basin. The coal-rich strata of the Shanxi Formation (palynologically dated as Artinskian-Kungurian; Liu et al. 2008) are the most likely source of the fossils from this site based on the presence of taxa such as Taeniopteris, Protoblechnum, and Neuropteris spp. and the absence of Lobatannularia, Gigantonoclea, and Gigantopteris, which mostly characterize Upper Permian strata in this region (Shen 1995).

Damugou (Gaoping area).—This site is near the margin of the Quinshi-Linfen Basin, in which the main coal-bearing units are the Taiyuan and Shanxi formations (Shao et al. 2007). The fossil assemblage includes Alethopteris ascendens, Sphenophyllum thonii, Pecopteris orientalis, Emplecopteridium alatum, Odontopteris subcrenulata, and Aphlebia sp. On the basis of the stratigraphiC ranges of taxa outlined by Shen (1995) and the absence of Lobatannularia and gigantopterids, the assemblage most likely derives from the Shanxi Formation (Artinskian-Kungurian). However, a younger age (from the Guadalupian Lower Shihezi Formation) can not be excluded.

Systematic palaeobotany

Class Cycadopsida Brongniart, 1843
Order Cycadales Dumortier, 1829
Family unknown
Genus Pseudoctenis Seward, 1911 emend. Harris, 1964

  • Type species: Zamites eathiensis Richards, 1884; from the Jurassic of Scotland.

  • Remarks.—The cycadalean foliage genus Pseudoctenis is a common element of several Mesozoic (Rhaetian-Jurassic) floras in Europe (Seward 1911, 1917; Harris 1932, 1950, 1964; Pott et al. 2007b). Seward (1911) introduced the genus for Zamites-type leaves from the Jurassic of Sutherland, Great Britain. Although Ctenis and Pseudoctenis are similar in macromorphology, Seward (1911) noted that they are easily distinguishable based on the occurrence of anastomoses in the venation of Ctenis, an interpretation with which Harris (1950) concurred. Nevertheless, historically, Pseudoctenis has often been used in an arbitrary manner because no valid generic diagnosis existed. Furthermore, numerous foliage specimens have been accommodated in genera such as Pterophyllum, Ctenophyllum, and Zamites over many years, although they better matched the characters of Pseudoctenis. This changed when Harris (1932) described the epidermal features of several Pseudoctenis species from the Rhaetian of Greenland. The epidermal anatomy established the cycadalean affinities of Pseudoctenis based on the presence of cyclocytic (“haplocheilic”) stomata. Harris (1932, 1964) provided a diagnosis for Pseudoctenis that included both macromorphological and epidermal characters. The earliest confirmed representatives of the genus occur in the Carnian of Lunz, Austria (Pott et al. 2007b).

  • Fig. 2.

    Leaves of cycadalean Pseudoctenis samchokense (Kawasaki, 1934) from Damugou, Gaoping, Shanxi, China. A. NRM S143500-02. B. NRM S143504. C. NRM S143503a. D. NRM S143505. E. NRM S143510. Scale bars 10 mm; arrows indicating prominent petiole and rachis.

    f02_157.eps

    Pseudoctenis samchokense (Kawasaki, 1934) nov. comb.
    Figs. 24.

  • 1931 Pterophyllum samchokense nom. nud.; Kawasaki 1931: pl. 86: 260.

  • 1934 Pterophyllum samchokense sp. nov.; Kawasaki 1934: 197, no illustration.

  • 1939 Pterophyllum pruvostii sp. nov.; Stockmans and Mathieu 1939: 93, pl. 21: 2, 2a, 3.

  • 1974 Pterophyllum pruvostii Stockmans and Mathieu, 1939; Gu and Zhi 1974: 144, pl. 114: 1, 2.

  • 2006 Pterophyllum pruvostii Stockmans and Mathieu, 1939; Sun 2006: 385, no illustration.

  • Basionym: Pterophyllum samchokense Kawasaki, 1934.

  • Type material: Holotype: specimen figured by Kawasaki (1931) on pl. 86: 260 (repository and accession number not recorded). Epitypes: specimens NRM S141652 and NRM S141653 (Fig. 3C, 3F).

  • Type locality: Sanchoku (Samchok) district, South Korea (Chosen).

  • Type horizon: Jido Series, Heian Group.

  • Remarks.—The species was originally established on a single specimen and compared to Pterophyllum daihoense by Kawasaki (1934). However, another comment by the author in the same paragraph, later supported by Sze (1936), illustrates that these taxa can not be regarded as conspecific because Pt. daihoense includes leaves with laminae that are partly not divided into segments, especially in the distal portion of the leaf. Specimen NRM S141652 is chosen as an epitype, because it provided the cuticular details on which the new combination of the species is based.

  • Material/repository.—26 specimens from the palaeobotanical collections in the NRM. From Yangjialiang: S141640, S141648, S141650–S141655; from Damugou: S143500-02, S143501, S143502, S143503a, S143503b, S143504, S143505, S143506-01, S143506-02, S143507, S143508-01, S143509, S143510, S143511-01, S143511-02, S143512, S143513-01; from Linxi: S146368.

  • Emended diagnosis.—Frond pinnate, rachis roughly striate, leaflets attached laterally and almost perpendicularly to the rachis, distinctly separated, never confluent, slender and unequal in width, gradually narrowing into the bluntly pointed apices, slightly narrowing near the base and a little dilated at the attachment to the rachis, basipetal margin slightly decurrent; veins forked at the base and commonly just distal to the base; the marginal veins arching parallel to the margins of the leaflets and the middle ones being straight; leaves hypostomatic, epidermal cells isodiametric polygonal to broadly elongate, cell walls straight, stomata surrounded by 5–7 subsidiary cells (emended after Kawasaki 1934).

  • Description.—Leaves are petiolate, impari-segmented, regular, oblong to broadly oval in outline (Fig. 2A–C), obtusely rounded at apex, up to 24 cm long and 22 cm wide (incomplete leaves). The petiole is prominent, but incomplete on all specimens (Fig. 2B; arrow). Besides these large leaves, some very small leaves occur (Fig. 3D) that reach only 5 cm long but display identical leaf architecture apart from narrower rachides. The lamina is subdivided into numerous long and narrow, parallel-sided to ensiform leaflets, which are oppositely to sub-oppositely positioned (Fig. 2A–E). The length of the individual leaflets varies depending on the position in the leaf; leaflets are up to 92 mm long and 5–11 mm wide. Leaflet length seems to increase slightly toward the middle of the leaf, and then gradually decrease toward the leaf tip (Fig. 2C). The leaflets are only slightly constricted basally; the basipetal margin is slightly decurrent (Fig. 3B; arrows). Leaflet apices are obtusely to acutely rounded (Fig. 3E). The distance between the individual leaflets is regular within a single leaf but may vary between leaves of this species.

    The leaflets are inserted laterally on the prominent and longitudinally striate rachis (Fig. 3B, E, F). The distal leaflets are arched towards the apex and form a rounded leaf apex (Figs. 2B, 3A). Numerous parallel veins enter each leaflet and usually bifurcate once close to the leaflet base (Fig. 3B, C). In some cases, additional bifurcations occur in the proximal portion of the leaflet. Veins positioned close to the lateral leaflet margins do not fork. Cuticles are very thin, brittle and poorly preserved. The leaves are probably hypostomatic; costal and intercostal fields are distinguishable on the abaxial side of the leaf. Stomata are restricted to the intercostal fields (Fig. 4C1, C2). The adaxial cuticle is slightly thicker than the abaxial cuticle (Fig. 4A, C1).

    Few details are available for the adaxial cuticle: epidermal cells are polygonal, elongate to isodiametric in outline, 40–100 urn long and 30–45 µm wide. Anticlinal and periclinal cell walls are smooth. Stomata, papillae and/or hair bases are absent (Fig. 4A).

    In the abaxial cuticle, costal fields are composed of 6–8 rows of epidermal cells. The cells above the veins are polygonal, elongate to isodiametric, 30–110 pm long, 30–40 µm wide, and possess delicate walls. Anticlinal cell walls are usually straight and periclinal walls are smooth; papillae are absent. Intercostal fields are 200–380 µm wide, with isodiametric polygonal to broadly rectangular cells. Epidermal cells are 30–80 µm long and 30–55 µm wide (Fig. 4C1, C2). Anticlinal cell walls are straight. Stomata (Fig. 4B1–B3, C3) are cyclocytic (“haplocheilic”), probably slightly sunken, and up to 110 µm in diameter. Pores are orientated almost perpendicularly to the veins (Fig. 4C1, C2; arrows). Stomatal complexes incorporate 5–7 rectangular subsidiary cells that are arranged in a circle around the pit (Fig. 4B1, B2); some stomata appear to be surrounded by a weakly defined second ring of subsidiary cells. The guard cells possess heavily cutinised central portions of the dorsal walls, whereas the polar ends are weakly cutinised (Fig. 4B1, B2, C3).

  • Discussion.—This foliage type is assigned to Pseudoctenis because essential macromorphological features (e.g., the segmented architecture of the leaf, the lateral and perpendicular insertion of the almost parallel-sided leaflets, and the striate rachis) correspond well to those evident in typical representafives of the genus (Harris 1964; Pott et al. 2007b). In addition, the venation is similar, especially with respect to the parallel lateral veins that fork near their base. Furthermore, the epidermal anatomy, characterised by cyclocytic (“haplocheilic”) stomata, justifies accommodation of this species in Pseudoctenis (Harris 1964; Pott et al. 2007b) and, therefore, in the Cycadales.

    Cycadales range from the Permo-Carboniferous to present. Cleal (1993) gave a short overview of their temporal distribution and stated that the first unequivocal cycads derive from the Early Permian of Taiyuan (Shanxi series) in China (Gao and Thomas 1989). We agree with Cleal (1993) who suggested treating several doubtful Carboniferous and Early Permian fossils (for details see Cleal 1993) as precursors of the Cycadales rather than regarding them as true cycads. The fossils described here also come from the latest Carboniferous-Early Permian of China, some of them from close to the source of the early cycads described by Gao and Thomas (1989; see Fig. 1) and thus rank amongst the earliest cycads. The early cycadalean record of Gao and Thomas (1989) is now supported by unequivocal cycadalean foliage from coeval deposits of this region.

  • Stratigraphic and geographic range.—Latest Carboniferous to Early Permian of China (Hebei, Shanxi) and South Korea (Sanchoku).

  • Fig. 3.

    Different leaves of cycadalean Pseudoctenis samchokense (Kawasaki, 1934); from Damugou, Gaoping (A, B, E), Yangjialiang, Baode, Shanxi (C, F), and Linxi (Tangshan area), Hebei (D), China. A. NRM S143507. B. Enlargement of NRM S143500-02; cf. Fig. 2A. C. NRM S141652 (epitype). D. NRM S146368; E. NRM S143502; F. NRM S141653 (epitype). Scale bars 10 mm; arrows indicating venation details and lateral insertion of decurrent leaflets.

    f03_157.eps

    Discussion

    Permian cycads.—None of the Permian-Carboniferous species assigned to Pterophyllum (see below), except Pt. grandeuryi and Pt. pruvostii, is similar to Pseudoctenis samchokense in gross macromorphology. Although cuticle details are lacking, we regard Pt. pruvostii from Tangshan (Hebei, China; Stockmans and Mathieu 1939; Gu and Zhi 1974) as most likely conspecific with Ps. samchokense based on macromorphological features and dimensions. Although Pt. pruvostii has wider interspaces between the leaflets and the material figured by Stockmans and Mathieu (1939) is somewhat incomplete, the wider spacing of the leaflets can be caused by growth conditions as demonstrated for Pt. filicoides (Schlotheim, 1822) Zeiller, 1906 from the Upper Triassic of Austria (Pott et al. 2007d). Pterophyllum grandeuryi from the Permian of Blanzy, France (Saporta and Marion 1885) is also very similar to Ps. samchokense in overall morphology, dimensions and epidermal cell pattern. Zeiller (1906) figured some schematic drawings of cuticular remains he obtained from the original specimens of Pt. grandeuryi and Thomas (1930) described the epidermal anatomy of this species in more detail although he mainly referred to the schematic illustrations by Zeiller (1906). Thomas (1930) interpreted the stomata in the drawings and in his own preparations as sunken with up to five thickened subsidiary cells arranged in a circle around the pit. This is not the architecture of a brachyparacytic (syndetocheilic) stoma, hence, Thomas (1930) correctly compared Pt. grandeuryi with Nilssonia mediana (Leckenby, 1864) Nathorst, 1878 from the Jurassic of Scarborough, UK. The stomatal architecture described by Thomas (1930) assigns Pt. grandeuryi clearly to a non-bennettitalean genus. We refrain from regarding Pt. grandeuryi as conspecific with Ps. samchokense due to differences in the architecture of the stomata (i.e., sunken stomata and thickened subsidiary cells in the former). Moreover, Pt. grandeuryi has epidermal anatomy more similar to Pseudoctenis cornelii Pott, Kerp, and Krings, 2007, described from the Carnian of Austria (Pott et al. 2007b).

    Dioonites densinervis Halle, 1927 from the Permian of the Taiyuan-Fu area in the Shanxi district of China (Halle 1927) is also broadly similar to Pseudoctenis samchokense. However, leaves of D. densinervis are distinctly smaller (about one-third of the size) than those of the latter and also differ in having leaflet bases that are decurrent on both the acropetal and basipetal margins. This species was erroneously transferred to Nilssonia densinervis by Stockmans and Mathieu (1939) and later illegitimately named N. huabeiensis by Gu and Zhi (1974). Indeed, both views can not be accepted, since Nilssonia is characterised by leaflet insertion on the upper side of the rachis (Pott et al. 2007a), which is not visible in the original specimens, and a cycadalean nature of the epidermis/cuticle is unproven since the specimens do not yield cuticles. Hence, retention of this species in Dioonites is recommended.

    Cycad or cycad-like remains from Permian deposits are rare; there are only a few species of cycadophyte foliage formally described. Species broadly similar to Pseudoctenis samchokense include Ps. middridgensis Stoneley, 1958, from the UK, several Zamites species from Commentry, France, described by Renault and Zeiller (1890), and some species from China assigned to Nilssonia, Yuania, Tingia, and Plagiozamites (Halle 1927; Ghu and Zhi 1974; see Wang and Shen 2000; Taylor et al. 2009). Pseudoctenis middridgensis from the Upper Permian (Thuringian) of England is based on a single specimen that yielded only small, ill-preserved cuticle fragments from the rachis, and Stoneley (1958) noted that, in the absence of adequate knowledge of the epidermal anatomy, assignment of this fossil to Pseudoctenis must be considered provisional. The identities of most of the Chinese Nilssonia species are questionable since the figures do not provide sufficient details for confident generic or specific assignment. Moreover, N. huabeiensis is illegitimate (see above). The Zamites remains from France are in almost all cases preserved only as single leaflets and appropriate assignment remains equivocal. The genera Yuania, Tingia, and Plagiozamites, historically included by some researchers in the Cycadales, are better assigned to the Noeggerathiales, an order recently placed in the progymnosperms based on the organisation of their sporophylls and other reproductive organs (Taylor et al. 2009). Historically, the poorly understood Noeggerathiales have been included within the cycads by some workers (cf. Taylor et al. 2009). However, none of the mentioned genera includes foliage that is rudimentarily comparable to the leaves described herein apart from their basic segmented (pinnate) plan.

    Fig. 4.

    Cuticle details of cycadalean Pseudoctenis samchokense (Kawasaki, 1934); from Yangjialiang, Baode, Shanxi, China. A. NRM S141652-001, adaxial cuticle overview. B. NRM S141652-002, two adjacent stomata in the abaxial cuticle (B1); different focus (B2), stomata on the abaxial cuticle (B3), arrows point to subsidiary cells in B3. C. NRM S141652-003, abaxial cuticle overview (C1), arrows pointing to stomata; enlargement on abaxial cuticle (C2), arrows pointing to stomata; two adjacent stomata in the abaxial cuticle (C3). Scale bars 10 µm in B1–B3 C3, and 50 µm in A, C1, C2.

    f04_157.eps

    Several studies have reported rare examples of pinnate, cycad-like foliage from the Permian of Gondwana (e.g., McLoughlin 1992). The best preserved of these fossils is Pteronilssonia gopalii Pant and Mehra, 1963 from the Late Permian of India. That species is broadly similar to Pseudoctenis samchokense in its leaflet dimensions and venation style but differs in having leaflet bases that are decurrent on both the acropetal and basipetal margins. It also has strongly sinuous epidermal cell walls and prominent papillae on the subsidiary cells. On this basis it is considered to represent an atypical compound glossopterid leaf rather than a cycad (Pant 1982).

    Since the generic attribution of Pseudoctenis middridgensis is equivocal, the next most similar species to Ps. samchokense is Ps. cornelii from the Carnian of Austria, which to date is the earliest record of a Pseudoctenis species in the Northern Hemisphere (Pott et al. 2007b). Both species agree in several characters (i.e., leaflet size, outline, insertion, gross architecture and size) but differ mainly in the details of their epidermal anatomy (e.g., architecture and position of the stomata, cell wall shape) and the great disparity in their ages. Therefore, a close relationship is not assumed.

    If Primocycas chinensis is accepted as the oldest cycad reproductive structure to date, Pseudoctenis samchokense may be regarded as the oldest cycad foliage species. Bennettitaleans appeared, based on our survey of published data, not before the Middle to Late Triassic and were completely absent during the Palaeozoic even if the sudden mass abundance of bennettitaleans in the floras from Lunz and Neuewelt (Kräusel and Schaarschmidt 1966; Pott et al. 2007c, d, 2008) requires that bennettitaleans had originated earlier than the Carnian.

    Alleged Permian bennettitaleans.—Since several fossils from Carboniferous or Permian deposits, including the leaves described here, have been described as possible bennettitalean remains, we re-evaluated reports of the oldest pre-Carnian bennettitaleans. Bennettitaleans first arose in noteworthy abundance during the Carnian (e.g., Anderson and Anderson 1989; Pott et al. 2007c, d). Almost all of the reports of bennettitaleans from older floras are unconvincing since, in most cases, cuticles are lacking or were not described. As the epidermal details identified in this study reveal, reports of bennettitalean foliage from older deposits should be considered equivocal if based on macromorphology alone.

    At least 27 species of Pterophyllum have been formally described from Upper Carboniferous and Permian deposits (see also Table 1). Most of these derive from Western Europe, eastern Russia, East Asia and Laos (Table 1). In the Late Palaeozoic, these regions belonged to the Euramerican, Angaran (Siberian and Far East), and Cathaysian (N and S China) phytogeographic provinces (Chaloner and Meyen 1973; Wang and Shen 1996). Assignment of any of these species to Pterophyllum and thereby to the Bennettitales is doubtful. On the basis of the available macromorphological characters and their incompletely known or unknown epidermal anatomies, all species ought to be assigned to Dioonites (Halle 1927; Johanna H.A. van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, personal communication 2008) whose higher level taxonomic affinities are unclear. We finally compare these species to Pseudoctenis samchokense because of their similar age and original assignment to Pterophyllum. Of these, Pt. pruvostii is considered conspecific with Ps. samchokense (see above).

    Six species have been described from Permian-Carboniferous deposits of central Europe. The simple descriptions and schematic illustrations of Pterophyllum cottaeanum (Geinitz 1862, 1873) and Pterophyllum blechnoides (Geinitz 1873) together with Barthel's (1976) figure are inadequate to allow assignment to Pterophyllum or support a combination with Pseudoctenis samchokense. Pterophyllum cottaeanum differs in gross lamina shape from Ps. samchokense. Pterophyllum blechnoides from the Carboniferous of southern Germany as figured by Sandberger (1864) is more similar to Dioonites densinervis than Ps. samchokense in leaf shape, leaflet bases and venation pattern, but differs from both in its dimensions. One of the specimens figured by Sandberger (1864: pl. 2: 1) must have had an impressive length of more than 120 cm. Pterophyllum fayolii from the Commentry Basin (France) differs from Ps. samchokense mainly in having acutely pointed leaflets (Renault 1890; Zeiller 1906; Thomas 1930) that are more similar to those of Pt. cultelliforme. Renault (1896) noted that several additional species of Pterophyllum were described from other Carboniferous and Permian localities of France such as Saint Étienne, Montmaillot (Blanzy; i.e., Pt. grandeuryi), Commentry (i.e., Pt. fayolii) and Autun (i.e., Pt. cambrayi Renault, 1894). Some of these lack cuticles, despite Renault's (1890) description of a thin coaly layer partly covering the Pt. fayolii specimen. Later, Zeiller (1906) figured a small piece of cuticle of Pt. fayolii and provided several schematic drawings of cuticles of Pt. grandeuryi but figuring stomata only schematically since he was only able to obtain fragments of the adaxial and abaxial cuticle. The epidermal anatomy of Pt. grandeuryi was later discussed by Thomas (1930) who revealed that it distinctly differs from Mesozoic forms in having non-brachyparacytic stomata.

    From East Asia, five species assigned to Pterophyllum have been reported. Pterophyllum cultelliforme differs from Pseudoctenis samchokense in having leaflets resembling a small knife (Sze 1936). Pterophyllum daihoense from the Heian System of South Korea was described by Kawasaki (1931, 1934) as having a segmented proximal region and an entire-margined lamina in the distal part of the leaf; it also differs from Ps. samchokense in size and insertion angles of the leaflets. A few illustrations of Pt. eratum were provided with the Chinese descriptions of this species by Gu and Zhi (1974) and Huang (1987). Based on the figures, Pt. eratum is similar to Ps. samchokense, especially to specimens NRM S141652 and NRM S141653 in arrangement, size and shape of the leaflets, but it lacks cuticle and the overall architecture of the leaf is not evident in the figured specimens. Pterophyllum bipartitium nom. nud. and Pt. nilssonioides nom. nud. (figured by Kawasaki 1931) were discussed by Sze (1936), who doubted their affinity to Pterophyllum. In fact, they were not included in Pterophyllum later in the text by Kawasaki (1934) accompanying the preceding atlas volume (Kawasaki 1931). Sze (1936) proposed that both species be better included in Taeniopteris or Nilssonia. Based on examination of Kawasaki's (1931) figures, we agree with a preliminary assignment of those specimens to Nilssonia due to agreements in macromorphology (i.e., entire-margined lamina parts and leaflets inserted on the upper side of the rachis). Shen (1995) provided in his synoptic species list seven further species: Pterophyllum bifidum Xiao, Pt. huabeiense Fang, Pt. maxum Shen, Pt. nanshanense Durante, Pt. shangdonense Sun, Pt. shanxiense Zhao, and Pt. striatum Hu and Du, 1982. All species except the last could not be traced completely due to incomplete referencing and thus comparison was not possible. Pteropyhllum striatum from the Permian of Shanxi has distinctly slender leaflets (up to 3 mm in width) than Ps. samchokense (Zhu et al. 1982). We assume that the remainder are better referred to Dioonites due to their similar lack of epidermal details.

    Table 1.

    Synopsis of the Pterophyllum species reported from Permo-Carboniferous deposits.

    t01_157.gif

    Central Asian assemblages include seven Pterophyllum species, of which some were already described as questionably assigned to the genus. The material of Schwedov (1961) and Vozenin-Serra (1979) assigned to Pt. slobodskiensis Schwedov, 1961, Pt. kotschetkovii Schwedov, 1961, and Pt. fromagetii Vozenin-Serra, 1979 is sparse and not convincingly described; hence comparisons can only be superficial. The figured specimens of Schwedov (1961) differ from Pseudoctenis samchokense in having relatively wider and shorter leaflets and coarser venation. The descriptions of these taxa lack cuticle details although cuticle possibly exists (at least in Pt. slobodskiensis and Pt. kotschetkovii, thus accommodation in Pterophyllum remains equivocal). Vozenin-Serra (1979) argued that “the cuticle, when preserved, shows the genus Pterophyllum to undeniably approach extant Dioon in its xerophytic characters”. If this view is taken into account, the Laotian material assigned to Pt. fromagetii is hard to compare either to Dioon or any other cycadophyte, since cuticular details are lacking. Consequently, the systematic position of Pt. fromagetii remains equivocal. Zimina and Zimina (2005) described four taxa from the Upper Permian of Southern Primorye but the assignment of Pt.? sitsense Zimina and Zimina, 2005, Pt.? ratnoense Zimina and Zimina, 2005, Pt. klyuchense Zimina and Zimina, 2005 and Pt. shevelevskiense Zimina and Zimina, 2005 to that genus is questionable. The specimens lack cuticular information, which would require assignment of the leaves to Dioonites rather than Pterophyllum. In addition, the separation of the four species is based mainly on small differences in vein density and leaflet width; hence these forms may represent intraspecific variants (Stearns and Hoekstra 2005).

    Conclusion.—Cuticular studies of Permian cycad-like leaves from China revealed that generic and higher taxonomic assignments of foliage from Palaeozoic deposits must be undertaken with great care. No evidence could be found that any Palaeozoic leaves are assignable to bennettitaleans; moreover, the cycadalelan nature of these leaves was demonstrated. Such foliage may not be assigned to Pterophyllum due to the clear bennettitalean nature of that genus. Assignment to the typical cycadalean genus Pseudoctenis is recommended for Ps. samchokense.

    Acknowledgements

    We wish to thank Wang Jun (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Nanjing, China) for his help in acquiring rare Chinese literature. We thank Brian J. Axsmith (University of South Alabama, Mobile, USA), Patricia E. Ryberg (University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA), and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. The study was carried out during a postdoctoral fellowship from the NRM to CP, which is greatly acknowledged. SM is supported by a Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) grant.

    References

    1.

    J.M. Anderson and H.M. Anderson 1989. Palaeoflora of Southern Africa, Molteno Formation (Triassic)—Gymnosperms (excluding Dicroidium). 567 pp. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar

    2.

    J.M. Anderson and H.M. Anderson 2003. Heyday of the Gymnosperms: Systematics and Biodiversity of the Late Triassic Molteno Fructifications , viii + 398 pp. SANBI, Pretoria. Google Scholar

    3.

    M. Barthel 1976. Ergebnisse der floristischen Neubearbeitung des Rotliegenden in Sachsen. Zeitschrift für geologische Wissenschaften 6: 921–933. Google Scholar

    4.

    W.G. Chaloner and S.V. Meyen 1973. Carboniferous and Permian floras of the Northern Continents. In : A. Hallam (ed.), Atlas of Palaeobiography , 169–186. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

    5.

    C.J. Cleal 1993. Gymnospermophyta. In : M. Benton (ed.), The Fossil Record 2 , 795–808. Chapman and Hall, London. Google Scholar

    6.

    P. Crabb 2001. The use of polarised light in photography of macrofossils. Palaeontology 44: 659–664. doi: 10.1111/1475-4983.00196 Google Scholar

    7.

    P.R. Crane 1988. Major clades and relationships in the “higher” gymnosperms. In : C. Beck (ed.), The Origin and Evolution of Gymnosperms , 218–272. Columbia University Press, New York. Google Scholar

    8.

    R. Florin 1933. Zur Kenntnis der Spaltöffnungsapparate der Bennettitales. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, Tredje Serien 12: 11–31. Google Scholar

    9.

    Z. Gao and B.A. Thomas 1989. Occurrence of earliest cycads in the Permian of China and its bearing on their evolution. Chinese Science Bulletin 34: 766–769. Google Scholar

    10.

    H.B. Geinitz 1862. Dyas oder die Zechsteinformation und das Rothliegende. Heft II. Die Pflanzen der Dyas und Geologisches. vii + 212 pp. W. Engelmann, Leipzig. Google Scholar

    11.

    E. Geinitz 1873. Versteinerungen aus dem Brandschiefer der unteren Dyas von Weissig bei Pillnitz in Sachsen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Paläontologie 1873: 691–704. Google Scholar

    12.

    Gu and Zhi 1974. An Introduction to Chinese Fossils, Palaeozoic Plants from China. 277 pp. Scientific Press, Beijing. Google Scholar

    13.

    H.R. Göppert 1844. Ueber die fossilen Cykadeen überhaupt, mit Rücksicht auf die in Schlesien vorkommenden Arten. Uebersicht der Arbeiten und Veränderungen der schlesischen Gesellschaft für vaterländische Kultur 1844: 114–144. Google Scholar

    14.

    T.G. Halle 1927. Palaeozoic plants from Central Shansi. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series A 2: 1–316. Google Scholar

    15.

    T.M. Harris 1932. The fossil flora of Scoresby Sound East Greenland. Part 3: Caytoniales and Bennettitales. Meddelelser om Grønland 85: 1–133. Google Scholar

    16.

    T.M. Harris 1950. Notes on the Jurassic flora of Yorkshire, 46–48. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series XII 3: 1001–1030. Google Scholar

    17.

    T.M. Harris 1964. The Yorkshire Jurassic Flora. II.—Caytoniales, Cycadales & Pteridosperms. viii +191 pp. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    18.

    B. Huang 1987. The Late Permian stratigraphy and fossil plants of northern Ju Ud Meng, Inner Mongolia. Professional Papers of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology 17: 214–226. Google Scholar

    19.

    S. Kawasaki 1931. The flora of the Heian System—Part 2 (Atlas). Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Chosen (Korea) 6: pls. 16–99. Google Scholar

    20.

    S. Kawasaki 1934. The flora of the Heian System—Part 2. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Chosen (Korea) 6: 47–311. Google Scholar

    21.

    H. Kerp 1990. The study of fossil gymnosperms by means of cuticular analysis. Palaios 5: 548–569. doi: 10.2307/3514861 Google Scholar

    22.

    H. Kerp and M. Krings 1999. Light microscopy of cuticles. In : T.P. Jones and N.P. Rowe (eds.), Fossil Plants and Spores: Modern Techniques , 52–56. Geological Society, London. Google Scholar

    23.

    R. Kräusel and F. Schaarschmidt 1966. Die Keuperflora von Neuewelt bei Basel—IV. Pterophyllen und Taeniopteriden. Schweizer Paläontologische Abhandlungen 84: 3–44. Google Scholar

    24.

    Leaf Architecture Working Group (LAWG). 1999. Manual of Leaf Architecture. 67 pp. Smithsonian Institution, Washington. Google Scholar

    25.

    M. Leppe and P. Moisan 2003. Nuevos registros de Cycadales y Cycadeoidales del triásico superior del río Bíobío, Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 76: 415–484. doi:10.4067/S0716-078X2003000300011 Google Scholar

    26.

    F. Leuthardt 1903. Die Keuperflora von Neuewelt bei Basel -I. Teil Phanerogamen. Abhandlungen der Schweizer Paläontologischen Gesellschaft 30: 1–23. Google Scholar

    27.

    X. Li and X. Wu 1996. Late Paleozoic phytogeographic provinces in China and its adjacent regions. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 90: 41–62. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(95)00023-2 Google Scholar

    28.

    F. Liu , H. Zhu , and S. Ouyang 2008. Late Carboniferous-Early Permian palynology of Baode (Pao-te-chou) in Shanxi Province, North China. Geological Journal 43: 487–510. doi:10.1002/gj.1121 Google Scholar

    29.

    K. Mägdefrau 1968. Paläobiologie der Pflanzen. 549 pp. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

    30.

    P. Martens 1971. Les Gnétophytes. 295 pp. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin. Google Scholar

    31.

    S. McLoughlin 1992. Late Permian plant megafossils from the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia: Part 1. Palaeontographica Abteilung B 228: 105–149. Google Scholar

    32.

    S.N. Nielsen 2005. The Triassic Santa Juana Formation at the lower Biobío River, South Central Chile. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 19: 547–562. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2005.06.002 Google Scholar

    33.

    D.D. Pant 1982. The Lower Gondwana gymnosperms and their relationships. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 37: 55–70. doi:10.1016/ 0034-6667(82)90037-9 Google Scholar

    34.

    C. Pott , H. Kerp , and M. Krings 2007a. Morphology and epidermal anatomy of Nilssonia (cycadalean foliage) from the Upper Triassic of Lunz (Lower Austria). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143: 197–217. doi: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2006.07.007 Google Scholar

    35.

    C. Pott , H. Kerp , and M. Krings 2007b. Pseudoctenis cornelii nov. spec. (cycadalean foliage) from the Carnian (Upper Triassic) of Lunz, Lower Austria. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien 109A: 1–17. Google Scholar

    36.

    C. Pott , M. Krings , and H. Kerp 2007c. First record of Nilssoniopteris (Gymnospermophyta, Bennettitales) from the Carnian (Upper Triassic) of Lunz, Lower Austria. Palaeontology 50: 1299–1318. doi: 10.1111/J.1475-4983.2007.00704.x Google Scholar

    37.

    C. Pott , M. Krings , and H. Kerp 2008. The Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz in Lower Austria: Paleoecological considerations. Palaeoworld 17: 172–182. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2008.03.001 Google Scholar

    38.

    C. Pott , J.H.A. Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert , H. Kerp , and M. Krings 2007d. Revision of the Pterophyllum species (Cycadophytina: Bennettitales) in the Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz, Lower Austria. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 147: 3–27. doi:10.1016/j.revpalbo.2007.03.005 Google Scholar

    39.

    M.B. Renault 1890. Cycadées. In : M.B. Renault and R. Zeiller (eds.), Études sur le terrain houiller de Commentry - Livre deuxième - Flore fossile , 613–625. Théolier et Compagnie, Saint Étienne. Google Scholar

    40.

    M.B. Renault 1896. Bassin houiller et permien d'Autun et d'Épinac-Fascicule IV - Flore fossile - Deuxième partie. 578 pp. Ministère des travaux publics, Paris. Google Scholar

    41.

    M.B. Renault and R. Zeiller 1890. Études sur le terrain houiller de Commentry - Livre deuxième - Flore fossile. 378 pp. Théolier et Compagnie, Saint Étienne. Google Scholar

    42.

    F. Sandberger 1864. Die Flora der oberen Steinkohlenformation im badischen Schwarzwalde. Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Karlsruhe 1: 30–36. Google Scholar

    43.

    G. de Saporta and A.-F. Marion 1885. L'évolution du règne végétal - Les phanérogames, Tome premier , x + 249 pp. Félix Alcan, Paris. Google Scholar

    44.

    F. Schaarschmidt 1973. Pflanzenfossilien in ungewöhnlichem Licht. Natur und Museum 103: 247–253. Google Scholar

    45.

    N. A. Schwedov 1961. Permian Flora of the Northern Yenisey-Lena Region [in Russian]. Trudy Naučno-Issledovatel'skogo Instituta Geologii Arktiki 103: 1–240. Google Scholar

    46.

    A.C. Seward 1911. The Jurassic flora of Sutherland. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 47: 643–709. Google Scholar

    47.

    A.C. Seward 1917. Fossil Plants - A Textbook for Students of Botany and Geology, vol. 3. viii + 656 pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

    48.

    L. Shao , Z. Xiao , J. Lu , Z. He , H. Wang , and P. Zhang 2007. Permo-Carboniferous coal measures in the Qinshui basin: Lithofacies paleogeography and its control on coal accumulation. Frontiers of Earth Science in China 1: 106–115. doi:10.1007/s11707-007-0014-5 Google Scholar

    49.

    G. Shen 1995. Permian Floras. In : X. Li , Z. Zhou , C. Cai , G. Sun , S. Ouyang , and L. Deng (eds.), Fossil Floras of China through the Geological Ages , 127–243. Guandong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou. Google Scholar

    50.

    S.-Z. Shen , H. Zhang , Q.H. Shang , and W.-Z. Li 2006. Permian stratigraphy and correlation of Northeast China: A review. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 26: 304–326. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.07.007 Google Scholar

    51.

    S.C. Stearns and R.F. Hoekstra 2005. Evolution: An Introduction. xx + 575 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

    52.

    F. Stockmans and F.-F. Mathieu 1939. La flore paléozoïque du bassin houiller de Kaiping (Chine). La stratigraphie du bassin houiller de Kaiping (Chine) , 51–164. Musée Royal d'Histoire Naturelle de Belgique, Bruxelles. Google Scholar

    53.

    H.M.M. Stoneley 1958. The Upper Permian flora of England. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Geology 3: 293–337. Google Scholar

    54.

    K.-Q. Sun 2006. The Cathaysia flora and the mixed Late Permian CathaysianAngaran floras in East Asia. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 48: 381–389. doi: 10.1111/J.1744-7909.2006.00207.x Google Scholar

    55.

    H.C. Sze 1936. Über einen Vorläufer von Pterophyllen in der unteren Shihhotze Serie in Shansi. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China 15: 467–476. Google Scholar

    56.

    T.N. Taylor , E.L. Taylor , and M. Krings 2009. Paleobotany—The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants. xxii + 1230 pp. Academic Press, Burlington. Google Scholar

    57.

    H.H. Thomas 1930. Further observations on the cuticle structure of Mesozoic cycadean fronds. The Journal of the Linnean Society of London/Botany 48: 389–415. Google Scholar

    58.

    H.H. Thomas and N. Bancroft 1913. On the cuticles of some recent and fossil Cycadean fronds. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London: Botany 8: 155–204. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1913.tb00284.x Google Scholar

    59.

    C. Vozenin-Serra 1979. Étude de quelques empreintes de végétaux fossiles du paléozoïque supérieur du Laos. Comptes Rendus du 104e Congrès National des Sociétés Savantes (Bordeaux 1979), Fascicule I : 155–174. Google Scholar

    60.

    J. Wang and G. Shen 1996. Permian phytogeography of China. The Palaeobotanist 45: 272–277. doi:10.1016/S0034-6667(00)00008-7 Google Scholar

    61.

    J. Wang and G. Shen 2000. A new species of Discinites (Noeggerathiales) from the Upper Permian of Weibei Coalfield, North China. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 110: 175–190. Google Scholar

    62.

    K.J. Willis and J.C. McElwain 2002. The Evolution of Plants. x + 378 pp. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

    63.

    X. Wu 1995. Carboniferous floras. In : X. Li , Z. Zhou , C. Cai , G. Sun , S. Ouyang , and L. Deng (eds.), Fossil Floras of China through the Geological Ages , 78–126. Guandong Science and Technology Press, Guangzhou. Google Scholar

    64.

    Z. Yang 1986a. The Carboniferous System. In : Z. Yang , Y. Cheng , and H. Wang (eds.), The Geology of China. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 3: 102–112. Google Scholar

    65.

    Z. Yang 1986b. The Permian System. In : Z. Yang , Y. Cheng , and H. Wang (eds.), The Geology of China. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 3: 113–125. Google Scholar

    66.

    R. Zeiller 1906. Bassin houiller etpermien de Blanzy et du Creusot - Fascicule II : Flore fossile - Texte. 265 pp. Ministère des travaux publics, Paris. Google Scholar

    67.

    J. Zhu , Y. Hu and X. Du 1982. Supplementary study of Upper Shihezi (Shihhotse) plants from Taiyuan, Shanxi Province. Acta Botanica Sinica 24: 77–84. Google Scholar

    68.

    V.G. Zimina and M.P. Zimina 2005. On Pterophyllum Brongniart from the Upper Permian of Southern Primorye. Paleontological Journal 39: 671–676. Google Scholar
    Christian Pott, Stephen McLoughlin, and Anna Lindström "Late Palaeozoic Foliage from China Displays Affinities to Cycadales Rather than to Bennettitales Necessitating a Re-Evaluation of the Palaeozoic Pterophyllum Species," Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55(1), 157-168, (23 October 2009). https://doi.org/10.4202/app.2009.0070
    Received: 10 June 2009; Accepted: 1 October 2009; Published: 23 October 2009
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    12 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top